What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Obesity and Ozempic and more (2 Viewers)

It's an interesting disconnect for me as I see more people around me than ever interested in cooking.

But it also seems lots of people don't have time or desire to cook.

There are also non expensive healthy options. With a hot plate and a few pots, one can make a LOT of healthy.

Sure, Red Beans And Rice or Vegetable Stir Fry may take more work than the Big Mac. But not that much more. At some point, don't we ask whether it's really worth it?
 
Re: sugar. You'd think healthy sounding cereals like Raisin Bran and Cracklin Oat Bran would be decent but both are loaded with sugar. Might as well eat Cap'n Crunch. My wife is the cereal eater so I found some no sugar added cereal at Costco and it's actually really good, but it's $14 for a box of 2 bags. I haven't priced cereal in forever but that has to be quite a bit higher than the junk from Post and Kellogg's.
If you would be so kind as to provide the name of the cereal it would be greatly appreciated!

Interested! My wife is T2 diabetic and a cereal nut and anything I can do to help, I try.... She likes Chex and Honey Nut Cheerios...
Oof. Honey Nut Cheerios are loaded with added sugar. So are the Multi Grain Cheerios, despite the packaging make it sound like they are super-healthy.


Not sure "loaded" is the right word. Per your link, It's 150 calories and 8 grams of Sugar. That's 16% of the recommended daily allowance.

Add 85 calories for a cup of skim milk and that's breakfast for 235 calories. One can easily start from there for the day.

The important thing is objectively looking at the labels. And keeping up with the diet through the day.

That's where the free apps are so useful.

Set a goal and keep up with what you eat and go from there.

And soon you know the information for the foods you regularly eat and it's way less work.
 
235 calories for Multi Grain Cheerios and milk vs McDonalds Bacon Egg and Cheest (460 calories) + Hash Browns (140 Calories) plus coffee with 2 packets of sugar (32 calories) and you're at 632 for breakfast.
 
Re: sugar. You'd think healthy sounding cereals like Raisin Bran and Cracklin Oat Bran would be decent but both are loaded with sugar. Might as well eat Cap'n Crunch. My wife is the cereal eater so I found some no sugar added cereal at Costco and it's actually really good, but it's $14 for a box of 2 bags. I haven't priced cereal in forever but that has to be quite a bit higher than the junk from Post and Kellogg's.
If you would be so kind as to provide the name of the cereal it would be greatly appreciated!

Interested! My wife is T2 diabetic and a cereal nut and anything I can do to help, I try.... She likes Chex and Honey Nut Cheerios...
Oof. Honey Nut Cheerios are loaded with added sugar. So are the Multi Grain Cheerios, despite the packaging make it sound like they are super-healthy.


Not sure "loaded" is the right word. Per your link, It's 150 calories and 8 grams of Sugar. That's 16% of the recommended daily allowance.

Add 85 calories for a cup of skim milk and that's breakfast for 235 calories. One can easily start from there for the day.

The important thing is objectively looking at the labels. And keeping up with the diet through the day.

That's where the free apps are so useful.

Set a goal and keep up with what you eat and go from there.

And soon you know the information for the foods you regularly eat and it's way less work.
We'll have to disagree here. 8 grams of added sugar is a lot for a 1.3 cup portion size. To put it in perspective, that's just more than 20% of the added sugar you'll find in a can of Coke. Double that portion size for a meaningful bowl of cereal and you're now looking at 41% of a can of Coke.

To further put it in perspective, compare to standard Cheerios at 1 gram of added sugar.
 
Re: sugar. You'd think healthy sounding cereals like Raisin Bran and Cracklin Oat Bran would be decent but both are loaded with sugar. Might as well eat Cap'n Crunch. My wife is the cereal eater so I found some no sugar added cereal at Costco and it's actually really good, but it's $14 for a box of 2 bags. I haven't priced cereal in forever but that has to be quite a bit higher than the junk from Post and Kellogg's.
If you would be so kind as to provide the name of the cereal it would be greatly appreciated!

Interested! My wife is T2 diabetic and a cereal nut and anything I can do to help, I try.... She likes Chex and Honey Nut Cheerios...
Oof. Honey Nut Cheerios are loaded with added sugar. So are the Multi Grain Cheerios, despite the packaging make it sound like they are super-healthy.


