What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Offensive Rookie of the year...As of right now... (1 Viewer)

In the game Griffin missed the Redskins ran the exact same offensive concepts with Cousins as they have with RGIII, and they didn't miss a beat. I honestly do not believe you could say the same thing with Flynn replacing Wilson; Flynn wouldn't run the zone read and would be limited in the pistol as well.
:confused: They didn't run the exact same offensive concepts against Cleveland. They ran a ton of play-action, but it was all out of "traditional" formations. I believe they ran the pistol formation once and just did a straight handoff; no read option. What they ran against Cleveland was classic Shanahan (both Mike and Kyle). It was the stretch run plays and play action. What they run with Griffin is different.
 
In the game Griffin missed the Redskins ran the exact same offensive concepts with Cousins as they have with RGIII, and they didn't miss a beat. I honestly do not believe you could say the same thing with Flynn replacing Wilson; Flynn wouldn't run the zone read and would be limited in the pistol as well.
:confused: They didn't run the exact same offensive concepts against Cleveland. They ran a ton of play-action, but it was all out of "traditional" formations. I believe they ran the pistol formation once and just did a straight handoff; no read option. What they ran against Cleveland was classic Shanahan (both Mike and Kyle). It was the stretch run plays and play action. What they run with Griffin is different.
Regardless of who you believe should win rookie of the year, what dgreen said is correct. The offense was quite different the game Cousins started at QB for the Redskins.
 
In the game Griffin missed the Redskins ran the exact same offensive concepts with Cousins as they have with RGIII, and they didn't miss a beat. I honestly do not believe you could say the same thing with Flynn replacing Wilson; Flynn wouldn't run the zone read and would be limited in the pistol as well.
:confused: They didn't run the exact same offensive concepts against Cleveland. They ran a ton of play-action, but it was all out of "traditional" formations. I believe they ran the pistol formation once and just did a straight handoff; no read option. What they ran against Cleveland was classic Shanahan (both Mike and Kyle). It was the stretch run plays and play action. What they run with Griffin is different.
Regardless of who you believe should win rookie of the year, what dgreen said is correct. The offense was quite different the game Cousins started at QB for the Redskins.
Not according to my recollection or that of Greg Cosell. Pistol was definitely incorporated. I didn't watch that game on the coaches tape however.ETA: just rewatched it and while they didn't run as much pistol they did run the same passing game, just with Cousins under center more often in the straight I. Same quick hitting reads and routes though, and same concepts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In the game Griffin missed the Redskins ran the exact same offensive concepts with Cousins as they have with RGIII, and they didn't miss a beat. I honestly do not believe you could say the same thing with Flynn replacing Wilson; Flynn wouldn't run the zone read and would be limited in the pistol as well.
:confused: They didn't run the exact same offensive concepts against Cleveland. They ran a ton of play-action, but it was all out of "traditional" formations. I believe they ran the pistol formation once and just did a straight handoff; no read option. What they ran against Cleveland was classic Shanahan (both Mike and Kyle). It was the stretch run plays and play action. What they run with Griffin is different.
Regardless of who you believe should win rookie of the year, what dgreen said is correct. The offense was quite different the game Cousins started at QB for the Redskins.
Not according to my recollection or that of Greg Cosell. Pistol was definitely incorporated. I didn't watch that game on the coaches tape however.ETA: just rewatched it and while they didn't run as much pistol they did run the same passing game, just with Cousins under center more often in the straight I. Same quick hitting reads and routes though, and same concepts.
Only one snap in pistol for Cousins. So if you are saying passing and running the ball are the same concepts you are correct. Otherwise, it was pretty much a completely different gameplan for Cousins.
 
This is gonna be one CRAZY vote. Three incredibly deserving guys, and that's not even mentioning Morris who has 1,478 total yards and 10 TDs!
Morris has 1600 plus yards and 13 TDs, and the most rushing yards of any running back in a season in Redskins history. In any normal year he would be ROY. Now he is #4 (I rank him just ahead of Martin).But Griffin still wins it. He almost has the highest passer rating in the NFL behind only Rodgers, a former league MVP. He has 20 passing TDs, 5 INTs, 3000 plus passing yards, 800 plus rushing yards and 8 rushing TDs. And a seven game winning streak to close out the year. And I think Wilson is a star.
Why do you put Morris ahead of Martin when D-Mart has 200 more yards?
 
