What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official*** 2018 World Cup thread (and Drinking Guide) (2 Viewers)

Have an appointment at noon, but I might try a preview or two this afternoon. 

I could do France, Argentina, Belgium, England, maybe Mexico or Portugal.  Too far down the food chain and I know the players but don't really have much of an idea of where the depth chart stands.  Colombia might be an interesting sleeper to take a look at.  

 
QuizGuy66 said:
So yahoo has started it's group previews today.

Got me hoping the NJ Sports Books will open in time to take bets on the Golden Boot :)   Suarez and Cavani look promising if the odds are right.

-QG
Both at 25/1 or so.

I'd stick away from all Germans/French/Belgians as too may options will probably take goals from another.  I do like Kane to score quite a few, but I am just not sure England will go that deep.  If you can tell me Neymar is back 100% that would be my pick even at very short odds.  

Lionel Messi  +900

Neymar  +1000

Antoine Griezmann  +1200

Cristiano Ronaldo  +1400

Gabriel Jesus  +1600

Timo Werner  +1600

Harry Kane  +1600

Romelu Lukaku  +1800

Edinson Cavani  +2500

Luis Suarez  +2500

Diego Costa  +2500

Thomas Muller  +3000

Sergio Aguero  +3000

Robert Lewandowski  +3300

Gonzalo Higuain  +3300

Kylian Mbappe  +3300

Olivier Giroud  +4000

Radamel Falcao  +4000

Paulo Dybala  +4500

Eden Hazard  +5000

Dries Mertens  +5000

Isco  +5000

Mario Gomez  +6000

Roberto Firmino  +6000

James Rodriguez  +6600

Philippe Coutinho  +7000

David Silva  +7000

Andre Silva  +8000

Mario Mandzukic  +8000

Jamie Vardy  +8000

Carlos Bacca  +8500

Sadio Mane  +8500

Ivan Perisic  +9000

Leon Goretzka  +10000

Paulinho  +10000

Kevin De Bruyne  +10000

Arkadiusz Milik  +10000

Christian Eriksen  +10000

Delli Alli  +10000

Javier Hernandez  +10000

Marcus Rashford  +10000

Mesut Ozil  +10000

Nikola Kalinic  +10000

Ousmane Dembele  +10000

Paul Pogba  +10000

Raheem Sterling  +10000

Fyodor Smolov  +10000

Michy Batshuayi  +10000

Aleksandr Mitrovic  +12500

Oribe Peralta  +12500

Hirving Lozano  +12500

Marcus Berg  +12500

Gylfi Sigurdsson  +15000

Kelechi Iheanacho  +15000

Diafra Sakho  +15000

Nicolai Jorgensen  +15000

Xherdan Shaqiri  +15000

Emil Forsberg  +15000

Moussa Sow  +17500

Son Heung-Min  +17500

Keisuke Honda  +20000

Alan Dzagoev  +22500

Adem Ljajic  +25000

Tim Cahill  +25000

Shinji Okazaki  +25000

Bryan Ruiz  +50000

Joel Campbell  +50000

Luis Tejada  +50000

Reza Ghoochannejhad  +50000

 
Both at 25/1 or so.

I'd stick away from all Germans/French/Belgians as too may options will probably take goals from another.  I do like Kane to score quite a few, but I am just not sure England will go that deep.  If you can tell me Neymar is back 100% that would be my pick even at very short odds.  

