What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***OFFICIAL*** 2012 Washington Redskins Season Thread (3 Viewers)

ESPN 980 has an inflammatory and controversial report regarding the behavior of Redskins offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan at Sunday’s loss to the Bengals. And the Redskins have no response to that report.

According to ESPN 980, Kyle Shanahan chased down an official and said, “You have no f–king balls, you are a f–king #####.”
link
 
'ChrisCooleyFan said:
This is the worst defense ever. They cant cover cant tackle, Pathetic :thumbdown:
perhaps you misremember the late 90's Mike Nolan defense :yucky: not sure what the solution is to the defensive problems. I'm a proponent of building from the lines out -and they've done that- but the secondary issues are troubling. Talent evaluation is called into question, keeping R Dougherty and not retaining guys like Torrence & Holmes.Thank God we have a guy like Fletcher, who I expect to lead the unit to a turnaround
 
Griffin did all he could today, which was a lot. Morris was good today. Rob Jackson looked good early.
i agree.dude is incredible.loved wen they showed him on the side line, i think wen it was 24-14, right after the touchdown wen he was rallying the guys. good stuff.
 
Thank God we have a guy like Fletcher, who I expect to lead the unit to a turnaround
:eek: As in, turn around and find the receiver that's running ten yards behind them already on the way to another TD reception? Seriously, I'd like to know what you see that even HINTS at the defense turning around. They are beyond horrible.

 
Oh, and it was completely ridiculous to punt on 4th and 1 in the 4th quarter.
No kidding. They were going to trust their defense to hold the Bengals?
I think the most unexplainable play of the game is the first play of the game. The Bengals line up in the Wildcat with Dalton as a WR on the far right and A.J. Green in the slot. So the Redskins put Hall on Dalton and Gomes on Green. When is it right to cover Green one on one with a safety? The answer can't be when Green lines up in the slot.
 
While I'd like the Skins to be 3-0, I couldn't be happier with the season thus far (outside of the crappy injuries) RG3 has made watching this team fun, and they are competing in every game. Clearly the defense is what is going to kill us this year, but at least we'll have a lot of fun, high scoring games to watch! :thumbup:

 
While I'd like the Skins to be 3-0, I couldn't be happier with the season thus far (outside of the crappy injuries) RG3 has made watching this team fun, and they are competing in every game. Clearly the defense is what is going to kill us this year, but at least we'll have a lot of fun, high scoring games to watch! :thumbup:
The high scoring is fun to watch. And it is so different that the Redskin teams of the past few years.It is fun to watch RGIII run the ball and run an unconventional offense. But I do cringe everytime he gets hit. The book on Vick is to hit him hard every time he runs the ball and I am certain defenses will do this with RGIII.
 
While I'd like the Skins to be 3-0, I couldn't be happier with the season thus far (outside of the crappy injuries) RG3 has made watching this team fun, and they are competing in every game. Clearly the defense is what is going to kill us this year, but at least we'll have a lot of fun, high scoring games to watch! :thumbup:
I guess this shows you how far the skins have fallen. When watching a team with perhaps the worst defense in the league is considered fun. I guess if I turned the channel every time the other team had the ball it might be fun. Or if I was a video game addict that wanted the teams to go up and down the field scoring every possesion with little to no defensive effort. I get the hype for RGIII, I like him a lot. And the A Morris story is nice. But to enjoy watching another cellar dweller losing game after game, I don't get that at all. Like I said, I guess as a skins fan, expectations have just fallen off a cliff when this is considered a "good" or "fun" season.
 
Oh, and it was completely ridiculous to punt on 4th and 1 in the 4th quarter.
No kidding. They were going to trust their defense to hold the Bengals?
I think the most unexplainable play of the game is the first play of the game. The Bengals line up in the Wildcat with Dalton as a WR on the far right and A.J. Green in the slot. So the Redskins put Hall on Dalton and Gomes on Green. When is it right to cover Green one on one with a safety? The answer can't be when Green lines up in the slot.
yeah they were talking about this on the junkies this morningsaying how they just wernt prepared for itcomparing haslett to williams
 
