**NFC Divisional Round - Rams at Eagles** (-6, 42.5) 3:00 on NBC (2 Viewers)

[unckeyherb]

For the QBs in this game, which team has the edge do you think?

Having an interesting discussion with a good friend that's a big Eagles fan on this.

Stafford is good against the blitz but we don’t really do that. Bad weather means lack of edge rush so I think this will be a big game for Jalen Carter. Stafford is a statue and we should get home a couple times.

On the flipside Jalen is the exact opposite of Sam Darnold. That fast D line is not gonna be much of a match for the offensive line and Jalen‘s ability to escape. I give Jalen the edge here because of his legs.

 

[Leroy Hoard]

For the QBs in this game, which team has the edge do you think?

Having an interesting discussion with a good friend that's a big Eagles fan on this.

Eagles are the better team, Stafford is the better QB.

 

[Snotbubbles]

An excellent pass rushing team against a team that’s supposed to have a great line. Should be an interesting match-up up front when the Eagles have the ball.

Hard to get a pass run when the other team runs the ball. So what LA does best is neutralized by what Philly does best on offense. Philly's offense is a terrible matchup for LA's defense.

I think its arguable if the Rams even have a great pass rush in the first place. They were 20th in pressures and 21st in sacks this season. I don't wanna give them too much credit for Darnold being a deer in the headlights last week.

Consider me enamored of rookies then. They’ve got Jared Verse, who has been a beast, and Braden Fiske, who led all the rookies in sacks through Week 16 or 17. Not sure how that isn’t the beginnings of a great pass rush. They’ve also got Kobie Turner and Byron Young.

From the assessment before the MN game on NFL.com

“[T]he Rams defense is peaking and primed to make a statement of its own. When last these teams met, L.A.’s youth movement was more used to getting moved. From Weeks 1-14, the Rams allowed 25.5 points per game (24th in the NFL), and in Week 8 they were carved up by Sam Darnold. But during the past month of action, they’ve allowed 13.5 points per game, second-best during that span. The turnaround has been fueled largely by first- and second-year players.The team’s top-four sack-getters -- Braden Fiske (8.5), Kobie Turner (8.0), Byron Young (7.5) and Jared Verse(4.5) -- were all drafted in the past two years. Rookie safeties Kamren Kinchens and Jaylen McCollough share the team lead in interceptions with four. Among NFL rookies, the Rams defense ranks first or tied for first with 312 tackles, 13.5 sacks, 30 QB hits, five forced fumbles and eight picks. The group is turning the corner at exactly the right time. The all-important question is if it will continue under the bright playoff lights."

Safe to say it did. I think it’s safe to say that the top rookie sack-getter and guys like Turner, Young, and Verse help comprise an “excellent” pass rushing team. Maybe “excellent” was too much, but I’m giving myself the benefit of the doubt here.

See when you compartmentalize it like this, it's best to look at the opponents. None of the opponents in the last month ran the ball more than 22 times (excluding the Seahawk, but the Rams rested their starters). Comparing how the Rams D fared against those teams and how the Rams D will fare against a team that was #1 in rush attempts this season is apples and oranges.

Oh and the opposite side of that coin is the Rams offense over that same time period has only scored 17.25 points per game.

Its such a bad matchup for the rams. That tiny dline is going to get run over. Even if we ran gainwell 20.times . Amazing some.people hate the eagles so much they dont wamt to see it. Stop the hate and look at the numbers. Its staring you in the face. They have been a bottom 5 run def all year. We ran for 300 yards last time on them at their place. They beat an overachieving vikings team and now suddenly they are going to win a snow game on the road in philly? Gtfo. Unless the nfl script writers deem it eagles should win by 2 scores

Excluding the Giants game in week 18, they haven't been under 30 rush attempts since week 4 and have been over 40 multiple times. I'm expecting about 35+ rush attempts tomorrow.

Agreed. That seems to me like the key. One of if not the best back on the league and arguably the best OL in the league. (Although technically we say #2). https://www.footballguys.com/article/offensive-line-rankings But leaning on the run game seems like the answer.

I'm not taking any offensive line ahead of the Eagles.

 

[Snotbubbles]

For the QBs in this game, which team has the edge do you think?

Having an interesting discussion with a good friend that's a big Eagles fan on this.

Stafford is a better thrower, but for Philly's offense, Hurt's legs are a necessity. If I'm replacing Hurts with other QBs, those other QBs need to be able to tuck the ball and run so guys like Stafford, Goff, etc. are a no for me.

 

[travdogg]

For the QBs in this game, which team has the edge do you think?

Having an interesting discussion with a good friend that's a big Eagles fan on this.

I think Hurts>>>Stafford. Legs are so valuable. I don't think Stafford is the passer he was 3 years ago.

I'd argue Stafford is the worst QB of the 8 remaining.

 

[Joe Bryant]

Poll https://forums.footballguys.com/thr...tthew-stafford-whos-the-better-nfl-qb.815542/

 

[Snotbubbles]

An excellent pass rushing team against a team that’s supposed to have a great line. Should be an interesting match-up up front when the Eagles have the ball.

Hard to get a pass run when the other team runs the ball. So what LA does best is neutralized by what Philly does best on offense. Philly's offense is a terrible matchup for LA's defense.

I think its arguable if the Rams even have a great pass rush in the first place. They were 20th in pressures and 21st in sacks this season. I don't wanna give them too much credit for Darnold being a deer in the headlights last week.

Consider me enamored of rookies then. They’ve got Jared Verse, who has been a beast, and Braden Fiske, who led all the rookies in sacks through Week 16 or 17. Not sure how that isn’t the beginnings of a great pass rush. They’ve also got Kobie Turner and Byron Young.

From the assessment before the MN game on NFL.com

“[T]he Rams defense is peaking and primed to make a statement of its own. When last these teams met, L.A.’s youth movement was more used to getting moved. From Weeks 1-14, the Rams allowed 25.5 points per game (24th in the NFL), and in Week 8 they were carved up by Sam Darnold. But during the past month of action, they’ve allowed 13.5 points per game, second-best during that span. The turnaround has been fueled largely by first- and second-year players.The team’s top-four sack-getters -- Braden Fiske (8.5), Kobie Turner (8.0), Byron Young (7.5) and Jared Verse(4.5) -- were all drafted in the past two years. Rookie safeties Kamren Kinchens and Jaylen McCollough share the team lead in interceptions with four. Among NFL rookies, the Rams defense ranks first or tied for first with 312 tackles, 13.5 sacks, 30 QB hits, five forced fumbles and eight picks. The group is turning the corner at exactly the right time. The all-important question is if it will continue under the bright playoff lights."

Safe to say it did. I think it’s safe to say that the top rookie sack-getter and guys like Turner, Young, and Verse help comprise an “excellent” pass rushing team. Maybe “excellent” was too much, but I’m giving myself the benefit of the doubt here.

