What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official 2014 World Cup Thread*** (2 Viewers)

I like Ian Darke in general but as I have said before, not for US games.

His knowledge of the sports history in the country is very very low. You can tell any facts he has, he has just learned the night before.

No passion and no real tie to the country comes through in his telecasts. Just compare his silly "go go USA" call of Landon's Algeria goal with Cantor's heartfelt emotional call where he almost came to tears.

Much like everything else regarding the sport in this country, developing good American announcers will take time. In the mean time if we have to go with the accented voice, at least let it be with people who have been involved in the game in the country.

I am hoping that Fox gives up the Gus Johnson experiment and just builds off of John Strong's very good start to his career. At 28 I think he is the best soccer announcer the US has ever produced and should only get better as he enters his prime in the next 10-20 years.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fwiw one of the articles I read today had JK realizing the diamond wasn't working in the first half and going to a straight 4 across the midfield for the second half so Bradley could provide some cover. JK also though Jones had a excellent game and the Turkish coach thought our 3 best players were Fabs, Bradley, and Jozy. Said their backs had real problems with Jozy and that he was basically occupying both CBs for much of the game.

 
I'll try to do one or two previews tomorrow. Chime in with your preferences. Obviously, Spain and Brazil are options, but I fear I'll say what everyone else says (think Brazil will go as far as Neymar can take them, worry about Spain's strikers). Italy, Netherlands, and Belgium are also good choices. Maybe I'll try to do one of the up and coming South American teams like Chile, but my coverage is necessarily less complete outside my comfort zone.

 
I'll try to do one or two previews tomorrow. Chime in with your preferences. Obviously, Spain and Brazil are options, but I fear I'll say what everyone else says (think Brazil will go as far as Neymar can take them, worry about Spain's strikers). Italy, Netherlands, and Belgium are also good choices. Maybe I'll try to do one of the up and coming South American teams like Chile, but my coverage is necessarily less complete outside my comfort zone.
Iran please

 
I'll try to do one or two previews tomorrow. Chime in with your preferences. Obviously, Spain and Brazil are options, but I fear I'll say what everyone else says (think Brazil will go as far as Neymar can take them, worry about Spain's strikers). Italy, Netherlands, and Belgium are also good choices. Maybe I'll try to do one of the up and coming South American teams like Chile, but my coverage is necessarily less complete outside my comfort zone.
Iran please
Good cover of Iran

 
I'll try to do one or two previews tomorrow. Chime in with your preferences. Obviously, Spain and Brazil are options, but I fear I'll say what everyone else says (think Brazil will go as far as Neymar can take them, worry about Spain's strikers). Italy, Netherlands, and Belgium are also good choices. Maybe I'll try to do one of the up and coming South American teams like Chile, but my coverage is necessarily less complete outside my comfort zone.
Italy, please. Their roster is almost exclusively Serie A and I think it's tough to gauge players in that league.

 
USA-1 Ghana-0

USA-1 Portugal-1

USA-0 Germany-0

Mark it, dude.
I fear that won't be enough to get through.
How do you figure? 5 points would be a dream scenario for most of us.

Hell, I think most of us would be happy with 4 points and roll the dice with a tie breaker.
If Germany and Portugal tied each other and both beat Ghana by more than a goal, we would not advance in this scenario.

 
USA-1 Ghana-0

USA-1 Portugal-1

USA-0 Germany-0

Mark it, dude.
I fear that won't be enough to get through.
How do you figure? 5 points would be a dream scenario for most of us.

Hell, I think most of us would be happy with 4 points and roll the dice with a tie breaker.
I outlined it above:

Game 1: US 1, Ghana 0; Germany 1, Portugal 1

Game 2: US 1, Portugal 1; Germany 2, Ghana 0

Game 3: US 0, Germany 0; Portugal 3, Ghana 1

Germany and Portugal advance on goal differential

I think we really need Germany to beat Portugal in game 1, but I think both will be happy for a draw in the first game.

 
Norman Paperman said:
My official prediction remains that the US will advance out of this group.

I suspect though, that the US will play well, but not advance. I can see US beating Ghana, while Germany/Portugal draw. Then the US draws Portugal, while Germany beats Ghana. This puts it Germany 4, US 4, Portugal 2, and Ghana 0. That leaves the third game, where the US will almost need a win against Germany to advance - assuming Germany and Portugal both outscore the US v. Ghana.

I think the US really needs Germany to beat Portugal in the opening game, and the US will need 2-3 goals against Ghana.
This is how I had it playing out.

Certainly a win against Germany would be a moment to remember, but I think even a tired German squad will be tough to break down.