Not sure "loaded" is the right word. Per your link, It's 150 calories and 8 grams of Sugar. That's 16% of the recommended daily allowance.

Add 85 calories for a cup of skim milk and that's breakfast for 235 calories. One can easily start from there for the day.

The important thing is objectively looking at the labels. And keeping up with the diet through the day.

That's where the free apps are so useful.

Set a goal and keep up with what you eat and go from there.

And soon you know the information for the foods you regularly eat and it's way less work.
But it's sugar added unnecessarily, well obviously for taste but that's the point. Even people think they are doing the right thing are inundated with sugar

And I doubt people are eating only 1 cup for breakfast
 
235 calories for Multi Grain Cheerios and milk vs McDonalds Bacon Egg and Cheest (460 calories) + Hash Browns (140 Calories) plus coffee with 2 packets of sugar (32 calories) and you're at 632 for breakfast.
This isn't remotely a reasonable comparison, to the point that you're purposely trying to slant it in a specific direction. Why are we only including coffee (with sugar) with the McDonald's meal and not with the sugary Cheerios? Why are you adding hash browns to one side? That 1.3 cup of cereal isn't filling anyone up, so what else should we add to that side of the comparison?

More to the point, it's the added sugar that's the nutritional problem with Multi Grain Cheerios, not the calories.
 
One thing I think we are leaving out of the discussion (and maybe rightfully so) is the number of people who just don’t care. You could make salmon and fresh vegetables cheap and they would still pick the Big Mac. Unfortunately, I think that’s a larger number than we think.

I used to work with a guy who weighed 5 bills and ate a lot of garbage all the time. He literally did not care and no arguments or assistance from me was able to change that.

ETA: I meant to include that I’m making that point in reference to our high obesity numbers. If 35% of us are obese, how many of those people even care that they are?
 
If you're looking for the perfect breakfast food it's pasture raised, organic eggs. It's about as perfect a food as you can eat. I had 4 medium boiled this morning with a little salt. Virtually all cereal is just pure crap. It's better than fast food but what isn't?
 
My on the go breakfast is

One egg McMuffin, black coffee, maybe some creamer no hash brown

Probably "healthier" than the Cheerios listed

And I'm a fat sugar addict lol
 
f you're looking for the perfect breakfast food it's pasture raised, organic eggs. It's about as perfect a food as you can eat. I had 4 medium boiled this morning with a little salt.
When I was a kid, I didn't mind cereal or frozen waffles for breakfast. These days? I need a protein fix in the mornings to feel satisfied. Eggs hit the spot.
 
Re: sugar. You'd think healthy sounding cereals like Raisin Bran and Cracklin Oat Bran would be decent but both are loaded with sugar. Might as well eat Cap'n Crunch. My wife is the cereal eater so I found some no sugar added cereal at Costco and it's actually really good, but it's $14 for a box of 2 bags. I haven't priced cereal in forever but that has to be quite a bit higher than the junk from Post and Kellogg's.
The one that blew my mind was the little Quaker Instant Oatmeal packets. They're like half sugar, half oatmeal. Eat two packets and you've basically had a candy bar.

I started buying the plain unsweetened flavor and adding my own fruit/sugar. You can make feel like you're making a dessert and still only have about half the sugar of the pre-flavored stuff.

two slices of white bread have about 1/6 the recommended amount of sugar a man should eat in a day. people are woefully ignorant on the prominence of sugar in our everyday lives.
Growing up, I thought saltines were healthy, because hey, food pyramid says so.
The one that had all those carbs is the base of it all? Yeah, those were the good old days that have since produced several disturbing/unnerving documentaries.
 
Re: sugar. You'd think healthy sounding cereals like Raisin Bran and Cracklin Oat Bran would be decent but both are loaded with sugar. Might as well eat Cap'n Crunch. My wife is the cereal eater so I found some no sugar added cereal at Costco and it's actually really good, but it's $14 for a box of 2 bags. I haven't priced cereal in forever but that has to be quite a bit higher than the junk from Post and Kellogg's.
If you would be so kind as to provide the name of the cereal it would be greatly appreciated!

