What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

**OFFICIAL 2025 Draft Thread - Green Bay Opens The Door For Guests** (1 Viewer)

Thor Nystrom pointed out that Felton is a bit like Diggs coming out of Maryland as well. Skilled receiver that has somethings to clean up and that will determine his trajectory in the NFL.
 
Texans traded back, then traded up twice.

Did they come out ahead from all those shenanigans?

Boiling down their trades around the first 3 rounds.... Texans dropped 9 spots in 1st and 8 spots in 3rd, and gained 10 spots in second. Also gained a future year 3rd round pick, and a this year 6th round pick. Without checking Chase's value chart, I'd say they came out ahead by a little bit.
 
Which RB has the best chance of "surviving" the weekend?

J Ford
C Brown*
T Bigsby/ETN
J Jacobs*
D Swift
A Jones
A Kamara
T Tracy*
J Warren
Brian Robinson
R Stevenson
K Williams*
N Harris
I Pacheco
J Mixon
C Hubbard*
J Conner


DEN, DAL, and TEN look like wide open starter spots to me.

*are going as ~premium picks right now

Yes this RB class is super deep but do we really think all these names are going to be drafted over? There's no way. Many of them are going to be more or less replaced, even if it takes a year, and some will be replaced almost immediately. But... there are some criminally undervalued names up there right now if they don't get drafted over.

The churning will be epic though. Pretty wild FF landscape this year - WR isn't any prettier than RB. QB and TE have steep cliffs. This weekend is supposed to bring clarity ha.
I'd expect Bigsby and Swift and Robinson to get bumps moving forward. The crossed out names might becomes affordable and the rest will probably remain steady. Lots of names still susceptible to losing out.
 
Here are the teams sorted by profit from trades, combining a few different trade value charts (JJ, Rich Hill, F-S, AV, Reinhard, Reinhard Empirical) and treating future picks as being worth the last (non-compensatory) pick of the round:

CLE (946, 1.30, 6/6)
LV (575, 1.32, 6/6)
LAR (289, 1.23, 6/6)
NE (264, 1.24, 5/6)
HOU (249, 1.07, 6/6)
TEN (183, 1.17, 4/6)
CHI (132, 1.07, 4/6)
DEN (83, 1.03, 6/6)
MIN (56, 1.11, 5/6)
PHI (51, 1.02, 3/6)
KC (-30, 0.98, 1/6)
BUF (-132, 0.94, 2/6)
CAR (-141, 0.94, 0/6)
SEA (-183, 0.88, 2/6)
MIA (-365, 0.76, 0/6)
ATL (-391, 0.81, 0/6)
DET (-429, 0.78, 0/6)
NYG (-445, 0.76, 0/6)
JAX (-714, 0.87, 0/6)

The first number in parentheses is the total profit, value gained minus value lost, averaging together 6 trade value charts where each one is scaled so that the first overall pick is worth 3000.

The second number is the return, value gained divided by value lost.

The third number is how many of the 6 trade value charts the team came out ahead on. e.g., NE came out ahead on their trades according to 5 of the 6 charts, but the Jimmy Johnson chart has them as slight losers, so they get 5/6.

IMO these numbers are too harsh on some trade-ups (e.g. JAX from 5 to 2 - the gap between those players was bigger than usual) and too gentle on some (e.g. counting the future 1st that ATL gave to draft Pearce as pick 32 is underrating its value, since that pick could be early).
 
Here are the teams sorted by profit from trades, combining a few different trade value charts (JJ, Rich Hill, F-S, AV, Reinhard, Reinhard Empirical) and treating future picks as being worth the last (non-compensatory) pick of the round:

CLE (946, 1.30, 6/6)
LV (575, 1.32, 6/6)
LAR (289, 1.23, 6/6)
NE (264, 1.24, 5/6)
HOU (249, 1.07, 6/6)
TEN (183, 1.17, 4/6)
CHI (132, 1.07, 4/6)
DEN (83, 1.03, 6/6)
MIN (56, 1.11, 5/6)
PHI (51, 1.02, 3/6)
KC (-30, 0.98, 1/6)
BUF (-132, 0.94, 2/6)
CAR (-141, 0.94, 0/6)
SEA (-183, 0.88, 2/6)
MIA (-365, 0.76, 0/6)
ATL (-391, 0.81, 0/6)
DET (-429, 0.78, 0/6)
NYG (-445, 0.76, 0/6)
JAX (-714, 0.87, 0/6)

The first number in parentheses is the total profit, value gained minus value lost, averaging together 6 trade value charts where each one is scaled so that the first overall pick is worth 3000.

