Yeah but they had a pulled Galloway, Garcia and Graham with a few minutes left in the first half. Im not really sure if any of them got nicked up a bit, Galloway and Garcia might have but I think Gruden was just playing it safe. I'm not sure if they rested any of their defensive playersdidnt the Bucs lose to SF today?
Other than it was written while I was writing this one...nothing.Giants have NO CHANCE.Bucs are 6-1 at home...soon to be 7-1.Gaints seem to be relying on turnovers and big plays to win...Bucs are +15 in the TO ratio.Manning against a decieving Cover 2/4? Ok....Bucs win easily.Something wrong with the thread right below this one?
Took you six minutes to type that crap!Other than it was written while I was writing this one...nothing.Giants have NO CHANCE.Bucs are 6-1 at home...soon to be 7-1.Gaints seem to be relying on turnovers and big plays to win...Bucs are +15 in the TO ratio.Manning against a decieving Cover 2/4? Ok....Bucs win easily.Something wrong with the thread right below this one?
Thought I had time to plan out an insightful, though-provoking post. I was wrong on both counts apparently.The Giants matchup is exactly what the Bucs wanted and needed.Two weeks for Monte and Co to prepare....not to mention Gruden.Take the points!Took you six minutes to type that crap!Other than it was written while I was writing this one...nothing.Giants have NO CHANCE.Bucs are 6-1 at home...soon to be 7-1.Gaints seem to be relying on turnovers and big plays to win...Bucs are +15 in the TO ratio.Manning against a decieving Cover 2/4? Ok....Bucs win easily.Something wrong with the thread right below this one?Giants have a better chance against Tampa than anyone else in the playoffs... and visa-versa.
There's this sports quote that you might, or might not judging by you post, be familiar with:"That's why they play the games."Does it really make any difference which of these teams gets to get beat by either the Pack or Dallas. This is just a loser bowl.
Do not under estimate TB.Does it really make any difference which of these teams gets to get beat by either the Pack or Dallas. This is just a loser bowl.
I agree but in this case I will bet the home team in either instance. I agree nothing is a sure thing but I really don't believe that Tampa or the Giants are in the class with Dallas and Green Bay. Of course that is what makes this sport so much fun. I am in a colege pool with no points and after 6 games can do no better than 50%. So that probably tells you something of my betting prowess.There's this sports quote that you might, or might not judging by you post, be familiar with:"That's why they play the games."Does it really make any difference which of these teams gets to get beat by either the Pack or Dallas. This is just a loser bowl.![]()
Do not under estimate TB.
Bucs may be 6-1 at home but the Giants are 7-1 on the road, including 7 straight W's. Relying on turnovers and big plays to win isn't a bad thing last time I checked. Can the cover 2 still be considered deceiving? This form of D is being played in a lot of towns besides Tampa. Also, in response to the poster who said the Giants haven't beaten anyone ... where's Tampa's big win(s) this season? New Orleans? Of teams that are assured of making the playoffs, Tampa went winless and got blown out in each of those contests, except Jacksonville. As a Giants backer, I'm not guaranteeing a win. I won't even say I'm overly confident. However to say they have no chance is just foolish. If the Giants could've picked an opponent it would've been Tampa. The Bucs may be playing better than Seattle at present, however Seattle is a much tougher road opponent (and Seattle waxed Tampa). Not to mention getting Eli out of the bad weather is also probably a benefit for the G-Men.Other than it was written while I was writing this one...nothing.Giants have NO CHANCE.Bucs are 6-1 at home...soon to be 7-1.Gaints seem to be relying on turnovers and big plays to win...Bucs are +15 in the TO ratio.Manning against a decieving Cover 2/4? Ok....Bucs win easily.Something wrong with the thread right below this one?
Minnesota plays the cover 2, and I believe Eli had just a little bit of a problem against them this year.Bucs may be 6-1 at home but the Giants are 7-1 on the road, including 7 straight W's. Relying on turnovers and big plays to win isn't a bad thing last time I checked. Can the cover 2 still be considered deceiving? This form of D is being played in a lot of towns besides Tampa. Also, in response to the poster who said the Giants haven't beaten anyone ... where's Tampa's big win(s) this season? New Orleans? Of teams that are assured of making the playoffs, Tampa went winless and got blown out in each of those contests, except Jacksonville.
As a Giants backer, I'm not guaranteeing a win. I won't even say I'm overly confident. However to say they have no chance is just foolish. If the Giants could've picked an opponent it would've been Tampa. The Bucs may be playing better than Seattle at present, however Seattle is a much tougher road opponent (and Seattle waxed Tampa). Not to mention getting Eli out of the bad weather is also probably a benefit for the G-Men.