Lionel Messi  +900

Neymar  +1000

Antoine Griezmann  +1200

Cristiano Ronaldo  +1400

Gabriel Jesus  +1600

Timo Werner  +1600

Harry Kane  +1600

Romelu Lukaku  +1800

Edinson Cavani  +2500

Luis Suarez  +2500

Diego Costa  +2500

Thomas Muller  +3000

Sergio Aguero  +3000

Robert Lewandowski  +3300

Gonzalo Higuain  +3300

Kylian Mbappe  +3300

Olivier Giroud  +4000

Radamel Falcao  +4000

Paulo Dybala  +4500

Eden Hazard  +5000

Dries Mertens  +5000

Isco  +5000

Mario Gomez  +6000

Roberto Firmino  +6000

James Rodriguez  +6600

Philippe Coutinho  +7000

David Silva  +7000

Andre Silva  +8000

Mario Mandzukic  +8000

Jamie Vardy  +8000

Carlos Bacca  +8500

Sadio Mane  +8500

Ivan Perisic  +9000

Leon Goretzka  +10000

Paulinho  +10000

Kevin De Bruyne  +10000

Arkadiusz Milik  +10000

Christian Eriksen  +10000

Delli Alli  +10000

Javier Hernandez  +10000

Marcus Rashford  +10000

Mesut Ozil  +10000

Nikola Kalinic  +10000

Ousmane Dembele  +10000

Paul Pogba  +10000

Raheem Sterling  +10000

Fyodor Smolov  +10000

Michy Batshuayi  +10000

Aleksandr Mitrovic  +12500

Oribe Peralta  +12500

Hirving Lozano  +12500

Marcus Berg  +12500

Gylfi Sigurdsson  +15000

Kelechi Iheanacho  +15000

Diafra Sakho  +15000

Nicolai Jorgensen  +15000

Xherdan Shaqiri  +15000

Emil Forsberg  +15000

Moussa Sow  +17500

Son Heung-Min  +17500

Keisuke Honda  +20000

Alan Dzagoev  +22500

Adem Ljajic  +25000

Tim Cahill  +25000

Shinji Okazaki  +25000

Bryan Ruiz  +50000

Joel Campbell  +50000

Luis Tejada  +50000

Reza Ghoochannejhad  +50000
Thanks :) Very informative.

Reading the Group A preview it seems like the Uruguayans both will have plenty of opportunity to score (basically the Saudis qualified through offense and look to play that way - which should make for some entertaining ugly results like 8-2 against.

-QG

 
Time to gear up.  Looking for other recommended preview resources, other than Scoobie's excellent ongoing series here.

Here's what I've ordered so far:

8by8 preview edition (one year subscription required, which is 4 issues). This one is as much about the cool art as it is the content.  Well worth it, looks great on the coffee table. Shipping this week.  http://8by8mag.com/world-cup-2018-issue/

Wall Chart - my son and I enjoyed having one of these in '14

Official FIFA because, why not, they need the money. Comes out June 5: 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks :) Very informative.

Reading the Group A preview it seems like the Uruguayans both will have plenty of opportunity to score (basically the Saudis qualified through offense and look to play that way - which should make for some entertaining ugly results like 8-2 against.

-QG
I'm not a betting guy, but wouldn't you want to roll the dice on a guy whose team is most likely to make a deep run? Seems like the usual winners come from teams that make the semis at least, no?

 
I'm not a betting guy, but wouldn't you want to roll the dice on a guy whose team is most likely to make a deep run? Seems like the usual winners come from teams that make the semis at least, no?
Yes but the style of Germany and Spain make that a little harder. The favorites who have a main guy are the guys where the payouts are the lowest Neymar and Messi. 

 
Still weird to imagine a tournament without Italy.  Their starting lineup in today's friendly vs. France isn't full strength.

 
Does having American announcers mean I won't have to hear the words pitch, side, match, footie, and "are" instead of "is"?  I feel like the American Revolution happened partly because of this terrible use of the language.  Also, looking forward to the Belgium preview.  

 
Saw an article today that Fox is using mostly American announcers for their coverage. Awesome. Now we get to hear incessant talking for 98% of the game broadcast.

LET THE GAME BREATHE YOU STUPID ANNOUNCERS!!!

(apologies if you guys covered this already. just a huge pet peeve of mine)
More stats, please!

(j/k)​
 
Listening to Henry Bushnell's prop bet podcast. Over/under 6.5 -- number of Prem players in the final. 

Also, which club's players will have the most tournament goals? 

These are fun to think about and I don't even gamble.

 
I'm not a betting guy, but wouldn't you want to roll the dice on a guy whose team is most likely to make a deep run? Seems like the usual winners come from teams that make the semis at least, no?
Let's look at Uruguay's path...

Russia, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia - these set up to yield a lot of goals and seems to be a glide path for a group win.

Ah...yeah Portugal or Spain in the round of 16 is not ideal.  But some of the appear of the two from Uruguay is the long odds.  It is also true that are recent semi-finalists so it's not the craizest thing.

But while we're here let me take a look at what other "glide paths" seem out there or the trouble facing those that make it out of particular groups.

A - Uruguay is the one appealing option given what I said previously (chance for a disproportionate number of goals in the 3 group games - though Spain/Portugal is the likely knock out opponent which tempers things.

B - Portugal/Spain are good promise to get to the round of 8 - however if their opening game is not a draw the loser of the game has to worry about Morocco pipping them for a spot potentially.  And Uruguay in the round of 16 is not ideal. 

