What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official 2014 World Cup Thread*** (6 Viewers)

It's kinda like when Dave Chappelle was asked to testify against Michael Jackson:

"He scored 31 goals last season, man. 31 goals."

 
I think it's a fairly debatable call. I don't know if there was an intent to stud the guy in the shin. That's what he did, though. I've certainly seen it given before, and if it looked like a deliberate stab/stomp to the ref, then it's an easy call.
exactly.

thanks for the ESPN link above- two different angles cements it as clear red for me, despite whether the Italian meant it or not.

 
Luis Suarez has never been on the losing team in a game in which he's bitten an opponent.

Ajax 0-0

Liverpool 2-2

Uruguay 1-0
nor even carded
And the altercations never seem that heated leading up to it. I want to say that he's doing it to try to draw a reaction and get the other guy red carded, but he can't possibly be deluded into thinking that's a +EV move after his last two experiences. Its so weird.

 
Luis Suarez has never been on the losing team in a game in which he's bitten an opponent.

Ajax 0-0

Liverpool 2-2

Uruguay 1-0
nor even carded
And the altercations never seem that heated leading up to it. I want to say that he's doing it to try to draw a reaction and get the other guy red carded, but he can't possibly be deluded into thinking that's a +EV move after his last two experiences. Its so weird.
Well this one was +EV.

 
Luis Suarez has never been on the losing team in a game in which he's bitten an opponent.

Ajax 0-0

Liverpool 2-2

Uruguay 1-0
nor even carded
And the altercations never seem that heated leading up to it. I want to say that he's doing it to try to draw a reaction and get the other guy red carded, but he can't possibly be deluded into thinking that's a +EV move after his last two experiences. Its so weird.
Well this one was +EV.
Not sure I buy the theory that the Italians were too incensed to bother to mark Godin.

 
So FIFA can institute their own judicial system, sentence people to years in prison and do so in a swift manner, yet they can't suspend a player for biting someone on the pitch during a match? :confused:

 
I am going to guess that Suarez is not disciplined during the WC, if at all.

:noted:
The ref will note in his report that he saw suarez head but cheiliani but didnt think it was worthy of calling or carding. He wasnt sure what the Italian was showing him on his shoulder.

FIFA will say the ref saw it and didnt do anything so neither can we...

 
Richard Conway
BBC Sport
"Fifa do have the right to impose all football activity bans and that would include club level. They do have that option open to them but normally it would only apply to international football."

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So FIFA can institute their own judicial system, sentence people to years in prison and do so in a swift manner, yet they can't suspend a player for biting someone on the pitch during a match? :confused:
This has been sloppily reported. The "FIFA" courts in South Africa were South African courts, set up by South Africa as a condition for winning the World Cup. I imagine its the same in Brazil. FIFA didn't just arbitrarily create laws and arrest people. They asked South Africa to institute laws (and even suspend some of their constitutional protections) in advance of the World Cup. That's scandalous enough, I suppose, but "FIFA Courts" is a misnomer.

 
Good GIF here shows the ref's view of the Marchisio tackle. Hard not to think its a red from that angle, IMO.
Yeah... that little follow through at the end didn't show up in the other angles. I do think starting the video there is a little misleading though.
Sitting here I think the red is harsh. Had I been the defender getting spiked I would have been all over the ref had he not given a red...

 
Good GIF here shows the ref's view of the Marchisio tackle. Hard not to think its a red from that angle, IMO.
What am I missing here? Looks like his studs graze the dude's knee a bit, but how is that a "tried-and-trued" way of breaking a person's leg? And I'm not really seeing any follow through...he twists his leg but I can't tell if his studs are still touching the guy at that point from that camera angle.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am going to guess that Suarez is not disciplined during the WC, if at all.

:noted:
The ref will note in his report that he saw suarez head but cheiliani but didnt think it was worthy of calling or carding. He wasnt sure what the Italian was showing him on his shoulder.

FIFA will say the ref saw it and didnt do anything so neither can we...
Martyn Ziegler @martynziegler
FIFA announce will investigate Suarez biting incident: "will gather all the necessary elements in order to evaluate the matter"
 
Good GIF here shows the ref's view of the Marchisio tackle. Hard not to think its a red from that angle, IMO.
Yeah... that little follow through at the end didn't show up in the other angles. I do think starting the video there is a little misleading though.
Sitting here I think the red is harsh. Had I been the defender getting spiked I would have been all over the ref had he not given a red...
that's it.

