Kwai Chang Caine
Footballguy
Here's some news on Hugh Jackson:
Jackson has told 49ers he wants roster and staff control and to fly to Houston to vote on L.A. relocation.
I see what you're doing here.
Here's some news on Hugh Jackson:
Jackson has told 49ers he wants roster and staff control and to fly to Houston to vote on L.A. relocation.
Ray Diddy said he feels like Peterson has a 40% chance and isn't really 100% sure if we've interviewed the one we want yet. He mentioned how methodical we usually are during this process.If Pederson is a done deal, why Coughlin then? Must be to get some info on the Giants. Or maybe for WR coach??
FWIWTweeted by Ray RattoHaven't seen anything like this, that he wants or asked for any power. But, have seen rumors that he's meeting with NYG shortly. Very in demand.http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2606692-insider-buzz-giants-expected-to-interview-hue-jackson-49ers-hire-on-hold?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=web-des-art-top-16It's not anti-Hue. I hoped on Twitter and that was the first thing I saw, seemed like a lot, and thought I'd share.It also sheds some light on why he's not a candidate here as well since we have a GM and don't seem interested in giving all the power to a HC again.Why so anti-Jackson? He seems like a good candidate, and there are no links/stories about him wanting to do anything abnormal re: control. Not in Oakland, and not in 2016. The rumor is Howie wants a guy he can control. Well, that's not Hue, I guess, from what his rep is. He ruffled feathers being so outspoken in Oakland, but he thought he was getting a raw deal. In any event, since when is being a strong personality and a guy with an opinion an auto rejection as an NFL coach? I can see why Philly doesn't want that, given the recent events.Not sold he's the answer, but IMO he's a better candidate than the majority. I find it odd we don't seem interested. Like to see him interviewed, some aspects of him I deem impressive. I prefer him to some of the candidates we've talked to.Here's some news on Hugh Hue Jackson:
Jackson has told 49ers he wants roster and staff control and to fly to Houston to vote on L.A. relocation.![]()
Anyways, Hue to SF seems a done deal. First day he was eligible to interview, he gets 2 interviews and a (likely) hire. Can't do much better than that.
http://www.espn1530.com/onair/james-rapien-56340/breaking-hue-jackson-to-san-francisco-14260380/
I can't tell, but do you guys think I'm kidding or really don't like the guy? I mentioned previously that if we, and others, aren't interviewing or hiring him there has to be a reason. That would be a pretty big reason, no?Here's some news on Hugh Jackson:
Jackson has told 49ers he wants roster and staff control and to fly to Houston to vote on L.A. relocation.I see what you're doing here.
LOL. He was being completely sarcastic. Like the Onion reporting the Chicago PD is going to start using 'bullet cams.'Tweeted by Ray RattoHaven't seen anything like this, that he wants or asked for any power. But, have seen rumors that he's meeting with NYG shortly. Very in demand.http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2606692-insider-buzz-giants-expected-to-interview-hue-jackson-49ers-hire-on-hold?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=web-des-art-top-16It's not anti-Hue. I hoped on Twitter and that was the first thing I saw, seemed like a lot, and thought I'd share.It also sheds some light on why he's not a candidate here as well since we have a GM and don't seem interested in giving all the power to a HC again.Why so anti-Jackson? He seems like a good candidate, and there are no links/stories about him wanting to do anything abnormal re: control. Not in Oakland, and not in 2016. The rumor is Howie wants a guy he can control. Well, that's not Hue, I guess, from what his rep is. He ruffled feathers being so outspoken in Oakland, but he thought he was getting a raw deal. In any event, since when is being a strong personality and a guy with an opinion an auto rejection as an NFL coach? I can see why Philly doesn't want that, given the recent events.Not sold he's the answer, but IMO he's a better candidate than the majority. I find it odd we don't seem interested. Like to see him interviewed, some aspects of him I deem impressive. I prefer him to some of the candidates we've talked to.Here's some news on Hugh Hue Jackson:
Jackson has told 49ers he wants roster and staff control and to fly to Houston to vote on L.A. relocation.![]()
Anyways, Hue to SF seems a done deal. First day he was eligible to interview, he gets 2 interviews and a (likely) hire. Can't do much better than that.
http://www.espn1530.com/onair/james-rapien-56340/breaking-hue-jackson-to-san-francisco-14260380/
I read he got control of the 53 man roster, which isn't as great as it sounds. Means he gets to make training camp cuts, but not draft picks, FA signings etc.Gase apparently getting full control over personnel in Mia, so maybe that was a sticking point.
