NFFC Shark Pool Home Leagues! Let's Go - Draft Boards In 1st Post (3 Viewers)

[Instinctive]

After SP UNO was kicked while down a few times today, it's worth noting the scoreboard at the conclusion of day one (as I head to bed)...

UNO: pick 4.10, four QBs thru rd 3
Dosie Dos: 3.6, zero QBs
Tres Leches: 2.5, zero QBs
D is for Donut: 3.5, zero QBs

6 pts per pass TD, -1 per int and 1 per 20 pass yds. Embrace the darkside of the Schwartz!

At 6 points per passing TD and 1 pt/20 yards passing, that actually makes the later round pocket QBs a bit more valuable, and the early round running QBs less valuable. So who are the sharks in this case?

Literally why I did not take a QB at 3.02.

When I actually ran it through...it makes the very top guy(s), Allen and Jackson basically in my projections, even more valuable. Allen isn't getting a boost because he and Burrow are gonna score about the same total TDs, but because they're gonna throw around the same AND he adds rushing TDs on top.

All that depends on how you're projecting guys, of course. But for me the scoring change appears to have done two things.

1. The elite passers who also run are even more valuable (because now every passing TD and passing yard they throw more than the average guys is worth a bigger gap)

2. Anyone who was only ranked somewhat high because of their rushing, but didn't actually throw that much, is now closer to that average pack.

So for me, it didn't really seem to increase the value of a guy like Baker Mayfield as much as it did decrease the value of a guy like Hurts.

 

[LawFitz]

After SP UNO was kicked while down a few times today, it's worth noting the scoreboard at the conclusion of day one (as I head to bed)...

UNO: pick 4.10, four QBs thru rd 3
Dosie Dos: 3.6, zero QBs
Tres Leches: 2.5, zero QBs
D is for Donut: 3.5, zero QBs

6 pts per pass TD, -1 per int and 1 per 20 pass yds. Embrace the darkside of the Schwartz!

At 6 points per passing TD and 1 pt/20 yards passing, that actually makes the later round pocket QBs a bit more valuable, and the early round running QBs less valuable. So who are the sharks in this case?

Literally why I did not take a QB at 3.02.

When I actually ran it through...it makes the very top guy(s), Allen and Jackson basically in my projections, even more valuable. Allen isn't getting a boost because he and Burrow are gonna score about the same total TDs, but because they're gonna throw around the same AND he adds rushing TDs on top.

All that depends on how you're projecting guys, of course. But for me the scoring change appears to have done two things.

1. The elite passers who also run are even more valuable (because now every passing TD and passing yard they throw more than the average guys is worth a bigger gap)

2. Anyone who was only ranked somewhat high because of their rushing, but didn't actually throw that much, is now closer to that average pack.

So for me, it didn't really seem to increase the value of a guy like Baker Mayfield as much as it did decrease the value of a guy like Hurts.

Hurts for sure takes a dip. But unless Allen levels up like Lamar did last year in terms of passing TDs, he takes a bit of a dip too. Ultimately, any QB that throws a lot of yards and TDs gets a bump relative to those who are dependant on rushing and more typically stand out in standard scoring leagues. Think Burrow, Goff. Baker was QB3 last year, ahead of Allen at QB4, to make the point further - though that particular example is ripe for regression risk IMO.

That said, if Allen suddenly bumps into the 35+ pass TD range like Lamar did last year, he'll be well worth where you took him, and that's not at all beyond the realm of reasonable probability with that guy. Just curious who he will throw to in order to make that happen. His weapons are lacking on paper, but then again, so are Lamar's.

Dak feels like a true sleeper in this format, especially if the wheels come off the D there, but I'm not one to believe that you can just throw your way around not having a running game, and right now that backfield in Dallas looks pretty sus.

 

[pinkstapler]

Lamar screams TD regression more than just about anyone in the league this upcoming season, even more than Terry.

 

[Instinctive]

After SP UNO was kicked while down a few times today, it's worth noting the scoreboard at the conclusion of day one (as I head to bed)...

UNO: pick 4.10, four QBs thru rd 3
Dosie Dos: 3.6, zero QBs
Tres Leches: 2.5, zero QBs
D is for Donut: 3.5, zero QBs

6 pts per pass TD, -1 per int and 1 per 20 pass yds. Embrace the darkside of the Schwartz!