 
USA-1 Ghana-0

USA-1 Portugal-1

USA-0 Germany-0

Mark it, dude.
I fear that won't be enough to get through.
How do you figure? 5 points would be a dream scenario for most of us.Hell, I think most of us would be happy with 4 points and roll the dice with a tie breaker.
I outlined it above:

Game 1: US 1, Ghana 0; Germany 1, Portugal 1

Game 2: US 1, Portugal 1; Germany 2, Ghana 0

Game 3: US 0, Germany 0; Portugal 3, Ghana 1

Germany and Portugal advance on goal differential

I think we really need Germany to beat Portugal in game 1, but I think both will be happy for a draw in the first game.
While your prediction is mathematically possible to occur it is worth noting that in the history of the World Cup, exactly 0 groups have ended up with 3 teams on 5 points.Since 1994 (the first world cup with 3 points for a win) 0 out of 38 groups have ended with 3 teams on 5 points.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
USA-1 Ghana-0USA-1 Portugal-1USA-0 Germany-0 Mark it, dude.
I fear that won't be enough to get through.
How do you figure? 5 points would be a dream scenario for most of us.Hell, I think most of us would be happy with 4 points and roll the dice with a tie breaker.
If Germany and Portugal tied each other and both beat Ghana by more than a goal, we would not advance in this scenario.
I know that. What I am saying is that it has never happened even once in all the groups and all the years to have three teams on 5 points. It is beyond rare.

It is more common to have three teams on 6 points.

 
Yada yada yada about the announcers. Who gives a crap.

More in-depth final 23 analyses needed.
Timmy Chandler scares me in the back. I think he was channeling his inner Omar Gonzalez yesterday and realized the game was almost over and he hadn't made a totally brain dead mistake. You know things are bad when you are hoping Beasley gets the start.

Also with his orangish hue he reminds me of an ompah loompah from Willy Wonka.

Edit as NR kindly pointed out I had my ompah loompah's and munchkins mixed up.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'll try to do one or two previews tomorrow. Chime in with your preferences. Obviously, Spain and Brazil are options, but I fear I'll say what everyone else says (think Brazil will go as far as Neymar can take them, worry about Spain's strikers). Italy, Netherlands, and Belgium are also good choices. Maybe I'll try to do one of the up and coming South American teams like Chile, but my coverage is necessarily less complete outside my comfort zone.
Belgium is my vote.
 
Tom Hagen said:
I absolutely love that Rossi didn't make the Italy team. I feel bad for the guy that he keeps getting injured, but I can't feel sorry for him. He chose Italy because they were the better team. Now he can't make that team. Its pretty great.

And yes, I realize that we're benefiting from quite a few duals at this point. But most of their situations are very different. Rossi's father voluntarily left Italy because the US offered more opportunities. The fathers of the German contingent (I believe all of them) were only there because they were serving our country. Bacon probably chose the US mostly because we're better, but at least he was born here.
I don't watch Serie A, how good is a healthy Rossi compared to the current U.S. roster. Is he comparable to Demspey or Bradley? Better?
IMO, a healthy Rossi would be the best player on the current US roster.

 
I'm somewhere in the middle. I recognize that many of the things that people dislike about Gus Johnson aren't noticed when Darkie does it because he has an English accent. But part of doing a broadcast is building a decent relationship with your color guy. Darkie had a great relationship with Macca, and a decent one with Taylor. I actually prefer that he doesn't describe the action as much, because I know who the guys are.

But he does too much NFL style storyline progression and some of his excited calls are grating (to me).
I prefer an announcer who describes the action instead of just saying the name of each player as they gain possession, which is what Johnson seemingly does way too much.
I still don't understand how a guy named John Sutcliffe has the strongest accent of them all. (I replied to the wrong post with this one; should be about the Mexican-American announcers)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My guess for Spain (which is not my preferred XI):

Casillas; Alba, Ramos, Pique, Azpilicueta; Busquets, Alonso; Iniesta, Xavi, Pedro; Costa (if healthy, if not then Torres or possibly Cesc)

 
I'll try to do one or two previews tomorrow. Chime in with your preferences. Obviously, Spain and Brazil are options, but I fear I'll say what everyone else says (think Brazil will go as far as Neymar can take them, worry about Spain's strikers). Italy, Netherlands, and Belgium are also good choices. Maybe I'll try to do one of the up and coming South American teams like Chile, but my coverage is necessarily less complete outside my comfort zone.
Belgium is my vote.
+1

 
Mexico is running their friendlies very quickly. The play again tonight against Bosnia.

They are packing in 4 games in just 10 days. Seems like a recipe for injuries.

 
So was Volland dropped or kept? He's in both lists.
Dropped. Several were on both lists (stupid editor.) Fixed now.
Sebowski said:
How do you see the starting lineup looking, Mjo?
That's tough. There's no telling what Löw will do.Neuer - naturally

Lahm, Hummels, Mertesacker and .... ???

Schweinsteiger, Khedira (or Kroos based on Khedira's health)

Özil, Müller, Götze, Reus

I see Klose and Podolski only coming on as subs.