No, just thought you were kidding. Lots of others (SF, NYG, CLE) are all immediately interested. We're not. Speculation is he's too 'strong willed' for our GM.I can't tell, but do you guys think I'm kidding or really don't like the guy? I mentioned previously that if we, and others, aren't interviewing or hiring him there has to be a reason. That would be a pretty big reason, no?Here's some news on Hugh Jackson:
Jackson has told 49ers he wants roster and staff control and to fly to Houston to vote on L.A. relocation.I see what you're doing here.
Butch! The coolest one of 'em all mate!Come on man! Who am I!Kwai Chang Caine said:I think every situation in life can be explained by either Pulp Fiction or the Big Lebowski. I'm the absolutely typical Eagle fan who's like Vincent Vega and #####es about the guy keying his car and how he'd actually like to have the guy key it again so he could catch him and #### him up LOL. And some of you guys are without a doubt Jules or Walter from Lebowksi (Junior and Daemon come to mind LOL).
And if Junior is Walter, then ShaBucks is definitely Donny LOL!
Our boy Insein...he's kinda like the Dude. Pretty chill unless you play music from the band the Eagles and our Bigboy...he's the Wolf come in here to chill us mother ####ers out!
Yeah...lack of sleep fellas...I know...
Everything I said is just my opinion from the couch. I don't know if it's a done deal per se, I just think he's their top choice and like I said the rest is just due diligence and backup plans. But I also thought there was no way Chip would be fired before his contract ended, so what the heck do I know?If Pederson is a done deal, why Coughlin then? Must be to get some info on the Giants. Or maybe for WR coach??
Solid. It's ambiguous but I might be banging Julianne Moore which would be sweet. I've always beenKnox Harrington, the video artist.Come on man! Who am I!Kwai Chang Caine said:I think every situation in life can be explained by either Pulp Fiction or the Big Lebowski. I'm the absolutely typical Eagle fan who's like Vincent Vega and #####es about the guy keying his car and how he'd actually like to have the guy key it again so he could catch him and #### him up LOL. And some of you guys are without a doubt Jules or Walter from Lebowksi (Junior and Daemon come to mind LOL).
And if Junior is Walter, then ShaBucks is definitely Donny LOL!
Our boy Insein...he's kinda like the Dude. Pretty chill unless you play music from the band the Eagles and our Bigboy...he's the Wolf come in here to chill us mother ####ers out!
Yeah...lack of sleep fellas...I know...
on her for some reason.I didn't realize it was a fishing tweet. Admittedly I've had a few today but when I saw that Tweet I was like "damn, no wonder this guy hasn't gotten a job yet"No, just thought you were kidding. Lots of others (SF, NYG, CLE) are all immediately interested. We're not. Speculation is he's too 'strong willed' for our GM.He didn't really ask for all that stuff. No biggie, miscommunication.I can't tell, but do you guys think I'm kidding or really don't like the guy? I mentioned previously that if we, and others, aren't interviewing or hiring him there has to be a reason. That would be a pretty big reason, no?Here's some news on Hugh Jackson:
Jackson has told 49ers he wants roster and staff control and to fly to Houston to vote on L.A. relocation.I see what you're doing here.
Onwards and upwards. Hire Pederson, resign Bradford, etc.
Absolutely no worries! Thought you were busting balls from prior convo re: Roseman.I didn't realize it was a fishing tweet. Admittedly I've had a few today but when I saw that Tweet I was like "damn, no wonder this guy hasn't gotten a job yet"No, just thought you were kidding. Lots of others (SF, NYG, CLE) are all immediately interested. We're not. Speculation is he's too 'strong willed' for our GM.He didn't really ask for all that stuff. No biggie, miscommunication.I can't tell, but do you guys think I'm kidding or really don't like the guy? I mentioned previously that if we, and others, aren't interviewing or hiring him there has to be a reason. That would be a pretty big reason, no?Here's some news on Hugh Jackson:
Jackson has told 49ers he wants roster and staff control and to fly to Houston to vote on L.A. relocation.I see what you're doing here.
Onwards and upwards. Hire Pederson, resign Bradford, etc.![]()
thisNot interested in Coughlin. His game management has been horrible and he's way past his prime.
The two teams that beat us when we got closest to the SB! haha.Give me a Cards and Pats SB and I'd be happy.
I wouldn't mind Coughlin if McAdoo comes alongI have to say, at this point I think Coughlin is the HC candidate I would feel best about. None of the available coordinators fill me with confidence. I feel like Coughlin would fit well into the organization, in that he is not likely to be any challenge or threat to Lurie and Roseman. I think he instantly gains buy-in and support from the players, which with this roster is good for at least an extra two wins.