At 6 points per passing TD and 1 pt/20 yards passing, that actually makes the later round pocket QBs a bit more valuable, and the early round running QBs less valuable. So who are the sharks in this case?

Literally why I did not take a QB at 3.02.

When I actually ran it through...it makes the very top guy(s), Allen and Jackson basically in my projections, even more valuable. Allen isn't getting a boost because he and Burrow are gonna score about the same total TDs, but because they're gonna throw around the same AND he adds rushing TDs on top.

All that depends on how you're projecting guys, of course. But for me the scoring change appears to have done two things.

1. The elite passers who also run are even more valuable (because now every passing TD and passing yard they throw more than the average guys is worth a bigger gap)

2. Anyone who was only ranked somewhat high because of their rushing, but didn't actually throw that much, is now closer to that average pack.

So for me, it didn't really seem to increase the value of a guy like Baker Mayfield as much as it did decrease the value of a guy like Hurts.

Hurts for sure takes a dip. But unless Allen levels up like Lamar did last year in terms of passing TDs, he takes a bit of a dip too. Ultimately, any QB that throws a lot of yards and TDs gets a bump relative to those who are dependant on rushing and more typically stand out in standard scoring leagues. Think Burrow, Goff. Baker was QB3 last year, ahead of Allen at QB4, to make the point further - though that particular example is ripe for regression risk IMO.

That said, if Allen suddenly bumps into the 35+ pass TD range like Lamar did last year, he'll be well worth where you took him, and that's not at all beyond the realm of reasonable probability with that guy. Just curious who he will throw to in order to make that happen. His weapons are lacking on paper, but then again, so are Lamar's.

Dak feels like a true sleeper in this format, especially if the wheels come off the D there, but I'm not one to believe that you can just throw your way around not having a running game, and right now that backfield in Dallas looks pretty sus.

FWIW, I wouldn't frame it as Allen suddenly bumping up so much as Allen returning to normal after a down year (where he weirdly got MVP lol...narrative awards!)

He has in the prior seasons thrown for 4300/29, 4300/35, 4400/36, 4500/37. Last year was super low in attempts. Maybe that holds, but I think they probably return to passing more with less luck on defense. He also had a median TD% outcome last year. I think his receiving corps as a whole is better than last year (Coleman and Kincaid should improve, Palmer has great underlying metrics) so it seems pretty reasonable to me.

When I juxtapose that with Burrow, maybe he's at a new peak but last year looks outlier-y to me. Career highs in attempts and TD%, both so high that they rarely occur multiple times in a row for a QB, as best I can tell.

Totally agree on Baker - similarly unreliable career highs on underlying metrics that I doubt sustain.

 

[Instinctive]

Lamar screams TD regression more than just about anyone in the league this upcoming season, even more than Terry.

Agreed. But he also has been high on TD% his whole career. I think he falls back to his closer to his average, which does hurt him quite a bit. I think I've got him at like 31 (10 fewer) which is meaningful. And why I don't think I'll be taking him much lol.

A key difference between Allen and Hurts/Lamar is the passing yardage expectation too. It's not just TDs here it's yards too.

 

[pinkstapler]

Lamar screams TD regression more than just about anyone in the league this upcoming season, even more than Terry.

Agreed. But he also has been high on TD% his whole career. I think he falls back to his closer to his average, which does hurt him quite a bit. I think I've got him at like 31 (10 fewer) which is meaningful. And why I don't think I'll be taking him much lol.

A key difference between Allen and Hurts/Lamar is the passing yardage expectation too. It's not just TDs here it's yards too.

Yeah I think Hurts is due positive regression as far as passing yardarge. First time he's ever been below 3k, and 800+ yards less than the past two seasons. I'm pretty much the biggest Barkley believer out there and my bank account is very happy he did what he did last season. But I don't think it's happening again though, and Hurts should return to ~3500 yards passing at least and back over 20 passing TDs.

 

[LawFitz]

with Burrow, maybe he's at a new peak but last year looks outlier-y

I can buy that Allen has a great chance to get back to 4000/35+ while keeping his gawdy rushing totals, which would put him at QB1. I can also buy that he's the most likely of the bunch this year to get to such totals.

For Burrow, in three of five seasons that he's played all the games, he finished with 4500/34+ every time, while also chipping in a small but meaningful amount of rushing points. To me, he's as safe as it comes to finish top 3-5 *IF* he stays healthy.