See when you compartmentalize it like this, it's best to look at the opponents. None of the opponents in the last month ran the ball more than 22 times (excluding the Seahawk, but the Rams rested their starters). Comparing how the Rams D fared against those teams and how the Rams D will fare against a team that was #1 in rush attempts this season is apples and oranges.

Oh and the opposite side of that coin is the Rams offense over that same time period has only scored 17.25 points per game.

Its such a bad matchup for the rams. That tiny dline is going to get run over. Even if we ran gainwell 20.times . Amazing some.people hate the eagles so much they dont wamt to see it. Stop the hate and look at the numbers. Its staring you in the face. They have been a bottom 5 run def all year. We ran for 300 yards last time on them at their place. They beat an overachieving vikings team and now suddenly they are going to win a snow game on the road in philly? Gtfo. Unless the nfl script writers deem it eagles should win by 2 scores

Excluding the Giants game in week 18, they haven't been under 30 rush attempts since week 4 and have been over 40 multiple times. I'm expecting about 35+ rush attempts tomorrow.

Agreed. That seems to me like the key. One of if not the best back on the league and arguably the best OL in the league. (Although technically we say #2). https://www.footballguys.com/article/offensive-line-rankings But leaning on the run game seems like the answer.

I'm not taking any offensive line ahead of the Eagles.

@Joe Bryant

Curious, how did you do your offensive line rankings? Was there a grading system?

 

[Joe Bryant]

An excellent pass rushing team against a team that’s supposed to have a great line. Should be an interesting match-up up front when the Eagles have the ball.

Hard to get a pass run when the other team runs the ball. So what LA does best is neutralized by what Philly does best on offense. Philly's offense is a terrible matchup for LA's defense.

I think its arguable if the Rams even have a great pass rush in the first place. They were 20th in pressures and 21st in sacks this season. I don't wanna give them too much credit for Darnold being a deer in the headlights last week.

Consider me enamored of rookies then. They’ve got Jared Verse, who has been a beast, and Braden Fiske, who led all the rookies in sacks through Week 16 or 17. Not sure how that isn’t the beginnings of a great pass rush. They’ve also got Kobie Turner and Byron Young.

From the assessment before the MN game on NFL.com

“[T]he Rams defense is peaking and primed to make a statement of its own. When last these teams met, L.A.’s youth movement was more used to getting moved. From Weeks 1-14, the Rams allowed 25.5 points per game (24th in the NFL), and in Week 8 they were carved up by Sam Darnold. But during the past month of action, they’ve allowed 13.5 points per game, second-best during that span. The turnaround has been fueled largely by first- and second-year players.The team’s top-four sack-getters -- Braden Fiske (8.5), Kobie Turner (8.0), Byron Young (7.5) and Jared Verse(4.5) -- were all drafted in the past two years. Rookie safeties Kamren Kinchens and Jaylen McCollough share the team lead in interceptions with four. Among NFL rookies, the Rams defense ranks first or tied for first with 312 tackles, 13.5 sacks, 30 QB hits, five forced fumbles and eight picks. The group is turning the corner at exactly the right time. The all-important question is if it will continue under the bright playoff lights."

Safe to say it did. I think it’s safe to say that the top rookie sack-getter and guys like Turner, Young, and Verse help comprise an “excellent” pass rushing team. Maybe “excellent” was too much, but I’m giving myself the benefit of the doubt here.

See when you compartmentalize it like this, it's best to look at the opponents. None of the opponents in the last month ran the ball more than 22 times (excluding the Seahawk, but the Rams rested their starters). Comparing how the Rams D fared against those teams and how the Rams D will fare against a team that was #1 in rush attempts this season is apples and oranges.

Oh and the opposite side of that coin is the Rams offense over that same time period has only scored 17.25 points per game.

Its such a bad matchup for the rams. That tiny dline is going to get run over. Even if we ran gainwell 20.times . Amazing some.people hate the eagles so much they dont wamt to see it. Stop the hate and look at the numbers. Its staring you in the face. They have been a bottom 5 run def all year. We ran for 300 yards last time on them at their place. They beat an overachieving vikings team and now suddenly they are going to win a snow game on the road in philly? Gtfo. Unless the nfl script writers deem it eagles should win by 2 scores

Excluding the Giants game in week 18, they haven't been under 30 rush attempts since week 4 and have been over 40 multiple times. I'm expecting about 35+ rush attempts tomorrow.

Agreed. That seems to me like the key. One of if not the best back on the league and arguably the best OL in the league. (Although technically we say #2). https://www.footballguys.com/article/offensive-line-rankings But leaning on the run game seems like the answer.

I'm not taking any offensive line ahead of the Eagles.

@Joe Bryant

Curious, how did you do your offensive line rankings? Was there a grading system?

Yes. Matt Bitonti does those and does an extensive grading system. I'm biased but I think they're by far the best rankings in the industry.

 

[Joe Bryant]

For the QBs in this game, which team has the edge do you think?

Having an interesting discussion with a good friend that's a big Eagles fan on this.

I think Hurts>>>Stafford. Legs are so valuable. I don't think Stafford is the passer he was 3 years ago.

I'd argue Stafford is the worst QB of the 8 remaining.

Interesting. Thanks.

It's also a testament though to how important QBs are. One might make the case the worst QB playing this weekend might still be a top 10 QB.

 

[Joe Bryant]

While we're on predictions, Eagles easily roll here.

Then beat Detroit next week in a tougher game with the two best OL's in the league to get to the Super Bowl.

Will have to see who the AFC gets in to make the call for the Super Bowl.

 

[Snotbubbles]

While we're on predictions, Eagles easily roll here.

Then beat Detroit next week in a tougher game with the two best OL's in the league to get to the Super Bowl.

Will have to see who the AFC gets in to make the call for the Super Bowl.

I like the way you think.

 

[Joe Bryant]

While we're on predictions, Eagles easily roll here.

Then beat Detroit next week in a tougher game with the two best OL's in the league to get to the Super Bowl.

Will have to see who the AFC gets in to make the call for the Super Bowl.

I like the way you think.

They're just too talented for the rest.

And picking the #2 seed to make the Super Bowl isn't going out on much of a limb.

 

[Alex P Keaton]

Eagles 41-10

 

[Snotbubbles]

While we're on predictions, Eagles easily roll here.

Then beat Detroit next week in a tougher game with the two best OL's in the league to get to the Super Bowl.

Will have to see who the AFC gets in to make the call for the Super Bowl.

I like the way you think.

They're just too talented for the rest.

And picking the #2 seed to make the Super Bowl isn't going out on much of a limb.

I agree with you. I think they'll go into Detroit and win a close game. They'd roll the Commanders at home.

 

[LTsharks]

For the QBs in this game, which team has the edge do you think?

Having an interesting discussion with a good friend that's a big Eagles fan on this.

I think Hurts>>>Stafford. Legs are so valuable. I don't think Stafford is the passer he was 3 years ago.

I'd argue Stafford is the worst QB of the 8 remaining.

