Andy Dufresne
Footballguy
I just think that Quinn is the much more NFL-ready QB and fits better in what appears to be shaping up as a WCO style team. I'm very wary of fast rising QBs and Russell is just the latest one of those.That, and it's boring going with the grain all the time.good work!
just wanted to know your reasoning behind the following predictions:
why Quinn and not Russell to Oakland,
They don't have any more RB's on the roster than any other team. And here's my breakdown of eachand why would Minnesota go for yet another RB, when they have 120 of them on their current roster, including Taylor with his mega contract. I understand Peterson is a very talented player, but do they really need another ( injury prone) RB?

Fason - nothing special and rumored to be a possible cut
Moore - perpetually in the doghouse, both with Tice and Childress. He's talented but just not tough enough
Taylor - I loved the CT pickup last year and he gave the Vikings everything he could. But I think a superior back like Peterson would have put up monster numbers, where Chet's were simply very good. Chet lacks the burst of an elite back. I'm playing with numbers a bit here, if you take out his 95 yarder against Seattle his YPC was only 3.7 - which isn't great. He wore down as the season went on, like any lone feature back would, so he could either USE a good #2 back, or BE a great #2 back to shoulder the load .