The Kansas Comet
Footballguy
The artistry of that goal - hang it in the Brazilian equivalent of the Louvre.That third Brazil goal was unbelievable
The artistry of that goal - hang it in the Brazilian equivalent of the Louvre.That third Brazil goal was unbelievable
I have seen a lot of awful tattoos in this tournament... this Brazil team seems to have the most of them though.

only if the photo excludes a heath bar.I have seen a lot of awful tattoos in this tournament... this Brazil team seems to have the most of them though.
Funny you bring this up....
We are leasing the back warehouse space to a hot tub company who had a year-end closing sale this weekend. One of the heavy set guys who works for them just came in to use the bathroom. He's wearing a Heath Bar sweatshirt. So I asked him - "Hey, where can a fella get a Heath Bar sweatshirt?" He said he created it himself off the internet and then showed me a giant tattoo on his right forearm that's also a Heath Bar. I said "Man, you must REALLY love Heath Bars" and he said "No, not really, but that's my name and so I figured why not?".
Would it be weird if I asked him to take a picture with me?
they're using a freaking ladderThis is Harlem Globetrotters ****.
Was about to say I am waiting for them to come out with the ball on a string and bucket of confetti at this point
-QG
The second goal was one of the more ridiculous dives I've seen in this tournament. Fitting that it came from Brazil.That third Brazil goal was unbelievable
The second goal was one of the more ridiculous dives I've seen in this tournament. Fitting that it came from Brazil.That third Brazil goal was unbelievable
Was definitely a dive. The replay made it clear to me that he really had no intention of playing the ball and came from behind the defender with the intent to take contact. He got grazed and went down.The second goal was one of the more ridiculous dives I've seen in this tournament. Fitting that it came from Brazil.That third Brazil goal was unbelievable
Not sure I would call it a dive - I would call it a ridiculous embellishment by Richarlison but the guy clipped him a little.
He got got kicked in the foot; that is a foul.Was definitely a dive. The replay made it clear to me that he really had no intention of playing the ball and came from behind the defender with the intent to take contact. He got grazed and went down.The second goal was one of the more ridiculous dives I've seen in this tournament. Fitting that it came from Brazil.That third Brazil goal was unbelievable
Not sure I would call it a dive - I would call it a ridiculous embellishment by Richarlison but the guy clipped him a little.

