What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

NFL Comeback Player of the Year (1 Viewer)

Who deserves it more?

  • Peyton Manning

    Votes: 50 48.1%
  • Adrian Peterson

    Votes: 54 51.9%

  • Total voters
    104

[icon]

Insoxicated
So who do you think should take it down?

ADP flirting with 2000 yards less than 1 year after completely smoking his knee

Peyton on pace to approach career highs in several categories after missing a year due to serious neck condition

:popcorn:

 
ADP played in 3/4 of the season in 2011 with great numbers so he is really not coming back.

MVP is more fitting this season.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
ADP. having a career season after that kind of knee injury. freaking amazing! Peyton is impressive as well. But ADP.

 
Peyton Manning has the best chance

But if ADP gets the rushing record or close to it he'll win it

Thomas Davis would win it in any other year

 
ADP deserves it but this thing will be given to Peyton.

Speaking of guys who have no shot at consideration, Danario Alexander's ascent to elite WR is amazing.

 
So the Comeback Player of the Year can now go to players who miss 4 or so games? :confused:

AP shouldn't even be on the ballot for Comeback Player.

 
So the Comeback Player of the Year can now go to players who miss 4 or so games? :confused: AP shouldn't even be on the ballot for Comeback Player.
Why does a player need to miss a significant amount of games to be a comeback player? So you would have been more impressed with AD getting injured in week 3 of last year, missing more games and having more time to recover before coming back this year? Then he would be eligible for the comeback player. Make sense. :unsure:
 
So the Comeback Player of the Year can now go to players who miss 4 or so games? :confused: AP shouldn't even be on the ballot for Comeback Player.
Why does a player need to miss a significant amount of games to be a comeback player? So you would have been more impressed with AD getting injured in week 3 of last year, missing more games and having more time to recover before coming back this year? Then he would be eligible for the comeback player. Make sense. :unsure:
Technically ADP is not really coming back since he played almost all of last season. If ADP miss the last 3 games with an ankle sprain would he be the comeback player of the year?Forget about the comeback award. ADP is going to win the MVP Award.
 
It doesn't mean coming back from an injury after missing time. It can be a comeback after having a down year. Hell, players have won it for breaking out after a season or two of disappointing (which I think is dumb, but whatever).

 
Manning missed a full season. Peterson missed what? one game in 2011?

Should be cut and dry. Manning wins this.

 
both are amazing, but I give the nod to Peyton since he missed the entire season last year and switched teams in the process.

 
So the Comeback Player of the Year can now go to players who miss 4 or so games? :confused: AP shouldn't even be on the ballot for Comeback Player.
Why does a player need to miss a significant amount of games to be a comeback player? So you would have been more impressed with AD getting injured in week 3 of last year, missing more games and having more time to recover before coming back this year? Then he would be eligible for the comeback player. Make sense. :unsure:
Technically ADP is not really coming back since he played almost all of last season. If ADP miss the last 3 games with an ankle sprain would he be the comeback player of the year?Forget about the comeback award. ADP is going to win the MVP Award.
Even if AP breaks the rushing record he will not win the MVP award. I don't think any player from any non-playoff team should ever win the MVP, because clearly whatever they are doing is not good enough to make the team a winner. People may complain about it being the MVQB nowadays but I see good reason for that. The game is so immensely complex and the QB is responsible for so much of it that it really takes someone playing a skill position incredibly well (and for that team to be winning because of it) for them to warrant consideration over even an above average QB. Someone like Rodgers, even this year, with what he does on every single play is just incredible. The amount of information he processes is amazing and then to be able to make an athletic play based on that information is even better. Rodgers or Brady have my vote for MVP, hands-down.
 
The player named Comeback Player of the Year shows perseverance in overcoming adversity, in the form of not being in the NFL the previous year, a severe injury, or simply poor performance.
The number of games Peterson missed last year irrelevant. Not being in the NFL the prior year is only 1 of 3 possible things to make you eligible. A severe injury, which he had, is one of the potential qualifiers.
 
both are amazing, but I give the nod to Peyton since he missed the entire season last year and switched teams in the process.
After further thought I'd give Manning the "comeback" award for that reason..Ap Should get MVP regardless if the team makes the playoffs or not.