C - France has a pretty good set up in their group and pedigree to advance - but group D has some teeth - if Argentina gets off a little lackadaisical there could be France/Argentina in the round of 16.

D - It's a tough group and the 2nd place team probably gets France.

E - Brazil shouldn't have trouble with this bunch and winning the group probably avoids Germany and gets a more reasonable matchup up for the 1st knockout game.  But Brazil being Brazil shorten the odds one could get.  The Swiss could go on a run but you could probably give Switzerland two-dozen extra games and they still might not produce a player with enough goals for a golden boot.

F- Looking more at the E/F/G/H path and I can see the appeal - Germany is the one team in group that you can figure for a long run but again what kind of price?

G -The England/Belgium group has intrigue.  Though winning the group probably puts them against Brazil in the round of 8.  Side note - the schedule could definitely provide opportunity schenanigans - if Germany or Brazil stumble into a matchup with each other (one finishes first in group and the other takes 2nd in theirs) suddenly Belgium/England could have either a heavy incentive to win their last game (if Brazil loses group E) or a heavy incentive to lose (if Brazil is the one that comes in 2nd).  Not that teams necessarily would play to lose but if one path gives you a Swiss/Swedish winner and the other a Brazil/Germany winner what do YOU do?   But I can see  Belgium as being a team that could offer a golden boot option at a decent price with a decent prospect to play in enough games to get it done.

H - Group H is so relatively weak that it really makes the group G choices pop out. 

But I am no expert - what group do you guys see as being the one with the most defensively challenged teams?  Which one is the most likely to yield at 8-1 score line of which golden boot dreams are made of?

-QG

 
Still weird to imagine a tournament without Italy.  Their starting lineup in today's friendly vs. France isn't full strength.
Yeah it's kinda too bad a World Cup NIT wasn't put together to have us and Italy and the Netherlands.

-QG

 
Side note to Seb and everyone if I do end up making some legal World Cup bets I will surely post them here so you can avoid duplicating them.  Seb can attest to my prowess at picking World Cup losers

-QG

 
Neymar played for the first time since February today and scored in a friendly against Croatia. Are we all good with that then?  Brazil seems completely dependent on him. Does this mean it’s a clean bill of health? I thought he had essentially the same injury Neuer had. 

 
Neymar played for the first time since February today and scored in a friendly against Croatia. Are we all good with that then?  Brazil seems completely dependent on him. Does this mean it’s a clean bill of health? I thought he had essentially the same injury Neuer had. 
Everything is good.

no idea. 
 
I don’t know if there is something official somewhere or if it’s just because it was a friendly, but I watched Spain/Switzerland and it looked to me like a 4-2-3-1 with Iniesta, Silva, Aspas (LV sub) feeding Costa at striker.  Maybe Isco playing would just replace Aspas in that lineup. 

 
Wow, Sane didn’t make the cut.  He hasn’t played well in the friendlies, but still shocking.
Couldn't believe that. Also puts a dent in the Citeh prop bet to score the most goals of any club. That was looking pretty good with Aguero, DeBruyne, Sterling, Silva and Sane.

 
I fear BSilva playing mf in the Portugal system might be a mess also. That’s probably a 0 imo

Still don’t hate that bet though as I think Aguero is a safe bet for some and I love KDB. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow, Sane didn’t make the cut.  He hasn’t played well in the friendlies, but still shocking.
I'm not a big Sane fan just yet.  I think he has great physical tools and has inflated assist numbers due to the insane firepower of City.  If you watch Sane in difficult games (City didn't have many), he does his own thing, wastes too many dribbles and tries to rely on his physical skills.  I suspect that in the structure of the German team, he currently mixes like oil and water.  

In the end, he scored 10 PL goals last year and he's quite young.  That isn't the kind of production that should make him an automatic German starter.  

Scary thing is how much he (and Sterling/Jesus) can improve and what they did last season in the PL.

 
I fear BSilva playing mf in the Portugal system might be a mess also. That’s probably a 0 imo

Still don’t hate that bet though as I think Aguero is a safe bet for some and I love KDB. 
KDB often fails in big games and I suspect he will have a very average WC.  I like the players on Belgium but that team plays terrible together.  