Interesting. Thanks.

It's also a testament though to how important QBs are. One might make the case the worst QB playing this weekend might still be a top 10 QB.

Yeah right. Lots of “rank the remaining QB” talk out there that makes it feel like an insult (not intentional I don’t think) to be #8 but it really isn’t.

 

[travdogg]

For the QBs in this game, which team has the edge do you think?

Having an interesting discussion with a good friend that's a big Eagles fan on this.

I think Hurts>>>Stafford. Legs are so valuable. I don't think Stafford is the passer he was 3 years ago.

I'd argue Stafford is the worst QB of the 8 remaining.

Interesting. Thanks.

It's also a testament though to how important QBs are. One might make the case the worst QB playing this weekend might still be a top 10 QB.

Yeah right. Lots of “rank the remaining QB” talk out there that makes it feel like an insult (not intentional I don’t think) to be #8 but it really isn’t.

No bad QBs made the playoffs.

 

[ProstheticRGK]

For the QBs in this game, which team has the edge do you think?

Having an interesting discussion with a good friend that's a big Eagles fan on this.

I think Hurts>>>Stafford. Legs are so valuable. I don't think Stafford is the passer he was 3 years ago.

I'd argue Stafford is the worst QB of the 8 remaining.

Interesting. Thanks.

It's also a testament though to how important QBs are. One might make the case the worst QB playing this weekend might still be a top 10 QB.

Yeah right. Lots of “rank the remaining QB” talk out there that makes it feel like an insult (not intentional I don’t think) to be #8 but it really isn’t.

No bad QBs made the playoffs.

Russ would like a word.

 

[travdogg]

For the QBs in this game, which team has the edge do you think?

Having an interesting discussion with a good friend that's a big Eagles fan on this.

I think Hurts>>>Stafford. Legs are so valuable. I don't think Stafford is the passer he was 3 years ago.

I'd argue Stafford is the worst QB of the 8 remaining.

Interesting. Thanks.

It's also a testament though to how important QBs are. One might make the case the worst QB playing this weekend might still be a top 10 QB.

Yeah right. Lots of “rank the remaining QB” talk out there that makes it feel like an insult (not intentional I don’t think) to be #8 but it really isn’t.

No bad QBs made the playoffs.

Russ would like a word.

Russ is not bad. He's not ideal, but he's not bad. He's like a C on a report card.

 

[ProstheticRGK]

For the QBs in this game, which team has the edge do you think?

Having an interesting discussion with a good friend that's a big Eagles fan on this.

I think Hurts>>>Stafford. Legs are so valuable. I don't think Stafford is the passer he was 3 years ago.

I'd argue Stafford is the worst QB of the 8 remaining.

Interesting. Thanks.

It's also a testament though to how important QBs are. One might make the case the worst QB playing this weekend might still be a top 10 QB.

Yeah right. Lots of “rank the remaining QB” talk out there that makes it feel like an insult (not intentional I don’t think) to be #8 but it really isn’t.

No bad QBs made the playoffs.

Russ would like a word.

Russ is not bad. He's not ideal, but he's not bad. He's like a C on a report card.

I used to get the belt if I got a C on my report card.

 

[Rubi]

For the QBs in this game, which team has the edge do you think?

Having an interesting discussion with a good friend that's a big Eagles fan on this.

I think Hurts>>>Stafford. Legs are so valuable. I don't think Stafford is the passer he was 3 years ago.

I'd argue Stafford is the worst QB of the 8 remaining.

Interesting. Thanks.

It's also a testament though to how important QBs are. One might make the case the worst QB playing this weekend might still be a top 10 QB.

Yeah right. Lots of “rank the remaining QB” talk out there that makes it feel like an insult (not intentional I don’t think) to be #8 but it really isn’t.

No bad QBs made the playoffs.

Russ would like a word.

Russ is not bad. He's not ideal, but he's not bad. He's like a C on a report card.

Of all the playoff quarterbacks
I would argue Russ had the least amount of talent around him

 

[ProstheticRGK]

For the QBs in this game, which team has the edge do you think?

Having an interesting discussion with a good friend that's a big Eagles fan on this.

I think Hurts>>>Stafford. Legs are so valuable. I don't think Stafford is the passer he was 3 years ago.

I'd argue Stafford is the worst QB of the 8 remaining.

Interesting. Thanks.

It's also a testament though to how important QBs are. One might make the case the worst QB playing this weekend might still be a top 10 QB.

Yeah right. Lots of “rank the remaining QB” talk out there that makes it feel like an insult (not intentional I don’t think) to be #8 but it really isn’t.

No bad QBs made the playoffs.

Russ would like a word.

Russ is not bad. He's not ideal, but he's not bad. He's like a C on a report card.

Of all the playoff quarterbacks
I would argue Russ had the least amount of talent around him

I’d agree. I’d also say he had the least amount of talent inside him, too.

 

[travdogg]

For the QBs in this game, which team has the edge do you think?

Having an interesting discussion with a good friend that's a big Eagles fan on this.

I think Hurts>>>Stafford. Legs are so valuable. I don't think Stafford is the passer he was 3 years ago.

I'd argue Stafford is the worst QB of the 8 remaining.

Interesting. Thanks.

It's also a testament though to how important QBs are. One might make the case the worst QB playing this weekend might still be a top 10 QB.

Yeah right. Lots of “rank the remaining QB” talk out there that makes it feel like an insult (not intentional I don’t think) to be #8 but it really isn’t.

No bad QBs made the playoffs.

Russ would like a word.

Russ is not bad. He's not ideal, but he's not bad. He's like a C on a report card.

Of all the playoff quarterbacks
I would argue Russ had the least amount of talent around him

Agreed. Him or Daniels.

ETA: Maybe Love by the time the Packers game was over.

 

[Rubi]

For the QBs in this game, which team has the edge do you think?

Having an interesting discussion with a good friend that's a big Eagles fan on this.

I think Hurts>>>Stafford. Legs are so valuable. I don't think Stafford is the passer he was 3 years ago.

I'd argue Stafford is the worst QB of the 8 remaining.

Interesting. Thanks.

It's also a testament though to how important QBs are. One might make the case the worst QB playing this weekend might still be a top 10 QB.

Yeah right. Lots of “rank the remaining QB” talk out there that makes it feel like an insult (not intentional I don’t think) to be #8 but it really isn’t.

No bad QBs made the playoffs.

Russ would like a word.

Russ is not bad. He's not ideal, but he's not bad. He's like a C on a report card.

Of all the playoff quarterbacks
I would argue Russ had the least amount of talent around him

I’d agree. I’d also say he had the least amount of talent inside him, too.

Doesn't make him "bad"

 

[ProstheticRGK]

For the QBs in this game, which team has the edge do you think?

Having an interesting discussion with a good friend that's a big Eagles fan on this.

I think Hurts>>>Stafford. Legs are so valuable. I don't think Stafford is the passer he was 3 years ago.