I'm also a big believer in Lamar. Agree with you guys that he's highly likely to regress from his ridonkulous season last year - he was robbed of MVP - but I think he's right there with Allen and Burrow in a tier of their own for this scoring system. Dude threw 4200/41 while also rushing for 900/4. He almost certainly won't repeat that, but even if he takes a 10% dip, he'd still easily finish top 3-5, and more importantly, in a significant tier above the middle pack of QB1s in this format, and way beyond the low-end QB1s.

To me these three are the most likely to finish in that uber tier of QBs this year. Health permitting for all of them, of course. After that, we have various names that could sneak into that tier with them, but each of those names has warts the three above don't IMO.

 

[Instinctive]

with Burrow, maybe he's at a new peak but last year looks outlier-y

I can buy that Allen has a great chance to get back to 4000/35+ while keeping his gawdy rushing totals, which would put him at QB1. I can also buy that he's the most likely of the bunch this year to get to such totals.

For Burrow, in three of five seasons that he's played all the games, he finished with 4500/34+ every time, while also chipping in a small but meaningful amount of rushing points. To me, he's as safe as it comes to finish top 3-5 *IF* he stays healthy.

I'm also a big believer in Lamar. Agree with you guys that he's highly likely to regress from his ridonkulous season last year - he was robbed of MVP - but I think he's right there with Allen and Burrow in a tier of their own for this scoring system. Dude threw 4200/41 while also rushing for 900/4. He almost certainly won't repeat that, but even if he takes a 10% dip, he'd still easily finish top 3-5, and more importantly, in a significant tier above the middle pack of QB1s in this format, and way beyond the low-end QB1s.

To me these three are the most likely to finish in that uber tier of QBs this year. Health permitting for all of them, of course. After that, we have various names that could sneak into that tier with them, but each of those names has warts the three above don't IMO.

I haven't actually got to Cincy yet so my only thought is 4500/35 seems fairly reasonable to me too

 

[pinkstapler]

with Burrow, maybe he's at a new peak but last year looks outlier-y

I can buy that Allen has a great chance to get back to 4000/35+ while keeping his gawdy rushing totals, which would put him at QB1. I can also buy that he's the most likely of the bunch this year to get to such totals.

For Burrow, in three of five seasons that he's played all the games, he finished with 4500/34+ every time, while also chipping in a small but meaningful amount of rushing points. To me, he's as safe as it comes to finish top 3-5 *IF* he stays healthy.

I'm also a big believer in Lamar. Agree with you guys that he's highly likely to regress from his ridonkulous season last year - he was robbed of MVP - but I think he's right there with Allen and Burrow in a tier of their own for this scoring system. Dude threw 4200/41 while also rushing for 900/4. He almost certainly won't repeat that, but even if he takes a 10% dip, he'd still easily finish top 3-5, and more importantly, in a significant tier above the middle pack of QB1s in this format, and way beyond the low-end QB1s.

To me these three are the most likely to finish in that uber tier of QBs this year. Health permitting for all of them, of course. After that, we have various names that could sneak into that tier with them, but each of those names has warts the three above don't IMO.

I haven't actually got to Cincy yet so my only thought is 4500/35 seems fairly reasonable to me too

Yeah third agree, I overlooked Burrow in our FBG #2 draft with these settings. It also helps their defense is horrendous to keep games high scoring, and their WR group is deep/talented enough to sustain through an injury to either Chase or Higgins IMO.

 

[wgoldsph]

Gotta be honest, this thread had me clenching. Burrow was my target since I read the league rules and I wasn't sure if he was going to get sniped

 

[joey]

6th round pick came and went and still no QB.

Team Late QB FTW!!!

 

[LawFitz]

6th round pick came and went and still no QB.

Team Late QB FTW!!!

Wondering when the Goff-Baker-Nix run happens. Lots of chicken being played right now!

 

[LawFitz]

Gotta be honest, this thread had me clenching. Burrow was my target since I read the league rules and I wasn't sure if he was going to get sniped

You stole him where you got him IMO. I don't think it's a coincidence that the league that played in this format last year took QBs well earlier than the three that didn't.

 

[joey]

Gotta be honest, this thread had me clenching. Burrow was my target since I read the league rules and I wasn't sure if he was going to get sniped

You stole him where you got him IMO. I don't think it's a coincidence that the league that played in this format last year took QBs well earlier than the three that didn't.

Speak for yourself.

#unoChamp

 

[joey]

6th round pick came and went and still no QB.

