Badgers Fan
Footballguy
According to them he injured it early (I suspect on the 68 yard catch all tho he seemed to be favoring his leg more than his hand) and kept playing. I hope it's nothing. If anyone finds out any info, post here.
IIRC Nicks injured his hand a few plays before the 68 yard bomb. He was falling out of bounds attempting to catch one of Eli's trademark heaves and landed awkwardly. He was seen grabbing it as he ran back to the huddle.According to them he injured it early (I suspect on the 68 yard catch all tho he seemed to be favoring his leg more than his hand) and kept playing. I hope it's nothing. If anyone finds out any info, post here.
Negative x-rays = positive news
it was knee, not wrist according to that. wonder if an MRI is coming?Negative x-rays = positive news
I'll inform the Giants.He looked fine to me.
This. He seemed to be able to catch alright after the injury.It looked like he slapped his hand (palm down) really, really hard against the ground when he was falling out of bounds. Could be anything from a bad contusion to fractures.But my guess is he'll still be able to play with it just because he stayed in the game and seemed to be the only thing working for the Giants today.IIRC Nicks injured his hand a few plays before the 68 yard bomb. He was falling out of bounds attempting to catch one of Eli's trademark heaves and landed awkwardly. He was seen grabbing it as he ran back to the huddle.According to them he injured it early (I suspect on the 68 yard catch all tho he seemed to be favoring his leg more than his hand) and kept playing. I hope it's nothing. If anyone finds out any info, post here.
Once we get a second FBG opinion, he'll be good to go.I'll inform the Giants.He looked fine to me.
I'll have my son watch highlights and report back.Once we get a second FBG opinion, he'll be good to go.I'll inform the Giants.He looked fine to me.![]()
ruh rohHakeem Nicks will undergo further evaluation on his injured knee after initial X-rays came back negative on Sunday evening.HC Tom Coughlin said at his Monday press conference that Nicks is dealing with "some type of injury." An ominous sounding statement, but far from an indication Nicks' injury is serious. He does appear to be a question mark for Week 2, however, after his knee swelled up on Monday. If Nicks doesn't go against the Rams, Mario Manningham can be treated as a WR1
At this rate, I would be more worried about radiation poisoning than anything else.ruh rohHakeem Nicks will undergo further evaluation on his injured knee after initial X-rays came back negative on Sunday evening.HC Tom Coughlin said at his Monday press conference that Nicks is dealing with "some type of injury." An ominous sounding statement, but far from an indication Nicks' injury is serious. He does appear to be a question mark for Week 2, however, after his knee swelled up on Monday. If Nicks doesn't go against the Rams, Mario Manningham can be treated as a WR1
@NotoriousOHMOhm YoungmisukNicks did some light running as well. Has an extra day to recover this week
IF you have Nicks who his coach says may or may not play on Monday night and you have another player in that game to sub in, fine. If you don't have another MNF wr or flex - go get Hixon for one week of insurance
won't know until inactives come out more than likely, just like every other GTD. For monday night, you'll need either a Ram WR or Hixon/Cruz to rely on as insurance. I'd suggest the latter with StL down to CB3-5 and just signing a practice squad player to be their dimefor the record, it's a bone bruise in his knee. With an extra day of recovery, I dont think they know whether he's doubtful or questionable just yetYou guys think we will know something more definitive by Sunday morning or will this thing be a mystery up until MNF kickoff?
Didn't Arian Foster say the same thing early last week?nicks says he's gonna play now: http://twitter.com/#!/MikeGarafolo/statuses/114034871164338176
I definitely wouldn't take his word for it...if that is what you are asking. Best play here is to get insurance if possibleDidn't Arian Foster say the same thing early last week?nicks says he's gonna play now: http://twitter.com/#!/MikeGarafolo/statuses/114034871164338176
No doubt.bump manningham?
We have a thread like this every year, and what I've learned is: always believe Hicks when he says he's playingI definitely wouldn't take his word for it...if that is what you are asking. Best play here is to get insurance if possibleDidn't Arian Foster say the same thing early last week?nicks says he's gonna play now: http://twitter.com/#!/MikeGarafolo/statuses/114034871164338176
We have a thread like this every year, and what I've learned is: always believe Hicks when he says he's playingI definitely wouldn't take his word for it...if that is what you are asking. Best play here is to get insurance if possibleDidn't Arian Foster say the same thing early last week?nicks says he's gonna play now: http://twitter.com/#!/MikeGarafolo/statuses/114034871164338176![]()
oh cmon. he played most of 09 with a broken toe. played thru a sprained ankle last yr.only missed 2 games with compartment syndrome. look that one up at your own peril.'Two Deep said:He's weak. guy always has some kind of injury.
