shader
Footballguy
I feel like the manager is quite average, has little ingenuity and is doing a relatively poor job of setting up the team, from an offensive standpoint. England had a very easy group and then drew a Colombian team that was without James Rodriguez.Some off-day questions from someone who watches maybe 20-30 non-World Cup matches every four years between Cups. Please be gentle with me:
1. Why do television broadcasts use the sideline angle for PKs? The angle behind the goal is way better. Every time there's a PK it feels like I'm basically just watching to see if the ball hits the net after the kick. Then I can see what actually happened (specific placement, how close the keeper came to actually saving it or not saving it, etc.) on the behind-the-goal replay
2. Why don't they fix extra time so they don't motivate players to fake injuries or otherwise delay proceedings? Even before someone put out that analysis last week everyone kind of knew that they didn't add all the time they should, right? Why not do that with every second of lost time, including every second injury timeouts and arguments about calls? Or even add time-and-a-half if in the ref's discretion one team is seeking to run clock with these tactics?
3. Basic strategy question - I noticed England removing Dele Ali and Raheem Sterling in the second half on Tuesday, two guys that looked to my untrained eye to be two of their three best offensive weapons. I know the idea is probably to be cautious by replacing them with more defensive minded players to protect the one goal lead, but isn't this risky or short-sighted because if you do concede a tying goal you've screwed yourself out of the best chance to re-take the lead? Especially in the knockout format with 30 extra minutes on tap if you concede a tying goal? Is it more about those players running around the most and therefore getting the most fatigued?
I'm amazed at the excitement in England for this team. To me, they've been extremely boring. Usually Dele Alli and Raheem Sterling are exciting players. That being said, I thought England were much more dangerous looking with Rashford and Vardy.
Managers routinely make "defensive" substitutions with a one-goal lead. Yes, it's risky when there is extra time.
For me, the biggest issue with England is that they tried to sit on a 1-0 lead. I hate when teams do that. It's a very silly way to play, unless you happen to have an absolutely stifling defense, which England does not.
The way England were playing in the 2nd half, it really didnt' matter which offensive players they put on, nothing was gonna happen. That only changed when they allowed the tying goal.