If you videoed it while eating a Heath bar in one bite...I have seen a lot of awful tattoos in this tournament... this Brazil team seems to have the most of them though.
Funny you bring this up....
We are leasing the back warehouse space to a hot tub company who had a year-end closing sale this weekend. One of the heavy set guys who works for them just came in to use the bathroom. He's wearing a Heath Bar sweatshirt. So I asked him - "Hey, where can a fella get a Heath Bar sweatshirt?" He said he created it himself off the internet and then showed me a giant tattoo on his right forearm that's also a Heath Bar. I said "Man, you must REALLY love Heath Bars" and he said "No, not really, but that's my name and so I figured why not?".
Would it be weird if I asked him to take a picture with me?
While getting a full back tattoo of a bunch of trees...If you videoed it while eating a Heath bar in one bite...I have seen a lot of awful tattoos in this tournament... this Brazil team seems to have the most of them though.
Funny you bring this up....
We are leasing the back warehouse space to a hot tub company who had a year-end closing sale this weekend. One of the heavy set guys who works for them just came in to use the bathroom. He's wearing a Heath Bar sweatshirt. So I asked him - "Hey, where can a fella get a Heath Bar sweatshirt?" He said he created it himself off the internet and then showed me a giant tattoo on his right forearm that's also a Heath Bar. I said "Man, you must REALLY love Heath Bars" and he said "No, not really, but that's my name and so I figured why not?".
Would it be weird if I asked him to take a picture with me?
i'd like to see a pic of ole HeathI have seen a lot of awful tattoos in this tournament... this Brazil team seems to have the most of them though.
Funny you bring this up....
We are leasing the back warehouse space to a hot tub company who had a year-end closing sale this weekend. One of the heavy set guys who works for them just came in to use the bathroom. He's wearing a Heath Bar sweatshirt. So I asked him - "Hey, where can a fella get a Heath Bar sweatshirt?" He said he created it himself off the internet and then showed me a giant tattoo on his right forearm that's also a Heath Bar. I said "Man, you must REALLY love Heath Bars" and he said "No, not really, but that's my name and so I figured why not?".
Would it be weird if I asked him to take a picture with me?
I have seen a lot of awful tattoos in this tournament... this Brazil team seems to have the most of them though.
Funny you bring this up....
We are leasing the back warehouse space to a hot tub company who had a year-end closing sale this weekend. One of the heavy set guys who works for them just came in to use the bathroom. He's wearing a Heath Bar sweatshirt. So I asked him - "Hey, where can a fella get a Heath Bar sweatshirt?" He said he created it himself off the internet and then showed me a giant tattoo on his right forearm that's also a Heath Bar. I said "Man, you must REALLY love Heath Bars" and he said "No, not really, but that's my name and so I figured why not?".
Would it be weird if I asked him to take a picture with me?
I couldn’t believe that was a penalty kick but the announcers were so certain of it that I just felt dumb. I hate penalty kicks when there is a non-goal scoring opportunity.Was definitely a dive. The replay made it clear to me that he really had no intention of playing the ball and came from behind the defender with the intent to take contact. He got grazed and went down.The second goal was one of the more ridiculous dives I've seen in this tournament. Fitting that it came from Brazil.That third Brazil goal was unbelievable
Not sure I would call it a dive - I would call it a ridiculous embellishment by Richarlison but the guy clipped him a little.
Has to be one of the best goals I've ever seen.The artistry of that goal - hang it in the Brazilian equivalent of the Louvre.That third Brazil goal was unbelievable
I hate it when penalties are not given because referees think there should be a higher standard of foul than "direct free kick offence which takes place in the penalty area"I couldn’t believe that was a penalty kick but the announcers were so certain of it that I just felt dumb. I hate penalty kicks when there is a non-goal scoring opportunity.Was definitely a dive. The replay made it clear to me that he really had no intention of playing the ball and came from behind the defender with the intent to take contact. He got grazed and went down.The second goal was one of the more ridiculous dives I've seen in this tournament. Fitting that it came from Brazil.That third Brazil goal was unbelievable
Not sure I would call it a dive - I would call it a ridiculous embellishment by Richarlison but the guy clipped him a little.
I couldn’t believe that was a penalty kick but the announcers were so certain of it that I just felt dumb. I hate penalty kicks when there is a non-goal scoring opportunity.Was definitely a dive. The replay made it clear to me that he really had no intention of playing the ball and came from behind the defender with the intent to take contact. He got grazed and went down.The second goal was one of the more ridiculous dives I've seen in this tournament. Fitting that it came from Brazil.That third Brazil goal was unbelievable
Not sure I would call it a dive - I would call it a ridiculous embellishment by Richarlison but the guy clipped him a little.
Feels like there can be middle ground there between doing nothing and giving a free goal when a guy has his back turned on the net.I hate it when penalties are not given because referees think there should be a higher standard of foul than "direct free kick offence which takes place in the penalty area"I couldn’t believe that was a penalty kick but the announcers were so certain of it that I just felt dumb. I hate penalty kicks when there is a non-goal scoring opportunity.Was definitely a dive. The replay made it clear to me that he really had no intention of playing the ball and came from behind the defender with the intent to take contact. He got grazed and went down.The second goal was one of the more ridiculous dives I've seen in this tournament. Fitting that it came from Brazil.That third Brazil goal was unbelievable
Not sure I would call it a dive - I would call it a ridiculous embellishment by Richarlison but the guy clipped him a little.