Team Late QB FTW!!!

Wondering when the Goff-Baker-Nix run happens. Lots of chicken being played right now!

I think there are some of us who think that tier is larger than just those 3 QBs.

 

[DA RAIDERS]

Gotta be honest, this thread had me clenching. Burrow was my target since I read the league rules and I wasn't sure if he was going to get sniped

You stole him where you got him IMO. I don't think it's a coincidence that the league that played in this format last year took QBs well earlier than the three that didn't.

Speak for yourself.

#unoChamp

Same for 2nd. Goff did me just fine last year

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

6th round pick came and went and still no QB.

Team Late QB FTW!!!

Wondering when the Goff-Baker-Nix run happens. Lots of chicken being played right now!

Round 10

 

[LawFitz]

Gotta be honest, this thread had me clenching. Burrow was my target since I read the league rules and I wasn't sure if he was going to get sniped

You stole him where you got him IMO. I don't think it's a coincidence that the league that played in this format last year took QBs well earlier than the three that didn't.

Speak for yourself.

#unoChamp

Same for 2nd. Goff did me just fine last year

You guys had Baker (QB3) and Goff (QB5), before and after whom there was a big dropoff in scoring.

Maybe you find the next guy this year with that kind of return. Or maybe it's these two again. Either way, it supports my point that a big dog QB is key, regardless of when you get him.

 

[joey]

Gotta be honest, this thread had me clenching. Burrow was my target since I read the league rules and I wasn't sure if he was going to get sniped

You stole him where you got him IMO. I don't think it's a coincidence that the league that played in this format last year took QBs well earlier than the three that didn't.

Speak for yourself.

#unoChamp

Same for 2nd. Goff did me just fine last year

You guys had Baker (QB3) and Goff (QB5), before and after whom there was a big dropoff in scoring.

But the point is: where did we draft them?

 

[TheWinz]

Will only comment on polarizing players already drafted in all 4 leagues

CMC - high 1.2, low 1.9
Davante - high 2.11, low 4.5
Irving - high 2.2, low 2.11

 

[joey]

Can’t wait til the post draft strategy/decision making conversations across all 4 leagues.

 

[wgoldsph]

Will only comment on polarizing players already drafted in all 4 leagues

CMC - high 1.2, low 1.9
Davante - high 2.11, low 4.5
Irving - high 2.2, low 2.11

So what I'm seeing is that league 4 has balls...

 

[packdog]

Gotta be honest, this thread had me clenching. Burrow was my target since I read the league rules and I wasn't sure if he was going to get sniped

he was my target too and i had hoped the other top 4 would go before him and they did. he was coming off that 2023 wrist injury last year and still balled. seems like he's finally fully over it now. his top wr is usually the top pick in fantasy and his other wr goes in rd 3 as a borderline wr1/2. his rb goes in rd 2 most often. that offense is primed to score a ton and the defense is gonna be horrid again. every single sports book has him as the leader in pass yards and pass tds. sign me up on burrow in any format

 

[wgoldsph]

Gotta be honest, this thread had me clenching. Burrow was my target since I read the league rules and I wasn't sure if he was going to get sniped

he was my target too and i had hoped the other top 4 would go before him and they did. he was coming off that 2023 wrist injury last year and still balled. seems like he's finally fully over it now. his top wr is usually the top pick in fantasy and his other wr goes in rd 3 as a borderline wr1/2. his rb goes in rd 2 most often. that offense is primed to score a ton and the defense is gonna be horrid again. every single sports book has him as the leader in pass yards and pass tds. sign me up on burrow in any format

Been nabbing him after the first qb run in a lot of best ball leagues. I'm honestly not comfortable with Daniels or Hurts, one could have a sophomore slump and the other could convert a few less goalline carries.

 

[DA RAIDERS]

Will only comment on polarizing players already drafted in all 4 leagues

CMC - high 1.2, low 1.9
Davante - high 2.11, low 4.5
Irving - high 2.2, low 2.11

So what I'm seeing is that league 4 has balls...

Deflated?

 

[greenmountaingoat]

After SP UNO was kicked while down a few times today, it's worth noting the scoreboard at the conclusion of day one (as I head to bed)...

UNO: pick 4.10, four QBs thru rd 3
Dosie Dos: 3.6, zero QBs
Tres Leches: 2.5, zero QBs
D is for Donut: 3.5, zero QBs

6 pts per pass TD, -1 per int and 1 per 20 pass yds. Embrace the darkside of the Schwartz!