Thanks for the warning cvnpoka... I unfortunately did not head that warning and googled the wiki page :Xoh cmon. he played most of 09 with a broken toe. played thru a sprained ankle last yr.only missed 2 games with compartment syndrome. look that one up at your own peril.'Two Deep said:He's weak. guy always has some kind of injury.
no kidding. guy does get banged up alot but nobody can question his pain tolerance. surgery for compartment syndrome is extremely painful post op. i have assisted on several and i honestly thought he was done for the year. still cant believe he came back that fast.oh cmon. he played most of 09 with a broken toe. played thru a sprained ankle last yr.only missed 2 games with compartment syndrome. look that one up at your own peril.'Two Deep said:He's weak. guy always has some kind of injury.
Yes he did. The week he came back after the surgery for compartment syndrome. I don't remember his exact numbers. But it was one of his best games of the year.'BroncoFreak_2K3 said:Ddint he go off last year when something like this came up??
oh cmon. he played most of 09 with a broken toe. played thru a sprained ankle last yr.only missed 2 games with compartment syndrome. look that one up at your own peril.'Two Deep said:He's weak. guy always has some kind of injury.
It was actually Week 7 vs Dallas on MNF. 9 rec, 109 yds, 2 td's. Eerily similar in that people were afraid to start him since he was playing on MNF and they had to figure out whether to play other options instead of risking that he woudn't play. Those that benched him regretted it. The fact that he played the whole game last week with whatever injury he got makes it likely he will play Monday. If he could play then why not 8 days later after receiving treatment on the injury every day?Yes he did. The week he came back after the surgery for compartment syndrome. I don't remember his exact numbers. But it was one of his best games of the year.'BroncoFreak_2K3 said:Ddint he go off last year when something like this came up??
All tho it was three years ago and pre-major injury, Hixon performed admirably when filling in for plaxico. He looked good in the preseason, and he is definitely the "hawk" play. This is a calculated risk IMO since Nicks is a tough guy and normally plays, you'll want to wait as long as you can to try and keep this stud in your lineup. If he misses the game, Hixon will start vs a banged up secondary, and probably be good for 50-70 yards.It just figures he'd be hurt going into a Monday night game. What are owners doing? In the league I have him I could plug in Jordy Nelson, Meachem/Moore, MThomas, Burleson, or Knox ... or maybe pick up MSW/Salas or Hixon and take a chance. What stinks for that league is the ww runs tomorrow and doesn't have an open transaction period. I think I gotta go Jordy and then my Sunday if it's still up in the air just give up on Nicks this week.
The league I own Nicks in is a 16 team 30 man dynasty so there is literally nothing on the WW. I'm still not sure what I'm going to do. Probably start him despite having other good options as his upside is just too high.It just figures he'd be hurt going into a Monday night game. What are owners doing? In the league I have him I could plug in Jordy Nelson, Meachem/Moore, MThomas, Burleson, or Knox ... or maybe pick up MSW/Salas or Hixon and take a chance. What stinks for that league is the ww runs tomorrow and doesn't have an open transaction period. I think I gotta go Jordy and then my Sunday if it's still up in the air just give up on Nicks this week.
Have Nicks in 2 of the 3 leagues I play in. One I have picked up Caddy to sub for Nicks in flex but Caddy isn't going to be on WWs.The other I have Gibson. He could be on some WWs. Someone has to catch the balls in STL against a depleted NYG secondary so it's not a reach to start Gibson, MSW, or even Salas in PPR.If you don't have an open period up until first game Sunday then you're probably right in your thinking that you should use one of your alternates already on your team. However, I agree with the poster above saying he's starting Nicks if he's playing. I had him last season and learned just because he is "hurt" doesn't mean he can't and won't blow up. I start him if he's in the lineup and expect good things..this is why I think having a backup plan playing MNF is worth it so you can start him if he plays and have a backup just in case he is inactive.It just figures he'd be hurt going into a Monday night game. What are owners doing? In the league I have him I could plug in Jordy Nelson, Meachem/Moore, MThomas, Burleson, or Knox ... or maybe pick up MSW/Salas or Hixon and take a chance. What stinks for that league is the ww runs tomorrow and doesn't have an open transaction period. I think I gotta go Jordy and then my Sunday if it's still up in the air just give up on Nicks this week.
