What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official - 2025 Major League Baseball Thread (3 Viewers)

Possible rainouts today: Cle at KC, SF at CIN and Min at STL. Not so nice in the midwest in March. Who could have seen that coming?

MLB - SCHEDULE YOUR EARLY SEASON GAMES ON THE WEST COAST AND THE SOUTH!!!

Why is this so hard?
On the heels of this rant...they then follow up opening day with a limited schedule of games. You have everyone excited for opening day and then half of teams are off on day 2.

Dumb.
Because the stupid players in the last CBA wanted more days off so they have to start earlier now to accommodate that.


The limited slate on the second day of the season is to accommodate potential rainouts on opening day. You'll notice that the games that are scheduled for Friday are either in domes or in warm weather locations.
 
Mookie looks frail. I hope he is over whatever it was that got him so sick.
Thought the exact same thing watching him run out. He was already a slight dude but losing 15 lbs. in the matter of a week will really do a number on a guy.
Thought the same when he came up to bat on Tuesday vs the Angels. Everyone looks tiny following Ohtani, but Betts looked bad. He didn't look strong in his swing but his running and fielding looked fine.
He was quoted recently as saying he’s down to 157lbs after the sickness. That is tiny.
 
All Rise

Judge

3-4
3 HR
7 RBI
For the Captain.

Piss off Soto…..you will miss Judges protection….nit the other way around lol.
 
9 HRs for the Yankees today. Franchise record for a single game.
Thanks to Nestor Cortez (5 in 2 innings including 3 on his FIRST 3 pitches??? LOL). Oh, and Yankee Stadium. Not a fan of history-making when so many things are so different from before.

Anytime I see some record, I immediately think of what helped it happen and certain eras like balls, roids, etc. And there's almost always an asterisk of some sort.
 
New Yankees bats?


Well this is wild…The Yankees made new bats that moved more of the wood into the label so the hardest part of the bat strikes the ball.They have 8 home runs today.

"Wild" or cheating. Typical Yankees.

"Hey, Yankees! You can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight . . ."
Trophy?

Not last year, thankfully. But they lay claim to 27 titles and quite a few iterations of the Commissioner's Trophy that they give out to the MLB winner every year since . . . well, I don't know when, exactly.

I mean, it's no Stanley Cup or Lombardi Trophy, but it's aight. Third-best trophy of the American big four. Encircled by gold pennants and all that.

Really just gave me an excuse to quote Tanner Boyle from the Bad News Bears.
 
Think I'm going to take the OVER in every Oriole's game the next few weeks. Especially when they play teams like Toronto.
You're making money so far if you've held to this.

Jordan Westburg hit two HRs yesterday. He got hurt last year and it, along with Adley going into his funk, really messed them up down the stretch. Their SP is suboptimal, so they need all of their hitters badly. Should get Henderson back soon and will be at full strength. That lineup can be frightening.
 
Yankees' bats are legal, according to MLB and the rule book. Science/scientists = winning!

MLB Gives Official Word on Legality of Innovative Yankees 'Torpedo' Bats​

The 'Torpedo' bat is in.

Blake Silverman

The New York Yankees set a franchise record with nine home runs in a single game Saturday as they smashed the Milwaukee Brewers 20-9 at Yankee Stadium. Jazz Chisholm Jr. and Anthony Volpe were among the many Yankees to join the home-run party and viewers quickly noticed they used an unusually shaped bat.

Yankees broadcaster Michael Kay explained the team made custom bats to improve hitting for players, like Chisholm and Volpe, who tend to make contact closer to the label than the true barrel. The funky looking twigs paid dividends immediately, which left viewers asking the same question: Are the Yankees' new 'Torpedo' bats legal?
MLB quickly put any uncertainty to rest, asserting that the shape of the bat does not violate league rules, The Athletic's Chris Kirschner reported.
The MLB's rulebook contains fairly generic guidelines which state the few limitations for bats used in games. Rule 3.02 says this: "The bat shall be a smooth, round stick not more than 2.61 inches in diameter at the thickest part and not more than 42 inches in length. The bat shall be one piece of solid wood."
The Yankees aren't breaking any rules and they apparently even have an MIT physicist on their payroll who created the 'Torpedo' barrel to bring more mass to where hitters most often make contact. The new bats are legal, and likely here to stay, at least in the Bronx. Don't be surprised if other MLB teams follow suit soon, too.