Last edited by a moderator:
While I'd like the Skins to be 3-0, I couldn't be happier with the season thus far (outside of the crappy injuries) RG3 has made watching this team fun, and they are competing in every game. Clearly the defense is what is going to kill us this year, but at least we'll have a lot of fun, high scoring games to watch! :thumbup:
The high scoring is fun to watch. And it is so different that the Redskin teams of the past few years.It is fun to watch RGIII run the ball and run an unconventional offense. But I do cringe everytime he gets hit. The book on Vick is to hit him hard every time he runs the ball and I am certain defenses will do this with RGIII.
RGIII isn't going to make it through the season if they keep running that option crap. It was brutal watching the defense blow him up every time he would release the ball. I'm all for the rollouts, giving him an option to run or pass, but that option run is going to kill him. Defenders don't give a crap if the RB gains an extra 5 yards, they will take the free shot at the defenseless QB.
 
Oh, and it was completely ridiculous to punt on 4th and 1 in the 4th quarter.
No kidding. They were going to trust their defense to hold the Bengals?
I think the most unexplainable play of the game is the first play of the game. The Bengals line up in the Wildcat with Dalton as a WR on the far right and A.J. Green in the slot. So the Redskins put Hall on Dalton and Gomes on Green. When is it right to cover Green one on one with a safety? The answer can't be when Green lines up in the slot.
Jay Gruden said they saw it on film that the Redskins always would play cover 0 and crowd the safeties up against the wildcat every time and that they figured Green would be singled up just like it happened. They put the play in at Wednesday's practice (Sanu completed 18 passes including 4 TDs out of the wildcat in college and was a HS QB).It was a fun game to attend and I have to give props to the Redskin fans :thumbup: who were very enthusiastic for their team but were 100% classy and generally good-natured. I also think it's awesome that they sell krispy kreme donuts in the parking lot for $5/dozen (dunno if that happens every game).-QG
 
Oh, and it was completely ridiculous to punt on 4th and 1 in the 4th quarter.
No kidding. They were going to trust their defense to hold the Bengals?
I think the most unexplainable play of the game is the first play of the game. The Bengals line up in the Wildcat with Dalton as a WR on the far right and A.J. Green in the slot. So the Redskins put Hall on Dalton and Gomes on Green. When is it right to cover Green one on one with a safety? The answer can't be when Green lines up in the slot.
yeah they were talking about this on the junkies this morningsaying how they just wernt prepared for it
It's common practice to line up that way against a wildcat formation. It's never made much sense to me why you'd have a CB on the QB, but that's what everyone does. And, really, it's mostly harmless because teams run out of the wildcat 99.999% of the time (warning: I made up that %). It would have been nice if they could have adjusted on the fly and been more aware of Green. But, I think they lined up the way pretty much every defensive unit would have lined up.Personally, I'd pretty leave the QB uncovered against most teams. If he wants to go out wide, I'd dare them to throw him the ball. If he picks up 15 yards one play, that's fine. But, make them show they are willing to throw to the QB before dedicating resources to covering him.
 
While I'd like the Skins to be 3-0, I couldn't be happier with the season thus far (outside of the crappy injuries) RG3 has made watching this team fun, and they are competing in every game. Clearly the defense is what is going to kill us this year, but at least we'll have a lot of fun, high scoring games to watch! :thumbup:
The high scoring is fun to watch. And it is so different that the Redskin teams of the past few years.It is fun to watch RGIII run the ball and run an unconventional offense. But I do cringe everytime he gets hit. The book on Vick is to hit him hard every time he runs the ball and I am certain defenses will do this with RGIII.
That is the book on every player in the league.
 
Oh, and it was completely ridiculous to punt on 4th and 1 in the 4th quarter.
No kidding. They were going to trust their defense to hold the Bengals?
I think the most unexplainable play of the game is the first play of the game. The Bengals line up in the Wildcat with Dalton as a WR on the far right and A.J. Green in the slot. So the Redskins put Hall on Dalton and Gomes on Green. When is it right to cover Green one on one with a safety? The answer can't be when Green lines up in the slot.
yeah they were talking about this on the junkies this morningsaying how they just wernt prepared for it
It's common practice to line up that way against a wildcat formation. It's never made much sense to me why you'd have a CB on the QB, but that's what everyone does. And, really, it's mostly harmless because teams run out of the wildcat 99.999% of the time (warning: I made up that %). It would have been nice if they could have adjusted on the fly and been more aware of Green. But, I think they lined up the way pretty much every defensive unit would have lined up.Personally, I'd pretty leave the QB uncovered against most teams. If he wants to go out wide, I'd dare them to throw him the ball. If he picks up 15 yards one play, that's fine. But, make them show they are willing to throw to the QB before dedicating resources to covering him.
I think that is why teams put the safeties up and make sure it is a safety in the slot rather than a CB. Imagine Hall lined up there and it is a run play right at him. I agree that AJ should have never been left 1-1 with Gomes though.

 
While I'd like the Skins to be 3-0, I couldn't be happier with the season thus far (outside of the crappy injuries) RG3 has made watching this team fun, and they are competing in every game. Clearly the defense is what is going to kill us this year, but at least we'll have a lot of fun, high scoring games to watch! :thumbup:
The high scoring is fun to watch. And it is so different that the Redskin teams of the past few years.It is fun to watch RGIII run the ball and run an unconventional offense. But I do cringe everytime he gets hit. The book on Vick is to hit him hard every time he runs the ball and I am certain defenses will do this with RGIII.
RGIII isn't going to make it through the season if they keep running that option crap. It was brutal watching the defense blow him up every time he would release the ball. I'm all for the rollouts, giving him an option to run or pass, but that option run is going to kill him. Defenders don't give a crap if the RB gains an extra 5 yards, they will take the free shot at the defenseless QB.
I'd really like to see an injury study between "running QBs" and "pocket QBs". I'm just not buying that it's a big difference.So, of course, I'm really not a fan of reining Griffin in. Let him do what he does. I see no reason to trade up for him in the draft if you are going to then try to alter his game. It's football. People get hurt. You can't play to not get hurt...or else you'll get hurt.The conventional stuff wasn't working yesterday. The offense couldn't move the ball in the first half. The second half, they adjusted and found something that worked. They can't just say, "Well, yeah, it worked but he might get hurt so let's go back to what wasn't working."Basically, I'd rather they not play scared and just do what works best.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The conventional stuff wasn't working yesterday. The offense couldn't move the ball in the first half. The second half, they adjusted and found something that worked. They can't just say, "Well, yeah, it worked but he might get hurt so let's go back to what wasn't working."
Part of reining him in occurred when Shanahan called for the punt on 4th and 1. What a lousy decision. The Skins had the momentum and it was time to keep attacking. Instead of going for it, for the second time in 2 weeks Shanahan changed his mind after an opponents time out and decided not to attack.
 
That’s why it’s difficult to lay the blame on any one particular coach. Meltdowns like this are a collective effort. Don’t read that as absolving anyone of blame. Jim Haslett is the defensive coordinator and he must fix this unit. Yeah, I’ve talked to people outside the organization who have criticized parts of his strategy (needs to adjust better; lack of sound technique in the back end, etc). Is it fair? I’d have to know a lot more than I do to say it is. But: he’s used to running a 4-3 and was then asked to run a 3-4 and he has none of his “guys” on his staff. It’s a little different. That’s why I say it’s a collective effort, though one guy does have the title. They’re on pace to give up 85.3 pass plays of 20 yards or more (27 more than last season). It also didn’t seem to be related to the loss of Adam Carriker and Brian Orakpo. Indeed, Rob Jackson had some huge plays with the diving interception for a touchdown and three tackles for a loss. Just a good read on his part on the touchdown. Maybe Orakpo would have applied a little more pressure, but it’s tough to say his impact Sunday would have been greater considering the points. Jarvis Jenkins was OK. Oh, by the way, two weeks ago everyone was talking about the impact Raheem Morris had made in the coverage. That angle has been toned down a bit.
John Keim
 
Trent Williams has a bruised knee bone.
:thumbup: I didn't think it was anything too serious. He walked off the field without help, which was a good sign. Also, he came back in a couple times and seemed clear to me that it just an issue of pain tolerance and how much he could move while in that pain. You could tell he was struggling when he came back in, but he was still better than Black. The final piece of evidence for me that he was probably ok was when I saw him out there for an XP. I saw him being helped up after an XP and I'm thinking, "Save him for real plays and not XP." Then I remembered that we don't have the best kick blocking and that could have been an important XP.Anyway, hope he can play soon.
 
