What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official 2014 World Cup Thread*** (2 Viewers)

Sinn Fein said:
Re: Suarez - Dude is an absolute train wreck. I know people don't care about him personally, but he needs to get help. It is not normal for a grown man to go around biting people. I am guessing he has the mentality of an immature adolescent, but all the football ability in the world can not be used to overlook the social problems he obviously has.

I could almost understand a biting situation if the players were tangled up on the ground, and he bit someone whose arm was in his face, out of frustration - but Suarez looks like he is auditioning for the next Sharknado movie the way he goes after his victims. If Liverpool, or Uruguay really wanted to help here - they would get him help, and stop making excuses.
I'm with you on all of that..........except right at the very end.

A) Liverpool WAS getting him help. I guess you missed the season last year, where he was doing much better, and seemed to have turned a corner.

B) Once again, holding Liverpool responsible for something done with the Uruguayan national team is downright idiotic. Please, in great detail, tell me what Liverpool should have done, at the World Cup, to prevent this.

C) He deserves to be punished. Liverpool do not.
Stop.You sound as irrational as Suarez. FIFA is not punishing Liverpool - Suarez is punishing Liverpool by his actions.

Liverpool made their bed with Suarez, handing him contract extensions, knowing about his issues. They can sell him if they want.

But, stop this whining about poor Liverpool.
No, I really don't. Something done with the national team should not impact the domestic season. Liverpool is being punished whether you look past your blind hatred, or not.

ETA - Still waiting on that list of things Liverpool could have done at the World Cup to prevent this.
You're a good guy Smoovy but this is ridiculous. I'm definitely biased when it comes to Liverpool but come on HE ####### BIT SOMEONE FOR THE 3RD TIME! He's lucky it wasn't a full year.
I fully admit that Liverpool affects my mood way more than it should. I can't help it. No other sports team or anything like that has that effect on me. So if I'm snappy, that's why.

My point all along has not been to defend him. It's indefensible. You're absolutely correct. I was simply trying to point out that Liverpool is being punished more than him or Uruguay, in my opinion, and I don't think it's fair. That's all.

I'm all for him being fined. I'm all for him losing salary. I'm all for him being banned from the national team. Just didn't think Liverpool needed to be punished. There are those that disagree, and I get that.

 
I don't think that anyone thought Liverpool should be singled out and punished, nor do I think FIFA set out to punish Liverpool. But you can't separate a player from his club. Punishing the player will always have an impact on the club. As many have said, it's just the risk of doing business with a volatile player. If anything, FIFA went light on Liverpool by starting the suspension now, instead of when the season starts.

It also sounds more and more like this won't be Liverpools problem much longer.

 
Usually the MLS All Star Game is vs a European club.
yup and this year is is Bayern Munich.
that i didnt know (or missed)... nice pull for the MLS ASG
The obvious problem in even numbered years is that the touring team's roster will be more depleted than usual. The All-star game falls 3 1/2 weeks after the WC final. I doubt anybody who advances as far as the semifinals will even show for the US tour.
Julian Green is a likely starter in this one.
Color me intrigued
He'll be well rested, and it seems theses clubs usually try to play local boys if possible. I saw Fergie give 90 minutes to Jonathan Spector against Bayern at Soldier Field about 10 years ago.
Some of the MLS stars may have some extra incentive to show that they should have had Green's spot on the bench in Brazil

 
I don't think that anyone thought Liverpool should be singled out and punished, nor do I think FIFA set out to punish Liverpool. But you can't separate a player from his club. Punishing the player will always have an impact on the club. As many have said, it's just the risk of doing business with a volatile player. If anything, FIFA went light on Liverpool by starting the suspension now, instead of when the season starts.

It also sounds more and more like this won't be Liverpools problem much longer.
I agree. I think it's just down to whether or not Barca want to take him on right now.

 
Sinn Fein said:
Re: Suarez - Dude is an absolute train wreck. I know people don't care about him personally, but he needs to get help. It is not normal for a grown man to go around biting people. I am guessing he has the mentality of an immature adolescent, but all the football ability in the world can not be used to overlook the social problems he obviously has.

