This late into the season, there aren't many opportunities to find a Peyton Hillis on the Waiver Wire. You're not going to get a guy come out of no where and turn into a star, unless something changes in their respective circumstance. This "change" is usually opportunity. For instance, Harry Douglas for the Falcons has been getting plenty of opportunity for the entire year. He hasn't done much with it. The chance that he all of a sudden turns into a stud is close to nil. Why would he? He hasn't yet so what is going to change? So, the idea is to look at a situation where something has changed and an opportunity has been created.
Now an opportunity is not just playing time. It is targets along with playing time. And perhaps the most important aspect of playing time/chances, is situation. If a new guy all of a sudden gets a lot of carries/targets and playing time on the Seahawks, that's ok, but not great. If that same player gets the exact same carries/targets and playing time on the colts, if they are a receiver, or the Jets if they are a RB, then that is worth a lot more. The best example of this is Jacob Tamme. When Clark went down, he got a chance at a bunch of targets and playing time, but his situation was the best you could get, a TE on the Colts. That's why i picked him up on every team, the opportunity was perfect for performance. Now he is a stud TE and may lead my team to a championship since it was my weakest position with that scrub Celek.
Basically, the long winded dialog above is not intended to preach, but to point out that i think another absolutely HUGE opportunity for a WR has been created. Not only will this WR who is probably sitting on the WW right now get a lot more playing time/targets, but they are in one of the best if not the best situation in the league! The Giants passing attack is one of the best in the NFL. They have lost their 2 star WRs in Hicks and Steve Smith for who knows how long, and perhaps the rest of the year.
A stud will be born! Who is that stud going to be?
Manningham is #1 but he is probably gone from the WW. Calhoun, Hagan, Reynaud and now Clayton are next in line. Who are you taking? I'm taking Hagan and have him on all my teams. I think that this is the biggest opportunity right now in fantasy football.
edit: Devin Thomas added, other added --both late, after 30 or so votes.
Now an opportunity is not just playing time. It is targets along with playing time. And perhaps the most important aspect of playing time/chances, is situation. If a new guy all of a sudden gets a lot of carries/targets and playing time on the Seahawks, that's ok, but not great. If that same player gets the exact same carries/targets and playing time on the colts, if they are a receiver, or the Jets if they are a RB, then that is worth a lot more. The best example of this is Jacob Tamme. When Clark went down, he got a chance at a bunch of targets and playing time, but his situation was the best you could get, a TE on the Colts. That's why i picked him up on every team, the opportunity was perfect for performance. Now he is a stud TE and may lead my team to a championship since it was my weakest position with that scrub Celek.
Basically, the long winded dialog above is not intended to preach, but to point out that i think another absolutely HUGE opportunity for a WR has been created. Not only will this WR who is probably sitting on the WW right now get a lot more playing time/targets, but they are in one of the best if not the best situation in the league! The Giants passing attack is one of the best in the NFL. They have lost their 2 star WRs in Hicks and Steve Smith for who knows how long, and perhaps the rest of the year.
A stud will be born! Who is that stud going to be?
Manningham is #1 but he is probably gone from the WW. Calhoun, Hagan, Reynaud and now Clayton are next in line. Who are you taking? I'm taking Hagan and have him on all my teams. I think that this is the biggest opportunity right now in fantasy football.
edit: Devin Thomas added, other added --both late, after 30 or so votes.
Last edited by a moderator: