What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***OFFICIAL*** 2013 MINNESOTA VIKINGS SEASON THREAD (1 Viewer)

HeirCoryell said:
What's the farthest down The Vikes could trade where you'd still feel good about them getting an impact player?
I would not want them to trade down past pick 20. The Packers are looking at linebackers and defensive backs too. So taking our best option while also keeping them from drafting the same player (Mosley, Shazier) would be fine.

Other than looking to sqrew the Packers at the same time though it doesn't much matter how far they drop and will likely take the best offer they receive.

Aaron Donald, Anthony Barr would certainly be good picks (teams could want to trade up for these guys) if no trade is found. But again would not be filling as great of a need for the Vikings as a 3 down LB would.

Barr would most likely be a DE for us. He is not really a coverage guy from my understanding of him, but a very good pass rusher.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Andy Dufresne said:
CanadianNFLJunkie said:
Seriously people still want Johnny Football?? :wall: I don't see him having a good or long NFL career. He's too small and fragile for the NFL game IMO.

I'd think we will either grab a defensive player with our top pick, or we'll trade down either to middle or late first and then make a move on a QB with either first two picks. The value of this year's QB crop has fallen with many of these QBs going late first or in the 2nd round. Sure someone will be in love with 1-2 of these QB's and obtain them early or mid first, hopefully not us and NOT Johnny Football.
You guys are like this with this "too small" stuff.
I guess that's why there was only one QB since 1953 that was under 6 foot tall drafted in the first round. Sure he's a flashy play-maker (in college) but this is the big leagues. Too much high risk for my liking. I want something more safe and prefer to have someone who can play for us for 10+ years.

 
Transcript: Zimmer, Patterson, Jennings and Robison Address The Media

Posted Apr 30, 2014 http://www.vikings.com/news/article-1/Transcript-Zimmer-Patterson-Jennings-and-Robison-Address-The-Media/c4d93a97-0438-4249-bf89-1a5cf2ccbeb5

Vikings Head Coach Mike Zimmer

You know we made this team meeting room for you so it’ll be a little bit easier for you, taking care of you all the time. We’ve had two walk throughs now and a practice and the guys are doing a good job concentrating, studying, learning what we’re trying to do, the principles that we’re trying to teach them. I’ve been impressed with their work ethic. We’ve got everybody here, so that’s always a good thing. They are all paying attention, the coaches are doing a good job and it’s good to go. I’m excited to watch the [Minnesota] Wild tonight, so let’s play hockey.

Q: How do you begin to implement a system? And what’s the process of going through that in the first week?

A: Well we start at the basics, we start with fundamentals. For us there is always a starting point where we begin and then from there we progress at different speeds based on how fast they catch on or at least defensively.

Offensively they are going a little bit faster pace than what we are defensively. What I don’t want to do is watch them out here on the practice field, and I told them yesterday that we are not only doing all of this learning schemes, but we are evaluating them how they practice, how they learn, how they move and things like that. What we try to do is get to a point where they’re not thinking so much that they’re not being athletes when they’re out on the field, so once they play starts they just are athletic and then we can see them as coaches and kind of figure out what this guy does and you know we don’t want to be instant evaluators, but we did yesterday as coaches. We got together and we talked about different things and kind of visions for the players and what we think they can do and how we can use them in different ways and that process will continue on throughout OTAs and until we get to training camp.

Q: What have you seen from Matt Cassel and Christian Ponder? What are you goals to see from them this spring?

A: Well, I want to see somebody that can lead the football team number one, guys that can execute under pressure, guys that can lead us in the 4th quarter when the game is on the line, but also make sure that they know what everybody else is doing and kind of be the extension of Norv [Turner] when we are out on the field.

Q: What is your definition of a great quarterback based on what you’ve seen?

A: You know I think that the quarterback has to be a leader. He has to be the tough guy, obviously he has to have the physical skills but I’m talking more about the other abilities, a guy that wants to put the game on his shoulders and at the end take it and win it. So to me those things are really important. Obviously they need to have the arm strength and the mental quickness to make quick decisions and a lot of that is with the quarterback too. You’ve got guys that can go out there and throw the ball today in 7-on-7 but when the bullets start flying they have to be able to keep everything slowed down, get guys in the right place and then deliver the ball to the right people.

Q: With so many new guys coming in at one time, is the more of let’s get the chemistry together?

A: Well I think it’s all a process of everything there. Part of the reason why we are lifting together as a team as opposed to individually is we are working on the chemistry there. We are working on the chemistry when we meet in this room that you all are sitting in right now. We meet in here together so we can talk to the defensive line and the linebackers hear what we’re saying and the secondary hears what the defensive end is being told. So the chemistry part is going to continue being an ongoing process and I do believe that what we preach, they’ll eventually buy into so those are the things that are trying to chemistry wise. As far as on the field, we’re trying to see what they can do. They’re trying to understand the system and then we go from there.

Q: How are you guys doing from an injury perspective?

A: Actually we’re doing great. Adrian [Peterson] is doing fantastic, he practiced yesterday. He’s been here, he’s been in good spirits. The rest of the guys are doing well. I really don’t want to talk about any of the injuries at this point in time. Other than Adrian, I’ll talk about him, he’s doing great.

Q: What did you say that you wanted the team to walk away with when you met as a group?

A: Well I had a message to them the first day about raising our expectations, about kind of players that we want on the football team, how we want to represent the community – the state of Minnesota and the Twin Cities. I talked to them about things that are important to me not only as far as football players but off the field also, so basically that.

Q: What’s the most important part?

A: The weight room is important for one thing. I told them the weight room is important to me and I expect them to be in there and getting stronger and bigger and physical and some of those things. The rest of it is honestly probably between me and them for the most part. You know I believe, and I’ve talked to some people about this, I want to be as honest as I can to you people in here. I never want to have to lie to you. I want to be as honest as I possibly can but in the same token I have the football team that I have to respect too and I have to make sure that what I say to them is sometimes private with us too. I hope you appreciate those kinds of things.

Q: Are you an open-door policy kind of coach where you will listen to positives and negatives from players?

A: Oh yeah. That’s not a problem whatsoever. It doesn’t mean I’ll agree with them at the either. I’m a fairly opinionated person and my job at the end of the day is to get the best out of the players that I possibly can. It’s not about who wins the argument or anything like that. Sometimes when you’re aggressive, there’s confrontation that happens. I’m not afraid of confrontation and hopefully they players won’t be too when we get ready to go play football games. Pat Riley had a quote that said, “discipline is not a nasty word,” so we are going to try and be disciplined.

Q: Is there potential this week for your evaluations to have an influence on the draft?

A: Well yeah I think so. I think we’ll sit down after these last few days because you always anticipate kind of what you have on tape but you don’t really know. You don’t know how a guy thinks, how he reacts, what kind of player he is under pressure, the best way to coach him is. Sometimes the best way is to put your arm around him and sometimes how he reacts to different situations so there is a possibility that all can change. It won’t change how we have players ranked, it just may put us in more of a position of well you know we probably need this position a little bit more than that position.

Q: As you’ve gone through the research on the quarterbacks, how has it meshed with you and Norv coming from two different perspectives?

A: Well you know Norv is the expert at the quarterbacks, he always has been. I think like everything else in this building there are experts that are better at certain things than I am. Now my input is more about what kind of player he is, what kind of worker he is, what kind of things does he bring as a leader as a team and Norv is more about the technical things and then we sit down and talk about what we think about what is the best for us.

Q: How much of what you bring is having to defend guys?

A: I know what things are harder to defend, but Norv knows what they can do better than I do. I think it’s a good combination to have. But I would silly if I didn’t use all of the resources that I have here and Norv has, for 30 years, been not only a great offensive coordinator and head coach but a great quarterback coach, just like I would be silly not to listen to Bob Hagan with the public relations. Obviously, as you’ve seen me speak, he’s way better at this stuff than I am.

Q: How much impact have you had in the draft in terms of the skillset you want to see them take? Or what’s your role there?

A: You’d have to ask Rick [spielman] how much input I’d have but I think we work together, we’ve sat up in that meeting room for 10-12 straight days and gone over different things. I always give my input. I don’t hold my feelings back so I’m going to go ahead and say what I think but I do believe that even the things I say, what I’m looking for in a player, it may not be that position but it might just be what I’m looking for in people and what kind of height and size and weight and strength and so on and so forth, personalities. I think a lot of that goes into it but saying that again, the scouts go out and watch these guys all year long from the time they’re juniors, or sophomores in a lot of these cases, and I get to see them on tape three times, talk to them in Indianapolis, watch them run around in underwear and then bring them in and talk to them again. Again, I feel like they’re much more experts on these kinds of things more than I am even though my input is, “This guy I like.” Now there are some things that I may be more of an expert in because that’s what I do every day. With Rick and the scouts, and I’ve been extremely impressed with all of those guys. As far as the relationship and I know this so you’ll always question, “How are you doing with the GM?” We’re fantastic. He’s a good guy, he’s a little bit like me, he’s a little bit sarcastic at times and we give each other a hard time but we really respect each other while we are there and when we come out of the room we are going to come out of the room together.

Q: Were you and Rick always on the same page with using the free agency period mainly on defense?

A: We were on the same page. We knew that we were going to lose some players in free agency, or anticipated losing some players in free agency and if that would happen we had to replace them. We felt like there were some areas that we needed to improve in and we always want to build through the draft. We don’t want to be a free agency football team. We want to build through the draft and we want to continue to do that.

Q: How have you seen guys adjust to what you are trying to do on defense?

A: They are learning. It’s a process for them. It’s a lot of new things, new terminology, new calls, I’m assuming they are being coached differently, I know I’m coaching them probably like they haven’t been coached before. I think all of that is new for them. I’ve been very impressed with a lot of the guys and with a lot of guys it’s slower to pick up. You can’t base on one practice that this one guy is going to be a great player in one practice because as I said we are moving on and trying to keep improving. Our big goal from this camp, I told the players, is we’re trying to start the process here where we can keep improving to where we can build a great football team. I don’t care about individuals, I care about a team. I’ve always believed that the more we can get guys in as a team and play good then we have the better chance of winning.

Q: What’s been your approach to running a practice so far as a head coach in terms of balancing the offense and defense?

A: You know I keep straying over the defense a little bit. I spent a lot of time yesterday with the defensive backs because I do feel like I’m an expert in that area and I took them in a meeting today and went through tape with the defensive backs and that’s what I do. I think I’m fairly good at it and so I’m going to try to use my abilities to the best I can. I get around the offense as much as I can, but at this stage where I’m at right now, I just feel like I have to spend more time with the defense. I have to be in the meetings with the defense, run the meetings actually, and coach. That’s what I am, I’m a coach. Just because I’m the head coach doesn’t mean you stop coaching. It means you coach everybody but you still do the best job you can to get guys better.

Q: Have you heard from guys that they’re doing a lot of new things that they haven’t done before?

A: I really haven’t asked them. I’ve asked some of the offensive guys, “How’s it going?” and things like that. They said the terminology is different and their heads are spinning a little bit right now. Defensive guys, I just kind of let them figure it out.

Q: What’s your timeline for installation?

A: You know I don’t know if we have a timeline. I think that offensively what they are trying to do is put a lot of things in and then find out what we can do really good and then go back and do that. Defensively what we are trying to do is move at a pace where we feel comfortable that they understand it very well and then we move onto something else. We may not be as complicated in some areas defensively that we were at the end of when I was in Cincinnati, but I anticipate that we’ll probably get to that point before our first ballgame.

Q: How would you describe the partnership that you have with Norv Turner?

A: It’s been fantastic. Really, it really has. We were talking about some things for the new stadium, the architecture a little bit. Mark Wilf asked for a little of our input on some of the things and Norv said, “well you know we had it like this and we are able to do that.” And I’ll go in there and talk to him about different things schematically. We talk about the quarterbacks all the time. I talk to him about the offense. He comes in my office and asks me questions. I understand that I’m the head coach and I don’t want to be separate from everybody else. I talk about it being a team and that’s what I want, I want to build a team whether it’s the coaches, the organization, the players. I don’t know everything that there is to know about a lot of things but the more experts that I can get help from I want to do it. When I was a young coordinator I used to go around to all of the defensive coordinators in the league to find out what we can do better, what kinds of things. I’m not so egotistical to say, “You know what, I know all of the answers,” and all of this other stuff. I want to be the best at what I do but I want to take input. I’ve talked to other coaches in the NFL about things, I’ve talked to other guys that have been head coaches about things. It is a learning process for me but I’m willing to listen to other people and then make decisions based on the information that I get, the input.

Q: Rick Spielman said that deciding to pick a quarterback at No. 8 is torturous. Do you agree? How has that process gone?

A: I understand what Rick was saying about it being torturous and it’s a hard decision anytime you take any of the guys. That’s what he’s the expert in. But I look at it as an opportunity also. It’s an opportunity to get that pick right, whether it’s the quarterback at 8 or in the 7th round. I look at all of those things that way. It’s an opportunity for us to get better as a football team. You should ask him what torturous means. I think it’s an opportunity for the Minnesota Vikings to get better.

Greg Jennings

Q: How is the new coaching staff?

A: Can’t stand them, but I’m here [laughs]. It’s just the nature of the beast. They’ve been great, top to bottom, starting with Coach Zim [Mike Zimmer]. Just his presence, the way he carries himself, he’s not one of those raw raw guys who’s going to do a lot of talking, he’s going to put a lot of action behind what he’s speaking. It’s one of those deals where accountability is priority number one. He’s going to make sure everyone is this building, including himself, is accountable for what they bring to the table and what expectations are for this organization.

Q: How big of an adjustment is that between coaching staffs?

A: It’s definitely an adjustment. You get a lot of guys, most guys, almost every guy, it’s almost like being a rookie all over again, not knowing what to expect from a personality standpoint. You get those team meetings that start at 9:00 but everybody is in their chair at 8:55 just to kind of gauge and feel out the new staff. That’s going to happen, but I’m impressed with not only what they bring to the table from just being upstairs and the dynamic from coaches to coaches, but the coaching to player relationship as far on the field actually coaching, you see very few head coaches being as involved as Coach Zim is. I think that’s because of his track record. He’s been a defensive coordinator so he’s also had to be involved so he’s not going to be that stand back head coach and not be engaged. He’s going to be an active participant and very transparent with his guys to a certain extent. And the same goes with Coach [Norv] Turner. I’ve been highly impressed with the way they’re coaching guys. It does not matter who you are, they are going to get the best out of every player in that locker room.

Q: What excites you about being a receiver in Norv’s system?

A: Everybody is going to have an opportunity to showcase what they do. That’s one of the things he’s spoken highly upon within our group. He’s going to showcase what we do well as individual receivers, as well as a unit. I think that’s all you can ask for when you’re playing a position where you don’t get to dictate what happens. All you can do is run your route and run it to the best of your ability and hope that you get opportunities to make plays. What Coach Turner is bringing to the table there are going to be a lot of guys who will have a ton of opportunities to make plays. And if you look at his track record, the receivers and tight ends that he’s had, and the running backs, they’ve all fared very, very well in this offense.

Cordarrelle Patterson

Q: What’s been your biggest focus so far this offseason?

A: Just my knowledge. I want to come in totally different this year. I want to learn everything this year. Last year I was just playing X and I want to play everything this year so if coach needs me or someone goes down I can be that guy.

Q: After such a successful rookie year, how do you go into an offseason not being satisfied with what you did?

A: You can never be too satisfied. Last year was last year. It’s a different year. I talk to my family about stuff like that all the time. They want me to be great, they don’t just want me to be a great football player, they want me to be great off the field. I listen to my family, friends, coaches, teammates and just let that stick in my head and just go with it.

Q: Did last year teach you to have more confidence in yourself moving forward?

A: I’m always a confident guy on and off the field. I just want to be great. You always want to be great as a person. Greg [Jennings] told me that a lot coming in as a rookie that I have more confidence than anyone he knows. I just like to set the tone for myself and my teammates.

Q: Greg said this year’s offense will be more complex than last year’s, do you agree with that?

A: Yeah, it’s totally different than last year. It’s going to be tough, but us guys we are going to work together and we are going to be with each other. We’ll have to come early in the morning and leave late after practice. We are going to be with each and we’re going to get it done.

Q: Have you looked at what receivers have done with Norv in the past?

A: Of course. I had the opportunity to talk to Josh Gordon over at the Pro Bowl and he told me, ‘You got my coach. He’s going to get you the ball and it just won’t be you, everybody on the team, the running back, the tight ends. Everybody is going to be involved.’ When you hear good guys like that saying good things about our offensive coordinator it’s a blessing.

Q: Was last year more than you expected coming in as a rookie? Are you scratching the surface?

A: Coming in as a rookie I don’t think you know what to expect. I don’t think my work ethic was good enough last year so this year my whole mindset coming in is ‘You got to work. You got to know everything. You got to do better than you did last year.’ I lean on that. My work ethic, I think it was kind of bad last year so this year it’s going to be way better.

Q: How did you come to that realization about your work ethic?

A: It’s you, you have to know it yourself. I was looking at film of me last year just seeing how I didn’t finish in practice. Coach Zimmer set the tempo high yesterday and everything was going great. With my work ethic in the offseason everything has improved in that little bit of time.

Brian Robison

Q: What kind of adjustments have you made with the new coaching staff?

A: It obviously makes you excited coming out here seeing the way the guys are working, but not only that, seeing the coaches. It’s a totally different atmosphere than where it was last year. Guys are yelling. I actually told Coach [George] Edwards today I said, ‘When I’m in my stance I feel like I should yell something because everyone else is yelling something.’ It’s definitely a different attitude. It’s one of those deals where you can obviously see where we can be a great team because of the way that they are coaching us and the way that they are really showing a lot of emotion on the field and it’s great to be a part of.

Q: Are they asking you guys to do a lot of different things? Is there a pretty big change that way?

A: They’re testing us. There’s no doubt about it, they’re definitely testing us. They are putting in a lot of stuff to see how quickly we can memorize those types of things, how we play on the run, very fast tempo during practice. Those type of deals not only put physical strain on you but mentally. That’s what we need. We need to be able to really push ourselves and try to see where that threshold is for us.

Q: Can you get a sense of the different responsibilities you’ll have on the line?

A: You can definitely get a sense of it. It’s similar to what we’ve done in the past, but a lot different, if that means anything to you [laughs]. It’s one of those deals where we’re playing things a lot different. Some of the times we have the same responsibilities, but the way we get to it is a little bit different. I think it honestly will help our defense tremendously because Coach [Andre] Patterson, our D line coach, has done a great job of bringing in a different mindset as far as how to rush the passer. What keys to look for and how to play those things. Things that will help us build on what we’re doing now during the season, but correct the things we didn’t do last season.

Q: What’s it like being the Dean of the defensive line group?

A: It’s different, definitely. You go from a year where you got Jared [Allen] and Kevin [Williams] in your room and all of the sudden you’re the old guy. You never want to be called the old guy. I had my birthday on Sunday and I thought I was going to come in here on Monday and I was going to have a walker in front of my locker or something. It’s one of those deals where you really have to step up your leadership role, lead by example, be a little bit more of vocal leader. But at the same time you don’t get to proclaim yourself a leader. The guys have to think of you as a leader. That’s what I’m trying to do now, lead by example and hopefully guys will follow and do the right thing.

 
Peterson, feeling urgency, is excited for new rolePosted by: Matt Vensel Updated: May 1 http://www.startribune.com/sports/vikings/blogs/257545541.html

The Vikings just wrapped up their three-day volunteer minicamp here at Winter Park, and we got a chance to chat with running back Adrian Peterson, who as he was recovering from groin surgeryhad no doubt that he would be back in town to participate in the offseason program.

“I wanted to come in and get a good feel for things,” said Peterson, who apparently popped into town for a day a week or two to get into the offense and be around his teammates and coaches.

Peterson guesstimated that he was at 80 percent as he tries to regain his strength and balance, but he said that he is feeling good and expects to be at full strength by the start of the season.

Peterson had good things to say about new coach Mike Zimmer and coordinator Norv Turner.

“I was pretty excited when they hired Zimmer and him bringing in Turner,” said the 29-year-old running back, who looks a little slimmer than he did at the end of last season. “And then actually being around those guys and listening to their philosophy. And now being able to participate. It’s a lot to take in. We have a long way to go but I’m excited about the direction we’re headed.”

Peterson is trying to learn Turner’s offense, which had one veteran’s head spinning yesterday, and he said trying to execute the plays on the field this week was “like performing heart surgery without having a license to do so.” But he is excited about one particular aspect of the offense.

“I’m definitely going to be involved more in the passing game,” said Peterson, who caught 29 passes last season. “That’s something that I look forward to. When he was at San Diego and Cleveland, they would always find a way to get the running back out in space. So I knew once we hired him that would be something that would be new for me. So I’m pretty excited about that.”

Peterson acknowledged being more of a dual threat could cut into his carries and subsequently his rushing yards, but he isn’t worried about it. He’s feeling urgency to win as he approaches 30.

“It’s all about winning,” Peterson said. “And I’m trying to win a championship, so if that’s taking less of a pounding and being more productive in the passing game, I’m all in for it.”

 
2014 NFL Draft: Minnesota Vikings Spotlight

By Rob Rang | The Sports Xchange/CBSSports.com

May 2, 2014 http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/nfl-draft-scout/24548422/nfl-draft-minnesota-vikings-spotlight

If new coach Mike Zimmer is going to have any better luck than predecessor Leslie Frazier in the NFC North, he'll need to improve a defense that ranked 32nd in the NFL in scoring and coax some consistency out of the quarterback position.

Zimmer and general manager Rick Spielman addressed several notable areas of concern in their first offseason together, convincing veteran quarterback Matt Cassel to return and dedicating millions to intriguing talents on defense, such as Everson Griffen (DE), Linval Joseph (DT) and Captain Munnerlyn (CB). While the foursome could help Minnesota take a step toward respectability, none are proven difference-makers. As such, the Vikings could once again prove overly reliant on superstar running back Adrian Peterson to be competitive in 2014.

Cassel proved serviceable a year ago, which is more that can be said for Christian Ponder, who at this point looks like a bust after being selected 12th overall three years ago. The two-year deal he signed, however, is an indication that the Vikings view him as a stop-gap solution and therefore it is likely that Minnesota will once again be investing an early pick in the game's most important position -- perhaps as early as the first round.

Should Central Florida's Blake Bortles land in Minnesota's lap at No. 8 overall, the Vikings may have a tough decision on their hands. After whiffing on a Ponder at No. 12 overall just three years ago, however, Spielman may be looking for a safer pick in the first round. Given Zimmer's expertise, the club's defensive shortcomings a year ago and the talent at quarterback in the division, taking the best-available-defender could be the way to go.

Minnesota Vikings' 2014 draft picks: 8, 40, 72, 96, 108, 148, 184, 223

Primary needs: QB, LB, SS, DL, OG

General Manager: Rick Spielman, third year

Five draft picks that clicked:
• OT Matt Kalil, third overall, 2012
• TE Kyle Rudolph, 43rd overall, 2011
• OG Brandon Fusco, 172nd overall, 2011
• DE Everson Griffin, 100th overall, 2010
• OT Phil Loadholt, 54th overall, 2009

Five players who should be on the Minnesota Vikings' draft radar:

Player, school (overall rating, position rating)

DT Aaron Donald, Pittsburgh (10, 1): The Vikings invested big dollars ($31.5 million over five years) in Joseph and a first-round pick a year ago in Sharrif Floyd but neither is a premium pass-rusher like Donald, who is earning comparisons from some to Vikings' Hall of Famer John Randle. Like Randle, Donald is a virtual Energizer Bunny, demonstrating rare hustle for an interior lineman. He's explodes off the snap and uses his natural leverage advantage and surprising power to overwhelm blockers and is effective against both the run and pass. Zimmer had the benefit of a talented rotation in Cincinnati and may see Donald as the type of interior pass rusher to help minimize the great quarterbacks of the division.

OLB Kyle Van Noy (56, 5): The Vikings have several intriguing young options at linebacker but could see Van Noy in the second round as a similarly safe pick as Donald in the first. Van Noy isn't as physical as some scouts would like but he anticipates very well, consistently beating linemen to the action and has a nice shoulder dip to slip past would-be blockers to make the stop. The Vikings may love young prospects Audie Cole, Gerald Hodges and Michael Mauti (among others) but Van Noy would offer intriguing flexibility.

QB Zach Mettenberger, LSU (101, 7): With Cassel clearly the starter for 2014, the Vikings may believe that they can wait until the draft's second or even early third day to find their quarterback of the future. Boasting the size, arm strength and experience in a pro-style scheme, Mettenberger is an ideal developmental prospect for Turner's offense -- so much so, in fact, that the Vikings might be willing to invest a higher pick in him than NFLDraftScout.com currently projects for the strong-armed pocket passer. Mettenberger does not possess ideal agility to escape pressure but with quality bookend tackles in Kalil and Loadholt already in place, as well as the running game, security blanket at tight end in Pro Bowler Kyle Rudolph and explosive big play wideout Cordarrelle Patterson, Mettenberger's natural passing ability could be maximized.

OG David Yankey, Stanford (151, 8): Yankey, a junior All-American, entered the 2014 draft amid much fanfare but his stock has settled as scouts pore over tape. Yankey impressed with his versatility in 2013, spending most of his sophomore campaign at left tackle (but seeing action at both guard spots and right tackle) and earned the Morris Trophy as the Pac 12's top offensive lineman. Rather than excel when moved exclusively to left guard last year, however, Yankey's play leveled off and therefore some have questioned his desire. In reality, the sudden death of his father (cardiac arrest) may have played a role in the uneven performance. At 6-foot-6, 315 pounds, Yankey offers balance, agility and power to play inside or out. He isn't an elite prospect but his mass, length (34-inch arms) and experience could be especially intriguing to Turner, who has shown a preference for massive guards in his power-based attack.