Essentially that the best kick is a hard shot right in the middle to middle-low. I base the theory on two ideas: 1) the keeper almost always seems to dive to one side; and 2) doing so gives the shooter the widest margin for error and effectively removes the chance of missing the net entirely.What is your theory?Basically proves my theory wrong. Thanks for posting.Some one was asking earlier about a study on PK's. I just saw this posted

World Cup 2022: How to take a penalty in a shootout
BBC Sport and Opta analyse the 279 World Cup shootout penalties to see the best ways to score your kick.www.bbc.com
I find it interesting that the article says go high. I never taught that as a coach and encourage the bottom back corner. You can kick over the goal but not under it.
Yes its different for pros then youth, but still.
This is exactly how I feel. Yeah, by definition it is a penalty but there has got to be some discretion there. Luckily Brazil dominated and that call didn't make a difference but I'd hate to see a world cup game decided on such a weak foul.Yeah it was a penalty by the definition of the rule, but I agree it felt like a cheesy way for SK to give it up. He was just kicking a ball with no one around from his perspective, and Richarlison just kind of slid his foot in between the ball and his foot at the last minute, at the very edge of the box, moving away from the goal, with no intent other than to put his foot into a spot where the guy's natural kicking motion would hit him.
Cheeky on his part, but sucks to give up a penalty in a totally non-threatening position because a player saw an opportunity to slip his foot in front of a player at the last second out of nowhere.
The funny thing is I always went down the middle. Heck even against my buddy who knew that's what I was going to do. He still dove and was so pissed at me.Essentially that the best kick is a hard shot right in the middle to middle-low. I base the theory on two ideas: 1) the keeper almost always seems to dive to one side; and 2) doing so gives the shooter the widest margin for error and effectively removes the chance of missing the net entirely.What is your theory?Basically proves my theory wrong. Thanks for posting.Some one was asking earlier about a study on PK's. I just saw this posted

World Cup 2022: How to take a penalty in a shootout
BBC Sport and Opta analyse the 279 World Cup shootout penalties to see the best ways to score your kick.www.bbc.com
I find it interesting that the article says go high. I never taught that as a coach and encourage the bottom back corner. You can kick over the goal but not under it.
Yes its different for pros then youth, but still.
I'd also argue that in regular play it seems most likely that a save on this kind of shot would give a good rebound chance.
To illustrate the kick I am opining on, the second Croatia scorer did it perfectly. See here at the 17 second mark. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9LOxzComp4
However, as demonstrated with the link study, apparently I'm completely wrong and the best play is something to a top corner. I suppose this makes sense as those shots are essentially impossible to stop even if the goalie correctly guesses the side (e.g. Wales' perfect PK to tie us in the first game). But, I would have thought this would have been offset by the more narrow margin of error and I am probably somewhat biased in my thinking because it was drilled into me when I was a young club player to go low and hard to take away error and, naturally here, we're talking about the best players in the world versus a 12 year old American kid.
Feels like there can be middle ground there between doing nothing and giving a free goal when a guy has his back turned on the net.
Not trying to be some dumb American changing the rules of the game here, just seems disproportionately punitive.
 