While I'd like the Skins to be 3-0, I couldn't be happier with the season thus far (outside of the crappy injuries) RG3 has made watching this team fun, and they are competing in every game. Clearly the defense is what is going to kill us this year, but at least we'll have a lot of fun, high scoring games to watch! :thumbup:
The high scoring is fun to watch. And it is so different that the Redskin teams of the past few years.It is fun to watch RGIII run the ball and run an unconventional offense. But I do cringe everytime he gets hit. The book on Vick is to hit him hard every time he runs the ball and I am certain defenses will do this with RGIII.
RGIII isn't going to make it through the season if they keep running that option crap. It was brutal watching the defense blow him up every time he would release the ball. I'm all for the rollouts, giving him an option to run or pass, but that option run is going to kill him. Defenders don't give a crap if the RB gains an extra 5 yards, they will take the free shot at the defenseless QB.
I'd really like to see an injury study between "running QBs" and "pocket QBs". I'm just not buying that it's a big difference.So, of course, I'm really not a fan of reining Griffin in. Let him do what he does. I see no reason to trade up for him in the draft if you are going to then try to alter his game. It's football. People get hurt. You can't play to not get hurt...or else you'll get hurt.The conventional stuff wasn't working yesterday. The offense couldn't move the ball in the first half. The second half, they adjusted and found something that worked. They can't just say, "Well, yeah, it worked but he might get hurt so let's go back to what wasn't working."Basically, I'd rather they not play scared and just do what works best.
A big part of the RGIII getting hit is the poor play of the OL. RGIII was sacked 6 times and hit many more while in pocket. He also got slammed twice while pitching balls out in his own backfield. The OL needs to keep people off RGII better than that. I think the hits when he is actually running the ball aren't that bad because he can anticipate and protect himself.
 
'TxBuckeye said:
'fatness said:
Part of reining him in occurred when Shanahan called for the punt on 4th and 1.
Just FYI, not trying to be a jerk or anything, honest. But it's "reigning"...
You're mistaken.Reigning is what kings and queens do, reign over kingdoms.Reins are used on horses to direct them; hence "reining".
 
dgreen said it right...we couldn't move the ball in the first half, RGIII's worst ball he has played so far. Then he and the offense came alive in the second, problem is the defense couldn't stop anyone all game long. We gave up 24 pts in first half and are easily the worst, if not one of the worst D's in the league for yardage & points.

Everyone talks about our coverage, which is to be desired, but our pass rush is not really making it uncomfortable for opposing QB's either. The worst secondary can look good if pressure is being applied. Haz just looks like a he hasn't done this before as adjustments are made or are not being done effectively.

 
It's getting lost in the shuffle with the complaints about special teams and the idiocy of Josh Morgan, but the decision to punt on 4th and 7 from the Rams 39 with 7 minutes left and the Redskins down 3 was absolutely inexcusable. Going for it would have been fine. Attempting the game-tying FG from 53 or 54 yards would have been fine. Punting was a disaster. Things went as well as they possibly could have gone post-decision: punt downed at the 11 yard line, then a three and out for the Rams- and even with everything going to plan, all they did was cost themselves 2:13 off the clock and 39 yards of field position in exchange for three downs. If a 62 yard FG to tie the game is within the range of possibility (to the point that it's more likely to happen than a 4th and 16 conversion), how is a 53 yard FG try so impossible that the team is better off pinning St. Louis on the11 instead of the 37? So, so dumb.
Two weeks in a row now. Once again, in the fourth quarter:
4-1-CIN 44 (13:41) 6-S.Rocca punts 44 yards to end zone, Center-54-J.Snow, Touchback. Washington challenged the touchback ruling, and the play was Upheld. (Timeout #3 at 13:27.)
Setting aside the moronic wasting of timeouts and challenges, this decision by Shanahan was inexcusable. The score was tied at this point. It's demonstrably wrong to punt here. It's not close. No matter who the teams and players are, you are hurting your team's chances to win if you punt here. Everyone focuses on blown calls and unsportsmanlike conduct penalties and stuff like this gets lost in the shuffle, but it shouldn't be. This is where the game was lost, and the media and fans need to call out Shanahan on it.
 