Is he a brilliant tactician or in-game coach? No, not really. But as a credible coach to guide the ship for the next 2-3 years while a more exhaustive search is performed, I think he's a good fit.
Bradford and it's not close.....I see a lot of Nick Foles in Cousins. We can sign Foles alot cheaper.So who would you rather overspend on at QB? Cousins or Bradford?
I think it's close. But given Bradford's comfort in our offense and with our guys, I want him. We also may have seen KC peek, but Bradford looks like he's getting better by the game this year. Excited to see him with a full offseason.So who would you rather overspend on at QB? Cousins or Bradford?
I was sitting around yesterday watching NFLN and at the bottom they have all the teams who need a HC along with who they interviewed and who they planned to interview. There's a LOT of guys like this from what I could seeI wish someone else would interview Pederson so it at least seems like he's a sought after guy. Has there been another single interview request for him?
While you're right about interest seemingly lukewarm to non-existent on him, no one else in the league has the insight on the guy as we do. Maybe there are qualities that the front office and existing players/coaches saw in him when he was here before that other teams aren't privy to. My concern with Pederson is that he's very limited in the people he has worked with. What connections could he possibly have as far as bringing in a DC?I wish someone else would interview Pederson so it at least seems like he's a sought after guy. Has there been another single interview request for him?
Ya but it's a copy cat league. You'd think if we brought him in then others would at least take a look at him. Other teams aren't dumb, if he's got some potential to be a great head coach they'll see it and ask for an interview I'd think.While you're right about interest seemingly lukewarm to non-existent on him, no one else in the league has the insight on the guy as we do. Maybe there are qualities that the front office and existing players/coaches saw in him when he was here before that other teams aren't privy to. My concern with Pederson is that he's very limited in the people he has worked with. What connections could he possibly have as far as bringing in a DC?I wish someone else would interview Pederson so it at least seems like he's a sought after guy. Has there been another single interview request for him?
What connections can a QB Coach from green bay have had? Apparently Jim Johnson. Let's hope Pederson learned that from Andy.While you're right about interest seemingly lukewarm to non-existent on him, no one else in the league has the insight on the guy as we do. Maybe there are qualities that the front office and existing players/coaches saw in him when he was here before that other teams aren't privy to. My concern with Pederson is that he's very limited in the people he has worked with. What connections could he possibly have as far as bringing in a DC?I wish someone else would interview Pederson so it at least seems like he's a sought after guy. Has there been another single interview request for him?
Don't get me all excited like thatWhat connections can a QB Coach from green bay have had? Apparently Jim Johnson. Let's hope Pederson learned that from Andy.While you're right about interest seemingly lukewarm to non-existent on him, no one else in the league has the insight on the guy as we do. Maybe there are qualities that the front office and existing players/coaches saw in him when he was here before that other teams aren't privy to. My concern with Pederson is that he's very limited in the people he has worked with. What connections could he possibly have as far as bringing in a DC?I wish someone else would interview Pederson so it at least seems like he's a sought after guy. Has there been another single interview request for him?
This is actually one of the bigger 'pros' Pederson brings to the table in the should we or shouldn't we hire him to be the HC:While you're right about interest seemingly lukewarm to non-existent on him, no one else in the league has the insight on the guy as we do. Maybe there are qualities that the front office and existing players/coaches saw in him when he was here before that other teams aren't privy to. My concern with Pederson is that he's very limited in the people he has worked with. What connections could he possibly have as far as bringing in a DC?I wish someone else would interview Pederson so it at least seems like he's a sought after guy. Has there been another single interview request for him?
That's all huge and one of the more underrated aspects of finding a HC IMO. A fan will look right at the #'s. Take Gase for instance....the fan just looks at where his units rank in the league as if the guy can bring all of his previous talent with him. The bigger part is how well connected he is and what kind of coaches he can bring in, something that fans just cant see.This is actually one of the bigger 'pros' Pederson brings to the table in the should we or shouldn't we hire him to be the HC:While you're right about interest seemingly lukewarm to non-existent on him, no one else in the league has the insight on the guy as we do. Maybe there are qualities that the front office and existing players/coaches saw in him when he was here before that other teams aren't privy to. My concern with Pederson is that he's very limited in the people he has worked with. What connections could he possibly have as far as bringing in a DC?I wish someone else would interview Pederson so it at least seems like he's a sought after guy. Has there been another single interview request for him?
http://mobile.philly.com/beta?wss=/philly/blogs/sports/eagles&id=364860351
"Start scrolling through his career, and you realize that he is pretty much the Kevin Bacon of NFL assistants. He has direct experience with an amazing number of offensive and defensive schemes thanks to his time as a journeyman quarterback. One of the biggest challenges facing any new coach is the task of building a quality coaching staff. A new head coach can't hire coordinators who are under contract elsewhere, which means he needs to rely on first and second-hand knowledge of position coaches across the league in order to find one capable of the task. That's a problem for a lot of head coaching candidates, given that many of them have spent their careers as assistants following the same head coaches around. It isn't nececessarily that they are a poor judge of talent or scheme. It's that they've only ever really been immersed in a small selection of schemes with a small selection of coaches.