:boxing:

 
Good GIF here shows the ref's view of the Marchisio tackle. Hard not to think its a red from that angle, IMO.
What am I missing here? Looks like his studs graze the dude's knee a bit, but how is that a "tried-and-trued" way of breaking a person's leg?
I think the article is a bit hyperbolic. While studs-up over the ball tackles are good ways to break a leg, I don't think that's the best analogue for what we're seeing. What we're seeing is a player kicking out at another player in frustration (or having a stomp), IMO. And that's generally a red when Beckham or Rooney or whoever does it.

 
Good GIF here shows the ref's view of the Marchisio tackle. Hard not to think its a red from that angle, IMO.
What am I missing here? Looks like his studs graze the dude's knee a bit, but how is that a "tried-and-trued" way of breaking a person's leg?
Not sure what you're missing, and not sure what a tried and true way of breaking a person's leg has to do with calling this a red.

He comes in over the ball. WAY over the ball. and puts his studs into the other guy's shin right below the knee. Right in front of the ref. Did you see all of that stuff?

 
Greece is the game to watch by the way. It be would just for the Elephants to go through but I have this weird feeling that Ug-ball is gonna find a way.

-QG

 
Greece is the game to watch by the way. It be would just for the Elephants to go through but I have this weird feeling that Ug-ball is gonna find a way.

-QG
I keep going back and forth about this... picture in picture isn't working for me.

I think I'll opt for Colombia Japan- still a lot for Japan to play for and the game should be more entertaining style-wise.

 
I think you need to be a lot more sure the move was intentional before you blow up a game of this importance.
I'm sure you're trolling on this, but I'll bite [suarez]

intention is irrelevant. rules are rules.
This is different than sliding into someone with studs up. I think he was ejected for unsportsmanship, not dangerous play, as the play itself was relatively harmless.

It's OK for people to have a different opinion. That doesn't mean they are trolling.

 
Greece is the game to watch by the way. It be would just for the Elephants to go through but I have this weird feeling that Ug-ball is gonna find a way.

-QG
I keep going back and forth about this... picture in picture isn't working for me.

I think I'll opt for Colombia Japan- still a lot for Japan to play for and the game should be more entertaining style-wise.
Honda for a hat-trick

 
Okay time for more scenarios.

Group C: Greece's ugliness might be rewarded yet - that 0-0 result wasn't the worst thing for them. Though it naturally was better for Colombia and Cote D'Ivoire. Japan's inability to capitalize on the man-advantage has them just about cooked. Anyway.

Colombia: Has clinched a spot in the knock out round.

Will finish first with:

1) a win or tie vs Japan

or 2) a loss and a loss or tie by Cote D'Ivoire

or 3) a loss and a win by Cote D'Ivoire where the combined margin of the games is 3 or less.

or 4) a loss and a win by Cote D'Ivoire where the combined margin of games is exactly 4 and Cote D'Ivoire fails to outscore Colombia by 3 or more.

Cote D'Ivoire:

Will finish first with:

1) a win and a loss by Colombia where the combined marging of the games is 5 or more.

or 2) a win and a loss by Colombia where the combined margin of the games is exactly 4 and Cote D'Ivoire outscores Colombia by 3 or more.

Will clinch a spot in the knock out round with:

1) a win

or 2) a tie and a Japan loss or tie

or 3) a tie and a Japan win by exactly 1 and Japan fails to outscore Cote D'Ivoire by 3 or more.

Cote D'Ivoire is out with a loss.

Greece

Will clinch a spot in the knock out round with:

1) a win and a Japan loss or tie

or 2) a win and a Japan win and Greece's margin of victory is at least 3 goals more than Japan's margin of victory

or 3) a win and a Japan win and Greece's margin of victory is exactly 2 goals more than Japans' margin of victory and Greece outscores Japan by at least 2 goals

or 4) a win and a Japan win and Greece's margin of victory is exactly 2 goals more than Japan's margin of victory and Greece outscores Japan by exactly 1 goal and Greece wins the ensuing drawing of lots.