DE Aaron Lynch, South Florida (185, 16): Spielman has shown a willingness to bet big on athletes. Lynch looked like a future first-round pick during his time at Notre Dame but, frankly, just went through the motions after his transfer to South Florida. Lynch possesses a prototypical frame at 6-foot-5 with long arms and broad shoulders. He slimmed down with the Bulls, weighing in at 249 pounds after tipping the scales closer to 260 with the Irish and needs to regain his bulk and determined play to stick in the NFL. If he commits, however, Lynch could prove a big-time steal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I really dislike Rangs picks. I do not think Mettenberger is a good QB. His ball placement and anticipation are poor. He makes questionable throws and his deep ball is not very accurate.

According to McGinn's recent article Yankey is just a guy and not a high draft pick. I know some have ranked him pretty highly (including Rang) and maybe the anomyous comment reported by McGinn is a fabrication. In any case there are other guards I like more.

The Van Noy pick does not really seem like an upgrade over Hodges to me. I actually think Hodges and Cole can be ok as depth LB, perhaps Mauti as well if fully recovered and no relapse with his knees. But none of them have the speed to be a eraser on TE and slot receivers and neither does Greenway. Few LB do and fewer still are LB who can cover the mismatches in the league and play sound run defense.

I do really like Donald so I would not be unhappy if that were the Vikings pick at 8.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sources tell the San Francisco Chronicle the Raiders "aren't really considering" Blake Bortles or Johnny Manziel at No. 5 overall.

Per Rotoworld

 
Sources tell the San Francisco Chronicle the Raiders "aren't really considering" Blake Bortles or Johnny Manziel at No. 5 overall.

Per Rotoworld
They would prefer Carr. Especially as it appears you might be able to get him a bit later. A top 7 talent in this draft + one of those QBs is quite the coup.

 
Sources tell the San Francisco Chronicle the Raiders "aren't really considering" Blake Bortles or Johnny Manziel at No. 5 overall.

Per Rotoworld
They would prefer Carr. Especially as it appears you might be able to get him a bit later. A top 7 talent in this draft + one of those QBs is quite the coup.
According to Carr, teams have been telling him they plan to draft him in the 20s. I really hope the Raiders are targeting him and not the Vikings because I am not a fan.

 
I think the perfect draft (day one) for me would be the Vikings sliding back 7-8 places and landing LB Mosley, then using some of the assets from the move down from 1.08 to move back into the 1.20s to get their QB. Drafting a QB at 1.08 feels like a reach to me. But that's why I'm just a fan and won't be in the War Room on Thursday, I suppose. In Spielman/Studwell/Zimmer/Turner We Trust. But they can't waste another 1 on another "Ponder," they just can't.

 
Sources tell the San Francisco Chronicle the Raiders "aren't really considering" Blake Bortles or Johnny Manziel at No. 5 overall.

Per Rotoworld
They would prefer Carr. Especially as it appears you might be able to get him a bit later. A top 7 talent in this draft + one of those QBs is quite the coup.
According to Carr, teams have been telling him they plan to draft him in the 20s. I really hope the Raiders are targeting him and not the Vikings because I am not a fan.
Yeah, you said you weren't a fan of Manziel either.

Not sure if fandom belies just how much they have done in the real games and how well they have looked in front of coaches and scouts this offseason.

 
Sources tell the San Francisco Chronicle the Raiders "aren't really considering" Blake Bortles or Johnny Manziel at No. 5 overall.

Per Rotoworld
They would prefer Carr. Especially as it appears you might be able to get him a bit later. A top 7 talent in this draft + one of those QBs is quite the coup.
According to Carr, teams have been telling him they plan to draft him in the 20s. I really hope the Raiders are targeting him and not the Vikings because I am not a fan.
Yeah, you said you weren't a fan of Manziel either.

Not sure if fandom belies just how much they have done in the real games and how well they have looked in front of coaches and scouts this offseason.
Manziel makes me nervous but i have changed my mind on him. He has enough good qualities that I would have no problem if they took him at 8. Also like Bortles and Bridgewater.

I am not fans of Mettenberger, Carr and McCarrons. Mettenberger because he has no ability to avoid the rush. Carr because he breakdowns under pressure and does not read the field. And McCarrons because he doesn't have the arm strength to keep defenses honest.

Garopplo is the wild card. I think he has enough skill to win in the league despite what Waldman says about him.

I also be OK if the Vikings decided to wait for next year and spent a 5th round pick on Garrett Gilbert to see if they can develop him into an NFL QB.

 
Andy Dufresne said:
Donnybrook said:
I also be OK if the Vikings decided to wait for next year and spent a 5th round pick on Garrett Gilbert to see if they can develop him into an NFL QB.
That plan just does not work.
The odds are bad but it has worked in the past and will work in the future.
 
I think the top 7 picks are some combination of Clowney/Mack/Robinson/Watkins/Evans/Matthews/Manziel.

So at #8 the options, to me, look like Mosley, Donald, or trade. Of course I'd go for the trade, but I think the pick will be Mosley.

It won't be Barr. I don't think he'll translate to a 4-3 linebacker.

 
I think the top 7 picks are some combination of Clowney/Mack/Robinson/Watkins/Evans/Matthews/Manziel.

So at #8 the options, to me, look like Mosley, Donald, or trade. Of course I'd go for the trade, but I think the pick will be Mosley.

It won't be Barr. I don't think he'll translate to a 4-3 linebacker.
No love for Bortles? If he's there at 8 I really want him.
 
The part that really has me 'gunshy' about the Vikings taking a QB at #8 is this:

There are 4-6 teams ahead of the Vikings that need a QB and if they all pass (and we know how much of a QB driven league the NFL is), then what good would it do to take one of them at #8...

 
The part that really has me 'gunshy' about the Vikings taking a QB at #8 is this: There are 4-6 teams ahead of the Vikings that need a QB and if they all pass (and we know how much of a QB driven league the NFL is), then what good would it do to take one of them at #8...
Well considering what a need QB is for most of the teams drafting in the top 8 it would have to make you wonder why all of those teams would pass on them.

If that happens then the Vikings can pick any of them. So if there is one they really believe in, then that QB should be the pick.

If the Vikings also believe that none of the QB are worth a top 10 pick (like in this hypothetical where Hou, StL, Jax, Cle, Oak, TB also pass) then they will trade down or look at another player. But it would be very lucky I think for all of these teams to pass on a QB before the Vikings pick and leave them their choice of all of them.

I think if Bridgewater is there at 8 the Vikings take him. I kind of do not think he will be an option however, despite all the nonsense about him falling in the draft.

If not Bridgewater then I would be alright with Bortles, Manziel or Garappolo, I guess even Carr but I am not sure any of them deserve to be a top 10 pick. The main caveat I have about this, is that I trust Norv Turners ability to evaluate and coach QBs. So I do not see the Vikings pulling the trigger unless Norv really believes that QB will be the answer.