I'd argue Stafford is the worst QB of the 8 remaining.

Interesting. Thanks.

It's also a testament though to how important QBs are. One might make the case the worst QB playing this weekend might still be a top 10 QB.

Yeah right. Lots of “rank the remaining QB” talk out there that makes it feel like an insult (not intentional I don’t think) to be #8 but it really isn’t.

No bad QBs made the playoffs.

Russ would like a word.

Russ is not bad. He's not ideal, but he's not bad. He's like a C on a report card.

Of all the playoff quarterbacks
I would argue Russ had the least amount of talent around him

I’d agree. I’d also say he had the least amount of talent inside him, too.

Doesn't make him "bad"

Yeah, a ‘C’ is about right. To me, a C is bad.

 

[Zeppelin]

For the QBs in this game, which team has the edge do you think?

Having an interesting discussion with a good friend that's a big Eagles fan on this.

I think Hurts>>>Stafford. Legs are so valuable. I don't think Stafford is the passer he was 3 years ago.

I'd argue Stafford is the worst QB of the 8 remaining.

Interesting. Thanks.

It's also a testament though to how important QBs are. One might make the case the worst QB playing this weekend might still be a top 10 QB.

Yeah right. Lots of “rank the remaining QB” talk out there that makes it feel like an insult (not intentional I don’t think) to be #8 but it really isn’t.

No bad QBs made the playoffs.

Russ would like a word.

Russ is not bad. He's not ideal, but he's not bad. He's like a C on a report card.

Of all the playoff quarterbacks
I would argue Russ had the least amount of talent around him

I’d agree. I’d also say he had the least amount of talent inside him, too.

Doesn't make him "bad"

He isn't bad. But he isn't good either.

 

[fred_1_15301]

For the QBs in this game, which team has the edge do you think?

Having an interesting discussion with a good friend that's a big Eagles fan on this.

I think Hurts>>>Stafford. Legs are so valuable. I don't think Stafford is the passer he was 3 years ago.

I'd argue Stafford is the worst QB of the 8 remaining.

Interesting. Thanks.

It's also a testament though to how important QBs are. One might make the case the worst QB playing this weekend might still be a top 10 QB.

Yeah right. Lots of “rank the remaining QB” talk out there that makes it feel like an insult (not intentional I don’t think) to be #8 but it really isn’t.

No bad QBs made the playoffs.

Russ would like a word.

Russ is not bad. He's not ideal, but he's not bad. He's like a C on a report card.

Of all the playoff quarterbacks
I would argue Russ had the least amount of talent around him

I’d agree. I’d also say he had the least amount of talent inside him, too.

Agree with this (at this stage of his career of course). Seattle Russ was a playmaker

 

[Rubi]

For the QBs in this game, which team has the edge do you think?

Having an interesting discussion with a good friend that's a big Eagles fan on this.

I think Hurts>>>Stafford. Legs are so valuable. I don't think Stafford is the passer he was 3 years ago.

I'd argue Stafford is the worst QB of the 8 remaining.

Interesting. Thanks.

It's also a testament though to how important QBs are. One might make the case the worst QB playing this weekend might still be a top 10 QB.

Yeah right. Lots of “rank the remaining QB” talk out there that makes it feel like an insult (not intentional I don’t think) to be #8 but it really isn’t.

No bad QBs made the playoffs.

Russ would like a word.

Russ is not bad. He's not ideal, but he's not bad. He's like a C on a report card.

Of all the playoff quarterbacks
I would argue Russ had the least amount of talent around him

I’d agree. I’d also say he had the least amount of talent inside him, too.

Doesn't make him "bad"

He isn't bad. But he isn't good either.

So not good but not bad makes him average?
That's a C

 

[Snotbubbles]

ake the points

If there's an upset this week I think it's this game
The numbers and analytics say The Eagles will win
But there's a feeling in me that thinks The Rams can win this game
Or it's the chili I ate all weekend
Either way I think The Rams keep it close and if they get a fortunate bounce they can win it
That would send Matthew to Detroit in The NFC Championship Game
Great theater
So why not...

Los Angeles Rams- 23
Philadelphia Eagles- 20

After watching the performances of the other NFC North teams in this years playoffs, I think if there is going to be an upset this week it could be Detroit. Jayden Daniels is no joke.

Still dumbfounded why you continue to say this. The Packers were beat up, lost both Doubs and Reed and still hung with your Eagles on the road.
Darnold is the reason the Vikings lost. Detroit got in his head and he was still seeing ghosts from last week.

The Rams are better than you give them credit for. IF the Eagles play like they did last week, they aren't beating Detroit and they probably won't be the Rams.

Edit: Absolutely Daniels is the real deal. He better get a touchdown on each drive because Detroit will.

The Packers were not beat up. We beat them up. There is a difference.

The way the Eagles played last week was forcing 4 turnovers and allowing 10 points total scored. If the Eagles win, the defense will be a huge determining factor, not so much the offense. It will still go, just how high a level is the question.

Detroit has like how many injured guys on defense? There is a bit of an element of surprise to the Commanders/Jayden Daniels.

Don't see anything here super crazy here.

Love injured going into game.
Watson out
Doubs out early
Reed out midgame

They were beat up and still kept it close. You can spin it however you want.

AJ injured going into game. Davonta didn't practice the Friday before due to back spasms. Jalen out for a month prior to the game. Lost our green dot LB in Nakobe Dean. How about no one is healthy in January and the better team won?

The better team did win. No doubt. But calling the NFC North frauds is ridiculous.

Who called the NFC North frauds?

From Snotbubbles in the Vikings - Ram game thread:

what we saw this weekend in 5 of 6 games is the result of parity and parity scheduling. Average teams with inflated records facing legit contenders and getting clowned.

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

OK. But why did you quote me? No one in that conversation mentioned the NFC north?

I mean, I think it’s fair to say the Vikings were a little bit of a fraud, don’t you think? I also don’t think the Packers are that great of a team yet, however, they will be in a year or two. But obviously the Lions are legit Super Bowl contenders. As an eagle fan, they scare me more than anyone else remaining in the playoffs.

That guy needs some reading comprehension. I said:

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

Operative words, "may be." If the Detroit Lions lose to the Commanders this weekend, I'll edit my post from "may be" to "is."

Update.

NFC North IS a fraud division.

 

[dgreen]

Let’s Go Rams!

 

[Deamon]

While we're on predictions, Eagles easily roll here.

Then beat Detroit next week in a tougher game with the two best OL's in the league to get to the Super Bowl.

Will have to see who the AFC gets in to make the call for the Super Bowl.

already wrong. yikes.

 

[Deamon]

Let’s Go Rams!

You guys have a really strong team. I'm not so sure traveling across the country to play the Rams would be any better than heading into Philly.

 

[Deamon]

ake the points

If there's an upset this week I think it's this game
The numbers and analytics say The Eagles will win
But there's a feeling in me that thinks The Rams can win this game
Or it's the chili I ate all weekend
Either way I think The Rams keep it close and if they get a fortunate bounce they can win it
That would send Matthew to Detroit in The NFC Championship Game
Great theater
So why not...