That right there is the appeal of Pederson.
In addition to the Reid coaching tree, he has played under Mike Holmgren, Darrell Bevell, Romeo Crennel, Joe Philbin, Mike Sherman, Tom Rossley, Todd Bowles, Marty Mornhinweg.
He is currently on a staff with defensive coordintor Bob Sutton, whose unit has ranked fifth, second and third in points over the last three years and 24th, seventh and seventh in yards. He was a long time assistant for the Jets under Eric Mangini and Rex Ryan, including a stint as a defensive coordinator of a staff that included future Legion of Boom DC(and current Falcons head coach) Dan Quinn and current Bills DC Dennis Thurman."
Nice. Wonder if Sutton is a candidate to come be our DC? Would he leave with Pederson? Would be pretty happy with a Pederson, Shurmur, Sutton combo.This is actually one of the bigger 'pros' Pederson brings to the table in the should we or shouldn't we hire him to be the HC:While you're right about interest seemingly lukewarm to non-existent on him, no one else in the league has the insight on the guy as we do. Maybe there are qualities that the front office and existing players/coaches saw in him when he was here before that other teams aren't privy to. My concern with Pederson is that he's very limited in the people he has worked with. What connections could he possibly have as far as bringing in a DC?I wish someone else would interview Pederson so it at least seems like he's a sought after guy. Has there been another single interview request for him?
http://mobile.philly.com/beta?wss=/philly/blogs/sports/eagles&id=364860351
"Start scrolling through his career, and you realize that he is pretty much the Kevin Bacon of NFL assistants. He has direct experience with an amazing number of offensive and defensive schemes thanks to his time as a journeyman quarterback. One of the biggest challenges facing any new coach is the task of building a quality coaching staff. A new head coach can't hire coordinators who are under contract elsewhere, which means he needs to rely on first and second-hand knowledge of position coaches across the league in order to find one capable of the task. That's a problem for a lot of head coaching candidates, given that many of them have spent their careers as assistants following the same head coaches around. It isn't nececessarily that they are a poor judge of talent or scheme. It's that they've only ever really been immersed in a small selection of schemes with a small selection of coaches.
That right there is the appeal of Pederson.
In addition to the Reid coaching tree, he has played under Mike Holmgren, Darrell Bevell, Romeo Crennel, Joe Philbin, Mike Sherman, Tom Rossley, Todd Bowles, Marty Mornhinweg.
He is currently on a staff with defensive coordintor Bob Sutton, whose unit has ranked fifth, second and third in points over the last three years and 24th, seventh and seventh in yards. He was a long time assistant for the Jets under Eric Mangini and Rex Ryan, including a stint as a defensive coordinator of a staff that included future Legion of Boom DC(and current Falcons head coach) Dan Quinn and current Bills DC Dennis Thurman."
or what mo said. Good timing, I'm with ya.Doubt it because it's a lateral move and if we want Bradford do we stay with Shumer?i'm guessing there is no way to bring Pederson and McDermott both on right? Would be fun to have a co-coach if possible
Don't think there's any way we lose Sam. Any coach would franchise him over starting Sanchez in his first yearDoubt it because it's a lateral move and if we want Bradford do we stay with Shumer?i'm guessing there is no way to bring Pederson and McDermott both on right? Would be fun to have a co-coach if possible
Seems like a lot less leaks and speculation this time around doesn't it?
Best news is the division isn't strong.....I'm excited to get someone in and see what they do. Will they keep Sam and try to compete right away or are we developing a QB? Hope the 1st with the state of the division.