This is the dilemma. I have a good team and solid options. Part of me thinks, don't take the risk just bench him while the other half thinks that the rest of my team could carry him if he didn't perform. I just have no chance of getting a back upHave Nicks in 2 of the 3 leagues I play in. One I have picked up Caddy to sub for Nicks in flex but Caddy isn't going to be on WWs.The other I have Gibson. He could be on some WWs. Someone has to catch the balls in STL against a depleted NYG secondary so it's not a reach to start Gibson, MSW, or even Salas in PPR.If you don't have an open period up until first game Sunday then you're probably right in your thinking that you should use one of your alternates already on your team. However, I agree with the poster above saying he's starting Nicks if he's playing. I had him last season and learned just because he is "hurt" doesn't mean he can't and won't blow up. I start him if he's in the lineup and expect good things..this is why I think having a backup plan playing MNF is worth it so you can start him if he plays and have a backup just in case he is inactive.It just figures he'd be hurt going into a Monday night game. What are owners doing? In the league I have him I could plug in Jordy Nelson, Meachem/Moore, MThomas, Burleson, or Knox ... or maybe pick up MSW/Salas or Hixon and take a chance. What stinks for that league is the ww runs tomorrow and doesn't have an open transaction period. I think I gotta go Jordy and then my Sunday if it's still up in the air just give up on Nicks this week.
I'm considering Stokley, Jake Ballard, and Billy Bajema right now...not sure if I'll do it. just under considerationThis is the dilemma. I have a good team and solid options. Part of me thinks, don't take the risk just bench him while the other half thinks that the rest of my team could carry him if he didn't perform. I just have no chance of getting a back upHave Nicks in 2 of the 3 leagues I play in. One I have picked up Caddy to sub for Nicks in flex but Caddy isn't going to be on WWs.The other I have Gibson. He could be on some WWs. Someone has to catch the balls in STL against a depleted NYG secondary so it's not a reach to start Gibson, MSW, or even Salas in PPR.If you don't have an open period up until first game Sunday then you're probably right in your thinking that you should use one of your alternates already on your team. However, I agree with the poster above saying he's starting Nicks if he's playing. I had him last season and learned just because he is "hurt" doesn't mean he can't and won't blow up. I start him if he's in the lineup and expect good things..this is why I think having a backup plan playing MNF is worth it so you can start him if he plays and have a backup just in case he is inactive.It just figures he'd be hurt going into a Monday night game. What are owners doing? In the league I have him I could plug in Jordy Nelson, Meachem/Moore, MThomas, Burleson, or Knox ... or maybe pick up MSW/Salas or Hixon and take a chance. What stinks for that league is the ww runs tomorrow and doesn't have an open transaction period. I think I gotta go Jordy and then my Sunday if it's still up in the air just give up on Nicks this week.
Guys, he's gonna play.This is the dilemma. I have a good team and solid options. Part of me thinks, don't take the risk just bench him while the other half thinks that the rest of my team could carry him if he didn't perform. I just have no chance of getting a back upHave Nicks in 2 of the 3 leagues I play in. One I have picked up Caddy to sub for Nicks in flex but Caddy isn't going to be on WWs.The other I have Gibson. He could be on some WWs. Someone has to catch the balls in STL against a depleted NYG secondary so it's not a reach to start Gibson, MSW, or even Salas in PPR.If you don't have an open period up until first game Sunday then you're probably right in your thinking that you should use one of your alternates already on your team. However, I agree with the poster above saying he's starting Nicks if he's playing. I had him last season and learned just because he is "hurt" doesn't mean he can't and won't blow up. I start him if he's in the lineup and expect good things..this is why I think having a backup plan playing MNF is worth it so you can start him if he plays and have a backup just in case he is inactive.It just figures he'd be hurt going into a Monday night game. What are owners doing? In the league I have him I could plug in Jordy Nelson, Meachem/Moore, MThomas, Burleson, or Knox ... or maybe pick up MSW/Salas or Hixon and take a chance. What stinks for that league is the ww runs tomorrow and doesn't have an open transaction period. I think I gotta go Jordy and then my Sunday if it's still up in the air just give up on Nicks this week.
I think he will too.Guys, he's gonna play.
ur gut is wrongMy gut tells me this kid is soft. Always seems nicked up, no pun intented.
Added Salas but not because I'm worried about Nicks... I do now have a contingency plan though.We have a thread like this every year, and what I've learned is: always believe Hicks when he says he's playingI definitely wouldn't take his word for it...if that is what you are asking. Best play here is to get insurance if possibleDidn't Arian Foster say the same thing early last week?nicks says he's gonna play now: http://twitter.com/#!/MikeGarafolo/statuses/114034871164338176![]()
I'm making no contingency plans either. Nicks or a zero.
ur gut is wrongMy gut tells me this kid is soft. Always seems nicked up, no pun intented.