NFC Championship GB@Seattle (3 Viewers)

[twistd]

These missed tackles are inexcusable.

 

[Wingnut]

Dammit

 

[The General]

This game is over. Great job today, Pack.

 

[Hawks64]

Starks should have had that

 

[Khy]

Clock is going to be an issue for Seattle

Yeah, if only they went for and got that 2pt conversion so they didn't need two more drives in this game.

 

[Freelove]

Pity GB can't catch.

 

[Sabertooth]

Hawks got away with huge pi there

 

[Officer Pete Malloy]

Greg Jennings needs to put the team of his back.

 

[General Tso]

Mike Periera saying that personal foul was not a dead ball foul, not loss of down. Terrible call.

It's literally not even possible for it not to be a dead ball foul. If it wasn't a dead ball foul, then there was zero reason to even call it a penalty. But it clearly happened after the sack and was clearly a dead ball foul.

Mike Pereira sticking up the for refs when they clearly blew it once again. And he is getting shredded for it on Twitter.

But who is to say the fault is the ref's? It may have been the fault of the Packers coaches. They may not have understood the explanation from the refs and declined the penalty. The refs may be asking themselves "What the hell were they thinking?"

This could be possible too. Won't know till after the game.

Good point... could've been a coaching mishap. Doubt it though as the refs didn't explain "after the play" like they normally do. Not sure why they didn't... I agree I'm not entirely sure how you can have a "late hit" without it being a dead ball foul. If the ball isn't dead, then it shouldn't be a late hit.

wasn't it called unnecessary roughness during the play?

 

[Hawks64]

This game is over. Great job today, Pack.

I do not accept your reverse jinx.

 

[Vike Me]

These missed tackles are inexcusable.

Watch Seattle, they go for the ball and then tackle. It gives the ball carrier a couple extra yards on every play.

 

[TheCommish]

Huge FG attempt here

 

[Sabertooth]

Watch the play. He grabs his left arm.

 

[Neofight]

Batman time...

 

[dickey moe]

Huge FG coming up

 

[Wingnut]

Wow Crosby MVP

 

[Alex P Keaton]

This game is over. Great job today, Pack.

Uh, no.

 

[georg013]

Guess the field goals were important.

 

[bostonfred]

That was a pole hugger

 

[Sonny Lubick Blowup Doll]

Colorado State's Mason Crosby the likely MVP here today. Cool.

 

[twistd]

That is it. The Seahawks had a chance and the defense blew it.

 

[Donnybrook]

Too big of a deficit for Seattle to overcome IMO.

 

[devouredbychaos]

if this game is the blowout one, does it mean the NE/Colts game is the close one? they cant both be lopsided victories can they?

history says no..

I wouldn't call 19-7 a blowout.. But usually only one underdog wins in the Conference Championship games

 

[MaxThreshold]

Plenty of time left for seattle. GB should have scored a TD.

 

[Buffaloes]

Colorado State's Mason Crosby the likely MVP here today. Cool.

ror...I know this is shtick

 

[Alex P Keaton]

Watch the play. He grabs his left arm.

Nah, that was weak. Starks didn't put up any fight or sell that call at all. He will never get that call, in that venue, in that situation unless he makes it look brutal.

 

[Khy]

Mike Periera saying that personal foul was not a dead ball foul, not loss of down. Terrible call.

It's literally not even possible for it not to be a dead ball foul. If it wasn't a dead ball foul, then there was zero reason to even call it a penalty. But it clearly happened after the sack and was clearly a dead ball foul.

Mike Pereira sticking up the for refs when they clearly blew it once again. And he is getting shredded for it on Twitter.

But who is to say the fault is the ref's? It may have been the fault of the Packers coaches. They may not have understood the explanation from the refs and declined the penalty. The refs may be asking themselves "What the hell were they thinking?"

This could be possible too. Won't know till after the game.

Good point... could've been a coaching mishap. Doubt it though as the refs didn't explain "after the play" like they normally do. Not sure why they didn't... I agree I'm not entirely sure how you can have a "late hit" without it being a dead ball foul. If the ball isn't dead, then it shouldn't be a late hit.

wasn't it called unnecessary roughness during the play?

