What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** Official 2015 College Football Thread *** (3 Viewers)

Dude threw for 734 yds and lost?

They lost but Mike Leach should be a hot commodity.
No offense, but you obviously aren't watching his team. He's the worst game-manager I've ever seen. The bowl game he lost last season was a disgrace. A Pop Warner coach could have closed that game out. And it seems to (impossibly) be getting even worse this season.

He's a career offensive coordinator. That's it.
Haven't watched the games. It's WSU. They nearly beat Oregon as well. They are seemingly a threat to anyone in the league. I'd be thrilled if I was a WSU alum.

 
Dude threw for 734 yds and lost?

They lost but Mike Leach should be a hot commodity.
No offense, but you obviously aren't watching his team. He's the worst game-manager I've ever seen. The bowl game he lost last season was a disgrace. A Pop Warner coach could have closed that game out. And it seems to (impossibly) be getting even worse this season.

He's a career offensive coordinator. That's it.
Haven't watched the games. It's WSU. They nearly beat Oregon as well. They are seemingly a threat to anyone in the league. I'd be thrilled if I was a WSU alum.
Yeah, that's kind of important. A simple box score cannot do justice to the level of Leach's incompetence.

 
Dude threw for 734 yds and lost?

They lost but Mike Leach should be a hot commodity.
No offense, but you obviously aren't watching his team. He's the worst game-manager I've ever seen. The bowl game he lost last season was a disgrace. A Pop Warner coach could have closed that game out. And it seems to (impossibly) be getting even worse this season.

He's a career offensive coordinator. That's it.
Haven't watched the games. It's WSU. They nearly beat Oregon as well. They are seemingly a threat to anyone in the league. I'd be thrilled if I was a WSU alum.
Yeah, that's kind of important. A simple box score cannot do justice to the level of Leach's incompetence.
They were a doormat. They are capable of beating anyone now. Disagree?

 
Down to. 10 unbeaten teams. No particular order.

FSU - plays ND and possibly GTech

GTech - possibly plays FSU

Marshall

Baylor - plays TCU

TCU - plays Baylor

ND - plays FSU

Arizona

Ole Miss - plays Miss St and Auburn

Miss St. - plays Ole Miss and Auburn

Auburn - plays Ole Miss and Miss St.

At best we could have 5 by seasons end. I'm guessing the only unbeaten is Marshall, though.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My top 5:

1. FSU

2. Auburn

3. Mississippi State

4. Notre Dame

5. Baylor

Mississippi St. jumps up with two top ten wins in a row and sets up a huge showdown with Auburn. Baylor takes the biggest hit not jumping to #3 because of their pathetic schedule. They've still played no one and their ranking should reflect that.

 
Good lord I was fitshaced last night....

Upside to bama going down is locally all the bammers are being typical sore losers "once a decade", "they'll never go anywhere, bama still will win it all", "refs robbed us" ( :lol: that ones rich)... Etc.

Downside is locally the ole miss contingent are bordering on unbearable. May have to shut down FB for a bit.

 
My top 5:

1. FSU

2. Auburn

3. Mississippi State

4. Notre Dame

5. Baylor

Mississippi St. jumps up with two top ten wins in a row and sets up a huge showdown with Auburn. Baylor takes the biggest hit not jumping to #3 because of their pathetic schedule. They've still played no one and their ranking should reflect that.
Auburn

Miss st

FSU

Baylor

Notre Dame

Ole miss

Oklahoma

Oregon

Bama

Michigan State

IMO

 
10. Oregon

9. Oklahoma

8. Alabama

7. Michigan State

6. Ole Miss

5. ND

4. Miss. State

3 Baylor

2. FSU

1. Auburn
How do you have Michigan state as the best 1 loss team when they've been demolished by Oregon?Not to mention ahead of an ole miss team who's beat Alabama (whom you have above the Oregon squad who demolished mich state)?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Really folks? Baylor? Take a look at their schedule: SMU, Northwestern State, Buffalo, Iowa State, Texas.

Texas is the only respectable team on that list and they're terrible this year; not to mention Petty looked pedestrian against a real defense (7 completions).

Punish them for the schedule. I'm tempted to say I could make a better case for Michigan State to be ahead of them, let alone Ole Miss.

 
Really folks? Baylor? Take a look at their schedule: SMU, Northwestern State, Buffalo, Iowa State, Texas.

Texas is the only respectable team on that list and they're terrible this year; not to mention Petty looked pedestrian against a real defense (7 completions).

Punish them for the schedule. I'm tempted to say I could make a better case for Michigan State to be ahead of them, let alone Ole Miss.
Yeah, I don't see how anyone could have Baylor ahead of TCU.
 
