This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
There is nothing I would care about giving up in that trade. I have no faith in Trent Richardson, very little in Martin and Spiller doesn't excite me anymore. If you want to win this year the price doesn't bother me in the slightest.
I don't have any faith in them and they will never start except a bye week for me with LBell, McCoy, and Charles ahead of them .... no one in the league wanted them individually and I can't blame them.
I wouldn't have moved Rivers for that offer. Old busted QB and 3 RBs who even if they land somewhere else with a start will likely be middle of the road RBs.
Yeah, me too. Those kind of players just tend to clog up your roster. A little too valuable to cut outright, but rarely if ever actually get into your starting lineup. They just take up shelf space. Get what you can and be done with them.
I can see having 2 kicks at the can for Gurley but I think I might keep Julio here.
Close but I might still take Foster/Blue side. I don't think Blue is special but Foster should help the next year or two.
Still 3RBs with at least some shot at starting somewhere in a nonPPR is pretty solid hedge for a QB that definitely has a clock beside his trade value.
Well, now that Cooks is likely out for the rest of the fantasy season, that seems like a more reasonable option.
Didn't factor into it for me. Cooks only loses value this season the overall value changes very little if at all for me. Assumed the guy trading Julio for Cooks 2 1sts is out of contention already
Falling down the rankings IMO. His value is certainly in flux, maybe at 8 or so for now. His value could rebound, but it could easily fall further. I have Hyde and wouldn't trade him for Bernard, but I also own Hill.
Maybe. Do you really have a ton of faith in any of those RBs?
I'm not a Cam fan but that's not much for him. Polk is a sneaky add because I don't know if McCoy is in Philly next year. Just a weird hunch.
Well I have some faith that Martin could become relevant again in a new environment. Spiller could have some value next year as well - but I think what people fail to realize about him is that he'll be 28 already to start next season so unless he lands in a plum role, his value is just getting lower and lower. At this point I have no hope in Trent ever being relevant again.
No more than buying low on Floyd. I would prefer the Floyd side and the upgraded pick makes it nicer
See, I like the deal a lot for a rebuilding team. Selling high on Demarco imo. RBs shelf life is short especially one with a near 400 carry workload.
Sure but is 3 late 1sts really selling high for the likely top scoring player in that league? I would probably like it better if Mason/late 1st were an early 1st.
I'm pairing him with Ellington and I have Hyde, Sims, Crowell and Randle waiting in the wings. Hoping this gives me the piece I needed since I have strong WRs (Dez, Julio, Evans, OBJ, M. Bryant, Jordan Mathews, Gordon).
When you're rebuilding you've got to move older RB's, especially UFA's who may be in a less desirable place next year. What happens to Murray's value if he signs with the Raiders?
Raiders already have best RB named Murray in the NFL...
I think Hill is more a mid 1st value at this point. That said 3 1sts for Murray is nice value imo for a team not needing him this year. Two years from now you'll look like a genius.
I personally like it for the other guy. If it wins you the league--it will have been worth it. If not, I think you'll regret it starting next year and for a few after that.