I could almost understand a biting situation if the players were tangled up on the ground, and he bit someone whose arm was in his face, out of frustration - but Suarez looks like he is auditioning for the next Sharknado movie the way he goes after his victims. If Liverpool, or Uruguay really wanted to help here - they would get him help, and stop making excuses.
I'm with you on all of that..........except right at the very end.

A) Liverpool WAS getting him help. I guess you missed the season last year, where he was doing much better, and seemed to have turned a corner.

B) Once again, holding Liverpool responsible for something done with the Uruguayan national team is downright idiotic. Please, in great detail, tell me what Liverpool should have done, at the World Cup, to prevent this.

C) He deserves to be punished. Liverpool do not.
Stop.You sound as irrational as Suarez. FIFA is not punishing Liverpool - Suarez is punishing Liverpool by his actions.

Liverpool made their bed with Suarez, handing him contract extensions, knowing about his issues. They can sell him if they want.

But, stop this whining about poor Liverpool.
No, I really don't. Something done with the national team should not impact the domestic season. Liverpool is being punished whether you look past your blind hatred, or not.

ETA - Still waiting on that list of things Liverpool could have done at the World Cup to prevent this.
You're a good guy Smoovy but this is ridiculous. I'm definitely biased when it comes to Liverpool but come on HE ####### BIT SOMEONE FOR THE 3RD TIME! He's lucky it wasn't a full year.
I fully admit that Liverpool affects my mood way more than it should. I can't help it. No other sports team or anything like that has that effect on me. So if I'm snappy, that's why.

My point all along has not been to defend him. It's indefensible. You're absolutely correct. I was simply trying to point out that Liverpool is being punished more than him or Uruguay, in my opinion, and I don't think it's fair. That's all.

I'm all for him being fined. I'm all for him losing salary. I'm all for him being banned from the national team. Just didn't think Liverpool needed to be punished. There are those that disagree, and I get that.
This was his first offense with the National team. If this was his first offense period, he'd be finishing this tournament. Therefor you can argue that his actions at Liverpool are unfairly punishing Uruguay.

 
Sinn Fein said:
Re: Suarez - Dude is an absolute train wreck. I know people don't care about him personally, but he needs to get help. It is not normal for a grown man to go around biting people. I am guessing he has the mentality of an immature adolescent, but all the football ability in the world can not be used to overlook the social problems he obviously has.

I could almost understand a biting situation if the players were tangled up on the ground, and he bit someone whose arm was in his face, out of frustration - but Suarez looks like he is auditioning for the next Sharknado movie the way he goes after his victims. If Liverpool, or Uruguay really wanted to help here - they would get him help, and stop making excuses.
I'm with you on all of that..........except right at the very end.

A) Liverpool WAS getting him help. I guess you missed the season last year, where he was doing much better, and seemed to have turned a corner.

B) Once again, holding Liverpool responsible for something done with the Uruguayan national team is downright idiotic. Please, in great detail, tell me what Liverpool should have done, at the World Cup, to prevent this.

C) He deserves to be punished. Liverpool do not.
Stop.You sound as irrational as Suarez. FIFA is not punishing Liverpool - Suarez is punishing Liverpool by his actions.

Liverpool made their bed with Suarez, handing him contract extensions, knowing about his issues. They can sell him if they want.

But, stop this whining about poor Liverpool.
No, I really don't. Something done with the national team should not impact the domestic season. Liverpool is being punished whether you look past your blind hatred, or not.

ETA - Still waiting on that list of things Liverpool could have done at the World Cup to prevent this.
You're a good guy Smoovy but this is ridiculous. I'm definitely biased when it comes to Liverpool but come on HE ####### BIT SOMEONE FOR THE 3RD TIME! He's lucky it wasn't a full year.
I fully admit that Liverpool affects my mood way more than it should. I can't help it. No other sports team or anything like that has that effect on me. So if I'm snappy, that's why.My point all along has not been to defend him. It's indefensible. You're absolutely correct. I was simply trying to point out that Liverpool is being punished more than him or Uruguay, in my opinion, and I don't think it's fair. That's all.

I'm all for him being fined. I'm all for him losing salary. I'm all for him being banned from the national team. Just didn't think Liverpool needed to be punished. There are those that disagree, and I get that.
This was his first offense with the National team. If this was his first offense period, he'd be finishing this tournament. Therefor you can argue that his actions at Liverpool are unfairly punishing Uruguay.
If you want to play that game, Ivanovic was his first and only offense with Liverpool.

 
Every team that won their first game except two went through to the round of 16. Just Italy and Ivory Coast.

Italy had to be what? 88%, 90% to advance after the first game?

 
Every team that won their first game except two went through to the round of 16. Just Italy and Ivory Coast.

Italy had to be what? 88%, 90% to advance after the first game?
I think the past number in the current format was something like 41 out of 46 winners of their first game advanced. I would have put Italy's chances as even higher with them at 3 points and England and Uruguay both on zero.

 
For B-Deep and others asking questions about the whole World Cup qualifying process, I have a spreadsheet that I kept during all the rounds that has each region in a tab with each round and results.

I think the mods can post with attachments. If one is willing, I can email it and they could put it in here for others to look over.

 
Sinn Fein said:
Re: Suarez - Dude is an absolute train wreck. I know people don't care about him personally, but he needs to get help. It is not normal for a grown man to go around biting people. I am guessing he has the mentality of an immature adolescent, but all the football ability in the world can not be used to overlook the social problems he obviously has.

I could almost understand a biting situation if the players were tangled up on the ground, and he bit someone whose arm was in his face, out of frustration - but Suarez looks like he is auditioning for the next Sharknado movie the way he goes after his victims. If Liverpool, or Uruguay really wanted to help here - they would get him help, and stop making excuses.
I'm with you on all of that..........except right at the very end.

A) Liverpool WAS getting him help. I guess you missed the season last year, where he was doing much better, and seemed to have turned a corner.

B) Once again, holding Liverpool responsible for something done with the Uruguayan national team is downright idiotic. Please, in great detail, tell me what Liverpool should have done, at the World Cup, to prevent this.

C) He deserves to be punished. Liverpool do not.
Stop.You sound as irrational as Suarez. FIFA is not punishing Liverpool - Suarez is punishing Liverpool by his actions.

Liverpool made their bed with Suarez, handing him contract extensions, knowing about his issues. They can sell him if they want.

But, stop this whining about poor Liverpool.
No, I really don't. Something done with the national team should not impact the domestic season. Liverpool is being punished whether you look past your blind hatred, or not.

ETA - Still waiting on that list of things Liverpool could have done at the World Cup to prevent this.
You're a good guy Smoovy but this is ridiculous. I'm definitely biased when it comes to Liverpool but come on HE ####### BIT SOMEONE FOR THE 3RD TIME! He's lucky it wasn't a full year.
I fully admit that Liverpool affects my mood way more than it should. I can't help it. No other sports team or anything like that has that effect on me. So if I'm snappy, that's why.My point all along has not been to defend him. It's indefensible. You're absolutely correct. I was simply trying to point out that Liverpool is being punished more than him or Uruguay, in my opinion, and I don't think it's fair. That's all.

I'm all for him being fined. I'm all for him losing salary. I'm all for him being banned from the national team. Just didn't think Liverpool needed to be punished. There are those that disagree, and I get that.
This was his first offense with the National team. If this was his first offense period, he'd be finishing this tournament. Therefor you can argue that his actions at Liverpool are unfairly punishing Uruguay.
If you want to play that game, Ivanovic was his first and only offense with Liverpool.
I think you are the only one looking to play that game.

 
Sinn Fein said:
Re: Suarez - Dude is an absolute train wreck. I know people don't care about him personally, but he needs to get help. It is not normal for a grown man to go around biting people. I am guessing he has the mentality of an immature adolescent, but all the football ability in the world can not be used to overlook the social problems he obviously has.

I could almost understand a biting situation if the players were tangled up on the ground, and he bit someone whose arm was in his face, out of frustration - but Suarez looks like he is auditioning for the next Sharknado movie the way he goes after his victims. If Liverpool, or Uruguay really wanted to help here - they would get him help, and stop making excuses.
I'm with you on all of that..........except right at the very end.

A) Liverpool WAS getting him help. I guess you missed the season last year, where he was doing much better, and seemed to have turned a corner.

