Let me get this straight. You sat McNabb against the worst defense in the league.You have alot to learn.
not much else to add hereHow about the I sat Curtis and lost because of it thread.
- Curtis was worth 57.5 in our league and as I sat there this morning I thought surely he won't be worth more than Wayne or Marshall....
I think I need Keith Bulluck to outscore Colston tomorrow night...maybe Bulluck will force 3 fumbles out of Colston so I can finally get my first win....Before anyone gives me the shirt! C'mon, give him some slack... McNabb has looked horrible the last two games -- he was immobile and couldn't hit a 10 feet target if he tried... Hasselbeck on the other hand, faced the Cincy D, who gave up 50+ points to the Brownies the week before. I don't think it was a stretch to sit McNabb.Let me get this straight. You sat McNabb against the worst defense in the league.You have alot to learn.not much else to add here
... uhhhh ... we didn't start the thread ... he didC'mon, give him some slack... McNabb has looked horrible the last two games -- he was immobile and couldn't hit a 10 feet target if he tried... Hasselbeck on the other hand, faced the Cincy D, who gave up 50+ points to the Brownies the week before. I don't think it was a stretch to sit McNabb.Let me get this straight. You sat McNabb against the worst defense in the league.You have alot to learn.not much else to add here

yeah, so what's your point?... uhhhh ... we didn't start the thread ... he didC'mon, give him some slack... McNabb has looked horrible the last two games -- he was immobile and couldn't hit a 10 feet target if he tried... Hasselbeck on the other hand, faced the Cincy D, who gave up 50+ points to the Brownies the week before. I don't think it was a stretch to sit McNabb.:( not much else to add hereLet me get this straight. You sat McNabb against the worst defense in the league.You have alot to learn.![]()
SIMPLE ENOUGH, slats ...yeah, so what's your point?... uhhhh ... we didn't start the thread ... he didC'mon, give him some slack... McNabb has looked horrible the last two games -- he was immobile and couldn't hit a 10 feet target if he tried... Hasselbeck on the other hand, faced the Cincy D, who gave up 50+ points to the Brownies the week before. I don't think it was a stretch to sit McNabb.Let me get this straight. You sat McNabb against the worst defense in the league.You have alot to learn.not much else to add here
![]()

No kiddin'. Why open this thread when there's a bragging thread as well?SIMPLE ENOUGH, slats ...yeah, so what's your point?... uhhhh ... we didn't start the thread ... he didC'mon, give him some slack... McNabb has looked horrible the last two games -- he was immobile and couldn't hit a 10 feet target if he tried... Hasselbeck on the other hand, faced the Cincy D, who gave up 50+ points to the Brownies the week before. I don't think it was a stretch to sit McNabb.Let me get this straight. You sat McNabb against the worst defense in the league.You have alot to learn.not much else to add here
![]()
![]()
![]()
nice! original! gotta love that.SIMPLE ENOUGH, slats ...yeah, so what's your point?... uhhhh ... we didn't start the thread ... he didC'mon, give him some slack... McNabb has looked horrible the last two games -- he was immobile and couldn't hit a 10 feet target if he tried... Hasselbeck on the other hand, faced the Cincy D, who gave up 50+ points to the Brownies the week before. I don't think it was a stretch to sit McNabb.Let me get this straight. You sat McNabb against the worst defense in the league.You have alot to learn.not much else to add here
![]()
![]()
![]()
In any event, those who sat McNabb for Hasselbeck lost points of course, but overall, the difference wasn't a back breaker between the two. Now if you started Bulger or the like instead of McNabb, I bet you lost.Thanks, Captain obvious!!!nice! original! gotta love that.SIMPLE ENOUGH, slats ...yeah, so what's your point?... uhhhh ... we didn't start the thread ... he didC'mon, give him some slack... McNabb has looked horrible the last two games -- he was immobile and couldn't hit a 10 feet target if he tried... Hasselbeck on the other hand, faced the Cincy D, who gave up 50+ points to the Brownies the week before. I don't think it was a stretch to sit McNabb.Let me get this straight. You sat McNabb against the worst defense in the league.You have alot to learn.not much else to add here
![]()
![]()
![]()
In any event, those who sat McNabb for Hasselbeck lost points of course, but overall, the difference wasn't a back breaker between the two. Now if you started Bulger or the like instead of McNabb, I bet you lost.
this just keeps getting better!keep it comin'!Thanks, Captain obvious!!!nice! original! gotta love that.SIMPLE ENOUGH, slats ...yeah, so what's your point?... uhhhh ... we didn't start the thread ... he didC'mon, give him some slack... McNabb has looked horrible the last two games -- he was immobile and couldn't hit a 10 feet target if he tried... Hasselbeck on the other hand, faced the Cincy D, who gave up 50+ points to the Brownies the week before. I don't think it was a stretch to sit McNabb.Let me get this straight. You sat McNabb against the worst defense in the league.You have alot to learn.not much else to add here
![]()
![]()
![]()
In any event, those who sat McNabb for Hasselbeck lost points of course, but overall, the difference wasn't a back breaker between the two. Now if you started Bulger or the like instead of McNabb, I bet you lost.
![]()
My opponent sat McNabb for Delhomme.I won by 10 points.
![]()
... and i'm sure that owner is