This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I at least want to wait till they actually lose a game before I panic. This could very well end up badly, but I'll wait to see what adjustments they come up with before organizing the search committee for a new head coach.
And I'm sure he will be a good trooper when they are losing and he isn't getting his numbers.
BS. Check his instagram on 12/30. He celebrated with his teammates. What kind of non-human are we trying to cast him as here?
I don't know but I think there's gonna be a heck of a lot of pressure on Maclin to produce.
I took the McLane pic as a joke...I thought a lot of people would take it as tongue in cheek
I think its asinine to think he didn't celebrate with his teammates. Clearly that's the intent of tweeting the photo, to show him as someone who was celebrating his number instead of joining a team photo. If you take it as evidence of his me-first behavior, it is poor evidence given other pictures from the same day exist.I took the McLane pic as a joke...I thought a lot of people would take it as tongue in cheek
You took it like mom forgot your birthday..."What kind of non-human" Seriously?
Now THIS one is serious!I think its asinine to think he didn't celebrate with his teammates. Clearly that's the intent of tweeting the photo, to show him as someone who was celebrating his number instead of joining a team photo. If you take it as evidence of his me-first behavior, it is poor evidence given other pictures from the same day exist.I took the McLane pic as a joke...I thought a lot of people would take it as tongue in cheek
You took it like mom forgot your birthday..."What kind of non-human" Seriously?
If you want to take it as a joke or just a symbol, that's fine. Haha, funny joke, that's for posting it in two threads. You're a regular Tosh.0.
Yeah, that's it
I think a combo of Maclin, Cooper, Ertz, McCoy, Sproles and whatever WR we draft should do.
Does it matter. While Chip's track record is short it looks pretty good. He made the offense go not Desean. As far as I know Mccoy is still there. I mean do you really think Foles throws 27 tds to 2 int anywhere else? our whole offense has inflated numbers due to chip.
Nick Foles
We had a guy not named Jackson that averaged roughly 18 ypc which was good enough for 3rd in the NFL....but he only caught those passes because of Jackson, right?
It's debatable, but it could be a plus that Foles will get the ball out quicker. In general we don't want him to sit in the pocket waiting for deep throws to open up. Maybe Chip thought this was best for his development, as backwards as that sounds. If he can make several short throws quickly instead of hoping for 1 deep throw, the success rate might be better. And less 3-and-outs. Even if that really is the strategy, I'd still have questions if the talent level is good enough. But I guess wait and see.
It's a spread-option offense dip ####. DeSean was getting the same amount of targets as the rest of the gang, nothing radical. I guess you think he's Calvin Johnson like the rest of mainstream media.
Aside from Denver the final 4 teams in the NFL last season had a simlar approach no? Boldin #'s can be had here
That's my question too --- if the talent level in the remaining receivers is good enough to sustain what the offense did last year. The offense is a year older and defenses have seen it more now, Jackson is gone, Maclin's coming off an injury.
How is this guy, that 2 different coaches have tried to trade - with no takers, suddenly irreplaceable? Remember when the entire NFL laughed at the Eagles for trading McNabb to Washington?fatness said:
They get mad when you do thatShaHBucks said:
fatness said:
Haha I can't say much more than this http://youtu.be/xokthY5zuPU FF to around the :29 sec markThey get mad when you do thatShaHBucks said:
No team was stupid enough to trade for him, and I think all Eagles fans are smart enough to know why. A trade meant giving up a draft pick and taking on Jackson's current contract. Nobody was stupid enough to do that when they all knew he'd be cut, they'd give up no draft picks, and they could negotiate their own contract with him.
Well they were correct this time. Andy dangled him in '12 and had no takers. The point I was trying to make is that 2 head coaches have wanted him off the team, yet he's somehow irreplaceable now that he's cut.
3 silly points:fatness said:
@howardeskin: @RapSheet #chiefs were never in running for @DeseanJackson10 after his release. Andy Reid told @Eagles weeks ago wasn't interested.
You don't need 4.2 or 4.3 speed to become a deep threat and open things up. See the Packers.fatness said:
What does that mean? Reid still tried to trade him from the Eagles in '12. And what they say in public doesn't mean that's what they're saying in private.
I think the Eagles offense will falter without him, probably not dramatically. I think the field that opposing defenses have to cover will be a bit compressed due to lack of a deep threat.
It means one of them wanted him back, but didn't have the cap money available to get it done.
No it doesnt:
Or it means Reid didn't want him, but said this publicly because he likes Jackson personally and wanted to make him feel good.
Remember when the Saints had no cap money but then had some when good players wanted to sign there?
Ask ANY Eagles homer who would be more likely to know Andy Reid out of the two in those tweets....