B) Once again, holding Liverpool responsible for something done with the Uruguayan national team is downright idiotic. Please, in great detail, tell me what Liverpool should have done, at the World Cup, to prevent this.

C) He deserves to be punished. Liverpool do not.
Stop.You sound as irrational as Suarez. FIFA is not punishing Liverpool - Suarez is punishing Liverpool by his actions.

Liverpool made their bed with Suarez, handing him contract extensions, knowing about his issues. They can sell him if they want.

But, stop this whining about poor Liverpool.
No, I really don't. Something done with the national team should not impact the domestic season. Liverpool is being punished whether you look past your blind hatred, or not.

ETA - Still waiting on that list of things Liverpool could have done at the World Cup to prevent this.
You're a good guy Smoovy but this is ridiculous. I'm definitely biased when it comes to Liverpool but come on HE ####### BIT SOMEONE FOR THE 3RD TIME! He's lucky it wasn't a full year.
I fully admit that Liverpool affects my mood way more than it should. I can't help it. No other sports team or anything like that has that effect on me. So if I'm snappy, that's why.My point all along has not been to defend him. It's indefensible. You're absolutely correct. I was simply trying to point out that Liverpool is being punished more than him or Uruguay, in my opinion, and I don't think it's fair. That's all.

I'm all for him being fined. I'm all for him losing salary. I'm all for him being banned from the national team. Just didn't think Liverpool needed to be punished. There are those that disagree, and I get that.
This was his first offense with the National team. If this was his first offense period, he'd be finishing this tournament. Therefor you can argue that his actions at Liverpool are unfairly punishing Uruguay.
If you want to play that game, Ivanovic was his first and only offense with Liverpool.
I think you are the only one looking to play that game.
I like to think logically, and not base my opinions on blind hatred.

 
The midfielder is in high demand, with his contract set to expire at the same time he's excelling in the World Cup.

USA midfielder Jermaine Jones could parlay his World Cup form into an MLS contract sooner rather than later.

Goal USA reported earlier this week that Jones is pursuing a move to MLS, and it now appears the league is already working on a deal for the German-born U.S. star, whose contract with Bundesliga side Schalke 04 expires next week. Already on his way out at the Veltins-Arena, Jones spent the first half of 2014 on loan to Turkish side Besiktas.

Sporting Kansas City manager Vermes denied his team was specifically targeting the 32-year-old, saying Sporting was "looking at a lot of players at the moment," but did reveal that Jones is in discussions with MLS.

"I have not talked to (Jones) by any means," the Sporting manager said after his team's 1-0 win over Portland on Friday night. "I know the league is talking to him, and we're kind of in the mix like any other team, but right now it's not 100 percent. It's somebody that we would keep on our radar, but it's not a decision that we've said 'hey, this is the guy we want.'

"You also have to consider the allocation ranking. Toronto has it right now, so anybody that comes back as a national team player, they have the first rights unless they want to trade that away."

Vermes, a former United States men's national team player who scored in the 1990 World Cup, also had words of praise for the Sporting pair of Matt Besler and Graham Zusi, who recently made their World Cup debuts for the United States.

"From the club's perspective, we're very proud of them," he said. "Not only have they come through the system, but more importantly, they've evolved into very good international players and true professionals.

"It's definitely proud for all of us who have been a part of their progression, but those two guys are really really good pros and it's one of the reasons why not only are they there, but more importantly since they've been on the field, both of them had a true impact on the success of the team."
 
"You also have to consider the allocation ranking. Toronto has it right now, so anybody that comes back as a national team player, they have the first rights unless the league tells them to trade that away."
Just a guess.

 
"You also have to consider the allocation ranking. Toronto has it right now, so anybody that comes back as a national team player, they have the first rights unless the league tells them to trade that away."
Just a guess.
just a guess for what?
That if Toronto holding first rights is incovenient for the league they'll trade it regardless of how inconvenient it might be for the team.

 
"You also have to consider the allocation ranking. Toronto has it right now, so anybody that comes back as a national team player, they have the first rights unless the league tells them to trade that away."
Just a guess.
just a guess for what?
That if Toronto holding first rights is incovenient for the league they'll trade it regardless of how inconvenient it might be for the team.
I don't think it has anything to do with inconvenience per say, it has to do with the rules of the league.