Yeah, but how is that roughness during the play? It's not like it was hard hit or anything, he just fell ontop of the guy as he went to the ground. That call shouldn't be allowed "during" the play. It should either be after the play or not at all.

 

[Alex P Keaton]

Plenty of time left for seattle. GB should have scored a TD.

Was just saying the same hung to my son. We needed a TD there.

 

[Power Monster]

The Wilson game ending pick seems likely

 

[The_Man]

The reason a flag was thrown is because the hit came after the play. If the play was still happening the block wouldn't have been illegal. Therefore if the block merited a flag it was by definition a dead ball flag and should have been added on

 

[smackdaddies]

Sherman - broken arm or collerbone?

 

[sho nuff]

Watch the play. He grabs his left arm.

Nah, that was weak. Starks didn't put up any fight or sell that call at all. He will never get that call, in that venue, in that situation unless he makes it look brutal.

Agreed...think Rodgers should just take 3-4 yards running there and slide. Have 3rd and short.

 

[Billy Bats]

It's all on Wilson now. Let's see what he has.

 

[rockaction]

Looks like getting rid of Harvin and Tate III worked wonders for the Seahawks. Even the Jets have better skill position players on offense. :X

 

[Hawks64]

Plenty of time left for seattle. GB should have scored a TD.

Yep. 2 TDs in ~10min isn't hard for Seattle. 21-19 final. Book it.

 

[TheCommish]

Did he really just say it's been a good special teams day for both teams? Is he watching the game he's calling?

 

[Freelove]

Sherman - broken arm or collerbone?

Ego.

 

[Officer Pete Malloy]

I'm a firework

 

[lod01]

Seattle wishes it went for 2 now.

 

[Mario Kart]

The Starks pass needed more air under it.

MVP = Ha Ha

 

[theplayer11]

anyone still second guessing the early FGs?..those points were HUGE

 

[IHEARTFF]

If Seattle wins 21-19, what will the Fat Mike defenders have to say?

 

[Junior McSpiffy]

Sherman - broken arm or collerbone?

My guess is hyper-extended elbow

 

[Alex P Keaton]

The reason a flag was thrown is because the hit came after the play. If the play was still happening the block wouldn't have been illegal. Therefore if the block merited a flag it was by definition a dead ball flag and should have been added on

Exactly.

 

[Wingnut]

If Seattle wins 21-19, what will the Fat Mike defenders have to say?

Fiddlesticks?

 

[tombonneau]

Guess the field goals were important.

This is assuming Pack don't score on one of those fourth down runs. But yes gutless calls look good in hindsight when other team plays like crap and you are up 12 in fourth.

 

[sporthenry]

If Seattle wins 21-19, what will the Fat Mike defenders have to say?

And if GB wins, what will you say?

 

[msommer]

Baldwin cost his team 7 yards by not taking a knee

 

[Alex P Keaton]

Sherman - broken arm or collerbone?

Looks like collarbone

 

[General Tso]

Mike Periera saying that personal foul was not a dead ball foul, not loss of down. Terrible call.

It's literally not even possible for it not to be a dead ball foul. If it wasn't a dead ball foul, then there was zero reason to even call it a penalty. But it clearly happened after the sack and was clearly a dead ball foul.

Mike Pereira sticking up the for refs when they clearly blew it once again. And he is getting shredded for it on Twitter.

But who is to say the fault is the ref's? It may have been the fault of the Packers coaches. They may not have understood the explanation from the refs and declined the penalty. The refs may be asking themselves "What the hell were they thinking?"

This could be possible too. Won't know till after the game.

Good point... could've been a coaching mishap. Doubt it though as the refs didn't explain "after the play" like they normally do. Not sure why they didn't... I agree I'm not entirely sure how you can have a "late hit" without it being a dead ball foul. If the ball isn't dead, then it shouldn't be a late hit.

wasn't it called unnecessary roughness during the play?

Yeah, but how is that roughness during the play? It's not like it was hard hit or anything, he just fell ontop of the guy as he went to the ground. That call shouldn't be allowed "during" the play. It should either be after the play or not at all.

I have to admit I don't know the rule all that well. But I always thought all personal fouls were dead ball fouls and tack on penalties. There should never be a cheap shot penalty in a game that doesn't result in any "penalty".