Interested! My wife is T2 diabetic and a cereal nut and anything I can do to help, I try.... She likes Chex and Honey Nut Cheerios...
Oof. Honey Nut Cheerios are loaded with added sugar. So are the Multi Grain Cheerios, despite the packaging make it sound like they are super-healthy.


Not sure "loaded" is the right word. Per your link, It's 150 calories and 8 grams of Sugar. That's 16% of the recommended daily allowance.

Add 85 calories for a cup of skim milk and that's breakfast for 235 calories. One can easily start from there for the day.

The important thing is objectively looking at the labels. And keeping up with the diet through the day.

That's where the free apps are so useful.

Set a goal and keep up with what you eat and go from there.

And soon you know the information for the foods you regularly eat and it's way less work.
We'll have to disagree here. 8 grams of added sugar is a lot for a 1.3 cup portion size. To put it in perspective, that's just more than 20% of the added sugar you'll find in a can of Coke. Double that portion size for a meaningful bowl of cereal and you're now looking at 41% of a can of Coke.

To further put it in perspective, compare to standard Cheerios at 1 gram of added sugar.

:confused: It's 16% of what you can have for the day. Manage the rest of the day and you're fine.

Sure, eggs or other things are better. But 235 calories for breakfast and 16% of the sugar for the day is ok.

If we're trying to make it the perfect routine, people won't ever do that.

And the portion control comment is a great example.

1.3 cup IS a meaningful bowl of cereal. Part of the problem in our society today is people don't understand portions.

But fortunately, all that information is easily available to us on the label now.

Or maybe you do want more. Have two bowls and know that you have 570 calories accounted for and plan accordingly from there.
 
Last edited:
If you're looking for the perfect breakfast food it's pasture raised, organic eggs. It's about as perfect a food as you can eat. I had 4 medium boiled this morning with a little salt. Virtually all cereal is just pure crap. It's better than fast food but what isn't?

Yes. Super easy too. Granted, not as easy as a bowl of 235 calories from a bowl of cereal. But not much more difficult.
 
You can tie it to the social programs too. "if you want our help, he need to stay within these guidelines" and making buying processed foods significantly more expensive in that system or ban them completely.
That's part of the rub too, processed unhealthy food is dirt cheap compared to unprocessed, whole foods. Flip the script on that and I bet you see a change. And I'm not saying the growers of whole foods should get priced out, I'm fine paying for good, healthy food. I just don't want the alternative to be half price or less. Double it, triple it, slap a sin tax on it, I don't care how you package it but make it a little more painful.
I have said this or similar a few times now in this thread. That is easily part of the approach from the "macro" level. Let's face it, we are clearly fine with subsidizing things so maybe we STOP subsidizing the things producing negative outcomes and start subsidizing the things that produce positive outcomes.
 
One thing I think we are leaving out of the discussion (and maybe rightfully so) is the number of people who just don’t care. You could make salmon and fresh vegetables cheap and they would still pick the Big Mac. Unfortunately, I think that’s a larger number than we think.

That's a factor for sure. And part of the personal responsibility element.

I'm not sure how we get people to care.
 
One thing I think we are leaving out of the discussion (and maybe rightfully so) is the number of people who just don’t care. You could make salmon and fresh vegetables cheap and they would still pick the Big Mac. Unfortunately, I think that’s a larger number than we think.

That's a factor for sure. And part of the personal responsibility element.

I'm not sure how we get people to care.
$. It won’t work for everyone, but it will for many.
 
Re: sugar. You'd think healthy sounding cereals like Raisin Bran and Cracklin Oat Bran would be decent but both are loaded with sugar. Might as well eat Cap'n Crunch. My wife is the cereal eater so I found some no sugar added cereal at Costco and it's actually really good, but it's $14 for a box of 2 bags. I haven't priced cereal in forever but that has to be quite a bit higher than the junk from Post and Kellogg's.
If you would be so kind as to provide the name of the cereal it would be greatly appreciated!

Interested! My wife is T2 diabetic and a cereal nut and anything I can do to help, I try.... She likes Chex and Honey Nut Cheerios...
Oof. Honey Nut Cheerios are loaded with added sugar. So are the Multi Grain Cheerios, despite the packaging make it sound like they are super-healthy.