Here is how I see it:

1) Toronto already has 3 DP's, so they can't sign Jones as a DP with out doing something

2) They are not going to trade Defoe or Bradley for obvious reasons to free up a DP slot

3) Gilberto has been less than stellar as their 3rd DP which means his value to other teams is pretty low at his salary

So the only way Toronto could sign this player would be to either get the rules changed (with Lieweke running the show, that is not an outrageous thought) or they have to find a sucker for Gilberto.

My guess is that Toronto will trade the slot for allocation money.

Jones picked the perfect time to look great though. If he does not have a stellar WC, there is no way MLS offers him a DP contract.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Italy has won one game combined in the last two World Cups. I hadn't realized that before today. Something's wrong there.
Didn't they mention something about not winning a game in their last 10 international fixtures? Agreed, underperforming significantly.
You are correct.

Here are their most recent results starting from the most recent and working backwards

Italy 0 Uruguay 1

Italy 0 Costa Rica 1

Italy 2 England 1

Italy 1 Luxembourg 1 ( this was in Italy)

Italy 0 Ireland 0

Italy 0 Spain 1

Italy 2 Nigeria 2

Italy 1 Germany 1

Italy 2 Armenia 2

Italy 2 Denmark 2

 
Italy 0 Uruguay 1

Italy 0 Costa Rica 1

Italy 2 England 1

Italy 1 Luxembourg 1 ( this was in Italy)

Italy 0 Ireland 0

Italy 0 Spain 1

Italy 2 Nigeria 2

Italy 1 Germany 1

Italy 2 Armenia 2

Italy 2 Denmark 2
That's one of the more shocking soccer-related things (non-biting category) I've seen in a long time.

I guess Soulfly was right about Italy being consistent after all?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Italy 0 Uruguay 1

Italy 0 Costa Rica 1

Italy 2 England 1

Italy 1 Luxembourg 1 ( this was in Italy)

Italy 0 Ireland 0

Italy 0 Spain 1

Italy 2 Nigeria 2

Italy 1 Germany 1

Italy 2 Armenia 2

Italy 2 Denmark 2
That's one of the more shocking soccer-related things (non-biting category) I've seen in a long time.

I guess Soulfly was right about Italy being consistent after all?
Oof.
of those 10 games, 8 were played either in Italy or in a neutral country.

 
I might try and take a peak to see if there is any correlation between the friendlies just before the WC and how teams performed in the WC.

I only know off the top of my head the US (3-0) and advanced and we see Italy's above with getting knocked out.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
"You also have to consider the allocation ranking. Toronto has it right now, so anybody that comes back as a national team player, they have the first rights unless the league tells them to trade that away."
Just a guess.
just a guess for what?
That if Toronto holding first rights is incovenient for the league they'll trade it regardless of how inconvenient it might be for the team.
I don't think it has anything to do with inconvenience per say, it has to do with the rules of the league.

Here is how I see it:

1) Toronto already has 3 DP's, so they can't sign Jones as a DP with out doing something

2) They are not going to trade Defoe or Bradley for obvious reasons to free up a DP slot

3) Gilberto has been less than stellar as their 3rd DP which means his value to other teams is pretty low at his salary

So the only way Toronto could sign this player would be to either get the rules changed (with Lieweke running the show, that is not an outrageous thought) or they have to find a sucker for Gilberto.

My guess is that Toronto will trade the slot for allocation money.

Jones picked the perfect time to look great though. If he does not have a stellar WC, there is no way MLS offers him a DP contract.
I should note that Toronto does not have to trade the slot if they can't sign Jones. They can keep it and simply not use it if they see something later on that might hold more value for them.

 
SAO PAULO — Michael Bradley is just shy of a marathon in this World Cup.

He has run more than any other player in Brazil and might be right up there with Luis Suarez among the most scrutinized.

The U.S. midfielder is taking the heat from fans and soccer pundits for his lack of offensive production through the three Group G matches. Yet the Americans reached the knockout rounds in consecutive World Cups for the first time with the help of his defense. And Bradley has coach Jurgen Klinsmann's utmost respect.