Now we should have MLB rule on the legality of the Brewers' pitching.
 
I can’t work up any hate for the Dodgers and their payroll. Educate me about its dirtiness. Something smells funny, but who can hate Shohei, Mookie, and Freddie?

Plus, they beat the Yankees last year. Seems A-Ok to me to defer hundreds of millions in salary (or whatever the figure is) and outspend everybody by a gobsmacking amount of money.
 
Last edited:
I can’t work up any hate for the Dodgers and their payroll. Educate me about its dirtiness. Something smells funny, but who can hate Shohei, Mookie, and Freddie?

Plus, they beat the Yankees last year. Seems A-Ok to me to defer hundreds of millions in salary (or whatever the figure is) and outspend everybody by a gobsmacking amount of money.
Every team can do the same if they choose to
 
I can’t work up any hate for the Dodgers and their payroll. Educate me about its dirtiness. Something smells funny, but who can hate Shohei, Mookie, and Freddie?

Plus, they beat the Yankees last year. Seems A-Ok to me to defer hundreds of millions in salary (or whatever the figure is) and outspend everybody by a gobsmacking amount of money.
Every team can do the same if they choose to

Right, they just either don’t have the capital to do it, or they’re too cheap.

I feel little sympathy towards guys that cry poor but still, after all these years, will not open their books to be evaluated. (That’s still the case, right?) Forget that. The Dodgers are great! Long live the Dodgers!
 
I can’t work up any hate for the Dodgers and their payroll. Educate me about its dirtiness. Something smells funny, but who can hate Shohei, Mookie, and Freddie?

Plus, they beat the Yankees last year. Seems A-Ok to me to defer hundreds of millions in salary (or whatever the figure is) and outspend everybody by a gobsmacking amount of money.
Every team can do the same if they choose to
In the same way every team in baseball could when the Yankee’s were doing it in the early 2000’s. Doesn’t mean it’s good for baseball, especially as the sports popularity continues to wane. Salary cap seems like the easy answer to me and works in other sports.
 
I can’t work up any hate for the Dodgers and their payroll. Educate me about its dirtiness. Something smells funny, but who can hate Shohei, Mookie, and Freddie?

Plus, they beat the Yankees last year. Seems A-Ok to me to defer hundreds of millions in salary (or whatever the figure is) and outspend everybody by a gobsmacking amount of money.
Every team can do the same if they choose to
In the same way every team in baseball could when the Yankee’s were doing it in the early 2000’s. Doesn’t mean it’s good for baseball, especially as the sports popularity continues to wane. Salary cap seems like the easy answer to me and works in other sports.

Salary cap would cause the longest work stoppage ever and the dwindling fan base might never come back (once they experience the thrill of YouTube E-sports!)

I kid. Having the Dodgers is good for baseball. Bad for San Diego’s competitive aspirations, but the brand is good because non-diehards like myself know the players (look, it’s Mookie! Hey, Mookie!) and it draws the populace in, a populace unconcerned with the plight of the teams in the state of CA who are two hours south or a bit further up north.

Nobody cares about that. Dynasties and super teams draw the eyeballs of the Average Joes, and that’s what MLB needs.
 
I can’t work up any hate for the Dodgers and their payroll. Educate me about its dirtiness. Something smells funny, but who can hate Shohei, Mookie, and Freddie?

Plus, they beat the Yankees last year. Seems A-Ok to me to defer hundreds of millions in salary (or whatever the figure is) and outspend everybody by a gobsmacking amount of money.
Every team can do the same if they choose to

Every team that’s owned by an investment bank could - agreed.
 
I can’t work up any hate for the Dodgers and their payroll. Educate me about its dirtiness. Something smells funny, but who can hate Shohei, Mookie, and Freddie?

Plus, they beat the Yankees last year. Seems A-Ok to me to defer hundreds of millions in salary (or whatever the figure is) and outspend everybody by a gobsmacking amount of money.
Every team can do the same if they choose to
In the same way every team in baseball could when the Yankee’s were doing it in the early 2000’s. Doesn’t mean it’s good for baseball, especially as the sports popularity continues to wane. Salary cap seems like the easy answer to me and works in other sports.

Salary cap would cause the longest work stoppage ever and the dwindling fan base might never come back (once they experience the thrill of YouTube E-sports!)