The second number is the return, value gained divided by value lost.

The third number is how many of the 6 trade value charts the team came out ahead on. e.g., NE came out ahead on their trades according to 5 of the 6 charts, but the Jimmy Johnson chart has them as slight losers, so they get 5/6.

IMO these numbers are too harsh on some trade-ups (e.g. JAX from 5 to 2 - the gap between those players was bigger than usual) and too gentle on some (e.g. counting the future 1st that ATL gave to draft Pearce as pick 32 is underrating its value, since that pick could be early).

Thanks for sharing that. I've given a lot of thought over the years to the value of future picks. I get the angle when people treat it like the future value of money... but I just haven't ever been convinced that is the right way to do it. I mean sure it is if you're a GM and more worried about keeping your job. But I don't think any of us have any reason to look at it from that angle. We should view it by the long term value to the franchise overall.

Agree with you I don't like the 'last pick of the round' aspect. I would rather treat them like it's the same draft order that year as this year. Or maybe sort by Vegas win totals to try to incorporate roster changes that are already known.

But, nice to see that look at it, so thanks for posting.
 
Watching the NFLN discussion after, about Shedeur. Rich seems to me to be taking it a bit personally for his friend and friend's son. Some good comments from the panel overall though.
 
Deion failed his son.
:thumbup:

It's going to take a really stable organization (coach/QB) to have any desire to take him on. He's probably looking at practice squad at this point. Where they can shove him in the background and maybe he develops in obscurity for a year or two.

Does any organization want to hear Deion say "Backup Shadeur is better than the starter, etc...." or Deion insinuate he's better than Shadeur's NFL coach? Why you've got to have an entrenched QB/coach. Even then, is it really worth it?
 
Texans traded back, then traded up twice.

Did they come out ahead from all those shenanigans?

Boiling down their trades around the first 3 rounds.... Texans dropped 9 spots in 1st and 8 spots in 3rd, and gained 10 spots in second. Also gained a future year 3rd round pick, and a this year 6th round pick. Without checking Chase's value chart, I'd say they came out ahead by a little bit.
Yeah, felt kinda like a wash to me. A little schizophrenic.
 
I just don't understand why all these guys in the media think Sanders should have been picked over any of the other qbs that went ahead of him other than Gabriel. Did they not watch him play and just take Deion's word for it? Take the name and hype away from him and he's exactly what the NFL GMs are showing everyone, an average talent with a ton of baggage that makes him a risk to even bring into the building as a backup. He's got the ability to be a backup, but that's it and with the circus and attitude he has even that might not be worth it. The entire thing has been pretty bizarre.
 
Thor Nystrom pointed out that Felton is a bit like Diggs coming out of Maryland as well. Skilled receiver that has somethings to clean up and that will determine his trajectory in the NFL.
I follow Maryland (I know, I know.....why?) and have seen Felton quite a bit. He's a good player. The Vikings seem pretty good at drafting/developing WRs, so I think Felton's future is bright.
 
Baltimore went DB, Edge, OL with their first three picks. They have 8 picks today (assuming no trades). I would expect DL to get some attention from them and they'll double-dip on at least a couple of the positions already taken. I also think they're going to draft a PK. There will be a RB, WR, and LB in there somewhere (they lost a bit from their core STers and their return game sucked last season).

I think it would be hilarious if they drafted Sanders.
 
Read an article saying how Roger Goodell wants to shorted the time between picks in the first round.

Once again, $$$$$$ >>>> the sport. The draft isn’t supposed to be a TV show. It’s supposed to be so that the teams can make the most important contributions and additions to their team.

Gross. My lawn, get off of it.
 
Read an article saying how Roger Goodell wants to shorted the time between picks in the first round.