Not sure "loaded" is the right word. Per your link, It's 150 calories and 8 grams of Sugar. That's 16% of the recommended daily allowance.

Add 85 calories for a cup of skim milk and that's breakfast for 235 calories. One can easily start from there for the day.

The important thing is objectively looking at the labels. And keeping up with the diet through the day.

That's where the free apps are so useful.

Set a goal and keep up with what you eat and go from there.

And soon you know the information for the foods you regularly eat and it's way less work.
We'll have to disagree here. 8 grams of added sugar is a lot for a 1.3 cup portion size. To put it in perspective, that's just more than 20% of the added sugar you'll find in a can of Coke. Double that portion size for a meaningful bowl of cereal and you're now looking at 41% of a can of Coke.

To further put it in perspective, compare to standard Cheerios at 1 gram of added sugar.

:confused: It's 16% of what you can have for the day. Manage the rest of the day and you're fine.

Sure, eggs or other things are better. But 235 calories for breakfast and 16% of the sugar for the day is ok.

If we're trying to make it the perfect routine, people won't ever do that.

And the portion control comment is a great example.

1.3 cup IS a meaningful bowl of cereal. Part of the problem in our society today is people don't understand portions.

But fortunately, all that information is easily available to us on the label now.

Or maybe you do want more. Have two bowls and know that you have 570 calories accounted for and plan accordingly from there.
8 grams of sugar is almost 25% fwiw for men

36 grams is recommended
 
The Multi Grain Cheerios discussion is highlighting a good point - it's not enough to just read labels. You need to look at serving sizes and do math. Lots of labels list ridiculously small servings to hide how unhealthy they are. Cereals are among the worst offenders.

And sure, Americans should probably dial down the portions on a lot of our food, but 1 1/3 cup of cereal is not very much. However, it's almost twice as much as the 3/4 cup listed as the serving size for Honey Nut Cheerios. That has 9 grams of sugar - prorate that to 1 1/3 cup and it's 16. Prorate it to what people are actually eating and it's a bowl of candy.
 
I'd love to get rid of boxed/processed foods completely, but we know that's not going to happen. At the very least, I think it's perfectly acceptable to put qualifications on the money I provide someone in my efforts to help them out. You disagree...cool.
Obesity raises everyone's insurance premiums, how much say should you have over the dietary habits of fat guys in this here forum?

Would you like them to forward some dinner receipts, so you can sign off on them?
 
you shouldn't have more than 25-35 grams of sugar in an entire day and that's being generous. that's approximately 100-150 calories worth.
Yeah, I was trying to avoid the math, but I gather 50 g of sugar consumption is considered ok by today's government standards, which seems excessive.
 
you shouldn't have more than 25-35 grams of sugar in an entire day and that's being generous. that's approximately 100-150 calories worth.
Dang, there is more than that in a single can of coke.
yep....just go "zero sugar" right? anyone ever looked at the extra chemicals present in those drinks? who knows what's happening with those. I try not to drink that much soda, but when I do, I go with the known quantity. If you guys are really feeling up to it, go to the starbucks site and start comparing those drinks to soda and other commonly consumed "treats". Same with Dunkin'
 
If you're looking for the perfect breakfast food it's pasture raised, organic eggs. It's about as perfect a food as you can eat. I had 4 medium boiled this morning with a little salt. Virtually all cereal is just pure crap. It's better than fast food but what isn't?

Yes. Super easy too. Granted, not as easy as a bowl of 235 calories from a bowl of cereal. But not much more difficult.
I do not focus on calories but on the types and quality of food I eat. Those 235 calories from Honey Nut Cheerios or whatever contain the triple play of heart disease (sugar, seed oils, processed/enriched grains) where as pasture-raised, organic eggs are almost, if not the most nutrient dense, healthy food there is. We have been duped our entire lives regarding fats/saturated fats and dietary cholesterol being the cause of heart disease. The main culprit has been sugar this whole time. Put a grass fed steak topped with butter on one side of the table and a Dr. Pepper on the other side other table and ask the average person to point to the thing that will clog your arteries. The vast majority will point to the steak and they couldn't be more wrong.
 
you shouldn't have more than 25-35 grams of sugar in an entire day and that's being generous. that's approximately 100-150 calories worth.
Yeah, I was trying to avoid the math, but I gather 50 g of sugar consumption is considered ok by today's government standards, which seems excessive.
It's patently misleading in my opinion. Craploads of research shows us a correlation, but they only go as far as causation in their "guidelines".
 