At 6 points per passing TD and 1 pt/20 yards passing, that actually makes the later round pocket QBs a bit more valuable, and the early round running QBs less valuable. So who are the sharks in this case?

Literally why I did not take a QB at 3.02.

When I actually ran it through...it makes the very top guy(s), Allen and Jackson basically in my projections, even more valuable. Allen isn't getting a boost because he and Burrow are gonna score about the same total TDs, but because they're gonna throw around the same AND he adds rushing TDs on top.

All that depends on how you're projecting guys, of course. But for me the scoring change appears to have done two things.

1. The elite passers who also run are even more valuable (because now every passing TD and passing yard they throw more than the average guys is worth a bigger gap)

2. Anyone who was only ranked somewhat high because of their rushing, but didn't actually throw that much, is now closer to that average pack.

So for me, it didn't really seem to increase the value of a guy like Baker Mayfield as much as it did decrease the value of a guy like Hurts.

Hurts for sure takes a dip. But unless Allen levels up like Lamar did last year in terms of passing TDs, he takes a bit of a dip too. Ultimately, any QB that throws a lot of yards and TDs gets a bump relative to those who are dependant on rushing and more typically stand out in standard scoring leagues. Think Burrow, Goff. Baker was QB3 last year, ahead of Allen at QB4, to make the point further - though that particular example is ripe for regression risk IMO.

That said, if Allen suddenly bumps into the 35+ pass TD range like Lamar did last year, he'll be well worth where you took him, and that's not at all beyond the realm of reasonable probability with that guy. Just curious who he will throw to in order to make that happen. His weapons are lacking on paper, but then again, so are Lamar's.

Dak feels like a true sleeper in this format, especially if the wheels come off the D there, but I'm not one to believe that you can just throw your way around not having a running game, and right now that backfield in Dallas looks pretty sus.

That's what I concluded last year. Unfortunately, Evans and Dak injuries derailed what would otherwise have been a fun season.

 

[Chaka]

League Uno checking in.

How's life in steerage?

 

[joey]

League Uno checking in.

How's life in steerage?

We finished our draft already in League Uno and are waiting for waivers to run.

(Winky face implied)

 

[FarFromHome]

League Uno checking in.

How's life in steerage?

We finished our draft already in League Uno and are waiting for waivers to run.

(Winky face implied)

In fact. We have had 3 trades already. Love active owners.

 

[joey]

League Uno checking in.

How's life in steerage?

We finished our draft already in League Uno and are waiting for waivers to run.

(Winky face implied)

In fact. We have had 3 trades already. Love active owners.

That reminds me….everyone from League UNO needs to register for our mirror league where we redraft with alternate rules and bigger payouts. Of course, all this is gratis and paid for by Joe and FBG since we’re all original Super Platinum Mega Members as the OG Home League, and Joe signed us up to his special Profit Sharing Plan for being such amazing ambassadors of the new FBG Home Leagues.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

One suggestion for next year:
Regional drafts. East coast, mid-west, west coast?

It’s rough when the draft timer stops at 7 PM PT & 1/3 of the league is going ninny— meanwhile it’s still daylight for another hour+ on the west coast.

Just a thought.

 

[Chaka]

League Uno checking in

One suggestion for next year:
Regional drafts. East coast, mid-west, west coast?

It’s rough when the draft timer stops at 7 PM PT & 1/3 of the league is going ninny— meanwhile it’s still daylight for another hour+ on the west coast.

Just a thought.

Feels complicated.

Relegation/Promotion gets my vote. But, throw it out there, maybe people will like it.

 

[Scoresman]

One suggestion for next year:
Regional drafts. East coast, mid-west, west coast?

It’s rough when the draft timer stops at 7 PM PT & 1/3 of the league is going ninny— meanwhile it’s still daylight for another hour+ on the west coast.

Just a thought.

On the one hand, these drafts started Monday and are now almost done on Wednesday. So there's no real rush.

But regional drafts make the possibility of live drafts happen or other home league in person camaraderie.

Just found out that league 2 mate barackdhouse and I basically live less than a mile from each other!

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

On the one hand, these drafts started Monday and are now almost done on Wednesday. So there's no real rush

Oh for sure we’re making great time.