The American Outlaws even chanted "Michael Bradley! Michael Bradley!" after he was admonished by the referee for a studs-up tackle on Thomas Mueller in the 45th minute of Thursday's 1-0 loss to Germany in Recife.

"I am very, very satisfied with Michael in this tournament so far," Klinsmann said. "I know that he has another gear in him."

Bradley has covered a World Cup-leading 23.6 miles, or 38 kilometers. Chilean midfielder Marcelo Diaz is the only other player to go more than 36 kilometers, with three others having covered slightly more than 35.

Klinsmann challenged all his players Friday once the team returned to its training base and held a session under sunny skies at Sao Paulo Futebol Clube in preparation for Tuesday's knockout game against Belgium.

"I believe that in our team so far nobody can claim that he reached his 100 percent yet, so this is a very important message to the players that now prove it," he said. "This is what you worked for so long, so hard for it. Now take it one game at a time with total focus just to this one game, and after that game is done to the next game and make it happen. Is it doable? Absolutely."

The 26-year-old Bradley, who plays for Toronto FC in Major League Soccer, is starved for a goal this year on soccer's biggest stage. Some of his touches have been heavy. His most memorable moment so far might be when he gave up the ball to Eder late in stoppage time, starting the sequence that led to Portugal's equalizer in a 2-2 draw last Sunday in Manaus.

Not that it seems to have Klinsmann concerned. The Americans know they must find ways to generate more shots to put themselves in position to keep this special Brazilian run going beyond Tuesday in Salvador. Bradley is expected to connect better with captain Clint Dempsey, who in the last two matches has been the Americans' lone forward.

"If he already plays on this level right now, we came through this group because of his influence on the field," Klinsmann said, "then if he steps it up another notch, it gives us with other players as well ... a big hope now getting ready for the knockout stage. Because we know that players have not reached their highest spot yet. He is one of them, but overall I am very, very happy with him. The leadership is, I mean he has covered so much ground, he is all over the place. The defensive work that Michael puts in is absolutely outstanding."

And Klinsmann credits Bradley's efforts in the back as a big reason Germany was unable to get many opportunities.

Bradley is his own toughest critic.

"I'm certainly honest enough and hard enough with myself to know that it wasn't my sharpest night, but unfortunately they're not all going to be," he said after the Ghana game, a 2-1 victory. "And on those days it's still about finding every possible way to help your team."

Klinsmann has called on players at all positions to consciously think about moving upfield. The Americans realize full well it's going to take everybody, not just Bradley behind Dempsey, pushing the attack to give them the best opportunity to reach the quarterfinals for the first time in 12 years.

"We needed to do a better job at the beginning of the game of not letting them have the 'German effect.' A lot of times teams will just sit back and allow them to come at you," midfielder Graham Zusi said. "We didn't really want them to do that. It took about 15-20 minutes for us to realize that we can knock the ball around as well.

"The first minutes of the game, impose yourself, step on their toes a bit, get in their face. I think that once we realized that we could play, we saw it turn around. We know that we can now. It's just a matter of doing it early on."
Read more here: http://www.islandpacket.com/2014/06/28/3187029/bradley-covering-most-ground-of.html#storylink=cpy
 
"You also have to consider the allocation ranking. Toronto has it right now, so anybody that comes back as a national team player, they have the first rights unless the league tells them to trade that away."
Just a guess.
just a guess for what?
That if Toronto holding first rights is incovenient for the league they'll trade it regardless of how inconvenient it might be for the team.
I don't think it has anything to do with inconvenience per say, it has to do with the rules of the league.

Here is how I see it:

1) Toronto already has 3 DP's, so they can't sign Jones as a DP with out doing something

2) They are not going to trade Defoe or Bradley for obvious reasons to free up a DP slot

3) Gilberto has been less than stellar as their 3rd DP which means his value to other teams is pretty low at his salary

So the only way Toronto could sign this player would be to either get the rules changed (with Lieweke running the show, that is not an outrageous thought) or they have to find a sucker for Gilberto.

My guess is that Toronto will trade the slot for allocation money.

Jones picked the perfect time to look great though. If he does not have a stellar WC, there is no way MLS offers him a DP contract.
I should note that Toronto does not have to trade the slot if they can't sign Jones. They can keep it and simply not use it if they see something later on that might hold more value for them.
Has this happened before?