The Multi Grain Cheerios discussion is highlighting a good point - it's not enough to just read labels. You need to look at serving sizes and do math. Lots of labels list ridiculously small servings to hide how unhealthy they are. Cereals are among the worst offenders.

And sure, Americans should probably dial down the portions on a lot of our food, but 1 1/3 cup of cereal is not very much. However, it's almost twice as much as the 3/4 cup listed as the serving size for Honey Nut Cheerios. That has 9 grams of sugar - prorate that to 1 1/3 cup and it's 16. Prorate it to what people are actually eating and it's a bowl of candy.
This.

Notice that the serving sizes for Cheerios (1.5 cups), Multi Grain Cheerios (1.3 cups), and Honey Nut Cheerios (1 cup) are all different. Why? Because the manufacturer is playing games and trying to hide how unhealthy the MG Cheerios and HN Cheerios are.
 
And yes, one should likely consume less sugar than the government suggests (where 8 grams is 16%) but I think it's important we realize how far off many people are on their diet right now.

First steps seem to be getting back to government guidelines. And then we can get better from there.
 
The Multi Grain Cheerios discussion is highlighting a good point - it's not enough to just read labels. You need to look at serving sizes and do math. Lots of labels list ridiculously small servings to hide how unhealthy they are. Cereals are among the worst offenders.

And sure, Americans should probably dial down the portions on a lot of our food, but 1 1/3 cup of cereal is not very much. However, it's almost twice as much as the 3/4 cup listed as the serving size for Honey Nut Cheerios. That has 9 grams of sugar - prorate that to 1 1/3 cup and it's 16. Prorate it to what people are actually eating and it's a bowl of candy.

But it's right there in front of you. If reading the label is too much to ask, we may indeed be doomed.

They're super clear.

I was traveling last week and picked up a protein bar. It was pretty big and the label said 170 calories.

Then I took a split second and looked at serving size and saw it was 2 servings per package.

I then had the choice to have half the bar for 170 or the whole bar for 340. I chose half.

I'm not sure how it could be more simple or transparent.
 
And yes, one should likely consume less sugar than the government suggests (where 8 grams is 16%) but I think it's important we realize how far off many people are on their diet right now.

First steps seem to be getting back to government guidelines. And then we can get better from there.
But the AHA recommends less.

The American Heart Association recommends limiting added sugars to no more than 6% of calories each day. For most American women, that’s no more than 100 calories per day, or about 6 teaspoons of sugar. For men, it’s 150 calories per day, or about 9 teaspoons. The AHA recommendations focusing on all added sugars without singling out a type such as high fructose corn syrup.



And we expect regular folks to keep track of all this

But eating less is good

Except the argument being made is sugar is added to "everything"
 
And we expect regular folks to keep track of all this

Absolutely. If we want to have a healthy diet.

It does take SOME effort.

Fortunately, free apps make it super simple and convenient. And if one cares about their health, it seems like some of the best ROI one can do.
 
The Multi Grain Cheerios discussion is highlighting a good point - it's not enough to just read labels. You need to look at serving sizes and do math. Lots of labels list ridiculously small servings to hide how unhealthy they are. Cereals are among the worst offenders.

And sure, Americans should probably dial down the portions on a lot of our food, but 1 1/3 cup of cereal is not very much. However, it's almost twice as much as the 3/4 cup listed as the serving size for Honey Nut Cheerios. That has 9 grams of sugar - prorate that to 1 1/3 cup and it's 16. Prorate it to what people are actually eating and it's a bowl of candy.

But it's right there in front of you. If reading the label is too much to ask, we may indeed be doomed.

They're super clear.

I was traveling last week and picked up a protein bar. It was pretty big and the label said 170 calories.

Then I took a split second and looked at serving size and saw it was 2 servings per package.

I then had the choice to have half the bar for 170 or the whole bar for 340. I chose half.

I'm not sure how it could be more simple or transparent.

Sure. But a 10-year-old doesn’t know how to pour out a 1 and 1/3 cup of cereal.