Outside the NFC East, from my perspective as a Redskins fan, I don't think there's a Team I dislike more than the Buccaneers. They are like an annoying gnat that always winds up on our schedule at a critical juncture, be it regular season or playoffs, and the games are always a gritty, scrappy and edgy struggle. I'd like nothing better than to completely dominate that Team in a game from whistle to whistle.

 
'TobiasFunke said:
This is where the game was lost, and the media and fans need to call out Shanahan on it.
I think he was asked about it in the postgame presser and he gave a pretty unsatisfactory answer. He said he was lining up to go for it because he thought the Bengals' defenders were tired. Once Cincy took the timeout, Shanahan changed his mind because they now had some rest. So, it appears his initial decision to go for it really had nothing to do with the game scenario (tied score, field position, distance to go, 4th quarter, etc.). It was all about them being tired...if you can trust his answer.It's baffling that he trusted his D to hold Cincy more than he trusted his O to pick up less than a yard. Even if he did trust his D, he has to then think that they'd return the punt further than the 44 in order for them to gain a field of position advantage out of all of that. I believe last week's decision to punt led to St. Louis getting off a 60+ yard punt with no return by Banks and a huge field position change. Oh, and btw, Racca is having a pretty bad year. He's been pretty good at dropping some inside the 10, but his punts in the middle of the field have to have a pretty low average.
 
'TxBuckeye said:
You're mistaken.Reigning is what kings and queens do, reign over kingdoms.Reins are used on horses to direct them; hence "reining".
Cool, thanks! Learn something new every day.
No problem. Any time you want to learn some fancy words let me know. I know some big ones like "sandwich" and "yardstick".
 
It's baffling that he trusted his D to hold Cincy more than he trusted his O to pick up less than a yard.
It really is baffling. The offense is the strength of the team, the defense is the weakness, and it is only 1 yard. He made a very bad decision.
 
'TobiasFunke said:
This is where the game was lost, and the media and fans need to call out Shanahan on it.
I think he was asked about it in the postgame presser and he gave a pretty unsatisfactory answer. He said he was lining up to go for it because he thought the Bengals' defenders were tired. Once Cincy took the timeout, Shanahan changed his mind because they now had some rest. So, it appears his initial decision to go for it really had nothing to do with the game scenario (tied score, field position, distance to go, 4th quarter, etc.). It was all about them being tired...if you can trust his answer.It's baffling that he trusted his D to hold Cincy more than he trusted his O to pick up less than a yard. Even if he did trust his D, he has to then think that they'd return the punt further than the 44 in order for them to gain a field of position advantage out of all of that. I believe last week's decision to punt led to St. Louis getting off a 60+ yard punt with no return by Banks and a huge field position change. Oh, and btw, Racca is having a pretty bad year. He's been pretty good at dropping some inside the 10, but his punts in the middle of the field have to have a pretty low average.
Yeah, I'd say.I'm gonna do my part to make this an issue for Redskins fans. Because it should be. It's one thing to complain about the state of the O-Line and the secondary. There are real limitations that the team faces in trying to improve those, with the salary cap and the need to use draft picks elsewhere and the lack of available talent and so on. But there is no excuse for willfully choosing to reduce your team's chances to win a game by making "conservative" decisions, presumably just so you don't look bad if the right decision backfires. It's not OK. I've been pro-Shanahan and I really want them to give this regime time to take root, but as a fan there's nothing that pisses me off more than this kind of stuff.

 
Steve Spurrier....Jim Zorn....

I'll take "a pretty unsatisfactory answer" from Shanny any day over satisfactory answers from those two BOZO's! Don't forget where we have been and take it for granted boyz!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ryan Grant agrees to terms with Washington Redskins

Veteran running back Ryan Grant has agreed to terms with the Washington Redskins, FOX Sports Insider and NFL Network contributor Jay Glazer reports.

Grant, who was in Chicago for a workout with the Bears, is flying to Washington on Tuesday evening to be with the team.

Grant was in the Bears' locker room when he got the call from the Redskins, according to Glazer.

CBSSports.com first reported that Grant and the Redskins struck a deal.

The Redskins are thin at running back after injuries to Roy Helu (foot) and Evan Royster (knee).

Grant was released by the Green Bay Packers following the 2011 season, in which he rushed for 559 yards on 134 carries.

He suffered a season-ending injury in Week 1 of the 2010 season following consecutive 1,200-yard campaigns.

