This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
TDorBust just had an aneurysm.If only they had a top linebacker who could keep QB's containedDoctor Detroit said:Packers have allowed the most scrambling yards and the most scrambling TDs this year.
Thankfully Russell Wilson doesn't scramble.
No JJ Watt is still the best, but Matthews is right behind him.Did someone say Matthews is the best defensive player in this game?
In the NFCC game? Absolutely.Did someone say Matthews is the best defensive player in this game?
And the award for the most idiotic comment ever in the history of the Shark Pool goes to......In the NFCC game? Absolutely.Did someone say Matthews is the best defensive player in this game?
As far as best defensive players in this game, while Clay is in the discussion, & everyone is praising Kam C....Bobby Wagner & Earl Thomas are outstanding & they are the difference makers on the Seattle defense. For Seattle, you're making a serious mistake if you under estimate Julius Peppers in this game. You're about to find out just how good he is, even at 34. While the Packers don't have the "Legion of Boom" their DB's, as a group, are second to none & the Seattle WR's scare nobody. Hell even the Bears DB's are laughing at Seattle's WR's.Ghost Rider said:
As bad as it was...you have at least 10 posts that are worse.And the award for the most idiotic comment ever in the history of the Shark Pool goes to......In the NFCC game? Absolutely.Did someone say Matthews is the best defensive player in this game?
Yeah...so hurt by it that only one Packer fan has brought it up in here.
Hard to take a stat like this seriously when it helped them forge their way to a league-average offense, league-average scoring, and nearly-league-worst passing game.Wingnut said:
I know advanced stats probably aren't your thing, but the Seahawks are a good offense. #1 in rush DVOA, #10 in pass DVOA, #5 overall offensive DVOA. They are very efficient with the ball, and a good offensive team. It'll probably be hard to take these seriously too, since they don't back up your assumptions, but here you go.Hard to take a stat like this seriously when it helped them forge their way to a league-average offense, league-average scoring, and nearly-league-worst passing game.
It's a cute stat, but mostly means that the Seahawks were the leaders in meaningless first downs the offense was ultimately unable to do anything with.
If you have the choice, you'd much rather be second (or thirtieth) in that stat, together with elite totals in yards and especially scoring. GB was a much more efficient offense, and all this silly "explosive play" stat details is how often they turned a broken play into a decent gain, along with how rarely they turned a designed play into anything big.
Are you wearing your Clay jersey while looking and your Ckay Fathead while you type this?In the NFCC game? Absolutely.Did someone say Matthews is the best defensive player in this game?
They were top 10 in total offense, ahead of the Patriots, and only 10 yards per game behind the Packers. They were top 10 in scoring which probably would have been higher had their defense not been #1 in points allowed (lots of victory formation). And when you're number one in rushing (by 400 yards), total passing yards aren't that important (Seattle was 6th in yards per attempt, so when they do pass, it's efficient).
Well DVOA is only part of the story but I 100% stock in what football outsiders does and while its not the end all it does give you a very good idea what the team is doing in that area.I know advanced stats probably aren't your thing, but the Seahawks are a good offense. #1 in rush DVOA, #10 in pass DVOA, #5 overall offensive DVOA. They are very efficient with the ball, and a good offensive team. It'll probably be hard to take these seriously too, since they don't back up your assumptions, but here you go.Hard to take a stat like this seriously when it helped them forge their way to a league-average offense, league-average scoring, and nearly-league-worst passing game.
It's a cute stat, but mostly means that the Seahawks were the leaders in meaningless first downs the offense was ultimately unable to do anything with.
If you have the choice, you'd much rather be second (or thirtieth) in that stat, together with elite totals in yards and especially scoring. GB was a much more efficient offense, and all this silly "explosive play" stat details is how often they turned a broken play into a decent gain, along with how rarely they turned a designed play into anything big.
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/teamoff
They don't I even said they struggle to keep QBs contained but with Clay moving inside it has helped as he was a big offender in losing containment. My point previously to your "stat" about the Packers being the worst against scrambling QBs was that they actually didn't allow the most yards or TDs to QBs this year on the ground. The 2014-15 Packers are not the same as the last decade that would get absolutely torched by running QBs.TDorBust just had an aneurysm.If only they had a top linebacker who could keep QB's containedDoctor Detroit said:Packers have allowed the most scrambling yards and the most scrambling TDs this year.
Thankfully Russell Wilson doesn't scramble.
The fact that you responded says a lot. ?Time to let it go man.Yeah...so hurt by it that only one Packer fan has
brought it up in here.
A regular season game almost 3 years ago
really gets to us.
In the NFCC game? Absolutely.Did someone say Matthews is the best defensive player in this game?
I already know what this is without even opening it. How epic would have it been if Hass was right?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaJZwYPe7Cc
I guess this was before all the bandwagon Seattle fans joined on, but surprised this never gets mentioned. This one should probably hurt more than the fail mary.
Thats fine all that matters is who wins anyways, your the last person in the world that would be realistic about the Seahawks.I keep hearing the packers are a different team..... You all realize the Hawks are as well?
I was listening to nfl network yesterday, and the consensus was both teams are improved from week 1, the hawks are just more improved.
Every fan who doesn't have any good retort always needs to fall back on "You aren't the loudest stadium!", "You pump in noise!", "You stole your slogan!", etc. It's so damn pathetic...
That sucks man. My reasons are 1) I'd love to see Rodgers get another ring, the guy is just awesome fun to watch. 2) my hatred of a division rival that has a better ran organization and has pretty much owned my team the past few years. Am I bitter and jealous? Damn right I am.Also, the lack of class a couple of players have shown during their run (as well as a few fans here) have fueled the fire for me and has made me really want to see them fall flat on their faces.
Sort of, yeah, but on the flip side, who cares about being the loudest? Loudest doesn't mean best, even in the context of being loud to make noise to make it difficult for road teams. There are good fans and bad fans everywhere. I just think arguments over who has the best fans are kinda silly, but that's me.
Agreed, it certainly doesn't make you a better fan and I don't think there has ever been any claim as such. We make noise up here because we feel it has a material effect on the outcome of the game and that's part of our home field advantage. I'm merely mentioning that trying to bring down another fan or team in this manner is just weird, yet Seattle fans have heard it all season long. And honestly I shouldn't say anything about it because for the folks I know actually crack up at this; it isn't grating like these people think as much as just shows your ignorance about teams outside of your own. (I debated even writing that last part because I don't want people to stop, but the folks that say this stuff wouldn't stop anyway so I'm in the clear.)
That's kind of like saying there are lots of planes that fly. Yes, actually I would go so far as to say all stadiums are loud.