My top 5:

1. FSU

2. Auburn

3. Mississippi State

4. Notre Dame

5. Baylor

Mississippi St. jumps up with two top ten wins in a row and sets up a huge showdown with Auburn. Baylor takes the biggest hit not jumping to #3 because of their pathetic schedule. They've still played no one and their ranking should reflect that.
You'd think ND would be in top 4, but no matter. Win or lose to FSU, as long as they win out their other games, they should be looking solid for a playoff spot. There's going to be few teams with less than 2 losses and its going to be hard to put a 1 loss ND team when there only loss is to the #1 team in the country behind any two loss team.

 
My top 10 right now would be.1. Auburn2. FSU3. Miss St.4. Ole Miss5. TCU
TCU at 5. Biggest jump in polling history
My poll /= their poll.
Even so, the first poll is based off pure speculation. If a big jump is warranted based upon actual results it should be made.
I thought OU was perhaps the best team going into that game vs. TCU. So, TCU knocking them off is one of the best wins of the season IMO.

 
My top 10 right now would be.1. Auburn2. FSU3. Miss St.4. Ole Miss5. TCU
TCU at 5. Biggest jump in polling history
My poll /= their poll.
Even so, the first poll is based off pure speculation. If a big jump is warranted based upon actual results it should be made.
I thought OU was perhaps the best team going into that game vs. TCU. So, TCU knocking them off is one of the best wins of the season IMO.
OU's biggest problem--only having one decent WR--has been exposed. I still think they are capable of beating anyone in the country if Knight can complete 50%+ of his passes. But the pass offense isn't quite as good as I was hoping going into the season. Some of my OU friends were complaining about Knight's completion percentage. But it had just as much to do with WRs not being able to get open as his accuracy.

 
Well if nothing else TCU gets back on track after being such a dud early in the Big12. I'm not sure, but I think that was their first home win in the Big12 since joining.

 
Auburn will jump all the way to 2 in todays poll. But their remaining schedule is absolutely brutal. A legit murderers row over the next seven games.

at Mississippi State (top ~10 team)

vs South Carolina

at Ole Miss (top ~10 team)

vs Texas A&M (top ~10 team)

at Georgia (top ~10 team)

vs Samford

at Alabama (top ~10 team)

Even South Carolina wont be easy.

 
Auburn will jump all the way to 2 in todays poll. But their remaining schedule is absolutely brutal. A legit murderers row over the next seven games.

at Mississippi State (top ~10 team)

vs South Carolina

at Ole Miss (top ~10 team)

vs Texas A&M (top ~10 team)

at Georgia (top ~10 team)

vs Samford

at Alabama (top ~10 team)

Even South Carolina wont be easy.
Yes, they will. SC can't stop a wildcat up the middle every play, they're not going to slow down Marshall.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This year's playoff definitely looks to be littered with debate of one and two loss teams. I'm not sure anyone will go undefeated and it'll leave us/the committee to debate losses, so I'm curious to ask now:

Do you view head to head more telling or strength of schedule/loss?

Ex. Do you rank Oregon ahead of Michigan State because of the head to head win or do you punish Oregon more because they lost to an unbanked team and put Sparty ahead of them?

 
This year's playoff definitely looks to be littered with debate of one and two loss teams. I'm not sure anyone will go undefeated and it'll leave us/the committee to debate losses, so I'm curious to ask now:

Do you view head to head more telling or strength of schedule/loss?

Ex. Do you rank Oregon ahead of Michigan State because of the head to head win or do you punish Oregon more because they lost to an unbanked team and put Sparty ahead of them?
If yesterday wasn't enough to shelve this convo, I'm not sure what is. There is a ton of football left to played.

The only thing that is clear is that 4 teams is way too few.

 
gump said:
Ouch...but the best team won. Congrats OM fans (not sure who that is).

We're still alive, but wounded and hanging by a thread....what a difference 2 weeks can make.
Gump. Why was Kenyan Drake in on Special teams? Looks like a bad idea in retrospect
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[icon] said:
SHIZNITTTT said:
10. Oregon

9. Oklahoma

8. Alabama

7. Michigan State

6. Ole Miss

5. ND

4. Miss. State

3 Baylor

2. FSU

1. Auburn
How do you have Michigan state as the best 1 loss team when they've been demolished by Oregon?Not to mention ahead of an ole miss team who's beat Alabama (whom you have above the Oregon squad who demolished mich state)?
You're still drunk; the ranking goes from 10 to 1, Casey Kasem.
 
Ex. Do you rank Oregon ahead of Michigan State because of the head to head win or do you punish Oregon more because they lost to an unbanked team and put Sparty ahead of them?
I think the traditional way of doing it by pollsters is to rank whichever team you want ahead and then use whichever argument justifies it - even if that argument is contrary to one you made previously.

 
Ex. Do you rank Oregon ahead of Michigan State because of the head to head win or do you punish Oregon more because they lost to an unbanked team and put Sparty ahead of them?
I think the traditional way of doing it by pollsters is to rank whichever team you want ahead and then use whichever argument justifies it - even if that argument is contrary to one you made previously.
Shorter PSP: pollster is never wrong.