It's RGIII.

Led the league in yards per attempt in passing and rushing. Has that ever been done before?

4000+ yards, 27 TDS vs 7 TO's. Led all rookies in passer rating, completion percentage, fewest INTs and espn's mythical QBR. Broke the rookie QB rushing record to boot.

Oh and btw, only rookie to lead his team to a division title.

:football:

 
My link

I can see Griffin or Wilson winning because they both played fantastic, efficient football.

I can see Luck winning it because he went 1st overall

 
In the game Griffin missed the Redskins ran the exact same offensive concepts with Cousins as they have with RGIII, and they didn't miss a beat. I honestly do not believe you could say the same thing with Flynn replacing Wilson; Flynn wouldn't run the zone read and would be limited in the pistol as well.
:confused: They didn't run the exact same offensive concepts against Cleveland. They ran a ton of play-action, but it was all out of "traditional" formations. I believe they ran the pistol formation once and just did a straight handoff; no read option. What they ran against Cleveland was classic Shanahan (both Mike and Kyle). It was the stretch run plays and play action. What they run with Griffin is different.
Regardless of who you believe should win rookie of the year, what dgreen said is correct. The offense was quite different the game Cousins started at QB for the Redskins.
Not according to my recollection or that of Greg Cosell. Pistol was definitely incorporated. I didn't watch that game on the coaches tape however.ETA: just rewatched it and while they didn't run as much pistol they did run the same passing game, just with Cousins under center more often in the straight I. Same quick hitting reads and routes though, and same concepts.
Only one snap in pistol for Cousins. So if you are saying passing and running the ball are the same concepts you are correct. Otherwise, it was pretty much a completely different gameplan for Cousins.
I don't know who Greg Cosell is, but he is about as wrong as wrong can be on this subject.
 
I gotta give it to RG3, although Wilson, Luck and Morris would all be very deserving winners as well.

RG3:

-Best TD-INT ratio of the rookies QBs (20-5)

-Led the entire NFL in YPA (8.14)

-815 rushing yards and 7 rushing touchdowns (blowing Luck and Wilson away there)

 
I gotta give it to RG3, although Wilson, Luck and Morris would all be very deserving winners as well. RG3:-Best TD-INT ratio of the rookies QBs (20-5)-Led the entire NFL in YPA (8.14)-815 rushing yards and 7 rushing touchdowns (blowing Luck and Wilson away there)
What about wins? RGIII only had 8. I have heard multiple media type (that get votes) state wins as why Luck should be getting votes... yet they seem to ignore the lack of wins when it comes to RGIII.... and tend to ignore that Wilson is the total package...stats and wins.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What about wins?
Seattle 2011: 7-9Seattle 2012: 11-5improvement under Wilson: 4 winsWashington 2011: 5-11Washington 2012: 10-6improvement under Griffin: 5 winsDivision titles: Griffin 1, Wilson 0
I have no horse in this race, but you're really going to leave Luck out of that?
I certainly shouldn't have. He blows them both away.Colts 2011: 2-14Colts 2012: 11-5I don't agree with wins is the ultimate measure of Rookie of the Year. But if it is, as scientist says, then Luck is the hands-down ROY.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's RGIII.Led the league in yards per attempt in passing and rushing. Has that ever been done before?4000+ yards, 27 TDS vs 7 TO's. Led all rookies in passer rating, completion percentage, fewest INTs and espn's mythical QBR. Broke the rookie QB rushing record to boot.Oh and btw, only rookie to lead his team to a division title. :football:
Yep. And RGIII was chosen as a captain by his teammates at the bye when the team was 3-6 and then led them to a 7 game win streak. Wilson is great and came on strong in the second half of the season, but RGIII has been getting it done all season while the Redskins found their footing with an injury depleted defense and receiving corps and a sixth round rookie running back (who turned out to be a monster).
 