 
Wow, Sane didn’t make the cut.  He hasn’t played well in the friendlies, but still shocking.
It seems most expected Sane over Brandt. Ginter making the final 23 is also somewhat of a surprise.  I guess Low is probably thinking Mueller -- Ozil -- Reus in the attacking 3 behind Werner. Brandt and Draxler can probably fill in any one of the 3 spots, as can Ozil. Although I think Sane can also play left and right. Its very tough competition obviously, but agree that is a shocker.  The Germans probably don't take losing to Austria very well, even in a seemingly meaningless friendly.

 
KDB often fails in big games and I suspect he will have a very average WC.  I like the players on Belgium but that team plays terrible together.  
KDB was, by far, Belgium's best player in the 2014 World Cup.  He had 10 chances created in a single game (with a goal and an assist).  OK, it was against the US, but still ...

 
KDB was, by far, Belgium's best player in the 2014 World Cup.  He had 10 chances created in a single game (with a goal and an assist).  OK, it was against the US, but still ...
He had a great world cup in Brazil, but I agree with Shader's second comment, the Belgians don't often add up to the sum of their parts in recent years.

 
He had a great world cup in Brazil, but I agree with Shader's second comment, the Belgians don't often add up to the sum of their parts in recent years.
Oh, absolutely.  I have them out in the first knockout game (and I have England winning their group because I can't stop myself).  I just disagree about KDB.  Hazard was a disappointment in 2014.  Lukaku too, although it's tough to know how much that was on Wilmots pulling Divock Origi shenanigans.  But KDB played terrific in big moments.  

 
Still weird to imagine a tournament without Italy.  
I did a pick 'em game with my son over the weekend and would say seems like a somewhat weak group stage.  We saw Chile play in the last Copa in Chicago, and all US fans have history with Ghana, so on a personal level there's quite a bit missing with Italy, Holland, Chile, USA and Ghana not there. There's really nothing close to a "group of death" and really only a couple groups with two really strong teams.  I think the Group Stage actually looks a bit boring, which is just as well for me since I'll be very busy at work that first 10 days or so.  I'm already kind of looking to the knockouts.

 
I did a pick 'em game with my son over the weekend and would say seems like a somewhat weak group stage.  We saw Chile play in the last Copa in Chicago, and all US fans have history with Ghana, so on a personal level there's quite a bit missing with Italy, Holland, Chile, USA and Ghana not there. There's really nothing close to a "group of death" and really only a couple groups with two really strong teams.  I think the Group Stage actually looks a bit boring, which is just as well for me since I'll be very busy at work that first 10 days or so.  I'm already kind of looking to the knockouts.
Wouldn't a lack of a group of death indicate that the new seeding method worked pretty well? I understand that it comes with the cost of lessening excitement in the group stage but it seems like it worked out pretty fairly overall. 

A boring group stage will really be the harbinger of a superdull tournament when it expands to 48, though.

 
Yeah, most of the drama in the group stage, for me, is between the presumptive 1st and 2nd qualifiers.  You could see, Germany, for instance, drawing with Mexico and maybe dropping to the 2nd position and then getting Brazil in the first knockout round.  In my bracket, I have Argentina finishing second to Croatia and then losing to France in the first knock out round.  I'm probably wrong about that, but I get bored picking chalk, and Argentina did not look good in qualifying.

 
Wouldn't a lack of a group of death indicate that the new seeding method worked pretty well? I understand that it comes with the cost of lessening excitement in the group stage but it seems like it worked out pretty fairly overall. 

A boring group stage will really be the harbinger of a superdull tournament when it expands to 48, though.
Some of it is that true, but some of it is also not having US, Italy, and the Netherlands in the pot as 3 seeds or Ghana as a 4 seed too.

 
That was a real shock to me too. He was lights out in the last half of the EPL, arguably top 5 guy.
Low doesn't seem to take club play into the equation as much as latest national team play.  Sane has been really poor in the last year with Germany.  Still a surprise, but understandable in that light.

 
He had a great world cup in Brazil, but I agree with Shader's second comment, the Belgians don't often add up to the sum of their parts in recent years.
This is arguably their best ever generation of players, mostly hitting their prime ages. I don't think referencing their past does much to acknowledge the unique qualities of this group. But yes, they don't have the experience of collwctively getting to a final, but for me this is the cup where they should be expected to go deep here.

 
This is arguably their best ever generation of players, mostly hitting their prime ages. I don't think referencing their past does much to acknowledge the unique qualities of this group. But yes, they don't have the experience of collwctively getting to a final, but for me this is the cup where they should be expected to go deep here.
It's like you guys are forgetting who's coaching them

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top