Los Angeles Rams- 23
Philadelphia Eagles- 20

After watching the performances of the other NFC North teams in this years playoffs, I think if there is going to be an upset this week it could be Detroit. Jayden Daniels is no joke.

Still dumbfounded why you continue to say this. The Packers were beat up, lost both Doubs and Reed and still hung with your Eagles on the road.
Darnold is the reason the Vikings lost. Detroit got in his head and he was still seeing ghosts from last week.

The Rams are better than you give them credit for. IF the Eagles play like they did last week, they aren't beating Detroit and they probably won't be the Rams.

Edit: Absolutely Daniels is the real deal. He better get a touchdown on each drive because Detroit will.

The Packers were not beat up. We beat them up. There is a difference.

The way the Eagles played last week was forcing 4 turnovers and allowing 10 points total scored. If the Eagles win, the defense will be a huge determining factor, not so much the offense. It will still go, just how high a level is the question.

Detroit has like how many injured guys on defense? There is a bit of an element of surprise to the Commanders/Jayden Daniels.

Don't see anything here super crazy here.

Love injured going into game.
Watson out
Doubs out early
Reed out midgame

They were beat up and still kept it close. You can spin it however you want.

AJ injured going into game. Davonta didn't practice the Friday before due to back spasms. Jalen out for a month prior to the game. Lost our green dot LB in Nakobe Dean. How about no one is healthy in January and the better team won?

The better team did win. No doubt. But calling the NFC North frauds is ridiculous.

Who called the NFC North frauds?

From Snotbubbles in the Vikings - Ram game thread:

what we saw this weekend in 5 of 6 games is the result of parity and parity scheduling. Average teams with inflated records facing legit contenders and getting clowned.

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

OK. But why did you quote me? No one in that conversation mentioned the NFC north?

I mean, I think it’s fair to say the Vikings were a little bit of a fraud, don’t you think? I also don’t think the Packers are that great of a team yet, however, they will be in a year or two. But obviously the Lions are legit Super Bowl contenders. As an eagle fan, they scare me more than anyone else remaining in the playoffs.

That guy needs some reading comprehension. I said:

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

Operative words, "may be." If the Detroit Lions lose to the Commanders this weekend, I'll edit my post from "may be" to "is."

Update.

NFC North IS a fraud division.

While I don't think they're a fraud, it is pretty wild that all 3 of them lost their first game of the playoffs. And 2 of those 3 were against the Rams and Commanders, who were underdogs and playing on the road.

 

[rockaction]

Entire NFC North are frauds.

That’s from October 24th of this year. You knew they were when Sam Darnold and Jared Goff highlighted that division’s QB situation.

So you all are about two and a half months late. Welcome to the party.

ake the points

If there's an upset this week I think it's this game
The numbers and analytics say The Eagles will win
But there's a feeling in me that thinks The Rams can win this game
Or it's the chili I ate all weekend
Either way I think The Rams keep it close and if they get a fortunate bounce they can win it
That would send Matthew to Detroit in The NFC Championship Game
Great theater
So why not...

Los Angeles Rams- 23
Philadelphia Eagles- 20

After watching the performances of the other NFC North teams in this years playoffs, I think if there is going to be an upset this week it could be Detroit. Jayden Daniels is no joke.

Still dumbfounded why you continue to say this. The Packers were beat up, lost both Doubs and Reed and still hung with your Eagles on the road.
Darnold is the reason the Vikings lost. Detroit got in his head and he was still seeing ghosts from last week.

The Rams are better than you give them credit for. IF the Eagles play like they did last week, they aren't beating Detroit and they probably won't be the Rams.

Edit: Absolutely Daniels is the real deal. He better get a touchdown on each drive because Detroit will.

The Packers were not beat up. We beat them up. There is a difference.

The way the Eagles played last week was forcing 4 turnovers and allowing 10 points total scored. If the Eagles win, the defense will be a huge determining factor, not so much the offense. It will still go, just how high a level is the question.

Detroit has like how many injured guys on defense? There is a bit of an element of surprise to the Commanders/Jayden Daniels.

Don't see anything here super crazy here.

Love injured going into game.
Watson out
Doubs out early
Reed out midgame

They were beat up and still kept it close. You can spin it however you want.

AJ injured going into game. Davonta didn't practice the Friday before due to back spasms. Jalen out for a month prior to the game. Lost our green dot LB in Nakobe Dean. How about no one is healthy in January and the better team won?

The better team did win. No doubt. But calling the NFC North frauds is ridiculous.

Who called the NFC North frauds?

From Snotbubbles in the Vikings - Ram game thread:

what we saw this weekend in 5 of 6 games is the result of parity and parity scheduling. Average teams with inflated records facing legit contenders and getting clowned.

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

OK. But why did you quote me? No one in that conversation mentioned the NFC north?

I mean, I think it’s fair to say the Vikings were a little bit of a fraud, don’t you think? I also don’t think the Packers are that great of a team yet, however, they will be in a year or two. But obviously the Lions are legit Super Bowl contenders. As an eagle fan, they scare me more than anyone else remaining in the playoffs.

That guy needs some reading comprehension. I said:

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

Operative words, "may be." If the Detroit Lions lose to the Commanders this weekend, I'll edit my post from "may be" to "is."

Update.

NFC North IS a fraud division.

 

[unckeyherb]

GO BIRDS!!!!!!! Let’s get that NFCCG in Philly baby!!

 

[fred_1_15301]

ake the points

If there's an upset this week I think it's this game
The numbers and analytics say The Eagles will win
But there's a feeling in me that thinks The Rams can win this game
Or it's the chili I ate all weekend
Either way I think The Rams keep it close and if they get a fortunate bounce they can win it
That would send Matthew to Detroit in The NFC Championship Game
Great theater
So why not...

Los Angeles Rams- 23
Philadelphia Eagles- 20

After watching the performances of the other NFC North teams in this years playoffs, I think if there is going to be an upset this week it could be Detroit. Jayden Daniels is no joke.

Still dumbfounded why you continue to say this. The Packers were beat up, lost both Doubs and Reed and still hung with your Eagles on the road.
Darnold is the reason the Vikings lost. Detroit got in his head and he was still seeing ghosts from last week.

The Rams are better than you give them credit for. IF the Eagles play like they did last week, they aren't beating Detroit and they probably won't be the Rams.

Edit: Absolutely Daniels is the real deal. He better get a touchdown on each drive because Detroit will.

The Packers were not beat up. We beat them up. There is a difference.

The way the Eagles played last week was forcing 4 turnovers and allowing 10 points total scored. If the Eagles win, the defense will be a huge determining factor, not so much the offense. It will still go, just how high a level is the question.

Detroit has like how many injured guys on defense? There is a bit of an element of surprise to the Commanders/Jayden Daniels.