Well, I guess you could teach them but they’re not going to listen.
 
One thing I think we are leaving out of the discussion (and maybe rightfully so) is the number of people who just don’t care. You could make salmon and fresh vegetables cheap and they would still pick the Big Mac. Unfortunately, I think that’s a larger number than we think.

That's a factor for sure. And part of the personal responsibility element.

I'm not sure how we get people to care.
I'm sure it will be taken the wrong way and I'm not trying to be callous but this journey ain't for everybody. You're going to lose a few along the way and I'm ok with that. Some folks would rather go out stuffing hoagies & snickers down their gullet.
 
The Multi Grain Cheerios discussion is highlighting a good point - it's not enough to just read labels. You need to look at serving sizes and do math. Lots of labels list ridiculously small servings to hide how unhealthy they are. Cereals are among the worst offenders.

And sure, Americans should probably dial down the portions on a lot of our food, but 1 1/3 cup of cereal is not very much. However, it's almost twice as much as the 3/4 cup listed as the serving size for Honey Nut Cheerios. That has 9 grams of sugar - prorate that to 1 1/3 cup and it's 16. Prorate it to what people are actually eating and it's a bowl of candy.

But it's right there in front of you. If reading the label is too much to ask, we may indeed be doomed.

They're super clear.

I was traveling last week and picked up a protein bar. It was pretty big and the label said 170 calories.

Then I took a split second and looked at serving size and saw it was 2 servings per package.

I then had the choice to have half the bar for 170 or the whole bar for 340. I chose half.

I'm not sure how it could be more simple or transparent.

Sure. But a 10-year-old doesn’t know how to pour out a 1 and 1/3 cup of cereal.

Sure. There has to be some guidance there. Same with candy and soda and lots of things.
 
And yes, one should likely consume less sugar than the government suggests (where 8 grams is 16%) but I think it's important we realize how far off many people are on their diet right now.

First steps seem to be getting back to government guidelines. And then we can get better from there.
The guidelines are crap though. You have these big food conglomerates lobbying to shape these guidelines and what lies they can put on packaging.

Bottom line, if it contains added sugar, avoid it. We're all human and you're never going to be perfect but there are some easy W's to be had like avoiding soda and cereal. One great thing about cutting all added sugar out of your diet is that your palate eventually resets and food that is naturally sweet tastes like candy.
 
Some folks would rather go out stuffing hoagies & snickers down their gullet.
My parents.

My brothers and I have all talked about this. Stepdad had a heart attack. They made some moves, switched out some foods, and after like a month, the only difference is now he's taking some pills. They both eat almost no veggies, and snack right before they go to bed. Every day. Their attitude 100% is we are gonna eat what we want.

It's a weird feeling, not REALLY pushing and nagging to get them to eat right, but if they aren't committed, there's no chance they will change
 
I'm not sure how it could be more simple or transparent.

Because you already do the label-checking as a matter of course. You can't use yourself as the default person when thinking about how tackle this stuff.

I don't matter in this. Transparency is on the person presenting something or the producer.

The producer clearly puts the nutrition label on the food. (Because they're legally required to. I'm sure the companies making unhealthy food hate this law)

I'm not sure how they could be more simple or transparent.

If people don't care enough to spend two seconds reading the clear and simple label, I'm not sure what they can do.
 
We're all human and you're never going to be perfect but there are some easy W's to be had like avoiding soda and cereal.
This is great advice.

My diet isn't very good and I don't have the attention span to enter all my calories into an app, but taking a little time to go through what I eat and throw out the absolute worst offenders went a long way. Soda is pretty much guaranteed to be #1 on the list for anyone who drinks it, so much sugar and zero redeeming qualities.
 
We're all human and you're never going to be perfect but there are some easy W's to be had like avoiding soda and cereal.
This is great advice.

My diet isn't very good and I don't have the attention span to enter all my calories into an app, but taking a little time to go through what I eat and throw out the absolute worst offenders went a long way. Soda is pretty much guaranteed to be #1 on the list for anyone who drinks it, so much sugar and zero redeeming qualities.

Agreed. Cutting out soda and cereal is a simple move.

For a lot of people so is alcohol but that's probably a next level thing.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top