SeniorVBDStudent
Footballguy
David, I just noticed you have Colston in the wide receiver projections this week. Didn't look for other errors, but am guessing there are other issues....
PM would have been a better play hereDavid, I just noticed you have Colston in the wide receiver projections this week. Didn't look for other errors, but am guessing there are other issues....
True; but I'm lazy. Thanks for the feedback. Mods feel free to delete.PM would have been a better play hereDavid, I just noticed you have Colston in the wide receiver projections this week. Didn't look for other errors, but am guessing there are other issues....
Why?PM would have been a better play hereDavid, I just noticed you have Colston in the wide receiver projections this week. Didn't look for other errors, but am guessing there are other issues....
lol. I guess it depends on whether you're trying to help the man out--or call the man out.Why?PM would have been a better play hereDavid, I just noticed you have Colston in the wide receiver projections this week. Didn't look for other errors, but am guessing there are other issues....
lol. I guess it depends on whether you're trying to help the man out--or call the man out.Why?PM would have been a better play hereDavid, I just noticed you have Colston in the wide receiver projections this week. Didn't look for other errors, but am guessing there are other issues....
Doesn't have anything to do with the man IMO. Pointing it out so your FBG brethren knows there might be errors on it this week is a good thing. I don't think this reflects poorly on DD at all. Honestly, I am surprised it doesn't happen more frequently.lol. I guess it depends on whether you're trying to help the man out--or call the man out.Why?PM would have been a better play hereDavid, I just noticed you have Colston in the wide receiver projections this week. Didn't look for other errors, but am guessing there are other issues....
The concept of Tight Ends being used in the passing game must be taught in FF 201.How is Orton #5 QB and the top CHI WR is Hester at #34? Dump offs to Forte for 200 yards?
also the concept of having multiple craptastic receivers any of which may be on the receiving end.The concept of Tight Ends being used in the passing game must be taught in FF 201.How is Orton #5 QB and the top CHI WR is Hester at #34? Dump offs to Forte for 200 yards?
What you are missing is they are calling me out for not sending a PM. Truth is, I'm PM impaired. I don't send them. I'm used to posting, so I post an issue I see.It's not like I called him out by pointing out an obvious issue with the subscriber area projections.Doesn't have anything to do with the man IMO. Pointing it out so your FBG brethren knows there might be errors on it this week is a good thing. I don't think this reflects poorly on DD at all. Honestly, I am surprised it doesn't happen more frequently.lol. I guess it depends on whether you're trying to help the man out--or call the man out.Why?PM would have been a better play hereDavid, I just noticed you have Colston in the wide receiver projections this week. Didn't look for other errors, but am guessing there are other issues....
2 Chicago TEs in the top-10.The concept of Tight Ends being used in the passing game must be taught in FF 201.How is Orton #5 QB and the top CHI WR is Hester at #34? Dump offs to Forte for 200 yards?
Since there aren't free projections, this is exactly what you did.SeniorVBDStudent said:What you are missing is they are calling me out for not sending a PM. Truth is, I'm PM impaired. I don't send them. I'm used to posting, so I post an issue I see.It's not like I called him out by pointing out an obvious issue with the subscriber area projections.831hoops said:Doesn't have anything to do with the man IMO. Pointing it out so your FBG brethren knows there might be errors on it this week is a good thing. I don't think this reflects poorly on DD at all. Honestly, I am surprised it doesn't happen more frequently.glumpy said:lol. I guess it depends on whether you're trying to help the man out--or call the man out.831hoops said:Why?PM would have been a better play hereDavid, I just noticed you have Colston in the wide receiver projections this week. Didn't look for other errors, but am guessing there are other issues....