Don't see anything here super crazy here.

Love injured going into game.
Watson out
Doubs out early
Reed out midgame

They were beat up and still kept it close. You can spin it however you want.

AJ injured going into game. Davonta didn't practice the Friday before due to back spasms. Jalen out for a month prior to the game. Lost our green dot LB in Nakobe Dean. How about no one is healthy in January and the better team won?

The better team did win. No doubt. But calling the NFC North frauds is ridiculous.

Who called the NFC North frauds?

From Snotbubbles in the Vikings - Ram game thread:

what we saw this weekend in 5 of 6 games is the result of parity and parity scheduling. Average teams with inflated records facing legit contenders and getting clowned.

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

OK. But why did you quote me? No one in that conversation mentioned the NFC north?

I mean, I think it’s fair to say the Vikings were a little bit of a fraud, don’t you think? I also don’t think the Packers are that great of a team yet, however, they will be in a year or two. But obviously the Lions are legit Super Bowl contenders. As an eagle fan, they scare me more than anyone else remaining in the playoffs.

That guy needs some reading comprehension. I said:

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

Operative words, "may be." If the Detroit Lions lose to the Commanders this weekend, I'll edit my post from "may be" to "is."

Update.

NFC North IS a fraud division.

Lions aren’t frauds at all. Take away 6-7 starters from any playoff team (including yours BTW) and see how they fare. Lions fully healthy were probably the best team in football. Unfortunately they ended up being the unluckiest.

 

[Snotbubbles]

ake the points

If there's an upset this week I think it's this game
The numbers and analytics say The Eagles will win
But there's a feeling in me that thinks The Rams can win this game
Or it's the chili I ate all weekend
Either way I think The Rams keep it close and if they get a fortunate bounce they can win it
That would send Matthew to Detroit in The NFC Championship Game
Great theater
So why not...

Los Angeles Rams- 23
Philadelphia Eagles- 20

After watching the performances of the other NFC North teams in this years playoffs, I think if there is going to be an upset this week it could be Detroit. Jayden Daniels is no joke.

Still dumbfounded why you continue to say this. The Packers were beat up, lost both Doubs and Reed and still hung with your Eagles on the road.
Darnold is the reason the Vikings lost. Detroit got in his head and he was still seeing ghosts from last week.

The Rams are better than you give them credit for. IF the Eagles play like they did last week, they aren't beating Detroit and they probably won't be the Rams.

Edit: Absolutely Daniels is the real deal. He better get a touchdown on each drive because Detroit will.

The Packers were not beat up. We beat them up. There is a difference.

The way the Eagles played last week was forcing 4 turnovers and allowing 10 points total scored. If the Eagles win, the defense will be a huge determining factor, not so much the offense. It will still go, just how high a level is the question.

Detroit has like how many injured guys on defense? There is a bit of an element of surprise to the Commanders/Jayden Daniels.

Don't see anything here super crazy here.

Love injured going into game.
Watson out
Doubs out early
Reed out midgame

They were beat up and still kept it close. You can spin it however you want.

AJ injured going into game. Davonta didn't practice the Friday before due to back spasms. Jalen out for a month prior to the game. Lost our green dot LB in Nakobe Dean. How about no one is healthy in January and the better team won?

The better team did win. No doubt. But calling the NFC North frauds is ridiculous.

Who called the NFC North frauds?

From Snotbubbles in the Vikings - Ram game thread:

what we saw this weekend in 5 of 6 games is the result of parity and parity scheduling. Average teams with inflated records facing legit contenders and getting clowned.

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

OK. But why did you quote me? No one in that conversation mentioned the NFC north?

I mean, I think it’s fair to say the Vikings were a little bit of a fraud, don’t you think? I also don’t think the Packers are that great of a team yet, however, they will be in a year or two. But obviously the Lions are legit Super Bowl contenders. As an eagle fan, they scare me more than anyone else remaining in the playoffs.

That guy needs some reading comprehension. I said:

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

Operative words, "may be." If the Detroit Lions lose to the Commanders this weekend, I'll edit my post from "may be" to "is."

Update.

NFC North IS a fraud division.

Lions aren’t frauds at all. Take away 6-7 starters from any playoff team (including yours BTW) and see how they fare. Lions fully healthy were probably the best team in football. Unfortunately they ended up being the unluckiest.

2017 Eagles say hi.

 

[fred_1_15301]

ake the points

If there's an upset this week I think it's this game
The numbers and analytics say The Eagles will win
But there's a feeling in me that thinks The Rams can win this game
Or it's the chili I ate all weekend
Either way I think The Rams keep it close and if they get a fortunate bounce they can win it
That would send Matthew to Detroit in The NFC Championship Game
Great theater
So why not...

Los Angeles Rams- 23
Philadelphia Eagles- 20

After watching the performances of the other NFC North teams in this years playoffs, I think if there is going to be an upset this week it could be Detroit. Jayden Daniels is no joke.

Still dumbfounded why you continue to say this. The Packers were beat up, lost both Doubs and Reed and still hung with your Eagles on the road.
Darnold is the reason the Vikings lost. Detroit got in his head and he was still seeing ghosts from last week.

The Rams are better than you give them credit for. IF the Eagles play like they did last week, they aren't beating Detroit and they probably won't be the Rams.

Edit: Absolutely Daniels is the real deal. He better get a touchdown on each drive because Detroit will.

The Packers were not beat up. We beat them up. There is a difference.

The way the Eagles played last week was forcing 4 turnovers and allowing 10 points total scored. If the Eagles win, the defense will be a huge determining factor, not so much the offense. It will still go, just how high a level is the question.

Detroit has like how many injured guys on defense? There is a bit of an element of surprise to the Commanders/Jayden Daniels.

Don't see anything here super crazy here.

Love injured going into game.
Watson out
Doubs out early
Reed out midgame

They were beat up and still kept it close. You can spin it however you want.

AJ injured going into game. Davonta didn't practice the Friday before due to back spasms. Jalen out for a month prior to the game. Lost our green dot LB in Nakobe Dean. How about no one is healthy in January and the better team won?

The better team did win. No doubt. But calling the NFC North frauds is ridiculous.

Who called the NFC North frauds?

From Snotbubbles in the Vikings - Ram game thread:

what we saw this weekend in 5 of 6 games is the result of parity and parity scheduling. Average teams with inflated records facing legit contenders and getting clowned.

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

OK. But why did you quote me? No one in that conversation mentioned the NFC north?

I mean, I think it’s fair to say the Vikings were a little bit of a fraud, don’t you think? I also don’t think the Packers are that great of a team yet, however, they will be in a year or two. But obviously the Lions are legit Super Bowl contenders. As an eagle fan, they scare me more than anyone else remaining in the playoffs.

That guy needs some reading comprehension. I said:

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

Operative words, "may be." If the Detroit Lions lose to the Commanders this weekend, I'll edit my post from "may be" to "is."

Update.

NFC North IS a fraud division.

