'SSOG said:
'Craig_MiamiFL said:
'SSOG said:
'LargeMouthBass said:
'SSOG said:
There's a rookie QB who is 2nd in ypa, 1st in AY/A, 3rd in ANY/A, 2nd in comp%, 2nd in QB Rating, with an extra 650/6 on the ground... And some people think he's not going to win RoY?
Look, Luck this year has looked like one of the best rookie QBs of all time... But Griffin has looked like one of the best QBs of all time, regardless of experience. He's a rookie QB with a triple digit passer rating and 600 rushing yards (and counting), despite playing most of the year without his two best receivers. He's a slam dunk.
Luck will win because he is taking the worst team in the NFL the previous year to the playoffs.That's unheard of...
Unheard of? Only if you've never heard of Vince Young- he took over a team that was 4-12 the year before and 0-3 without him, and he went 8-5. Or Ben Roethlisberger- he took the reins of a 6-10 team and then went 13-0. I'll agree that luck is largely responsible for Indy's record- but I mean the lowercase L kind. Indy has played three teams that currently have a winning record- a 20 point pasting by the Bears, a 35 point pasting by the Pats, and a 3 point win against the Packers in the "Win one for Chuck" game. They lost by 5 to the woeful Jags. They lost by 26 to the woeful Jets... on the road! They beat the 6-6 Vikes by 3 at home, posted one score home wins against the Browns, Dolphins, and Bills, got taken to overtime against the Titans, and needed a miracle rally to escape Detroit with a two point win. They have one win all season long by more than one score- a 17 point win against the post-MJD Jags. They've been out scored by 41 points on the season. I say without any hint of hyperbole that they are possibly the worst 8-4 team of all time, and their record has nothing to do with the difference between Luck and Griffin's play, and everything to do with the difference between Luck and Griffin's schedule. If Washington played Indy tomorrow on a neutral field, Washington would (rightfully) be favored.
Neither VY or Big Ben were drafted #1. So they didn't go to the worst team as the OP made pretty clear.Luck will win if he takes the Colts to the playoffs. #'s show RGIII has a good argument to win, but he won't win it outright if Indy goes to the playoffs.
Cool. That's not the slightest bit an argument over semantics or anything. Luck went to the worst team, while Young went to the third worst team, and this is totally a very meaningful distinction. Meanwhile, the fact that Young played a tougher schedule or the fact that his team was 0-3 in games Young didn't start are meaningless distinctions. As for Roethlisberger... yes, he went to a better team, but the jump from 6-10 to 13-0 against a solid schedule (including becoming the first QB to beat undefeated teams in back to back weeks in week 8 or later) is far more impressive than the jump from 2-14 to 8-4 against a schedule of nobodies.
According to Football Outsiders' metrics, Indy is the 28th best team in the league this year. That's bottom 5. Their offense is ranked 16th. Washington is the 14th best team, with the 9th ranked offense. As I said, we're looking at possibly the worst 8-4 team of all time. Football Outsiders estimates that their profile is about what you'd expect from a team with 3.6 wins and 8.4 losses.
Since we are using Football outsiders metrics...This is how they have the top 5 QBR this year....
1) Brady
2) Manning
3) M. Ryan
4) Andrew Luck
5) RGIII
As was mentioned, QBR is no more a football outsiders stat than QB rating is. It says so, plain as day, on the stat page. To quote directly from the page:Total QBR (listed as just QBR) is a metric created by the ESPN Stats & Information group. Total QBR is based on the expected points added by the quarterback on each play, then adjusts the numbers to a scale of 0-100. There are five main differences between Total QBR and Football Outsiders' DVOA metric (with further explanation here):
Total QBR incorporates information from game charting, such as passes dropped or thrown away on purpose.
Total QBR splits responsibility on plays between the quarterback, his receivers, and his blockers. Drops, for example, are more on the receiver, as are yards after the catch, and some sacks are more on the offensive line than others.
Total QBR has a clutch factor which adds (or subtracts) value for quarterbacks who perform best (or worst) in high-leverage situations.
Total QBR combines passing and rushing value into one number and differentiates between scrambles and planned runs.
Total QBR is not adjusted for strength of opponent.
There are a ton of flaws with QBR, which isn't taken too seriously by the statistically-minded football community; it would take far too long to go into them now, but lets begin by looking at that last sentence. Not adjusted for strength of opponent. Which makes it a particularly bad statistic when my key point is that Luck's schedule has been Charmin-soft.
Football Outsider's proprietary statistics, DVOA and DYAR, are adjusted for strength of schedule. Robert Griffin ranks 8th in DVOA (14.2%) to Luck's 18th (-2.2%). DYAR is a counting stat instead of a rate stat, meaning players with huge attempt totals are rewarded, and Griffin still outranks Luck (10th vs. 16th), despite a paltry 60% as many attempts. Ironically, adding rushing stats actually helps Luck (largely because Griffin has 5 fumbles), but RGIII has just been far and away a better passer.
'fridayfrenzy said:
Wilson should win it, but will not because he plays on the West Coast and RG3 and Luck just have more hype surrounding them. If Wilson doesn't win, then it should be RG3. Luck is #3 on the list in my opinion.
Some quick stats about Wilson.
-Has the 2nd highest QB rating in the NFL since week 5, only behind Tom Brady
-Has not thrown an interception since the end of October
-Has a 2.38 TD to INT ratio. Luck has a 1.06 ratio.
-Is on pace to break Peyton Manning's rookie passing TD record
-First rookie to have 3 consecutive games with QB rating over 125
-Has best percentage completion by a significant margin over RG3 and Luck
Luck is playing very inefficient football and is accumulating passing yards because he is passing the ball so much. I understand that they are putting the ball in his hands, which is a testament to his skill but Luck is bottom of the league in passer rating, completion percentage and TD/INT ratio. Luck certainly has been impressive but Wilson is playing very efficiently and winning with game ending drives with the team on his shoulder.
VERY

No way he actually wins it because the media has hyped Luck/RGIII from day one and the Seahawks just don't get the national pub. Wilson should win it...but will not. When its all said and done Wilson will have more rings and a gold jacket/bust in Canton..... that will far outweigh the ROY award.
I would like to see an argument for Wilson over Griffin that doesn't involve ignoring a third of the season.