I kid. Having the Dodgers is good for baseball. Bad for San Diego’s competitive aspirations, but the brand is good because non-diehards like myself know the players (look, it’s Mookie! Hey, Mookie!) and it draws the populace in, a populace unconcerned with the plight of the teams in the state of CA who are two hours south or a bit further up north.

Nobody cares about that. Dynasties and super teams draw the eyeballs of the Average Joes, and that’s what MLB needs.
I read the other day that a lockout next year is almost a certainty.
 
I can’t work up any hate for the Dodgers and their payroll. Educate me about its dirtiness. Something smells funny, but who can hate Shohei, Mookie, and Freddie?

Plus, they beat the Yankees last year. Seems A-Ok to me to defer hundreds of millions in salary (or whatever the figure is) and outspend everybody by a gobsmacking amount of money.
Every team can do the same if they choose to
In the same way every team in baseball could when the Yankee’s were doing it in the early 2000’s. Doesn’t mean it’s good for baseball, especially as the sports popularity continues to wane. Salary cap seems like the easy answer to me and works in other sports.

Salary cap would cause the longest work stoppage ever and the dwindling fan base might never come back (once they experience the thrill of YouTube E-sports!)

I kid. Having the Dodgers is good for baseball. Bad for San Diego’s competitive aspirations, but the brand is good because non-diehards like myself know the players (look, it’s Mookie! Hey, Mookie!) and it draws the populace in, a populace unconcerned with the plight of the teams in the state of CA who are two hours south or a bit further up north.

Nobody cares about that. Dynasties and super teams draw the eyeballs of the Average Joes, and that’s what MLB needs.
I read the other day that a lockout next year is almost a certainty.

It would be the year after that.

The current CBA runs through the end of 2026
 
I can’t work up any hate for the Dodgers and their payroll. Educate me about its dirtiness. Something smells funny, but who can hate Shohei, Mookie, and Freddie?

Plus, they beat the Yankees last year. Seems A-Ok to me to defer hundreds of millions in salary (or whatever the figure is) and outspend everybody by a gobsmacking amount of money.
Every team can do the same if they choose to
In the same way every team in baseball could when the Yankee’s were doing it in the early 2000’s. Doesn’t mean it’s good for baseball, especially as the sports popularity continues to wane. Salary cap seems like the easy answer to me and works in other sports.

Salary cap would cause the longest work stoppage ever and the dwindling fan base might never come back (once they experience the thrill of YouTube E-sports!)

I kid. Having the Dodgers is good for baseball. Bad for San Diego’s competitive aspirations, but the brand is good because non-diehards like myself know the players (look, it’s Mookie! Hey, Mookie!) and it draws the populace in, a populace unconcerned with the plight of the teams in the state of CA who are two hours south or a bit further up north.

Nobody cares about that. Dynasties and super teams draw the eyeballs of the Average Joes, and that’s what MLB needs.
I read the other day that a lockout next year is almost a certainty.

It would be the year after that.

The current CBA runs through the end of 2026
What are the owners looking for? A cap?
 
I can’t work up any hate for the Dodgers and their payroll. Educate me about its dirtiness. Something smells funny, but who can hate Shohei, Mookie, and Freddie?

Plus, they beat the Yankees last year. Seems A-Ok to me to defer hundreds of millions in salary (or whatever the figure is) and outspend everybody by a gobsmacking amount of money.
Every team can do the same if they choose to
In the same way every team in baseball could when the Yankee’s were doing it in the early 2000’s. Doesn’t mean it’s good for baseball, especially as the sports popularity continues to wane. Salary cap seems like the easy answer to me and works in other sports.

Salary cap would cause the longest work stoppage ever and the dwindling fan base might never come back (once they experience the thrill of YouTube E-sports!)

I kid. Having the Dodgers is good for baseball. Bad for San Diego’s competitive aspirations, but the brand is good because non-diehards like myself know the players (look, it’s Mookie! Hey, Mookie!) and it draws the populace in, a populace unconcerned with the plight of the teams in the state of CA who are two hours south or a bit further up north.

Nobody cares about that. Dynasties and super teams draw the eyeballs of the Average Joes, and that’s what MLB needs.
I read the other day that a lockout next year is almost a certainty.

It would be the year after that.

The current CBA runs through the end of 2026
What are the owners looking for? A cap?

The two sides haven't begun negotiating yet
 
I can’t work up any hate for the Dodgers and their payroll. Educate me about its dirtiness. Something smells funny, but who can hate Shohei, Mookie, and Freddie?