Lions aren’t frauds at all. Take away 6-7 starters from any playoff team (including yours BTW) and see how they fare. Lions fully healthy were probably the best team in football. Unfortunately they ended up being the unluckiest.

2017 Eagles say hi.

I don’t recall calling the 2017 Eagles frauds.

 

[Snotbubbles]

ake the points

If there's an upset this week I think it's this game
The numbers and analytics say The Eagles will win
But there's a feeling in me that thinks The Rams can win this game
Or it's the chili I ate all weekend
Either way I think The Rams keep it close and if they get a fortunate bounce they can win it
That would send Matthew to Detroit in The NFC Championship Game
Great theater
So why not...

Los Angeles Rams- 23
Philadelphia Eagles- 20

After watching the performances of the other NFC North teams in this years playoffs, I think if there is going to be an upset this week it could be Detroit. Jayden Daniels is no joke.

Still dumbfounded why you continue to say this. The Packers were beat up, lost both Doubs and Reed and still hung with your Eagles on the road.
Darnold is the reason the Vikings lost. Detroit got in his head and he was still seeing ghosts from last week.

The Rams are better than you give them credit for. IF the Eagles play like they did last week, they aren't beating Detroit and they probably won't be the Rams.

Edit: Absolutely Daniels is the real deal. He better get a touchdown on each drive because Detroit will.

The Packers were not beat up. We beat them up. There is a difference.

The way the Eagles played last week was forcing 4 turnovers and allowing 10 points total scored. If the Eagles win, the defense will be a huge determining factor, not so much the offense. It will still go, just how high a level is the question.

Detroit has like how many injured guys on defense? There is a bit of an element of surprise to the Commanders/Jayden Daniels.

Don't see anything here super crazy here.

Love injured going into game.
Watson out
Doubs out early
Reed out midgame

They were beat up and still kept it close. You can spin it however you want.

AJ injured going into game. Davonta didn't practice the Friday before due to back spasms. Jalen out for a month prior to the game. Lost our green dot LB in Nakobe Dean. How about no one is healthy in January and the better team won?

The better team did win. No doubt. But calling the NFC North frauds is ridiculous.

Who called the NFC North frauds?

From Snotbubbles in the Vikings - Ram game thread:

what we saw this weekend in 5 of 6 games is the result of parity and parity scheduling. Average teams with inflated records facing legit contenders and getting clowned.

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

OK. But why did you quote me? No one in that conversation mentioned the NFC north?

I mean, I think it’s fair to say the Vikings were a little bit of a fraud, don’t you think? I also don’t think the Packers are that great of a team yet, however, they will be in a year or two. But obviously the Lions are legit Super Bowl contenders. As an eagle fan, they scare me more than anyone else remaining in the playoffs.

That guy needs some reading comprehension. I said:

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

Operative words, "may be." If the Detroit Lions lose to the Commanders this weekend, I'll edit my post from "may be" to "is."

Update.

NFC North IS a fraud division.

Lions aren’t frauds at all. Take away 6-7 starters from any playoff team (including yours BTW) and see how they fare. Lions fully healthy were probably the best team in football. Unfortunately they ended up being the unluckiest.

2017 Eagles say hi.

I don’t recall calling the 2017 Eagles frauds.

No but they were missing a bunch of starters and won a Super Bowl.

 

[fred_1_15301]

ake the points

If there's an upset this week I think it's this game
The numbers and analytics say The Eagles will win
But there's a feeling in me that thinks The Rams can win this game
Or it's the chili I ate all weekend
Either way I think The Rams keep it close and if they get a fortunate bounce they can win it
That would send Matthew to Detroit in The NFC Championship Game
Great theater
So why not...

Los Angeles Rams- 23
Philadelphia Eagles- 20

After watching the performances of the other NFC North teams in this years playoffs, I think if there is going to be an upset this week it could be Detroit. Jayden Daniels is no joke.

Still dumbfounded why you continue to say this. The Packers were beat up, lost both Doubs and Reed and still hung with your Eagles on the road.
Darnold is the reason the Vikings lost. Detroit got in his head and he was still seeing ghosts from last week.

The Rams are better than you give them credit for. IF the Eagles play like they did last week, they aren't beating Detroit and they probably won't be the Rams.

Edit: Absolutely Daniels is the real deal. He better get a touchdown on each drive because Detroit will.

The Packers were not beat up. We beat them up. There is a difference.

The way the Eagles played last week was forcing 4 turnovers and allowing 10 points total scored. If the Eagles win, the defense will be a huge determining factor, not so much the offense. It will still go, just how high a level is the question.

Detroit has like how many injured guys on defense? There is a bit of an element of surprise to the Commanders/Jayden Daniels.

Don't see anything here super crazy here.

Love injured going into game.
Watson out
Doubs out early
Reed out midgame

They were beat up and still kept it close. You can spin it however you want.

AJ injured going into game. Davonta didn't practice the Friday before due to back spasms. Jalen out for a month prior to the game. Lost our green dot LB in Nakobe Dean. How about no one is healthy in January and the better team won?

The better team did win. No doubt. But calling the NFC North frauds is ridiculous.

Who called the NFC North frauds?

From Snotbubbles in the Vikings - Ram game thread:

what we saw this weekend in 5 of 6 games is the result of parity and parity scheduling. Average teams with inflated records facing legit contenders and getting clowned.

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

OK. But why did you quote me? No one in that conversation mentioned the NFC north?

I mean, I think it’s fair to say the Vikings were a little bit of a fraud, don’t you think? I also don’t think the Packers are that great of a team yet, however, they will be in a year or two. But obviously the Lions are legit Super Bowl contenders. As an eagle fan, they scare me more than anyone else remaining in the playoffs.

That guy needs some reading comprehension. I said:

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

Operative words, "may be." If the Detroit Lions lose to the Commanders this weekend, I'll edit my post from "may be" to "is."

Update.

NFC North IS a fraud division.

Lions aren’t frauds at all. Take away 6-7 starters from any playoff team (including yours BTW) and see how they fare. Lions fully healthy were probably the best team in football. Unfortunately they ended up being the unluckiest.

2017 Eagles say hi.

I don’t recall calling the 2017 Eagles frauds.

No but they were missing a bunch of starters and won a Super Bowl.

I know but what does that even have to do with anything lol? You gave one example of a team that won with injuries. That doesn’t corroborate your statement that the Lions are “frauds”.

 

[TheAristocrat]

Need some Eagles domination today sprinkled with some dashed Rams hope. Seems like a simple request before kickoff.

 

[Snotbubbles]

ake the points

If there's an upset this week I think it's this game
The numbers and analytics say The Eagles will win
But there's a feeling in me that thinks The Rams can win this game
Or it's the chili I ate all weekend
Either way I think The Rams keep it close and if they get a fortunate bounce they can win it
That would send Matthew to Detroit in The NFC Championship Game
Great theater
So why not...