Seattle 2011: 7-9

Seattle 2012: 11-5

improvement under Wilson: 4 wins

Washington 2011: 5-11

Washington 2012: 10-6

improvement under Griffin: 5 wins

Division titles: Griffin 1, Wilson 0
Technically Cousins saved that Ravens game for a W and got the W in the Browns gameI still think its RG3 hands down though

 
Wins would be important if this were for MVP, but it's not; it's just for Offensive Rookie of the Year. So, wins are meaningless. What matters is what rookie was the BEST offensive player. And that answer is RG3.

 
Wins would be important if this were for MVP, but it's not; it's just for Offensive Rookie of the Year. So, wins are meaningless. What matters is what rookie was the BEST offensive player. And that answer is RG3.
Totally agree that RGIII was the best Offensive rookie player in the league the first half of the season. In the second half it's been Wilson by just about any measure. If Griffin didn't miss time and wasn't hindered these last two games I'd say he may have matched Wilson's numbers, but as it turns out he was the second most productive rookie on his own offense down the stretch.ETA: also completely agree on the wins year over year comparison. Silly exercise.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Only rookie to lead his team to a divisional title should definitely not have any weight when 2 other rookie QBs had more wins than him.

Not really Luck's fault that Houston is in his division or Wilson having San Fran. Dallas, NYG, and Philly just don't really compare to either of the aforementioned teams.

 
Robert Griffin III of the Washington Redskins won the Rookie of the Year award Saturday night at NFL Honors over the Seattle Seahawks' Russell Wilson and the Indianapolis Colts' Andrew Luck in one of the best rookie crops of players in NFL history. Running backs like Washington's Alfred Morris and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers' Doug Martin would have been in the mix to win most years."Well, it's a truly a blessing to be up here and be able to stand, first and foremost," Griffin said when accepting the award as he continues to recover from knee surgery. "It seems like league's in good hands with the young quarterbacks."Griffin was the best option because he was excellent from the very first week. Wilson ultimately wasn't a huge factor in the Seahawks' offense for the first five to six weeks of the season. RG3 also was steadier than Luck, who had a dip in play during the final stretch of the season. I made my case for Griffin back in December. Wilson's playoff excellence didn't factor into the award or he might have won.RG3 combined insane athleticism with smarts beyond his years. Like Wilson, he was such a good decision-maker. Griffin was accurate and explosive, and he avoided mistakes. He played like a veteran. Luck took more chances, showed an amazing ability to avoid pressure, and his highs arguably were higher than any other rookie. Luck was asked to do more than anyone, but ultimately he was not as consistent.It feels silly to knock any of the rookie quarterbacks because all three would have been great choices for the award. But Griffin ultimately deserved this round in their competition.
 
Congratulations to RGIII. I would have easily given it to Wilson, but they were all deserving.Using the criteria of being good for the whole season Wilson shouldn't get ROY. But if you look at how they grew, Wilson was clearly the best QB by the end of the season. A rookies QBs growth as a rookie is more important to me than how much they contributed in weeks 1-4.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Congratulations to RGIII. I would have easily given it to Wilson, but they were all deserving.Using the criteria of being good for the whole season Wilson shouldn't get ROY. But if you look at how they grew, Wilson was clearly the best QB by the end of the season. A rookies QBs growth as a rookie is more important to me than how much they contributed in weeks 1-4.
At their best, Griffin was the most dominant. I'd like to hear the voters' reasoning though.
 
Congratulations to RGIII. I would have easily given it to Wilson, but they were all deserving.Using the criteria of being good for the whole season Wilson shouldn't get ROY. But if you look at how they grew, Wilson was clearly the best QB by the end of the season. A rookies QBs growth as a rookie is more important to me than how much they contributed in weeks 1-4.
At their best, Griffin was the most dominant. I'd like to hear the voters' reasoning though.
This just isn't true; Wilson dominated better competition. Congrats to RGIII. Looks like Wilson won a consolation prize with the NFL.com ROY.
 
Congratulations to RGIII. I would have easily given it to Wilson, but they were all deserving.Using the criteria of being good for the whole season Wilson shouldn't get ROY. But if you look at how they grew, Wilson was clearly the best QB by the end of the season. A rookies QBs growth as a rookie is more important to me than how much they contributed in weeks 1-4.
At their best, Griffin was the most dominant. I'd like to hear the voters' reasoning though.
This just isn't true; Wilson dominated better competition. Congrats to RGIII. Looks like Wilson won a consolation prize with the NFL.com ROY.
I believe it is true, Seahawks fan.
 