He is returning for ACL surgery, threatening the 2000 yard mark, all while playing with one of the worst starting QB in the NFL right now.

Vikings would be lucky to have 3 wins without AP.. IMO, THAT is the definition of MVP.

The Broncos won in the playoffs last year with Tim Tebow at QB. :mellow: So, although Manning is having a great year, the Broncos were already a pretty good team.

 
both are amazing, but I give the nod to Peyton since he missed the entire season last year and switched teams in the process.
After further thought I'd give Manning the "comeback" award for that reason..Ap Should get MVP regardless if the team makes the playoffs or not.

He is returning for ACL surgery, threatening the 2000 yard mark, all while playing with one of the worst starting QB in the NFL right now.

Vikings would be lucky to have 3 wins without AP.. IMO, THAT is the definition of MVP.

The Broncos won in the playoffs last year with Tim Tebow at QB. :mellow: So, although Manning is having a great year, the Broncos were already a pretty good team.
:goodposting: works for me.
 
'Aaron Rudnicki said:
I don't think AP wins the MVP award over Peyton or Brady if the Vikings don't even make the playoffs.
I think Denver would still be in the playoffs, with or without Manning.. They were there last year with Tebow and their division still stinks.Patriots.. hmmm I could see the argument for Brady as the Patriots wouldn't be very good without him.. Then again, look at their division.Vikings without Peterson, in this division?? 3 wins, if they were lucky.. If he hits the 2,000 yard mark, I'm Not sure what else a player has to do to be worthy of the MVP :shrug:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Aaron Rudnicki said:
I don't think AP wins the MVP award over Peyton or Brady if the Vikings don't even make the playoffs.
I think Denver would still be in the playoffs, with or without Manning.. They were there last year with Tebow and their division still stinks.Patriots.. hmmm I could see the argument for Brady as the Patriots wouldn't be very good without him.. Then again, look at their division.Vikings without Peterson, in this division?? 3 wins, if they were lucky.. If he hits the 2,000 yard mark, I'm Not sure what else a player has to do to be worthy of the MVP :shrug:
how valuable can a player truly be if the team doesn't make the playoffs? They could miss the playoffs without him.I think many voters won't vote for a player on a non-playoff team as a matter of principle.BTW, Percy Harvin was getting MVP consideration only a month or so ago.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Four surgeries, misses a whole year, comes back and wins the division. Peyton absolutely wins this and should. Peterson is a better candidate for MVP of the league. Without him the Vikings don't win more than two games.

 
'FreeBaGeL said:
The player named Comeback Player of the Year shows perseverance in overcoming adversity, in the form of not being in the NFL the previous year, a severe injury, or simply poor performance.
The number of games Peterson missed last year irrelevant. Not being in the NFL the prior year is only 1 of 3 possible things to make you eligible. A severe injury, which he had, is one of the potential qualifiers.
Is is relevant to a number of us :shrug: We are choosing who we think should win it. For us Peterson not missing a substantial amount of time is important.
 
I'm giving it to Peterson. I don't care who missed more time. Heck, I think that should make Peterson's that much more impressive. We've seen what happens after ACL injuries and the fact this guy isn't even a year removed from an injury that people usually take 1+ years to recover is worthy of my useless vote. Peyton is impressive but that team won that division last year. And fair or not, nobody really knows what was wrong with Peyton. His recovery was kept hush-hush so for me, it is hard to know what he had to go through. We've seen the grueling rehab it takes for an ACL. I know Peyton went and worked out at Duke but when waiting for his nerves to regrow, I just think of him sitting around watching TV. Is there anything you can do to actually regrow nerves?

 
'Aaron Rudnicki said:
I don't think AP wins the MVP award over Peyton or Brady if the Vikings don't even make the playoffs.
I think Denver would still be in the playoffs, with or without Manning.. They were there last year with Tebow and their division still stinks.Patriots.. hmmm I could see the argument for Brady as the Patriots wouldn't be very good without him.. Then again, look at their division.

Vikings without Peterson, in this division??