I am actually hoping that the Vikings can find their QB at pick 8 and hope teams pass on QB pick 1-7 so they have all of their options. But more what I expect to happen is whatever QB the Vikings may be willing to draft at pick 8 will already be gone by the time their pick is up. So then they will pass on the remaining QB options and either trade down or draft a player like Mack or Donald if they can't trade down.

Given Spielmans track record with trading so far, I think the Vikings find a deal to trade down if the QB they believe in is not there at pick 8.

What do you all think of the rumors about the Rams trading the Vikings Sam Bradford? Do the Vikings want Bradford? Is he a long term answer better than the QBs available in the draft?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think the top 7 picks are some combination of Clowney/Mack/Robinson/Watkins/Evans/Matthews/Manziel.

So at #8 the options, to me, look like Mosley, Donald, or trade. Of course I'd go for the trade, but I think the pick will be Mosley.

It won't be Barr. I don't think he'll translate to a 4-3 linebacker.
Totally agree with this thought process as well as this pick. Way too many QB's to be taken in the 2nd or 3rd round and NO THANK YOU ST. LOUIS for Sam. It would be too big of a cap hit for us as well as the cost would be too big.

 
P. Schrager ‏@PSchrags

Multiple people at teams now saying Vikings love Aaron Donald at 8. "Zim's a defensive guy"....Linval Joseph, Floyd, Donald at DT? Nice trio

 
I'd be in favor of Bradford. His contract would be renegotiated. Besides, they have plenty of cap room.

I think Turner could do much more with him than the bozos that he's had so far. And he was playing well before getting hurt last year.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trade Up, Trade Back, or Trade Further Back?

Mike Wobschall vikings.com

Posted 5 minutes ago http://www.vikings.com/news/article-1/Trade-Up-Trade-Back-or-Trade-Further-Back/da04e19e-ceb0-4a40-ad6c-caa84724bdb0

Everyone knows Vikings GM Rick Spielman likes to deal. Trade back or trade up, Spielman isn’t afraid to move in either direction if the deal is right. But that’s the key – the deal has to be right. A trade up or back in the first round this year for the Vikings can only happen if there’s a proposed deal on the table.

While we wait for the 2014 NFL Draft to finally arrive later this week, here are three hypothetical trade proposals for Vikings fans to consider...

TRADE UP

Vikings Get No. 5 Raiders Get No. 8 No. 108 (4th round)

With Spielman saying for months he wants to come away from the 2014 draft with 10 selections and with talk about the depth of this year’s draft, the Vikings pull off a shocker and trade up with Oakland from No. 8 to No. 5, also surrendering a fourth-round choice (No. 108) to grease the skids. Oakland took 50 cents on the dollar last season in trading back from No. 3 to No. 12 with Miami and received only an additional second-rounder (No. 42) for the steep drop, so maybe they’d take a fourth to drop back three spots this time.

In this scenario, the Vikings could have their eye on receiver Mike Evans or perhaps the draft’s top linebacker – Khalil Mack – somehow fell out of the top four and the Vikings felt he was too good to not go after. The Raiders do the deal because they know they can still get a difference-maker at No. 8 to fill their various needs, plus they now have back-to-back picks in the fourth round (they also have No. 107), which they can use to add two more quality players or they can use to package together to move up into the third round.

TRADE BACK

Rams Get No. 8 Vikings Get No. 13 No. 75 (3rd round) No. 110 (4th round)

Having already secured the No. 2 pick, the Rams decide to get splashy by moving up to No. 8 for a second Top-10 pick in the draft. Of the teams within a few picks after the Vikings, St. Louis has the most ammo to make such a trade (12 selections, nine tradable, three compensatory). For agreeing to move back five spots, the Vikings take in an additional third-rounder (No. 75) and fourth-rounder (No. 110), which gives them a total of 10 selections and seven picks in the first four rounds.

At No. 13, the Vikings would likely be looking at cornerbacks Darqueze Dennard and Justin Gilbert or perhaps one of two Alabama defenders – safety Ha Ha Clinton-Dix or linebacker CJ Mosley.

TRADE FURTHER BACK

49ers Get No. 8 Vikings Get No. 30 No. 56 (2nd round) No. 61 (2nd round) 2015 Third Rounder

In the 2013 draft, San Francisco moved aggressively from No. 31 to No. 18, giving Dallas an additional third-rounder (No. 74) to make it happen. In this proposed trade, the 49ers have to pony up their first-round pick (No. 30) in addition to both of their second-rounders and a third-rounder next year. This move would mean the Vikings possess four selections in the first two rounds and six in the first three rounds.

In this scenario, the 49ers add an elite talent to an already talent-rich team – perhaps Evans to beef up the receiver corps or linebacker Anthony Barr in the event Aldon Smith faces League discipline. The Vikings, meanwhile, could take a small hit in the caliber of player they get in the first round but will benefit greatly with the ability to add six third-round or better players to their roster. Possible selections at No. 30 include defensive end Kony Ealy, cornerback Kyle Fuller, defensive tackle Ra’Shede Hageman and linebacker Ryan Shazier.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am just going to throw some dung at the wall here and see if it sticks....lol. If we cant get a hold of Bridgewater we go Clowney or Barr and then try and deal for.....gulp.....Sam Bradford. I think with the way Clemons has played St.Louis would be eager to unload Bradford at a reasonable price and then draft a QB of the future with one of their 2 1st round picks with their first pick in the 1st round possibly being top 5 with the Redskins free falling. Bradford has under achieved so far in his career but only just turned 26 and I think he would be good with Peterson drawing most of the attention and getting to throw to Jennings, Patterson, Simpson, and Rudolph. This move let's us draft one of the 2 best defensive players in the draft in our attempt to rebuild our D. I personally like Manziel but dont think he will go top 5 and wont be there for us in the 2nd. Anyone else feeling nervous about any other QB other than Bridgewater?
Sounds like I might have partially hit on something here way back in November. Rumors flying that the Vikes want to trade a 2nd or 3rd round pick for Bradford and then renegotiate a long term deal for him. Rams then take their QB of the future in Manziel and the Vikes still keep their 8th pick and go Mack, Donald, Mosley, or Barr. Any more rumors swirling their in the Twin Cities?

 
I would be ecstatic to get him for a 3rd. Like Andy said in a previous post, Let Norv work with Bradford and he might unleash that potential he had as an overall number 1 pick. Good coaching and better weapons than he has ever had and I think we see Bradford shine.

 
I would be ecstatic to get him for a 3rd. Like Andy said in a previous post, Let Norv work with Bradford and he might unleash that potential he had as an overall number 1 pick. Good coaching and better weapons than he has ever had and I think we see Bradford shine.
It would be a perfect completion to the Harvin trade if we could get him for the #96 pick...