UPDATE: Grant later tweeted out that he was on the Redskins and thanked the fans in Green Bay.

Ryan Grant

@RyanGrant25

Big Thanks to all the Packer fans for all the support. Great 5 years.. Looking forward to the next journey. With that said Go Skins #HTTR
 
Steve Spurrier....Jim Zorn....I'll take "a pretty unsatisfactory answer" from Shanny any day over satisfactory answers from those two BOZO's! Don't forget where we have been and take it for granted boyz!
Well I'd prefer an answer from Madonna over Spurrier and Zorn too, but she'd do some ####ty coaching. That was a ####ty coaching decision by Shanahan, just like the 287-yard field goal the week before. So far Shanahan's record is worse than Zorn's.And who's deciding to use the Pearl Harbor pass defenses they've been using?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Helu on IR for the year with turf toe and problems with both Achilles tendons.

Ryan Grant signed.

Royster having injury problems.

David Jones signed at CB and Crezdon Butler waived.

Practice squad DL Delvin Johnson waived and DL Chigbo Anunoby signed(another name to love pronouncing).

The Redskins also signed defensive lineman Chigbo Anunoby (ch-BOO Ann-u-noby) to their practice squad and released defensive lineman Delvin Johnson from their practice squad.
 
Kyle Shanahan fined $25,000 for cussing out the refs and following them down the tunnel. NFL unresponsive to Mike Shanahan's "he was just doing it for a friend" defense.

 
Steve Spurrier....Jim Zorn....I'll take "a pretty unsatisfactory answer" from Shanny any day over satisfactory answers from those two BOZO's! Don't forget where we have been and take it for granted boyz!
Well I'd prefer an answer from Madonna over Spurrier and Zorn too, but she'd do some ####ty coaching. That was a ####ty coaching decision by Shanahan, just like the 287-yard field goal the week before. So far Shanahan's record is worse than Zorn's.And who's deciding to use the Pearl Harbor pass defenses they've been using?
Exactly.You can't defend a moronic decision by saying that the guy isn't always as moronic as two other guys who had the job. Stupid is stupid. And punting on 4th and 1 at the opponent's 44 with the score tied in the fourth quarter is honestly one of the dumbest things I've ever seen from an NFL coach. Possibly dumber than the "swinging gate" play.
 
Steve Spurrier....Jim Zorn....I'll take "a pretty unsatisfactory answer" from Shanny any day over satisfactory answers from those two BOZO's! Don't forget where we have been and take it for granted boyz!
Well I'd prefer an answer from Madonna over Spurrier and Zorn too, but she'd do some ####ty coaching. That was a ####ty coaching decision by Shanahan, just like the 287-yard field goal the week before. So far Shanahan's record is worse than Zorn's.And who's deciding to use the Pearl Harbor pass defenses they've been using?
Exactly.You can't defend a moronic decision by saying that the guy isn't always as moronic as two other guys who had the job. Stupid is stupid. And punting on 4th and 1 at the opponent's 44 with the score tied in the fourth quarter is honestly one of the dumbest things I've ever seen from an NFL coach. Possibly dumber than the "swinging gate" play.
I think you guys are over-reacting to the punt. It wasn't that bad of a decision compared to many others. And every coach will have some questionable decisions.
 
The punt decision intrigued me as a Bengals fans as I really thought we kinda wasted a timeout. Clearly I was wrong on that. I have to say I was surprised they didn't go for it though.

The time management on both sides was horrible.

-QG

 
I think you guys are over-reacting to the punt. It wasn't that bad of a decision compared to many others. And every coach will have some questionable decisions.
Game momentum shifted at that moment from the Skins to the Bengals. The Bengals didn't seize the momentum. The Redskins coach gave it away.
 
I think you guys are over-reacting to the punt. It wasn't that bad of a decision compared to many others. And every coach will have some questionable decisions.
Game momentum shifted at that moment from the Skins to the Bengals. The Bengals didn't seize the momentum. The Redskins coach gave it away.
I suspect 30% of the NFL head coaches would have punted there. If so, that his not a automatic decision.On the other side is the 62 yard field goal attempt by Cundiff. Almost no coach would have tried the field goal there.The point is: the decision to punt is not that unreasonable. I'm not saying it was a good decision, but I don't think it was surprising or unreasonable.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top