What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official 2014 World Cup Thread*** (5 Viewers)

So how dangerous are corners, really? Everyone seems to treat them like a super low percentage play and from reading around on the net some stats were saying that they're scored on only 3% of the time and in only about 1 out of every 10 games.

Seems like there's one going in basically every other game, if not more often, in this World Cup.

 
My favorite part was the bitten dude is trying to show the ref his shoulder and the Uruguay dude is trying to pull his shirt back over his shoulder :lmao:

-QG

 
wait... were we laughing because it's obviously a red and why should anybody question it, or laughing because somebody out there thinks studs up at knee level is somehow not a red?

I agree it looked worse than it really was, but studs to knee right in front of the ref... one of the easier reds that ref will have to call.
It looked like he was just lifting his leg to protect himself. His knee didn't even hit the guy, just his hip did.

 
I don't understand why people get so bent out of shape about the running clock. It's like complaining about the clock stopping after an out of bounds play in American football.

It's hard to defend FIFA but I think a lot of what's perceived as their reactionary stance regarding rules changes is due to a desire to keep the rules consistent around the globe. The big leagues and tournaments have the ability to handle a second referee, goal line technology or a dedicated clock operator. The same isn't true of the Senegalese second division.
Does the ref keep an actual timer for stoppage, or does he just SWAG it at the end of regulation?

If he had some kind of start/stop timer in his pocket, then there would at least be the option of a device where the stadium or TV could "read" it and show the current stoppage accumulation.

If he just pulls a number out of his ### (which appears to be the case), then not so much.

 
I don't understand why people get so bent out of shape about the running clock. It's like complaining about the clock stopping after an out of bounds play in American football.

It's hard to defend FIFA but I think a lot of what's perceived as their reactionary stance regarding rules changes is due to a desire to keep the rules consistent around the globe. The big leagues and tournaments have the ability to handle a second referee, goal line technology or a dedicated clock operator. The same isn't true of the Senegalese second division.
Does the ref keep an actual timer for stoppage, or does he just SWAG it at the end of regulation?

If he had some kind of start/stop timer in his pocket, then there would at least be the option of a device where the stadium or TV could "read" it and show the current stoppage accumulation.

If he just pulls a number out of his ### (which appears to be the case), then not so much.
:rolleyes:

 
wait... were we laughing because it's obviously a red and why should anybody question it, or laughing because somebody out there thinks studs up at knee level is somehow not a red?

I agree it looked worse than it really was, but studs to knee right in front of the ref... one of the easier reds that ref will have to call.
It looked like he was just lifting his leg to protect himself. His knee didn't even hit the guy, just his hip did.
wha?

italian player lifted his foot and put his studs into the uruguayan player's shin, right below the knee.

like everyboyd else, I don't think his intent was to kick the guy, but that's what he did under the dictionary definition of red card.

 
wait... were we laughing because it's obviously a red and why should anybody question it, or laughing because somebody out there thinks studs up at knee level is somehow not a red?

I agree it looked worse than it really was, but studs to knee right in front of the ref... one of the easier reds that ref will have to call.
Ya know what - I was lookin' at the shoulder - you're right - right foot stepping on left knee. And with the ref a foot away I get it now.

-QG

 
Wonder if FIFA will suspend Suarez on review?
If they have a good look at it, yes. The fact that the ref didn't see it works against him IIRC.
looks like a good look...
Suarez was holding his teeth afterwards. How is there any question?
well the italian did elbow suarez to get him to stop biting...

 
I don't think his intent was to kick the guy, but that's what he did under the dictionary definition of red card.
I'll take your word for it, but I feel like I see much worse on a regular basis that's a foul or a yellow.

"Suarez makes a three course meal of that challenge." :oldunsure:

 
I don't understand why people get so bent out of shape about the running clock. It's like complaining about the clock stopping after an out of bounds play in American football.

It's hard to defend FIFA but I think a lot of what's perceived as their reactionary stance regarding rules changes is due to a desire to keep the rules consistent around the globe. The big leagues and tournaments have the ability to handle a second referee, goal line technology or a dedicated clock operator. The same isn't true of the Senegalese second division.
Does the ref keep an actual timer for stoppage, or does he just SWAG it at the end of regulation?

If he had some kind of start/stop timer in his pocket, then there would at least be the option of a device where the stadium or TV could "read" it and show the current stoppage accumulation.

If he just pulls a number out of his ### (which appears to be the case), then not so much.
:rolleyes:
very helpful. thanks.

 
I don't understand why people get so bent out of shape about the running clock. It's like complaining about the clock stopping after an out of bounds play in American football.

It's hard to defend FIFA but I think a lot of what's perceived as their reactionary stance regarding rules changes is due to a desire to keep the rules consistent around the globe. The big leagues and tournaments have the ability to handle a second referee, goal line technology or a dedicated clock operator. The same isn't true of the Senegalese second division.
Does the ref keep an actual timer for stoppage, or does he just SWAG it at the end of regulation?If he had some kind of start/stop timer in his pocket, then there would at least be the option of a device where the stadium or TV could "read" it and show the current stoppage accumulation.

If he just pulls a number out of his ### (which appears to be the case), then not so much.
If it makes you feel better, pretend he keeps time on his wrist.

Everyone gets to see how much time is added, so not sure what the big deal is about showing the accumulation.

 
I don't understand why people get so bent out of shape about the running clock. It's like complaining about the clock stopping after an out of bounds play in American football.

It's hard to defend FIFA but I think a lot of what's perceived as their reactionary stance regarding rules changes is due to a desire to keep the rules consistent around the globe. The big leagues and tournaments have the ability to handle a second referee, goal line technology or a dedicated clock operator. The same isn't true of the Senegalese second division.
Does the ref keep an actual timer for stoppage, or does he just SWAG it at the end of regulation?

If he had some kind of start/stop timer in his pocket, then there would at least be the option of a device where the stadium or TV could "read" it and show the current stoppage accumulation.

If he just pulls a number out of his ### (which appears to be the case), then not so much.
:rolleyes:
very helpful. thanks.
definitely numbers from the butt, for 500.

 
I don't understand why people get so bent out of shape about the running clock. It's like complaining about the clock stopping after an out of bounds play in American football.

It's hard to defend FIFA but I think a lot of what's perceived as their reactionary stance regarding rules changes is due to a desire to keep the rules consistent around the globe. The big leagues and tournaments have the ability to handle a second referee, goal line technology or a dedicated clock operator. The same isn't true of the Senegalese second division.
Does the ref keep an actual timer for stoppage, or does he just SWAG it at the end of regulation?

If he had some kind of start/stop timer in his pocket, then there would at least be the option of a device where the stadium or TV could "read" it and show the current stoppage accumulation.

If he just pulls a number out of his ### (which appears to be the case), then not so much.
:rolleyes:
very helpful. thanks.
Sorry, thought you were trolling. Every referee at every level wears a watch. He keeps track of accumulated stoppage time and communicates it to the fourth official so the number of minutes added gets posted to the board.

 
I don't think his intent was to kick the guy, but that's what he did under the dictionary definition of red card.
I'll take your word for it, but I feel like I see much worse on a regular basis that's a foul or a yellow.

"Suarez makes a three course meal of that challenge." :oldunsure:
wow... ok.

the more I see that gifycat, the more it looks like he's putting his foot out there to protect himself and not to try to turn or shield.... so the more I see, the worse it gets, IMO.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top