 
Well, I'm going to start with Italy, because I think they're an intriguing team. With the news that Suarez likely won't miss any group games, Italy's future appears even more up in the air. They could make a deep run. Less talented Italy teams have, IMO. But it also wouldn't shock me to see them fail to advance. The analysis is complicated by the fact that I'm not sure we know what system Prandelli will run (in fact, I'm not sure he'll even stick to one system). I'm guessing, however, that we'll see a 4-3-3

GK- Italy is stacked here. Gigi Buffon has only slipped in the sense that he's not the consensus best goalkeeper in the world anymore. He's still on everyone's shortlist. Nobody has ever been better at the subtle things. Positioning, making sure rebounds go away from the goal, communication with his backline. All the stuff that isn't immediately apparent from highlights, but which are really the difference between a good shot stopper and a world class goalkeeper. Backups -- Salvatore Siragu is a top 10 GK in the world in his own right. But he's No. 2 here. Mattia Perin is a fine No. 3 as well.

CB -- This is the traditional strength of the Azurri going back at least to Franco Baresi. And based on club reputation, it still is. Andrea Barzagli, Giorgio Chiellini, and Antonio Bonucci form the "Juventus wall" in Serie A. Two of the three (probably Barzagli and Chiellini) will start in Brazil. Somewhat strangely, however, I thought both Barzagli and Chiellini played indifferently in the Confederations Cup. It was a weird tournament for Italy, who I thought played open and attractive football, but who also made uncharacteristic mistakes at the back. Nevertheless, this should still be a strength. The 4th CB Parma's Gabriel Palleta, has always played well for Italy.

FB -- There are questions here. Italy has the same problem as AC Milan in that they have two very good right backs in Ignacio Abate and Mattia Di Sciglio. One of them is going to have to play on the left, and that's likely to be Di Sciglio. Now, Matty Ice (yeah, I just gave him a nickname, sue me) isn't Timmy Chandler on his left foot, but I'd still rather see him on the right. Torino's Matteo Darmian is apparently a utility defender who can play anywhere on the back line, but I don't think he's world class anywhere.

CM- I think most people expect two out of the 3 CMs to be Andrea Pirlo and Danielle DeRossi. De Rossi will play deepest, but with license to make runs from deep when the cover is there. Pirlo will try to operate as the deep-lying creative fulcrum. I won't belabor the point on Pirlo. He's super cool. He plays the game with an effortless elegance that everybody loves. And he understands space so well that he's almost impossible to press because he'll happily draw a pressing defender to the sideline in order to open up the center of the pitch for the other two midfielders. That's why I'm guessing that the third midfielder will be a second "regista" type, like Marco Veratti or Claudio Marchisio, but it could also be Alberto Aqualani operating slightly forward of where the others would. As bad as Aqualani was in Liverpool, he's been pretty good used as something like trequarista by Italy and Fiorentina. I see Thiago Motta as De Rossi's backup and Marco Parolo as a guy who can provide legs if Prandelli wants a little more athleticism in MF.

FWs - I feel bad for Giuseppe Rossi, but I don't think he really fit what Italy wants to do. Antonio Candreva is a MF, but really the only natural wide player on the team, so I put him here. Lorenzo Insigne and Alessio Cerci are natural inside forwards and Antonio Cassano is a creative player who can still get goals without playing in the #9 role. And we all know who will be playing that position. Mario Balotelli could easily win the Golden Boot. He could also get red carded in the group stage. Even when he doesn't do something stupid, Balotelli is a streaky, streaky player. We remember him having a great Euros for his brace against Germany and forget how awful he was against Spain in the group stage. Balotelli also has a complicated relationship with his home country, recently facing racial abuse while training with the national team. Europe can really suck sometimes. But my biggest problem with Mario is that I don't think he combines well with other forwards. I think that leaves Italy too dependent on his own genius, which is a problem because that tap just isn't always on. I see one of Insigne and Cerci on one flank and Cassano pinching in from the other flank with Mario as the advanced striker.

The bottom line: It's a total gut feeling, but I don't see a great tournament for Italy this year. They'll control the middle of the pitch, but I don't fully trust Balotelli, I wonder about Cassano's ability to play in the heat and humidity of Brazil (I understand that his heart problems are no longer an issue, but . . ., heart problems). And I don't see a lot of finishing outside those two. While I expect the defense to play well, they have to deal with Suarez, Cavani, Rooney, and Sturridge in the group stage. That's a lot of forward talent and even the Juventus wall can't be expected to stand up to all of it. I'm a little unique in that I think England has the best chance of coming out of Group D. I think Italy and Uruguay are pretty much a pick-em. But if I had to bet on either Suarez or Balotelli, I'd bet on Suarez (assuming the news that he's already running without pain and training with Uruguay is true).

 
The bottom line: It's a total gut feeling, but I don't see a great tournament for Italy this year.
It should also be noted that they are the one team in their group that plays 3 matches in the Amazon/humid area (Manaus, Recife, Natal). They strike me as one team that will totally wilt by the 3rd match and their first match against England could be a total cluster in the 2nd half.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top