Plus, they beat the Yankees last year. Seems A-Ok to me to defer hundreds of millions in salary (or whatever the figure is) and outspend everybody by a gobsmacking amount of money.
Every team can do the same if they choose to
In the same way every team in baseball could when the Yankee’s were doing it in the early 2000’s. Doesn’t mean it’s good for baseball, especially as the sports popularity continues to wane. Salary cap seems like the easy answer to me and works in other sports.
Any salary cap needs to be paired with a significant salary floor (a much bigger issue that needs to be solved than high spending teams).

Do we also need caps (and floors) for the minor leagues too? That seems to be where a lot of competitive advantage can come from.
 
I can’t work up any hate for the Dodgers and their payroll. Educate me about its dirtiness. Something smells funny, but who can hate Shohei, Mookie, and Freddie?

Plus, they beat the Yankees last year. Seems A-Ok to me to defer hundreds of millions in salary (or whatever the figure is) and outspend everybody by a gobsmacking amount of money.
Every team can do the same if they choose to
In the same way every team in baseball could when the Yankee’s were doing it in the early 2000’s. Doesn’t mean it’s good for baseball, especially as the sports popularity continues to wane. Salary cap seems like the easy answer to me and works in other sports.

Salary cap would cause the longest work stoppage ever and the dwindling fan base might never come back (once they experience the thrill of YouTube E-sports!)

I kid. Having the Dodgers is good for baseball. Bad for San Diego’s competitive aspirations, but the brand is good because non-diehards like myself know the players (look, it’s Mookie! Hey, Mookie!) and it draws the populace in, a populace unconcerned with the plight of the teams in the state of CA who are two hours south or a bit further up north.

Nobody cares about that. Dynasties and super teams draw the eyeballs of the Average Joes, and that’s what MLB needs.
I read the other day that a lockout next year is almost a certainty.

It would be the year after that.

The current CBA runs through the end of 2026
What are the owners looking for? A cap?

The two sides haven't begun negotiating yet
But I saw multiple stories this week that insist there will be a lockout next year. Figured owners are drawing their lines in the sand.
 
I can’t work up any hate for the Dodgers and their payroll. Educate me about its dirtiness. Something smells funny, but who can hate Shohei, Mookie, and Freddie?

Plus, they beat the Yankees last year. Seems A-Ok to me to defer hundreds of millions in salary (or whatever the figure is) and outspend everybody by a gobsmacking amount of money.
Every team can do the same if they choose to
In the same way every team in baseball could when the Yankee’s were doing it in the early 2000’s. Doesn’t mean it’s good for baseball, especially as the sports popularity continues to wane. Salary cap seems like the easy answer to me and works in other sports.

Salary cap would cause the longest work stoppage ever and the dwindling fan base might never come back (once they experience the thrill of YouTube E-sports!)

I kid. Having the Dodgers is good for baseball. Bad for San Diego’s competitive aspirations, but the brand is good because non-diehards like myself know the players (look, it’s Mookie! Hey, Mookie!) and it draws the populace in, a populace unconcerned with the plight of the teams in the state of CA who are two hours south or a bit further up north.

Nobody cares about that. Dynasties and super teams draw the eyeballs of the Average Joes, and that’s what MLB needs.
I read the other day that a lockout next year is almost a certainty.

It would be the year after that.

The current CBA runs through the end of 2026
What are the owners looking for? A cap?

The two sides haven't begun negotiating yet
But I saw multiple stories this week that insist there will be a lockout next year. Figured owners are drawing their lines in the sand.

A spring lockout in 2026 a year before the CBA expires would be an unprecedented move
 
I can’t work up any hate for the Dodgers and their payroll. Educate me about its dirtiness. Something smells funny, but who can hate Shohei, Mookie, and Freddie?

Plus, they beat the Yankees last year. Seems A-Ok to me to defer hundreds of millions in salary (or whatever the figure is) and outspend everybody by a gobsmacking amount of money.
Every team can do the same if they choose to
In the same way every team in baseball could when the Yankee’s were doing it in the early 2000’s. Doesn’t mean it’s good for baseball, especially as the sports popularity continues to wane. Salary cap seems like the easy answer to me and works in other sports.

Salary cap would cause the longest work stoppage ever and the dwindling fan base might never come back (once they experience the thrill of YouTube E-sports!)