I was under the impression that if, say, Kansas City wanted Jones and Jones wanted Kansas City, the order of teams with the right to a DP was pretty much irrelevant -- the league would find a way to get Jones to Kansas City.

i.e. Toronto, or the team with the #2 spot, or the team with the #3 wouldn't actually take Jones -- that there's no real competition.

 
To be fair... it's hard to see the ground a guy covers over 90 minutes, and the loose touches really stand out. But 13km per game is so impressive -- especially given the conditions and the travel.

 
Bradley has covered a World Cup-leading 23.6 miles, or 38 kilometers. Chilean midfielder Marcelo Diaz is the only other player to go more than 36 kilometers, with three others having covered slightly more than 35.
5% more than the next guy in the entire World Cup is a ridiculous stat.
:meh: it took him 4.5 hours to accomplish that - a good athlete can cover 23.6 mile in under 2 hours....

 
Interesting look at how many knockout games go to penalties

[SIZE=16pt]One World Cup Knockout Game in Five Decided by Penalties[/SIZE]
Sports Interaction calculates odds on World Cup games being decided by shootout
The FIFA World Cup moves into its knockout phase on Saturday, when it’s win or go home for the sixteen teams left in the competition. Since 1978 the spectre of a penalty shootout looms for teams that can’t find a result after extra-time. Penalty shootouts are one of the great pieces of theatre in world sports, but exactly how likely are they to happen? Sports Interaction has crunched the numbers to find out.

“Penalty shootouts are thrilling moments in sports,” says Frank Doyle, a spokesman for Sports Interaction. “Players hate them, and so does the nation that’s just lost one, but for everybody else they’re like Old West showdowns with the entire population of the world watching. What could be more dramatic than that?”

1982 was the last World Cup to use two group rounds to produce the tournament finalists. The 1978 final between Argentina and the Netherlands was the only knockout game played during the tournament (although some group games were knockout by circumstance, of course). In 1982, the second group stage produced two semi-finals, one of which, France v West Germany, produced the first ever penalty shoot-out in the World Cup.

The current bracket-based system was introduced in the 1986 World Cup and has been with us since – a sweet sixteen followed by quarter-finals, semi-finals, a third-place game and the Final.

There have been 118 knockout games played in the World Cup since the penalty shootout was introduced. Thirty-eight of these, 32%, needed extra-time to be settled. But of those thirty-eight, twenty-two couldn’t be decided by extra-time and went on to shootouts.

In terms of odds, this means there is a 100/30 chance of any World Cup knockout stage game going to extra time, and it’s 4/1 against any World Cup knockout game going to penalties. But once a game has gone into extra time, the chances of a shootout being needed to separate the sides becomes an odds-on proposition, with a shootout being necessary in three of every five games.

Does the stage of the competition matter? Yes, it does. The most likely stage for a match to be decided by shootout is the quarter-final stage. Ten of the twenty-two penalty-shootouts in World Cup history have occurred in the quarter-finals, with an astonishing three of the four quarter-finals in Mexico ’86 decided by shootout. The only one that didn’t was the one that required the intervention of the “Hand of God” – Argentina’s (in)famous win over England, when Diego Maradona attributed his controversial first goal to “the hand of God and the head of Maradona.”

Shootouts are less likely in the Sweet Sixteen, where one game in eight is likely to need penalty kicks. The least likely round of all is the third-place game, only one of which has even gone into extra-time – Belgium beating France in 1986.

“I’m never quite sure how players manage to pull themselves together after losing a World Cup semi-final to play for third place,” says Frank Doyle. “Surely, to ask them to take part in a shootout after all that would be cruel and unusual punishment – even by FIFA standards.”
http://www.toddstake.com/2014/06/28/knockout-crash-course/

 
"You also have to consider the allocation ranking. Toronto has it right now, so anybody that comes back as a national team player, they have the first rights unless the league tells them to trade that away."
Just a guess.
just a guess for what?
That if Toronto holding first rights is incovenient for the league they'll trade it regardless of how inconvenient it might be for the team.
I don't think it has anything to do with inconvenience per say, it has to do with the rules of the league.