Once again, $$$$$$ >>>> the sport. The draft isn’t supposed to be a TV show. It’s supposed to be so that the teams can make the most important contributions and additions to their team.

Gross. My lawn, get off of it.

If the previous two months of work didn't give you an indication of who you were going pick in the first round, an extra 5 minutes isn't going to help.
 
Packers needed to address a few spots on D. Wish they would have made a move there instead.
Agreed. Don’t mind OT in the 2nd because its hard to have too many OL (especially how theirs was so thin in the playoffs). But the 2nd wr was puzzling.
Now if the somehow its a miracle and they keep Jaire and he stays healthy…that could change my mind. But need DL/DE and CB bad.
 
Texans traded back, then traded up twice.

Did they come out ahead from all those shenanigans?

Boiling down their trades around the first 3 rounds.... Texans dropped 9 spots in 1st and 8 spots in 3rd, and gained 10 spots in second. Also gained a future year 3rd round pick, and a this year 6th round pick. Without checking Chase's value chart, I'd say they came out ahead by a little bit.
Yeah, felt kinda like a wash to me. A little schizophrenic.
Would look a lot better had they not made that last trade up, that one was a head scratcher and was bad value. Hopefully the corner they took pans out, seeing him called a major reach a lot today but also found a bunch of pre-draft articles saying he was a top sleeper late round and could go much earlier than expected.
 
Read an article saying how Roger Goodell wants to shorted the time between picks in the first round.

Once again, $$$$$$ >>>> the sport. The draft isn’t supposed to be a TV show. It’s supposed to be so that the teams can make the most important contributions and additions to their team.

Gross. My lawn, get off of it.

If the previous two months of work didn't give you an indication of who you were going pick in the first round, an extra 5 minutes isn't going to help.
I think the extra time is more about making trades than making picks. Fielding calls from multiple teams takes some time.
 
The draft was more like a dragged out 3 hour movie where they had 2 picks then went to commercials, showed 2 more picks, commercial, 2 more picks, commercial. I think there was more commercial time than draft time.
 
Read an article saying how Roger Goodell wants to shorted the time between picks in the first round.

Once again, $$$$$$ >>>> the sport. The draft isn’t supposed to be a TV show. It’s supposed to be so that the teams can make the most important contributions and additions to their team.

Gross. My lawn, get off of it.

If the previous two months of work didn't give you an indication of who you were going pick in the first round, an extra 5 minutes isn't going to help.
I think the extra time is more about making trades than making picks. Fielding calls from multiple teams takes some time.

The GMs call ahead and negotiate based on players they're targeting. So the GMs know who's interested in their pick and what they're offering before they even come on the clock. They have so much time, there's video of the Lions GM calling teams and pranking them during the draft.
 
Texans traded back, then traded up twice.

Did they come out ahead from all those shenanigans?

Boiling down their trades around the first 3 rounds.... Texans dropped 9 spots in 1st and 8 spots in 3rd, and gained 10 spots in second. Also gained a future year 3rd round pick, and a this year 6th round pick. Without checking Chase's value chart, I'd say they came out ahead by a little bit.
Yeah, felt kinda like a wash to me. A little schizophrenic.
Would look a lot better had they not made that last trade up, that one was a head scratcher and was bad value. Hopefully the corner they took pans out, seeing him called a major reach a lot today but also found a bunch of pre-draft articles saying he was a top sleeper late round and could go much earlier than expected.

Yes, I was ok with the trade up for the tackle as he was going to go, and seemed like a bit of a drop off after him, nearly as big as the one between him and the day 1 tackles.

But I didn't feel like that last trade needed to be made. They could have gotten a good player, and even at a position of more need, just waiting.
 
Miami has 116, 143, 150 and 155 today plus 3 more picks in the 7th round that likely are going to be camp fodder mostly

I would be OK if they drafted Sanders or Skattebo/Martinez at RB
Miami has abandoned the DB position so why even bother at this point

-Logic says they will take 2-3 DBs today and challenge the crap they have starting in the Secondary
Maybe 1 more IDL if they find the right guy
 
Last edited:
Miami has 115, 143, 150 and 155 today plus 3 more picks in the 7th round that likely are going to be camp fodder mostly

I would be OK if they drafted Sanders or Skattebo/Martinez at RB
Miami has abandoned the DB position so why even bother at this point

-Logic says they will take 2-3 DBs today and challenge the crap they have starting in the Secondary
Maybe 1 more IDL if they find the right guy
Could see more OL help. Marcus Mbow or Cameron Williams maybe?