 
This year's playoff definitely looks to be littered with debate of one and two loss teams. I'm not sure anyone will go undefeated and it'll leave us/the committee to debate losses, so I'm curious to ask now:

Do you view head to head more telling or strength of schedule/loss?

Ex. Do you rank Oregon ahead of Michigan State because of the head to head win or do you punish Oregon more because they lost to an unbanked team and put Sparty ahead of them?
If yesterday wasn't enough to shelve this convo, I'm not sure what is. There is a ton of football left to played.

The only thing that is clear is that 4 teams is way too few.
The problem is people wait for the football to be played to throw logic out the door and defend their point. I asked a question with an example that has already been demonstrated to gauge how others view that scenario. It may be entirely likely with a conference like the SEC who has had multiple teams on the bubble of a playoff in past years.

 
My question...do you put a 1 loss ND team say they lose to FSU (personally I think ND wins the game on the field so this is a moot point) in the playoffs say Ole Miss and Miss. St. only loss is to Auburn going into the Egg Bowl. The winner of that game finishes with one loss. Considering Strength of Schedule a 1 loss SEC West team is more deserving than a 1 loss ND team or 1 loss FSU team. Thoughts or comments.

 
This year's playoff definitely looks to be littered with debate of one and two loss teams. I'm not sure anyone will go undefeated and it'll leave us/the committee to debate losses, so I'm curious to ask now:

Do you view head to head more telling or strength of schedule/loss?

Ex. Do you rank Oregon ahead of Michigan State because of the head to head win or do you punish Oregon more because they lost to an unbanked team and put Sparty ahead of them?
The rankings are supposed to reflect the entire season. If in December it's clear that MSU has had a better season than UO, UO's win--at home--early in the season--should not be the deciding factor.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Otherwise the ranking should be objectively done on W-L records and if 2 teams end up with the same record their H2H should break the tie.

 
This year's playoff definitely looks to be littered with debate of one and two loss teams. I'm not sure anyone will go undefeated and it'll leave us/the committee to debate losses, so I'm curious to ask now:

Do you view head to head more telling or strength of schedule/loss?

Ex. Do you rank Oregon ahead of Michigan State because of the head to head win or do you punish Oregon more because they lost to an unbanked team and put Sparty ahead of them?
If yesterday wasn't enough to shelve this convo, I'm not sure what is. There is a ton of football left to played.

The only thing that is clear is that 4 teams is way too few.
I see it exactly the opposite. With more teams in the playoff yesterday doesn't matter as much.

 
Daywalker said:
Raider Nation said:
Daywalker said:
Raider Nation said:
Daywalker said:
Dude threw for 734 yds and lost?

They lost but Mike Leach should be a hot commodity.
No offense, but you obviously aren't watching his team. He's the worst game-manager I've ever seen. The bowl game he lost last season was a disgrace. A Pop Warner coach could have closed that game out. And it seems to (impossibly) be getting even worse this season.

He's a career offensive coordinator. That's it.
Haven't watched the games. It's WSU. They nearly beat Oregon as well. They are seemingly a threat to anyone in the league. I'd be thrilled if I was a WSU alum.
Yeah, that's kind of important. A simple box score cannot do justice to the level of Leach's incompetence.
They were a doormat. They are capable of beating anyone now. Disagree?
You're missing the point. They have the #1 offense in all of college football, yet they are 1-4 against teams not named Portland State. The reason for that is because they have an offensive coordinator as their head coach.

THROW BALL..... DOWN THE FIELD! [grunt!]

He is clueless in every other aspect of being a head coach. They are competitive. Fantastic. Give them a gold star.

 
gump said:
Ouch...but the best team won. Congrats OM fans (not sure who that is).

We're still alive, but wounded and hanging by a thread....what a difference 2 weeks can make.
Gump. Why was Kenyan Drake in on Special teams? Looks like a bad idea in retrospect
Saban has always played stars on kick coverage (which gets debated). Drake got hurt on a offensive play though?

 
gump said:
Ouch...but the best team won. Congrats OM fans (not sure who that is).

We're still alive, but wounded and hanging by a thread....what a difference 2 weeks can make.
Gump. Why was Kenyan Drake in on Special teams? Looks like a bad idea in retrospect
Saban has always played stars on kick coverage (which gets debated). Drake got hurt on a offensive play though?
I was thinking that early injury may have been in his head - and set up the later one.

 
On the bright side yesterday, my often-posted thought that Tennessee is done as a national power looks more likely than ever. The days of standing toe-to-toe with Bama, Auburn, LSU, TAMU, UF, and UGA in conference are a distant memory...and competing on a level with Mizzou, SoCar, and Ole Miss will be a challenge.

 
Last night was so painful. I don't know why I let these games affect me so much. The thrill of victory doesn't quite seem worth the agony of defeat.

 
So Jay Glazer is reporting he doesn't see anyway Harbaugh returns to SF next year, I wonder if UM could lure him back to college?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top