3 wins, if they were lucky.. If he hits the 2,000 yard mark, I'm Not sure what else a player has to do to be worthy of the MVP :shrug:
lol...no.Matt freakin Cassel won 11 games with the Pats. Did you forget that?

 
'Aaron Rudnicki said:
I don't think AP wins the MVP award over Peyton or Brady if the Vikings don't even make the playoffs.
I think Denver would still be in the playoffs, with or without Manning.. They were there last year with Tebow and their division still stinks.Patriots.. hmmm I could see the argument for Brady as the Patriots wouldn't be very good without him.. Then again, look at their division.Vikings without Peterson, in this division?? 3 wins, if they were lucky.. If he hits the 2,000 yard mark, I'm Not sure what else a player has to do to be worthy of the MVP :shrug:
how valuable can a player truly be if the team doesn't make the playoffs? They could miss the playoffs without him.I think many voters won't vote for a player on a non-playoff team as a matter of principle.BTW, Percy Harvin was getting MVP consideration only a month or so ago.
Too bad Harvin got hurt...it would be funny seeing people trying to argue for co-MVPs on the same team which didn't make the playoffs :lmao:
 
I just think back to what Manning is all about... His brain, while he needs to be able to get out there and make the throws at the same time he has always been about being a field general and basically controlling his team Madden style and getting mis-matches and what not.

AP on the other hand is all about his body, how he can cut, the power he can put into a hit, and the speed he has to break a run.

I find it much more fitting that AP gets the comeback because he suffered an injury that does hamper a player for about 1+ year. Not only did he come back but he has a shot at breaking the rushing record.

With 3 weeks left still time will tell where the numbers end up at the end of the year.... Does Manning go off the next couple weeks? Does AP carry his team to the playoffs or break the rushing record?

I like AP at this point still but who knows what the next 3 weeks will bring, also alot of people make a great point that Tebow and company won the west last year so is what Manning doing so great? Or is it more in line with what a good QB would do? On the other hand only one of the best RBs even could do what AP does knowing how bad the passing offense is.

 
IMO, it's Manning. A lot of people thought he would never play again. We knew ADP would be back this year, he just exceeded our expectations. Add in that Peyton went through four surgeries, while ADP had what has become a pretty commonplace ACL repair.

 
IMO, it's Manning. A lot of people thought he would never play again. We knew ADP would be back this year, he just exceeded our expectations. Add in that Peyton went through four surgeries, while ADP had what has become a pretty commonplace ACL repair.
Who thought he would never play again? http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/11178865-419/doctors-peyton-mannings-neck-may-be-stronger.html
Fans hear the words “neck fusion” and wonder why Peyton Manning is even considering playing again, fearful he’ll risk a career-ending injury — or worse — the next time he takes a hit.But safety isn’t Manning’s issue, several spine specialists said. Arm strength is.
I don't think people really knew what was wrong with Peyton and that is what scares them. Sure, it wasn't a given he'd return but many doctors said it was more about arm strength and regaining nerves. The nerves didn't appear to have anything to do with Peyton while he does get credit for getting his arm strength back. But I look at Comeback POY as someone who works his butt off to come back from an injury and that would be AP. Sure, people come back from ACL's all the time but how many come back as strong or even stronger? How many come back 8.5 months later and can come back looking like the old AP? That is just a testament to how hard he works.
 
'Aaron Rudnicki said:
I don't think AP wins the MVP award over Peyton or Brady if the Vikings don't even make the playoffs.
I think Denver would still be in the playoffs, with or without Manning.. They were there last year with Tebow and their division still stinks.Patriots.. hmmm I could see the argument for Brady as the Patriots wouldn't be very good without him.. Then again, look at their division.Vikings without Peterson, in this division?? 3 wins, if they were lucky.. If he hits the 2,000 yard mark, I'm Not sure what else a player has to do to be worthy of the MVP :shrug:
how valuable can a player truly be if the team doesn't make the playoffs? They could miss the playoffs without him.I think many voters won't vote for a player on a non-playoff team as a matter of principle.BTW, Percy Harvin was getting MVP consideration only a month or so ago.
Too bad Harvin got hurt...it would be funny seeing people trying to argue for co-MVPs on the same team which didn't make the playoffs :lmao:
With Harvin they make the playoffs.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top