Congratulations to RGIII. I would have easily given it to Wilson, but they were all deserving.Using the criteria of being good for the whole season Wilson shouldn't get ROY. But if you look at how they grew, Wilson was clearly the best QB by the end of the season. A rookies QBs growth as a rookie is more important to me than how much they contributed in weeks 1-4.
At their best, Griffin was the most dominant. I'd like to hear the voters' reasoning though.
This just isn't true; Wilson dominated better competition. Congrats to RGIII. Looks like Wilson won a consolation prize with the NFL.com ROY.
I believe it is true, Seahawks fan.
Nope. Again with the leaps of logic. I'm a Cowboys fan, sad to say.
 
Congratulations to RGIII. I would have easily given it to Wilson, but they were all deserving.Using the criteria of being good for the whole season Wilson shouldn't get ROY. But if you look at how they grew, Wilson was clearly the best QB by the end of the season. A rookies QBs growth as a rookie is more important to me than how much they contributed in weeks 1-4.
At their best, Griffin was the most dominant. I'd like to hear the voters' reasoning though.
This just isn't true; Wilson dominated better competition. Congrats to RGIII. Looks like Wilson won a consolation prize with the NFL.com ROY.
I believe it is true, Seahawks fan.
Curious to know if you thought Luck was good enough for a second place finish, RN.
 
Congratulations to RGIII. I would have easily given it to Wilson, but they were all deserving.Using the criteria of being good for the whole season Wilson shouldn't get ROY. But if you look at how they grew, Wilson was clearly the best QB by the end of the season. A rookies QBs growth as a rookie is more important to me than how much they contributed in weeks 1-4.
At their best, Griffin was the most dominant. I'd like to hear the voters' reasoning though.
This just isn't true; Wilson dominated better competition. Congrats to RGIII. Looks like Wilson won a consolation prize with the NFL.com ROY.
I believe it is true, Seahawks fan.
Nope. Again with the leaps of logic. I'm a Cowboys fan, sad to say.
Interesting.I see you've posted in countless Seahawks threads and one Dallas thread.
 
Congratulations to RGIII. I would have easily given it to Wilson, but they were all deserving.Using the criteria of being good for the whole season Wilson shouldn't get ROY. But if you look at how they grew, Wilson was clearly the best QB by the end of the season. A rookies QBs growth as a rookie is more important to me than how much they contributed in weeks 1-4.
At their best, Griffin was the most dominant. I'd like to hear the voters' reasoning though.
This just isn't true; Wilson dominated better competition. Congrats to RGIII. Looks like Wilson won a consolation prize with the NFL.com ROY.
I believe it is true, Seahawks fan.
Curious to know if you thought Luck was good enough for a second place finish, RN.
I'm just giving you a hard time.Honestly, these guys could have finished 1-2-3 in any order and I really wouldn't have a huge beef with it.
 
Congratulations to RGIII. I would have easily given it to Wilson, but they were all deserving.Using the criteria of being good for the whole season Wilson shouldn't get ROY. But if you look at how they grew, Wilson was clearly the best QB by the end of the season. A rookies QBs growth as a rookie is more important to me than how much they contributed in weeks 1-4.
At their best, Griffin was the most dominant. I'd like to hear the voters' reasoning though.
This just isn't true; Wilson dominated better competition. Congrats to RGIII. Looks like Wilson won a consolation prize with the NFL.com ROY.
I believe it is true, Seahawks fan.
Nope. Again with the leaps of logic. I'm a Cowboys fan, sad to say.
Interesting.I see you've posted in countless Seahawks threads and one Dallas thread.
I live near Seattle and go to their games and practices on occasion. This year I only made it to three games, one of which was the Cowboys debacle. Being a Raiders fan you, of all fan base members, should be able to empathize with a Cowboys fan. Not that I believe in Granfalloonery or suffer from homerism on any level, mind you. The Cowboys as a franchise suck, of that there is little doubt.By the bye, I also posted early in the season that Russell Wilson had little chance of outperforming Luck and that Luck was destined to be the best rookie QB ever. I was wrong.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top