I kid. Having the Dodgers is good for baseball. Bad for San Diego’s competitive aspirations, but the brand is good because non-diehards like myself know the players (look, it’s Mookie! Hey, Mookie!) and it draws the populace in, a populace unconcerned with the plight of the teams in the state of CA who are two hours south or a bit further up north.

Nobody cares about that. Dynasties and super teams draw the eyeballs of the Average Joes, and that’s what MLB needs.
I read the other day that a lockout next year is almost a certainty.

It would be the year after that.

The current CBA runs through the end of 2026
What are the owners looking for? A cap?

The two sides haven't begun negotiating yet
But I saw multiple stories this week that insist there will be a lockout next year. Figured owners are drawing their lines in the sand.

A spring lockout in 2026 a year before the CBA expires would be an unprecedented move
I’m sure it meant after the 2026 season.
 
I can’t work up any hate for the Dodgers and their payroll. Educate me about its dirtiness. Something smells funny, but who can hate Shohei, Mookie, and Freddie?

Plus, they beat the Yankees last year. Seems A-Ok to me to defer hundreds of millions in salary (or whatever the figure is) and outspend everybody by a gobsmacking amount of money.
Every team can do the same if they choose to
In the same way every team in baseball could when the Yankee’s were doing it in the early 2000’s. Doesn’t mean it’s good for baseball, especially as the sports popularity continues to wane. Salary cap seems like the easy answer to me and works in other sports.

Salary cap would cause the longest work stoppage ever and the dwindling fan base might never come back (once they experience the thrill of YouTube E-sports!)

I kid. Having the Dodgers is good for baseball. Bad for San Diego’s competitive aspirations, but the brand is good because non-diehards like myself know the players (look, it’s Mookie! Hey, Mookie!) and it draws the populace in, a populace unconcerned with the plight of the teams in the state of CA who are two hours south or a bit further up north.

Nobody cares about that. Dynasties and super teams draw the eyeballs of the Average Joes, and that’s what MLB needs.
I don’t have a problem with the Dodgers winning, well I ****ing hate the Dodgers but other than that I don’t have a fundamental problem with it. I haven’t said boo about them on this thread over the last few years of them winning. They’re a well run team with some Hall of Fame players. But what they did this year and last with the deferred salaries I truly believe is awful for baseball.
 
But what they did this year and last with the deferred salaries I truly believe is awful for baseball.

I will admit to thinking that it doesn't pass the smell test, and that's why I said upthread that something smells about their payroll. I don't really care for the deferred money, either, but if the CBA permits it, then you have to abide or amend. There's really no middle ground there.

I don't know. My gut tells me that it's wrong from a revenue sharing perspective, but I don't know about that. I do know that the Dodgers are taking advantage of it to the fullest extent they can and they're reaping a windfall. Why aren't other teams doing it? Not enough liquidity or assets? Or is the money basically all tied up in their clubs and they don't have all sorts of cash to put in escrow? Just stingy? I wonder what the deal is. I'll have to look that up and stop pestering the thread with questions that can probably be found with a little effort and time.
 
Or is the money basically all tied up in their clubs and they don't have all sorts of cash to put in escrow? Just stingy? I wonder what the deal is. I'll have to look that up and stop pestering the thread with questions that can probably be found with a little effort and time.
I’m certainly no expert on it, but my lay men understanding is largely due to their ability to confidently generate high levels of cash going forward via TV and media deals and be unconcerned about potential competitive tax charges. Mid to small markets teams, like the Padres for example, can’t operate that way. The Pads for example have one of the highest attendance rates is the league (top 3 iirc) but don’t have a tv deal so they don’t have that ability. This level of imbalance is why I don’t think it’s good for baseball.
 
Or is the money basically all tied up in their clubs and they don't have all sorts of cash to put in escrow? Just stingy? I wonder what the deal is. I'll have to look that up and stop pestering the thread with questions that can probably be found with a little effort and time.
I’m certainly no expert on it, but my lay men understanding is largely due to their ability to confidently generate high levels of cash going forward via TV and media deals and be unconcerned about potential competitive tax charges. Mid to small markets teams, like the Padres for example, can’t operate that way. The Pads for example have one of the highest attendance rates is the league (top 3 iirc) but don’t have a tv deal so they don’t have that ability. This level of imbalance is why I don’t think it’s good for baseball.

That's fair and certainly a common lament with some truth to it, but baseball has a lot of teams rotating into and out of the playoffs seemingly every year. I mean the Royals won, what, just a decade ago? The Nationals won one in 2019 (?). And the playoff teams rotate around a bunch. It's not like you've got a situation like the Yankees dynasty of the late nineties where there was nobody close and they outspent everybody by a decent margin in the professional, international, and minor league ranks.