 Feels like there can be middle ground there between doing nothing and giving a free goal when a guy has his back turned on the net.
Not trying to be some dumb American changing the rules of the game here, just seems disproportionately punitive.
If he is fouled with his back to the goal make him take the penalty with his back to the goal.
-QG
This thread articulates a lot of what I've been trying to think through since Saturday. My take has a little bit of expansion on that thread...
LvG bet that the Netherlands could concede dangerous possession/chances to the US and get away with it. And they did.
Berhalter bet on his team to finish. And they couldn't do it.
In the end LvG won the bet, and would probably win it like 75% of the time. But what was the option? (And can you imagine the howls if we'd played a boring 0-0 or gone out 0-1 with Berhalter keeping his fullbacks deep?)
My (uneducated) guess is the Dutch equalize inside 20 minutes and the game largely plays out the same way. You still had the same issues of clear fatigue that would have led to the same marking mistakes that happened anyway. A goal 3 minutes in doesn’t change much tactically.This thread articulates a lot of what I've been trying to think through since Saturday. My take has a little bit of expansion on that thread...
LvG bet that the Netherlands could concede dangerous possession/chances to the US and get away with it. And they did.
Berhalter bet on his team to finish. And they couldn't do it.
In the end LvG won the bet, and would probably win it like 75% of the time. But what was the option? (And can you imagine the howls if we'd played a boring 0-0 or gone out 0-1 with Berhalter keeping his fullbacks deep?)
I’d love to know how that game plays out if CP is able to get that ball past the keeper.
Based on game play so far, Argentina will get slaughtered.Desperately need that Brazil - Argentina semifinal
Yeah, to my amateur eye, Brazil, France, and Spain* all seem a notch above.Based on game play so far, Argentina will get slaughtered.Desperately need that Brazil - Argentina semifinal
No joke... I played soccer maybe eight or ten times. I can remember all five goals I scored AND another half-dozen chances I'd have put away if I'd had any idea what I was doing. Like I can still describe all of them. And this is 20 years ago in a sport I never played seriously.I’d love to know how that game plays out if CP is able to get that ball past the keeper.
Right now I think they lose to Holland. Or even The Netherlands.Based on game play so far, Argentina will get slaughtered.Desperately need that Brazil - Argentina semifinal
But not the Dutch. Never the Dutch.Right now I think they lose to Holland. Or even The Netherlands.Based on game play so far, Argentina will get slaughtered.Desperately need that Brazil - Argentina semifinal
I have seen a lot of awful tattoos in this tournament... this Brazil team seems to have the most of them though.
Funny you bring this up....
We are leasing the back warehouse space to a hot tub company who had a year-end closing sale this weekend. One of the heavy set guys who works for them just came in to use the bathroom. He's wearing a Heath Bar sweatshirt. So I asked him - "Hey, where can a fella get a Heath Bar sweatshirt?" He said he created it himself off the internet and then showed me a giant tattoo on his right forearm that's also a Heath Bar. I said "Man, you must REALLY love Heath Bars" and he said "No, not really, but that's my name and so I figured why not?".
Would it be weird if I asked him to take a picture with me?
thanks for this. It's a pleasant read...This thread articulates a lot of what I've been trying to think through since Saturday. My take has a little bit of expansion on that thread...
LvG bet that the Netherlands could concede dangerous possession/chances to the US and get away with it. And they did.
Berhalter bet on his team to finish. And they couldn't do it.
In the end LvG won the bet, and would probably win it like 75% of the time. But what was the option? (And can you imagine the howls if we'd played a boring 0-0 or gone out 0-1 with Berhalter keeping his fullbacks deep?)
https://t.co/UyH5g4UTOP eviscerating commentary on the broadcast as a whole from the guardianLandon is really not good at this commentating thing.
https://t.co/UyH5g4UTOP eviscerating
There’s something almost religious about the experience of watching Ochocinco front up, night after night, with virtually nothing to say about the World Cup or the wildly popular sport it’s based on. That this man, despite possessing no charisma, sense of humor, or gift for sporting analysis, has managed to land a gig as the resident personality on Fox’s “fun” nightly wrap-up show represents its own kind of miracle, a wine-into-water moment for the Fox casting crew.

Yeah I'm starting to feel silly for claiming that Spain belonged with France and Brazil as the teams that seem a notch above all others.This Morocco team is pretty decent. Based on what I've seen so far, an upset is not that unlikely here today.
This has been the knock on "tiki-taka" forever. It tends to smother the other team and there are long periods where Barcelona or Spain are just playing keep away without looking like they're doing anything.I know Spain is skilled and all, but their methodical pass-pass-pass-pass-pass-pass offense is kind of boring to watch.
I find it to truly be the "beautiful game". I could watch them play for hours.I know Spain is skilled and all, but their methodical pass-pass-pass-pass-pass-pass offense is kind of boring to watch.
Holy hell... this line...https://t.co/UyH5g4UTOP eviscerating commentary on the broadcast as a whole from the guardian
An awful lot of history in one paragraph here...Tiki-taka or Tiqui-taca ([ˈtikiˈtaka]) is a style of play in Spain's football, characterised by short passing and movement, working the ball through various channels, and maintaining possession. The style is primarily associated with the Spain national team since 2006 by the managers Luis Aragonés and Vicente del Bosque.[6][7][8][9] Tiki-taka methods were eventually embraced by the La Liga club Barcelona from 2009, especially during the era of manager Pep Guardiola; however, Guardiola distanced himself and the club from the style: "I loathe all that passing for the sake of it", stating, "Barça didn't do tiki-taka!", adding, "You have to pass the ball with a clear intention, with the aim of making it into the opposition's goal".[10] Its development and influence goes back to Johan Cruyff's tenure as manager in the early 1990s all the way to the present.
