I also wonder (1) if he's older than 31, like others have said, and (2) wonder if the steroids era gave us all the wrong idea of what happens to sluggers in their mid-30s.
I think this is a great point and I mentioned either in this thread or the Marlins thread. I think only Hank Aaron had a season, after the age of 35, anywhere in the ballpark of Pujols-09 season. Coming of a down year and a significant injury I just don't know how it makes sense in light of what we've seen happen with AROD.
Pujols had a 150 OPS+ this past year as a career low. He has had three other OPS+ season under 160. His career high is 190 and career average is 170.As for age 36 and older seasons....Aaron was between 147 and 194 from 36-39.Ted Williams was between 179 and 208 from 36-39.Ruth was between 160 and 218 from 36-39.Yes, this deal would have scared me if my Cubs signed him. However, it would not surprise me if he was still an elite hitter through is late 30's. And unlike the players above, he will have the DH to accumulate extra at bats when his body begins to break down.If he is in fact 32 next season, the Angels could be in line for 9 elite levels seasons on a 10 year deal. The number could of course be less if he is in fact older.I am not saying the overall deal is a great thing for the Angels. But a hitter of Pujols level, and there have only been a handful of players at that level ever, shouldn't stun anybody if he was an elite hitter through this contract. At the age of 41, Ted Williams had an 190 OPS+ in 390 PA's. The .01% of hitters are on their own clock.