RB would really surprise me. Its arguably the position they need least.

They really dropped the ball at Safety. Guys like Winston and Watts fell big time, and they just watched. They might have the worst Safety room in the NFL. I do wonder if the lack of CB picks, means they are keeping Ramsey.
 
Miami has 115, 143, 150 and 155 today plus 3 more picks in the 7th round that likely are going to be camp fodder mostly

I would be OK if they drafted Sanders or Skattebo/Martinez at RB
Miami has abandoned the DB position so why even bother at this point

-Logic says they will take 2-3 DBs today and challenge the crap they have starting in the Secondary
Maybe 1 more IDL if they find the right guy
Could see more OL help. Marcus Mbow or Cameron Williams maybe?

RB would really surprise me. Its arguably the position they need least.

They really dropped the ball at Safety. Guys like Winston and Watts fell big time, and they just watched. They might have the worst Safety room in the NFL. I do wonder if the lack of CB picks, means they are keeping Ramsey.
I endorse Miami taking Sanders at 116...who knows if anyone will take him before Miami but the value for Sanders at this point, I can del with the circus, it's how Ross runs the team
Tua will be injured midway thru the season and they can roll him out and see what happens

I can't be the only NFL fan thinking this.
Sanders was never a 1st Rd QB but 2nd/3rd, now Day 3 he seems like an easy pick for most teams and Dillon Gabriel went ahead of him, don't know what to make of it
 
Miami has 115, 143, 150 and 155 today plus 3 more picks in the 7th round that likely are going to be camp fodder mostly

I would be OK if they drafted Sanders or Skattebo/Martinez at RB
Miami has abandoned the DB position so why even bother at this point

-Logic says they will take 2-3 DBs today and challenge the crap they have starting in the Secondary
Maybe 1 more IDL if they find the right guy
Could see more OL help. Marcus Mbow or Cameron Williams maybe?

RB would really surprise me. Its arguably the position they need least.

They really dropped the ball at Safety. Guys like Winston and Watts fell big time, and they just watched. They might have the worst Safety room in the NFL. I do wonder if the lack of CB picks, means they are keeping Ramsey.
I endorse Miami taking Sanders at 116...who knows if anyone will take him before Miami but the value for Sanders at this point, I can del with the circus, it's how Ross runs the team
Tua will be injured midway thru the season and they can roll him out and see what happens

I can't be the only NFL fan thinking this.
Sanders was never a 1st Rd QB but 2nd/3rd, now Day 3 he seems like an easy pick for most teams and Dillon Gabriel went ahead of him, don't know what to make of it
At this point, I think Sanders is a great pick for ANY team.
 
I really enjoyed watching the FBG livestream on YT the last two nights. Is that happening again today? Haven't seen a link yet if so....
 
Miami has 115, 143, 150 and 155 today plus 3 more picks in the 7th round that likely are going to be camp fodder mostly

I would be OK if they drafted Sanders or Skattebo/Martinez at RB
Miami has abandoned the DB position so why even bother at this point

-Logic says they will take 2-3 DBs today and challenge the crap they have starting in the Secondary
Maybe 1 more IDL if they find the right guy
Could see more OL help. Marcus Mbow or Cameron Williams maybe?

RB would really surprise me. Its arguably the position they need least.

They really dropped the ball at Safety. Guys like Winston and Watts fell big time, and they just watched. They might have the worst Safety room in the NFL. I do wonder if the lack of CB picks, means they are keeping Ramsey.

I think the Eagles could take Mbow at 111.
 
Do we really need draft room shots of your 4th rounder coaches room hugging and high fives.....

You are going to be proud of every pick. Are they going to show the draft room with everyone pissed off after a pick lol

Vrabel wasn't happy when they traded AJ Brown.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top