Los Angeles Rams- 23
Philadelphia Eagles- 20

After watching the performances of the other NFC North teams in this years playoffs, I think if there is going to be an upset this week it could be Detroit. Jayden Daniels is no joke.

Still dumbfounded why you continue to say this. The Packers were beat up, lost both Doubs and Reed and still hung with your Eagles on the road.
Darnold is the reason the Vikings lost. Detroit got in his head and he was still seeing ghosts from last week.

The Rams are better than you give them credit for. IF the Eagles play like they did last week, they aren't beating Detroit and they probably won't be the Rams.

Edit: Absolutely Daniels is the real deal. He better get a touchdown on each drive because Detroit will.

The Packers were not beat up. We beat them up. There is a difference.

The way the Eagles played last week was forcing 4 turnovers and allowing 10 points total scored. If the Eagles win, the defense will be a huge determining factor, not so much the offense. It will still go, just how high a level is the question.

Detroit has like how many injured guys on defense? There is a bit of an element of surprise to the Commanders/Jayden Daniels.

Don't see anything here super crazy here.

Love injured going into game.
Watson out
Doubs out early
Reed out midgame

They were beat up and still kept it close. You can spin it however you want.

AJ injured going into game. Davonta didn't practice the Friday before due to back spasms. Jalen out for a month prior to the game. Lost our green dot LB in Nakobe Dean. How about no one is healthy in January and the better team won?

The better team did win. No doubt. But calling the NFC North frauds is ridiculous.

Who called the NFC North frauds?

From Snotbubbles in the Vikings - Ram game thread:

what we saw this weekend in 5 of 6 games is the result of parity and parity scheduling. Average teams with inflated records facing legit contenders and getting clowned.

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

OK. But why did you quote me? No one in that conversation mentioned the NFC north?

I mean, I think it’s fair to say the Vikings were a little bit of a fraud, don’t you think? I also don’t think the Packers are that great of a team yet, however, they will be in a year or two. But obviously the Lions are legit Super Bowl contenders. As an eagle fan, they scare me more than anyone else remaining in the playoffs.

That guy needs some reading comprehension. I said:

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

Operative words, "may be." If the Detroit Lions lose to the Commanders this weekend, I'll edit my post from "may be" to "is."

Update.

NFC North IS a fraud division.

Lions aren’t frauds at all. Take away 6-7 starters from any playoff team (including yours BTW) and see how they fare. Lions fully healthy were probably the best team in football. Unfortunately they ended up being the unluckiest.

2017 Eagles say hi.

I don’t recall calling the 2017 Eagles frauds.

No but they were missing a bunch of starters and won a Super Bowl.

I know but what does that even have to do with anything lol? You gave one example of a team that won with injuries. That doesn’t corroborate your statement that the Lions are “frauds”.

Not just the Lions, the entire division. The Lions are frauds for beating up on the teams in their division. If they played in the NFC East, they're the 7 seed.

 

[fred_1_15301]

ake the points

If there's an upset this week I think it's this game
The numbers and analytics say The Eagles will win
But there's a feeling in me that thinks The Rams can win this game
Or it's the chili I ate all weekend
Either way I think The Rams keep it close and if they get a fortunate bounce they can win it
That would send Matthew to Detroit in The NFC Championship Game
Great theater
So why not...

Los Angeles Rams- 23
Philadelphia Eagles- 20

After watching the performances of the other NFC North teams in this years playoffs, I think if there is going to be an upset this week it could be Detroit. Jayden Daniels is no joke.

Still dumbfounded why you continue to say this. The Packers were beat up, lost both Doubs and Reed and still hung with your Eagles on the road.
Darnold is the reason the Vikings lost. Detroit got in his head and he was still seeing ghosts from last week.

The Rams are better than you give them credit for. IF the Eagles play like they did last week, they aren't beating Detroit and they probably won't be the Rams.

Edit: Absolutely Daniels is the real deal. He better get a touchdown on each drive because Detroit will.

The Packers were not beat up. We beat them up. There is a difference.

The way the Eagles played last week was forcing 4 turnovers and allowing 10 points total scored. If the Eagles win, the defense will be a huge determining factor, not so much the offense. It will still go, just how high a level is the question.

Detroit has like how many injured guys on defense? There is a bit of an element of surprise to the Commanders/Jayden Daniels.

Don't see anything here super crazy here.

Love injured going into game.
Watson out
Doubs out early
Reed out midgame

They were beat up and still kept it close. You can spin it however you want.

AJ injured going into game. Davonta didn't practice the Friday before due to back spasms. Jalen out for a month prior to the game. Lost our green dot LB in Nakobe Dean. How about no one is healthy in January and the better team won?

The better team did win. No doubt. But calling the NFC North frauds is ridiculous.

Who called the NFC North frauds?

From Snotbubbles in the Vikings - Ram game thread:

what we saw this weekend in 5 of 6 games is the result of parity and parity scheduling. Average teams with inflated records facing legit contenders and getting clowned.

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

OK. But why did you quote me? No one in that conversation mentioned the NFC north?

I mean, I think it’s fair to say the Vikings were a little bit of a fraud, don’t you think? I also don’t think the Packers are that great of a team yet, however, they will be in a year or two. But obviously the Lions are legit Super Bowl contenders. As an eagle fan, they scare me more than anyone else remaining in the playoffs.

That guy needs some reading comprehension. I said:

The NFC North looks like it may be a fraud division.

Operative words, "may be." If the Detroit Lions lose to the Commanders this weekend, I'll edit my post from "may be" to "is."

Update.

NFC North IS a fraud division.

Lions aren’t frauds at all. Take away 6-7 starters from any playoff team (including yours BTW) and see how they fare. Lions fully healthy were probably the best team in football. Unfortunately they ended up being the unluckiest.

2017 Eagles say hi.

I don’t recall calling the 2017 Eagles frauds.

No but they were missing a bunch of starters and won a Super Bowl.

I know but what does that even have to do with anything lol? You gave one example of a team that won with injuries. That doesn’t corroborate your statement that the Lions are “frauds”.

Not just the Lions, the entire division. The Lions are frauds for beating up on the teams in their division. If they played in the NFC East, they're the 7 seed.

Whatever man

 

[Insein]

Snow has begun.

 

[Snotbubbles]

Snow has begun.

Not snowing here. I about 5 minutes from the stadium.

 

[Insein]

Snow has begun.

Not snowing here. I about 5 minutes from the stadium.

Im further west. It's coming.

 

[unckeyherb]

I’m in Delco. Not snowing yet

 

[JetMaxx]

Heaviest snow is predicted to fall during the game.

NWS hourly forecast

 

[Snotbubbles]

Let’s Go Rams!

You guys have a really strong team. I'm not so sure traveling across the country to play the Rams would be any better than heading into Philly.

It would be so much better for WAS.

 

[Snotbubbles]

Snowing here now.

 

[TheAristocrat]

Everyone else's team is a fraud except mine and the Jets. The Jets really are that inept, incompetent, and foolish but they don't hide it.