The media isn't going to let him off the hook, his meltdown was way worse than Van de Velde or Norman. Arnie lost a 6 shot lead at the U.S. Open on the back nine but I'm not 80 so I've only read about it. Van de Velde was a fringe player and Norman was known as a guy who succumbs to nerves before his Masters meltdown. For Spieth, think how much the narrative changes as a result of yesterday. If he holds on and wins, the start of his career is the best of all time. Three majors and two green jackets at age 22. He would be without question the face of golf. Just a huge fall for him and the media will report it as such.
I don't like Spieth and I think this tournament exposed some of his negative side in terms of personality and slow play. However, I give him a lot of credit for how he handled himself with the media in the aftermath. The media is still going to properly frame his epic meltdown though.