Here is how I see it:

1) Toronto already has 3 DP's, so they can't sign Jones as a DP with out doing something

2) They are not going to trade Defoe or Bradley for obvious reasons to free up a DP slot

3) Gilberto has been less than stellar as their 3rd DP which means his value to other teams is pretty low at his salary

So the only way Toronto could sign this player would be to either get the rules changed (with Lieweke running the show, that is not an outrageous thought) or they have to find a sucker for Gilberto.

My guess is that Toronto will trade the slot for allocation money.

Jones picked the perfect time to look great though. If he does not have a stellar WC, there is no way MLS offers him a DP contract.
I should note that Toronto does not have to trade the slot if they can't sign Jones. They can keep it and simply not use it if they see something later on that might hold more value for them.
Has this happened before?

I was under the impression that if, say, Kansas City wanted Jones and Jones wanted Kansas City, the order of teams with the right to a DP was pretty much irrelevant -- the league would find a way to get Jones to Kansas City.

i.e. Toronto, or the team with the #2 spot, or the team with the #3 wouldn't actually take Jones -- that there's no real competition.
Yes, allocations slots have been traded and allocation slots have been reserved for future use over the years.

No it does not work that way for every player. Mix for example had a bunch of problems going to the team he wanted to (I think it was Portland if memory serves) and never got signed by the league.

You are also correct that if the name is big enough, the league and the teams find a way to get it done (whether through changing the rules as I mentioned earlier or another method) and no one really squawks too much since everyone knows it is for the good of the league.

I am unsure if Jones is a big enough name to go through this work around but we should find out soon enough.

It would be great if Toronto themselves could buy their way out of the Gilberto deal and sign Jones. Bradley, Jones and Defoe would make for an impressive MLS trio.

 
Squrez with his response

RIO DE JANEIRO -- Luis Suarez told FIFA's disciplinary panel that he did not deliberately bite Italy defender Giorgio Chiellini at the World Cup.

The Uruguay striker wrote in Spanish that "in no way it happened how you have described, as a bite or intent to bite."

The player's defense is in paragraph six of FIFA's ruling, which has been seen by The Associated Press.

Suarez wrote: "After the impact... I lost my balance, making my body unstable and falling on top of my opponent. At that moment I hit my face against the player, leaving a small bruise on my cheek and a strong pain in my teeth."

But the seven-man panel ruled that the bite was "deliberate, intentional and without provocation."

Suarez was banned for nine Uruguay matches and from all football for four months -- a punishment the Uruguayan FA has said it will appeal against.

The striker has returned to Uruguay after having his World Cup accreditation revoked and being banned from the team hotel by FIFA.
 
Squrez with his response

RIO DE JANEIRO -- Luis Suarez told FIFA's disciplinary panel that he did not deliberately bite Italy defender Giorgio Chiellini at the World Cup.

The Uruguay striker wrote in Spanish that "in no way it happened how you have described, as a bite or intent to bite."

The player's defense is in paragraph six of FIFA's ruling, which has been seen by The Associated Press.

Suarez wrote: "After the impact... I lost my balance, making my body unstable and falling on top of my opponent. At that moment I hit my face against the player, leaving a small bruise on my cheek and a strong pain in my teeth."

But the seven-man panel ruled that the bite was "deliberate, intentional and without provocation."

Suarez was banned for nine Uruguay matches and from all football for four months -- a punishment the Uruguayan FA has said it will appeal against.

The striker has returned to Uruguay after having his World Cup accreditation revoked and being banned from the team hotel by FIFA.
Embarrassing

 
Italy 0 Uruguay 1

Italy 0 Costa Rica 1

Italy 2 England 1

Italy 1 Luxembourg 1 ( this was in Italy)

Italy 0 Ireland 0

Italy 0 Spain 1

Italy 2 Nigeria 2

Italy 1 Germany 1

Italy 2 Armenia 2

Italy 2 Denmark 2
That's one of the more shocking soccer-related things (non-biting category) I've seen in a long time.

I guess Soulfly was right about Italy being consistent after all?
Oof.
of those 10 games, 8 were played either in Italy or in a neutral country.
They aren't dead, they are just restin'...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vuW6tQ0218

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top