Greece is out with a loss or tie

Japan

Will clinch a spot in the knockout round with:

1) a win by 2 or more goals and a Cote D'Ivoire tie

or 2) a win by exactly 1 and a Cote D'Ivoire tie and Japan outscores Cote D'Ivoire by 3 or more

or 3) a win and a Greece win and Greece's margin of victory is not more than 1 greater than Japan's margin of victory

or 4) a win and a Greece win and Greece's margin of victory is exactly 2 greater than Japan's margin of victory and Greece fails to outscore Japan

or 5) a win and a Greece win and Greece's margin of victory is exactly 2 greater than Japan's margin of victoyr and Greece outscores Japan by exactly 1 goal and Japan wins the ensuing drawing of lots.

Japan is out with a loss or tie.

So there ya go :)

Pretty simple, eh? ;)

-QG
Bumpity for today :)

-QG
Rebump because of the 8 pages of :shark: Suarez

-QG

 
Okay time for more scenarios.

Group C: Greece's ugliness might be rewarded yet - that 0-0 result wasn't the worst thing for them. Though it naturally was better for Colombia and Cote D'Ivoire. Japan's inability to capitalize on the man-advantage has them just about cooked. Anyway.

Colombia: Has clinched a spot in the knock out round.

Will finish first with:

1) a win or tie vs Japan

or 2) a loss and a loss or tie by Cote D'Ivoire

or 3) a loss and a win by Cote D'Ivoire where the combined margin of the games is 3 or less.

or 4) a loss and a win by Cote D'Ivoire where the combined margin of games is exactly 4 and Cote D'Ivoire fails to outscore Colombia by 3 or more.

Cote D'Ivoire:

Will finish first with:

1) a win and a loss by Colombia where the combined marging of the games is 5 or more.

or 2) a win and a loss by Colombia where the combined margin of the games is exactly 4 and Cote D'Ivoire outscores Colombia by 3 or more.

Will clinch a spot in the knock out round with:

1) a win

or 2) a tie and a Japan loss or tie

or 3) a tie and a Japan win by exactly 1 and Japan fails to outscore Cote D'Ivoire by 3 or more.

Cote D'Ivoire is out with a loss.

Greece

Will clinch a spot in the knock out round with:

1) a win and a Japan loss or tie

or 2) a win and a Japan win and Greece's margin of victory is at least 3 goals more than Japan's margin of victory

or 3) a win and a Japan win and Greece's margin of victory is exactly 2 goals more than Japans' margin of victory and Greece outscores Japan by at least 2 goals

or 4) a win and a Japan win and Greece's margin of victory is exactly 2 goals more than Japan's margin of victory and Greece outscores Japan by exactly 1 goal and Greece wins the ensuing drawing of lots.

Greece is out with a loss or tie

Japan

Will clinch a spot in the knockout round with:

1) a win by 2 or more goals and a Cote D'Ivoire tie

or 2) a win by exactly 1 and a Cote D'Ivoire tie and Japan outscores Cote D'Ivoire by 3 or more

or 3) a win and a Greece win and Greece's margin of victory is not more than 1 greater than Japan's margin of victory

or 4) a win and a Greece win and Greece's margin of victory is exactly 2 greater than Japan's margin of victory and Greece fails to outscore Japan

or 5) a win and a Greece win and Greece's margin of victory is exactly 2 greater than Japan's margin of victoyr and Greece outscores Japan by exactly 1 goal and Japan wins the ensuing drawing of lots.

Japan is out with a loss or tie.

So there ya go :)

Pretty simple, eh? ;)

-QG
Bumpity for today :) -QG
Rebump because of the 8 pages of :shark: Suarez-QG
Thanks

 
Japan a bit more alive than I thought. The problem is that I just don't see them getting past Colombia

Unless, folks think that perhaps Colombia finds the Costa Rica/Holland/Mexico combo is more appealing than the Uruguay/Brazil/Chile side and decides to try and sandbag.

Side note - wow there could actually be a CONCACAF quarterfinal, eh?

-QG

 
I think you need to be a lot more sure the move was intentional before you blow up a game of this importance.
I'm sure you're trolling on this, but I'll bite [suarez]

intention is irrelevant. rules are rules.
This is different than sliding into someone with studs up. I think he was ejected for unsportsmanship, not dangerous play, as the play itself was relatively harmless.

It's OK for people to have a different opinion. That doesn't mean they are trolling.
Hey- I don't mind. Noticed you posting something kinda goofy the other day so figured this was your schtick.

If your studs are up, your studs are up. That's the rule. Yes- sliding in will cause more harm, but not really relevant as I see to this particular play.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top