 
Much to do about nothing IMO. "People in the league believe" is a very weak source. I wonder if Jason La Canfora's source is an equipment manager who also believes he has been abducted by aliens.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trade Up, Trade Back, or Trade Further Back?

Mike Wobschall vikings.com

Posted 5 minutes ago http://www.vikings.com/news/article-1/Trade-Up-Trade-Back-or-Trade-Further-Back/da04e19e-ceb0-4a40-ad6c-caa84724bdb0

Everyone knows Vikings GM Rick Spielman likes to deal. Trade back or trade up, Spielman isn’t afraid to move in either direction if the deal is right. But that’s the key – the deal has to be right. A trade up or back in the first round this year for the Vikings can only happen if there’s a proposed deal on the table.

While we wait for the 2014 NFL Draft to finally arrive later this week, here are three hypothetical trade proposals for Vikings fans to consider...

TRADE UP

Vikings Get No. 5 Raiders Get No. 8 No. 108 (4th round)

With Spielman saying for months he wants to come away from the 2014 draft with 10 selections and with talk about the depth of this year’s draft, the Vikings pull off a shocker and trade up with Oakland from No. 8 to No. 5, also surrendering a fourth-round choice (No. 108) to grease the skids. Oakland took 50 cents on the dollar last season in trading back from No. 3 to No. 12 with Miami and received only an additional second-rounder (No. 42) for the steep drop, so maybe they’d take a fourth to drop back three spots this time.

In this scenario, the Vikings could have their eye on receiver Mike Evans or perhaps the draft’s top linebacker – Khalil Mack – somehow fell out of the top four and the Vikings felt he was too good to not go after. The Raiders do the deal because they know they can still get a difference-maker at No. 8 to fill their various needs, plus they now have back-to-back picks in the fourth round (they also have No. 107), which they can use to add two more quality players or they can use to package together to move up into the third round.
4th round pick for a 3 spot move into the top 5? yeah no.

 
Personally, my hope is for Manziel. I think the kid can play and judging from the work he put in before his pro day to throw from under center, he's a fast learner.

Living in Texas and surrounded by Aggies, all I hear is that he is a gym rat and a pretty big study of the game (when he's not out partying... Hah).

Maybe I just want some excitement injected into this team, but I think the kid can win and would make an immediate impact and provide some great media attention to my Vikes.

Probably get a few more televised games I could watch at home down here out if it as well.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Raiderfan32904 said:
Biabreakable said:
Trade Up, Trade Back, or Trade Further Back?

Mike Wobschall vikings.com

Posted 5 minutes ago http://www.vikings.com/news/article-1/Trade-Up-Trade-Back-or-Trade-Further-Back/da04e19e-ceb0-4a40-ad6c-caa84724bdb0

Everyone knows Vikings GM Rick Spielman likes to deal. Trade back or trade up, Spielman isn’t afraid to move in either direction if the deal is right. But that’s the key – the deal has to be right. A trade up or back in the first round this year for the Vikings can only happen if there’s a proposed deal on the table.

While we wait for the 2014 NFL Draft to finally arrive later this week, here are three hypothetical trade proposals for Vikings fans to consider...

TRADE UP

Vikings Get No. 5 Raiders Get No. 8 No. 108 (4th round)

With Spielman saying for months he wants to come away from the 2014 draft with 10 selections and with talk about the depth of this year’s draft, the Vikings pull off a shocker and trade up with Oakland from No. 8 to No. 5, also surrendering a fourth-round choice (No. 108) to grease the skids. Oakland took 50 cents on the dollar last season in trading back from No. 3 to No. 12 with Miami and received only an additional second-rounder (No. 42) for the steep drop, so maybe they’d take a fourth to drop back three spots this time.

In this scenario, the Vikings could have their eye on receiver Mike Evans or perhaps the draft’s top linebacker – Khalil Mack – somehow fell out of the top four and the Vikings felt he was too good to not go after. The Raiders do the deal because they know they can still get a difference-maker at No. 8 to fill their various needs, plus they now have back-to-back picks in the fourth round (they also have No. 107), which they can use to add two more quality players or they can use to package together to move up into the third round.
4th round pick for a 3 spot move into the top 5? yeah no.
Talk to Wobby about that. :shrug:

Seems like too little incentive for the move to me as well. Wobby is a bit of a :homer:

 
Question Vikings fans:

Would you take Romo at $10M a year for 4 years for the 1.8?
Only if he starts on Monday Night Football the following week, and immediately rips off a 50+ yard run in one shoe. Oh yes, and only if the Vikings can send the Cowboys 118 picks, 43 players, and the Cowboys promise to take us out for breakfast the next morning, call us every day the following week to "just talk," and send us flowers at work, so all the other ladies in our cube farm are jealous. ;)

 
Question for the Vikings fans. I am working on a top ten mock and I feel pretty confident that Aaron Donald is your man at pick #8 if he lands there. But I think Tampa is going to trade back with New York G-Men who also want Donald. I'm having trouble figuring what your plan B is. I figure you want to trade back as your prime option, but failing that, would you consider Bortles or Bridgewater at pick #8? or other _____?

 
Question for the Vikings fans. I am working on a top ten mock and I feel pretty confident that Aaron Donald is your man at pick #8 if he lands there. But I think Tampa is going to trade back with New York G-Men who also want Donald. I'm having trouble figuring what your plan B is. I figure you want to trade back as your prime option, but failing that, would you consider Bortles or Bridgewater at pick #8? or other _____?
Mosley. I had him in the Vikings spot until the last minute change to Donald.

 
Question for the Vikings fans. I am working on a top ten mock and I feel pretty confident that Aaron Donald is your man at pick #8 if he lands there. But I think Tampa is going to trade back with New York G-Men who also want Donald. I'm having trouble figuring what your plan B is. I figure you want to trade back as your prime option, but failing that, would you consider Bortles or Bridgewater at pick #8? or other _____?
Mosley. I had him in the Vikings spot until the last minute change to Donald.
Yeah, come to think of it, I do see Mosley in a lot of mocks at 8. I would be worried about his injury history, but I hear some people compare him to Kuechly. Thanks for chiming in.

 
Tom Pelissero@TomPelissero13m

Spielman says trade feelers heating up. Three calls yesterday, two texts today. Already had offer for their 2nd and 4th round picks

Tom Pelissero@TomPelissero8m

Spielman says he knows he's getting criticized and takes full responsibility for Christian Ponder pick. Emphasizes Ponder is still young.

Tom Pelissero@TomPelissero5m

Asked Spielman how many QBs he'd be willing to take at 8. "Why don't you just ask me the name?"