I don't know. It's not football in terms of parity, but it isn't too bad, IMO. Ask me in three years when the Dodgers win three more titles and see my patience with the deferred money tactic. I'll bet my estimation of it is low and I give it the :bs:
 
Or is the money basically all tied up in their clubs and they don't have all sorts of cash to put in escrow? Just stingy? I wonder what the deal is. I'll have to look that up and stop pestering the thread with questions that can probably be found with a little effort and time.
I’m certainly no expert on it, but my lay men understanding is largely due to their ability to confidently generate high levels of cash going forward via TV and media deals and be unconcerned about potential competitive tax charges. Mid to small markets teams, like the Padres for example, can’t operate that way. The Pads for example have one of the highest attendance rates is the league (top 3 iirc) but don’t have a tv deal so they don’t have that ability. This level of imbalance is why I don’t think it’s good for baseball.
 
Or is the money basically all tied up in their clubs and they don't have all sorts of cash to put in escrow? Just stingy? I wonder what the deal is. I'll have to look that up and stop pestering the thread with questions that can probably be found with a little effort and time.
I’m certainly no expert on it, but my lay men understanding is largely due to their ability to confidently generate high levels of cash going forward via TV and media deals and be unconcerned about potential competitive tax charges. Mid to small markets teams, like the Padres for example, can’t operate that way. The Pads for example have one of the highest attendance rates is the league (top 3 iirc) but don’t have a tv deal so they don’t have that ability. This level of imbalance is why I don’t think it’s good for baseball.
Exactly my point. 200 mil more in rev than mid market teams. That’s what gives them the confidence to defer huge dollars.
 
Or is the money basically all tied up in their clubs and they don't have all sorts of cash to put in escrow? Just stingy? I wonder what the deal is. I'll have to look that up and stop pestering the thread with questions that can probably be found with a little effort and time.
I’m certainly no expert on it, but my lay men understanding is largely due to their ability to confidently generate high levels of cash going forward via TV and media deals and be unconcerned about potential competitive tax charges. Mid to small markets teams, like the Padres for example, can’t operate that way. The Pads for example have one of the highest attendance rates is the league (top 3 iirc) but don’t have a tv deal so they don’t have that ability. This level of imbalance is why I don’t think it’s good for baseball.

The plot just thickened. They did have to trade Soto because of salary though, right? I mean, they went for it but just couldn’t ascend. dkp993 has a point about television rights. You can tell it’s a pretty penny for Los Angeles because Spectrum Cable guards that **** jealously and touts it every chance they get.

The Dodgers just inked an 8.35 billion dollar deal with Time Warner in January. That’ll pay some salaries. San Diego gets 20-30 million dollars. That’s quite the disparity. Here’s a source. As I suspected, they were going for it while they had the chance. That likely won’t continue. You can’t run a team at that much of a loss.

 
The Cubs saved 25 million dollars with the trade of Cody Bellinger and yet never gave the slightest interest in Kirby Yates or Tanner Scott, and as a result they have a bullpen that gave up a pinch-hit to a pitcher (Arizona had used all of their bench players).
 
The business stuff is boring to read about and pointless to worry about because none of us (except maybe Instinctive) are stakeholders. It'll suck when there's a lockout in 2027 but I'll come back when the games resume just as people have after previous work stoppages.

When the dust settles, the Yankees and Dodgers will be good and the Pirates probably won't be and baseball will still be the best sport to watch in person.
 
The Cubs saved 25 million dollars with the trade of Cody Bellinger and yet never gave the slightest interest in Kirby Yates or Tanner Scott, and as a result they have a bullpen that gave up a pinch-hit to a pitcher (Arizona had used all of their bench players).

Pitchers hitting bleeders past a drawn in infield; this is what they took from us.
 
The business stuff is boring to read about and pointless to worry about because none of us (except maybe Instinctive) are stakeholders. It'll suck when there's a lockout in 2027 but I'll come back when the games resume just as people have after previous work stoppages.

When the dust settles, the Yankees and Dodgers will be good and the Pirates probably won't be and baseball will still be the best sport to watch in person.

Every now and again, the Rangers, Royals, Nats win a world series. Sometimes having the most payroll isn't a winning strategy. See the Mets, NY.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top