I’ve just noticed a trend where half the league isn’t around in the early morning & half the league isn’t around in the mid-evening. Which is tough when those drafters are intermingled in draft position.

We’ll no doubt finish in a reasonable time. It could be smoother though.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

But regional drafts make the possibility of live drafts happen or other home league in person camaraderie.

That’s a good point as well.

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

One suggestion for next year:
Regional drafts. East coast, mid-west, west coast?

It’s rough when the draft timer stops at 7 PM PT & 1/3 of the league is going ninny— meanwhile it’s still daylight for another hour+ on the west coast.

Just a thought.

Good idea but I am enjoying drafting against some of the League 2 guys on the Left coast. And while the pace is slow for me in the mornings it's moving along very quickly to be honest.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

Good idea but I am enjoying drafting against some of the League 2 guys on the Left coast. And while the pace is slow for me in the mornings it's moving along very quickly to be honest.

Likewise I’m enjoying my east coast brethren. Still, can’t blame a guy for tryna start a gang war.

West coast!

 

[wgoldsph]

We should have a super final where the leagues combine to figure out who is the best at the playoffs. Maybe the top ranked teams in each league plays in a separate playoff only league with their teams from the main league. So some teams would have copies of others players, making lineup decisions a bit spicy when you're playing your own guy.

 

[DA RAIDERS]

One super league. Top 3 from each league

 

[wgoldsph]

We should have a super final where the leagues combine to figure out who is the best at the playoffs. Maybe the top ranked teams in each league plays in a separate playoff only league with their teams from the main league. So some teams would have copies of others players, making lineup decisions a bit spicy when you're playing your own guy.

This can run congruent to the regular league playoffs.

 

[joey]

We should have a super final where the leagues combine to figure out who is the best at the playoffs. Maybe the top ranked teams in each league plays in a separate playoff only league with their teams from the main league. So some teams would have copies of others players, making lineup decisions a bit spicy when you're playing your own guy.

This is similar to what I mentioned a page or 2 ago and I LOVE it! I think we should do this even if it means a couple of us volunteering to hand score the playoff matchups.

It would be easiest if we only have to do this for the final 2 teams in each of the 4 leagues, for a total of 8 teams to hand score for the cross-league final. Then, the top scorer out of those 8 teams in week 17 are crowned the cross-league champ.

 

[joey]

I was composing the above before I saw the next 2 replies. I’m fine either way and love this idea.

 

[joey]

Somehow, someway, we must figure out how we can match up all of the leagues against each other. (Without a relegation/promotion format). Is there a way to “mathematically” figure out which league is best overall? Some of you guys play in crazy league formats. Is there such a thing?

Proof from 5 days ago that I love this idea

 

[wgoldsph]

Somehow, someway, we must figure out how we can match up all of the leagues against each other. (Without a relegation/promotion format). Is there a way to “mathematically” figure out which league is best overall? Some of you guys play in crazy league formats. Is there such a thing?

Proof from 5 days ago that I love this idea

It should be easy to just take the top two teams from each league in terms of w/l then total points, and put them into a separate playoff league. Just need to figure out if sleeper does this or if we need to do it on mffl

 

[joey]

Somehow, someway, we must figure out how we can match up all of the leagues against each other. (Without a relegation/promotion format). Is there a way to “mathematically” figure out which league is best overall? Some of you guys play in crazy league formats. Is there such a thing?

Proof from 5 days ago that I love this idea

It should be easy to just take the top two teams from each league in terms of w/l then total points, and put them into a separate playoff league. Just need to figure out if sleeper does this or if we need to do it on mffl

Sleeper does the scoring for us in each of the 4 leagues and we just keep track (here?) of the score and match up and cross-league champ, no?

 

[wgoldsph]

Somehow, someway, we must figure out how we can match up all of the leagues against each other. (Without a relegation/promotion format). Is there a way to “mathematically” figure out which league is best overall? Some of you guys play in crazy league formats. Is there such a thing?

Proof from 5 days ago that I love this idea

It should be easy to just take the top two teams from each league in terms of w/l then total points, and put them into a separate playoff league. Just need to figure out if sleeper does this or if we need to do it on mffl

Sleeper does the scoring for us in each of the 4 leagues and we just keep track (here?) of the score and match up and cross-league champ, no?

Would totally work, just need someone to be the "commissioner" of it. Preferably someone from fbg so it's impartial to all leagues.