Tom Pelissero@TomPelissero47s

Spielman: "We would not trade Ponder."

Tom Pelissero@TomPelissero26s

Spielman says he has read the mock drafts. "You guys are missing some names on our pick at 8, I'll tell you that."

Tom Pelissero@TomPelissero28s

Why wouldn't he trade Ponder? "Because that would leave us with one quarterback." Says declined option to keep financial options open.

 
Question for the Vikings fans. I am working on a top ten mock and I feel pretty confident that Aaron Donald is your man at pick #8 if he lands there. But I think Tampa is going to trade back with New York G-Men who also want Donald. I'm having trouble figuring what your plan B is. I figure you want to trade back as your prime option, but failing that, would you consider Bortles or Bridgewater at pick #8? or other _____?
I think both of those QB and Manziel could be the pick at 8 if that is their guy.

If not Donald, Mosley, Dix, Barr could all be players the Vikings might pick assuming Mack is gone (most likely). If Mack or QBotf were there I don't think the Vikings will trade down. Otherwise they may be willing.

Beyond the players I already listed, I can see teams wanting to trade up for a WR, Ebron, Lewan or Martin possibly for a team looking for offensive line help. There really are a lot of teams that could benefit from moving up to the Vikings pick.

 
Tom Pelissero@TomPelissero8m

Spielman says he knows he's getting criticized and takes full responsibility for Christian Ponder pick. Emphasizes Ponder is still young.
<_<
I don't fault Spielman for the response. What else is he going to say? He isn't going to go to the media and hammer Ponder when he just was demoted. Not a very classy move.
Just wondering if not picking up the 5th year option will make him more tradable during the draft? I'm assuming so - even though they said they wouldn't trade him...

 
Question for the Vikings fans. I am working on a top ten mock and I feel pretty confident that Aaron Donald is your man at pick #8 if he lands there. But I think Tampa is going to trade back with New York G-Men who also want Donald. I'm having trouble figuring what your plan B is. I figure you want to trade back as your prime option, but failing that, would you consider Bortles or Bridgewater at pick #8? or other _____?
I feel like the Bucs will take Donald and if they don't he's very much in the running for the Vikes. I'd be shocked at this point if they took a QB at #8. I feel like Evans, Gilbert or one of the CBs would be the choice if Donald is gone, with a trade back being most likely. Hearing the Cowboys may badly want Donald and could be a trade partner with the Vikes too.

 
I can't shake the feeling that the Vikings will use an early draft pick on a running back just like they did with Gerhart.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't shake the feeling that the Vikings will use an early draft pick on a running back just like they did with Gerhart.
Me too somewhat. But I do not view that as a bad thing if the Vikings do end up trading down and picking up an extra 2nd or 3rd round draft pick that they end up using on a RB.

I would prefer they stay on the defensive side of things but if BPA in the 2nd or 3rd round is not a QB or defensive player but is a RB? I don't have a problem with them making that pick. The Vikings have had nice insurance in Gerhart for some time and also had depth in Chester Taylor before they got Peterson. The Vikings need 2 quality RB so if Peterson does miss any time they can stay balanced.

I think that is worth a 2nd or 3rd round pick.

By Ben Goessling | ESPN.com MINEAPOLIS http://espn.go.com/blog/minnesota-vikings/post/_/id/6549/spielman-assessing-vikings-trade-options?ex_cid=espnapi_public

Spielman assessing Vikings' trade options

-- Since he started running the Minnesota Vikings' drafts in 2007, Vikings general manager Rick Spielman hasn't been shy about making moves before and during the draft. Spielman has made 16 trades involving an exchange of draft picks, trading up seven times and moving down in the draft nine times. And when Spielman's had reason to move up, it's usually been because he has his eye on an impact player: his moves up the draft board netted Cordarrelle Patterson, Harrison Smith and Brian Robison, among others.

(The Vikings technically moved down in the 2008 draft, based on the exchange of picks in the Jared Allen trade, but the deal might have been Spielman's boldest with the Vikings, bringing a four-time Pro Bowler to Minnesota in exchange for four picks. Additionally, they got the 187th pick in the trade with the Chiefs, and used it to take center John Sullivan.)

This year, if the Vikings are going to make a trade in the first round of the draft, it seems likely their first step would be a move downward; Spielman typically likes to have 10 picks in a draft, and is currently in possession of eight. He could pick up a couple more if the Vikings move back from the No. 8 overall pick, and that might give Spielman the flexibility to do what he's done each of the last two years, moving back into the first round to take another player.

Spielman said on Tuesday that he'd already received three calls and two text messages about possible trades, adding he'd already had offers for the Vikings' second- and fourth-round picks, among others. "Everybody is just kind of starting to line up their dance partners," he said. "It doesn't usually happen till (you) get on the clock. At least you know on potential teams who may be interested in coming up into your spot."

On Tuesday, Spielman said, the Vikings went through one of the exercises they'd used the last two years, running through a four-hour scenario of how the Vikings would handle a trade down and whom they'd target if they moved back to a certain spot.

"We do that when we're at our secondround picks (too)," Spielman said. "We go through all different kinds of mocks. To me, people get tired of talking about everything. But the more I hear things, the more we can put ourselves in scenarios, when it comes up on draft day, you've already kind of experienced the worst thing that can happen to you on draft day and how you would react.

"I think that's really helped especially over the last two years of knowing when to move down, when to trade back up, when to go get players that you covet. I think that's been beneficial. I love to be active on draft day."
 
I can't shake the feeling that the Vikings will use an early draft pick on a running back just like they did with Gerhart.
It doesn't seem necessary in this no blue chip/deep RB draft. Would love to see them steal LaMichael James for a late round pick, and I love Charles Sims for the role I could see supplementing AP.

 
You can put me in the camp of trading back a few spots (in the 9-15 range) and pick up a guy like Mosley, Gilbert, Denard. Then use some of what we got in the trade to move up and get a QB late in the first round. I think that the QBs will slide giving us a choice of Bridgewater, Bortles, Manziel or Carr in the late first round. If somehow the Bradford for a 3rd or 4th happens and we restructure his contract than go BPA at #8.

Donald I also like as an option but would prefer if we went secondary or LB.

I don't think this would ever happen but if the Vikings somehow traded up and got Mack I would go bonkers.

 
I can't shake the feeling that the Vikings will use an early draft pick on a running back just like they did with Gerhart.
It doesn't seem necessary in this no blue chip/deep RB draft. Would love to see them steal LaMichael James for a late round pick, and I love Charles Sims for the role I could see supplementing AP.
They have shown some interest in Devonta Freeman. I wouldn't be surprised if he was on top of their running back draft board.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top