The silver lining is that I think Shurmur learned a lot from Chip in that sense. I'm hoping Pederson would give Shurmur a bit more control of running the offense then Chip did.and one of my biggest concerns with Pederson is that he just brings in a boring offense. I'm only basing that on what we have seen, but what i loved about Chip was that he tried something new and brought an exciting element to the gameplan. I get nervous seeing what pederson has overseen in the past, and with this KC offense the past few years, we are in for a lot of boring games. If it means wins that is cool i guess, but i like the excitement factor is possible
and one of my biggest concerns with Pederson is that he just brings in a boring offense. I'm only basing that on what we have seen, but what i loved about Chip was that he tried something new and brought an exciting element to the gameplan. I get nervous seeing what pederson has overseen in the past, and with this KC offense the past few years, we are in for a lot of boring games. If it means wins that is cool i guess, but i like the excitement factor is possible
I think it's safe to assume Pederson, as a Reid disciple in GB and PHI as a player, under Holmgren and Sherman as a player, then under Andy for 7 years as a coach, would run a variant of the GB/Reid WCO. Which has always seemed effective across the board, in GB/PHI/KC, characterized by a versatile back and running game (see Ahman Green/Westbrook/Shady/Charles).I know KC runs some sort of hybrid offense, but it's mostly built around a west coast style base, right? Not sure I feel like going back down that road.
ETA:or what mo said. Good timing, I'm with ya.
well, if Pederson becomes head coach i would suggest bailing and fading Ertz in fantasy for awhile. Every year i love the hype for Kelce.and one of my biggest concerns with Pederson is that he just brings in a boring offense. I'm only basing that on what we have seen, but what i loved about Chip was that he tried something new and brought an exciting element to the gameplan. I get nervous seeing what pederson has overseen in the past, and with this KC offense the past few years, we are in for a lot of boring games. If it means wins that is cool i guess, but i like the excitement factor is possibleI think it's safe to assume Pederson, as a Reid disciple in GB and PHI as a player, under Holmgren and Sherman as a player, then under Andy for 7 years as a coach, would run a variant of the GB/Reid WCO. Which has always seemed effective across the board, in GB/PHI/KC, characterized by a versatile back and running game (see Ahman Green/Westbrook/Shady/Charles).I know KC runs some sort of hybrid offense, but it's mostly built around a west coast style base, right? Not sure I feel like going back down that road.
ETA:or what mo said. Good timing, I'm with ya.
The biggest knock on Andy's O was/is his reluctance to bring in top-notch WRs, both in Philly for a long stretch, then his first two years in KC. It completely restricted the offense. Look at how it bloomed when he acquired TO, and later DJax/Maclin, and in KC with Maclin.
Imagine Reid's offense with a great WR corps and clock management skills. I think that's Pederson's upside...the Reid offense, but learning from watching/seeing his mentor taking that offense to higher highs with talent at WR.
Gosh I hope not. Do we really want to see THIS every week?Read on BGN Eagles and Coughlin are close, but some contractual sticking points with Medicare Part D and Social Security offsets are holding things up. Also some pre-existing conditions need to be detailed.![]()
Howie has his work cut out for him.
Is this a Ray Ratto alias?Read on BGN Eagles and Coughlin are close, but some contractual sticking points with Medicare Part D and Social Security offsets are holding things up. Also some pre-existing conditions need to be detailed.![]()
Howie has his work cut out for him.
Bradford is right in his prime now - you can get a solid 5-6 years imo - if we can work a deal with him that keeps us in ok cap shape, we do it.Doubt it because it's a lateral move and if we want Bradford do we stay with Shumer?i'm guessing there is no way to bring Pederson and McDermott both on right? Would be fun to have a co-coach if possible
Seems like a lot less leaks and speculation this time around doesn't it?
Best news is the division isn't strong.....I'm excited to get someone in and see what they do. Will they keep Sam and try to compete right away or are we developing a QB? Hope the 1st with the state of the division.
Dude is pushing 70......are we going to sign him for half a season? If they were worried about Chip relating to players is a guy a half century older the answer?Gosh I hope not. Do we really want to see THIS every week?Read on BGN Eagles and Coughlin are close, but some contractual sticking points with Medicare Part D and Social Security offsets are holding things up. Also some pre-existing conditions need to be detailed.![]()
Howie has his work cut out for him.
I was being sarcastic. No reports we are close that I've seen.Is this a Ray Ratto alias?Read on BGN Eagles and Coughlin are close, but some contractual sticking points with Medicare Part D and Social Security offsets are holding things up. Also some pre-existing conditions need to be detailed.![]()
Howie has his work cut out for him.
He's only 70??Dude is pushing 70......are we going to sign him for half a season? If they were worried about Chip relating to players is a guy a half century older the answer?Gosh I hope not. Do we really want to see THIS every week?Read on BGN Eagles and Coughlin are close, but some contractual sticking points with Medicare Part D and Social Security offsets are holding things up. Also some pre-existing conditions need to be detailed.![]()
Howie has his work cut out for him.