 

[joey]

Somehow, someway, we must figure out how we can match up all of the leagues against each other. (Without a relegation/promotion format). Is there a way to “mathematically” figure out which league is best overall? Some of you guys play in crazy league formats. Is there such a thing?

Proof from 5 days ago that I love this idea

It should be easy to just take the top two teams from each league in terms of w/l then total points, and put them into a separate playoff league. Just need to figure out if sleeper does this or if we need to do it on mffl

Sleeper does the scoring for us in each of the 4 leagues and we just keep track (here?) of the score and match up and cross-league champ, no?

Would totally work, just need someone to be the "commissioner" of it. Preferably someone from fbg so it's impartial to all leagues.

If we make it super simple (e.g. highest scoring team of the final 8 teams in the 4 leagues championship games) then it’s basically done for us. We look at the final scores in each championship and “crown” the team with the highest score of those 8 teams as the SharkPool Home League Champ.

 

[wgoldsph]

Somehow, someway, we must figure out how we can match up all of the leagues against each other. (Without a relegation/promotion format). Is there a way to “mathematically” figure out which league is best overall? Some of you guys play in crazy league formats. Is there such a thing?

Proof from 5 days ago that I love this idea

It should be easy to just take the top two teams from each league in terms of w/l then total points, and put them into a separate playoff league. Just need to figure out if sleeper does this or if we need to do it on mffl

Sleeper does the scoring for us in each of the 4 leagues and we just keep track (here?) of the score and match up and cross-league champ, no?

Would totally work, just need someone to be the "commissioner" of it. Preferably someone from fbg so it's impartial to all leagues.

If we make it super simple (e.g. highest scoring team of the final 8 teams in the 4 leagues championship games) then it’s basically done for us. We look at the final scores in each championship and “crown” the team with the highest score of those 8 teams as the SharkPool Home League Champ.

We could also just do total points across the playoffs for those teams, take out any randomness for the ultimate playoffs

 

[joey]

Somehow, someway, we must figure out how we can match up all of the leagues against each other. (Without a relegation/promotion format). Is there a way to “mathematically” figure out which league is best overall? Some of you guys play in crazy league formats. Is there such a thing?

Proof from 5 days ago that I love this idea

It should be easy to just take the top two teams from each league in terms of w/l then total points, and put them into a separate playoff league. Just need to figure out if sleeper does this or if we need to do it on mffl

Sleeper does the scoring for us in each of the 4 leagues and we just keep track (here?) of the score and match up and cross-league champ, no?

Would totally work, just need someone to be the "commissioner" of it. Preferably someone from fbg so it's impartial to all leagues.

If we make it super simple (e.g. highest scoring team of the final 8 teams in the 4 leagues championship games) then it’s basically done for us. We look at the final scores in each championship and “crown” the team with the highest score of those 8 teams as the SharkPool Home League Champ.

We could also just do total points across the playoffs for those teams, take out any randomness for the ultimate playoffs

Love it. But each league gets 6 teams in the playoffs. Do we do total points for all 24 teams across the 3 weeks of the fantasy playoffs?

 

[wgoldsph]

Somehow, someway, we must figure out how we can match up all of the leagues against each other. (Without a relegation/promotion format). Is there a way to “mathematically” figure out which league is best overall? Some of you guys play in crazy league formats. Is there such a thing?

Proof from 5 days ago that I love this idea

It should be easy to just take the top two teams from each league in terms of w/l then total points, and put them into a separate playoff league. Just need to figure out if sleeper does this or if we need to do it on mffl

Sleeper does the scoring for us in each of the 4 leagues and we just keep track (here?) of the score and match up and cross-league champ, no?

Would totally work, just need someone to be the "commissioner" of it. Preferably someone from fbg so it's impartial to all leagues.

If we make it super simple (e.g. highest scoring team of the final 8 teams in the 4 leagues championship games) then it’s basically done for us. We look at the final scores in each championship and “crown” the team with the highest score of those 8 teams as the SharkPool Home League Champ.

We could also just do total points across the playoffs for those teams, take out any randomness for the ultimate playoffs

Love it. But each league gets 6 teams in the playoffs. Do we do total points for all 24 teams across the 3 weeks of the fantasy playoffs?

The "super playoffs" would be for just the top 2 of each individual league based on w/l record and then total points, regardless of league divisions and what not. Gives the team that was stuck in a division with the no1 overall team a chance at making it to the interleauge playoffs even if they don't get a bye in their league.