Lots of teams play a cover 2. To use it as a reason to favor the Bucs in this matchup seems a stretch. That's all I'm sayin'Minnesota plays the cover 2, and I believe Eli had just a little bit of a problem against them this year.Bucs may be 6-1 at home but the Giants are 7-1 on the road, including 7 straight W's. Relying on turnovers and big plays to win isn't a bad thing last time I checked. Can the cover 2 still be considered deceiving? This form of D is being played in a lot of towns besides Tampa. Also, in response to the poster who said the Giants haven't beaten anyone ... where's Tampa's big win(s) this season? New Orleans? Of teams that are assured of making the playoffs, Tampa went winless and got blown out in each of those contests, except Jacksonville.
As a Giants backer, I'm not guaranteeing a win. I won't even say I'm overly confident. However to say they have no chance is just foolish. If the Giants could've picked an opponent it would've been Tampa. The Bucs may be playing better than Seattle at present, however Seattle is a much tougher road opponent (and Seattle waxed Tampa). Not to mention getting Eli out of the bad weather is also probably a benefit for the G-Men.![]()
No, he beat them last year as well.gump said:- Giants are the only team in the NFL to have a Negative Turnover Ratio and a winning record? That bodes well for the Bucs, if they can convert TO to points. Bucs are 8-0 this season when winning the turnover battle
- Garcia's last playoff start was against the Giants in '02 (Jan '03)...I'm sure the Giants remember how that went!
- Will Jacobs be healthy? Bucs D under Monte has always had a weakness for power runners.
- Umenyiora vs Donald Penn? That will be trouble for the Bucs...
Tampa isn't a juggernaut by any stretch so, of course the Giants have a chance. But looking at it objectively, New York shouldn't beat the Bucs nor do I expect them to. And to be fair, I thought neither the Bucs nor Giants would make the playoffs.If the coaching staff can remember that the strength of the team is the running game and not ask Eli to throw it a ton of times, I like the Giants chances.I see that some people are giving the Giants no chance at winning next weekend, I wonder if those are the same people who gave the Giants no shot at making the playoffs this year.
Tampa is no juggernaut but they shouldn’t lose to the Giants?Why do you think that? Is it because the game is in Tampa?I see two mediocre teams playing each other; sure I would give Tampa the slight edge because they are home but to say they shouldn’t lose to the Giants is stretch.Dallas, Green Bay, just about all the AFC playoff teams they shouldn’t lose at home to the Giants. There is nothing about Tampa that screams out the shouldn't be beat by the Giants or any other playoff team for that matter.Tampa isn't a juggernaut by any stretch so, of course the Giants have a chance. But looking at it objectively, New York shouldn't beat the Bucs nor do I expect them to. And to be fair, I thought neither the Bucs nor Giants would make the playoffs.If the coaching staff can remember that the strength of the team is the running game and not ask Eli to throw it a ton of times, I like the Giants chances.I see that some people are giving the Giants no chance at winning next weekend, I wonder if those are the same people who gave the Giants no shot at making the playoffs this year.![]()
Maybe...but saying TB has an advantage over NYG because of Monte Kiffen is not a stretch.Monte has been playing more of what he calls a cover 4 this year, which is more man-to-man than the Cover 2. The main reason? The cover skills of rookie safety Tanard Jackson. TB hasn't been on TV at all this year, so most people aren't familiar with Tanard. You will be.Lots of teams play a cover 2. To use it as a reason to favor the Bucs in this matchup seems a stretch. That's all I'm sayin'Minnesota plays the cover 2, and I believe Eli had just a little bit of a problem against them this year.Bucs may be 6-1 at home but the Giants are 7-1 on the road, including 7 straight W's. Relying on turnovers and big plays to win isn't a bad thing last time I checked. Can the cover 2 still be considered deceiving? This form of D is being played in a lot of towns besides Tampa. Also, in response to the poster who said the Giants haven't beaten anyone ... where's Tampa's big win(s) this season? New Orleans? Of teams that are assured of making the playoffs, Tampa went winless and got blown out in each of those contests, except Jacksonville.
As a Giants backer, I'm not guaranteeing a win. I won't even say I'm overly confident. However to say they have no chance is just foolish. If the Giants could've picked an opponent it would've been Tampa. The Bucs may be playing better than Seattle at present, however Seattle is a much tougher road opponent (and Seattle waxed Tampa). Not to mention getting Eli out of the bad weather is also probably a benefit for the G-Men.![]()
Well ... I'll agree with you there ... if the Giants do notch the win it likely will be due to running the ball moreso than Eli coordinating anything resembling an aerial assault.Maybe...but saying TB has an advantage over NYG because of Monte Kiffen is not a stretch.Monte has been playing more of what he calls a cover 4 this year, which is more man-to-man than the Cover 2. The main reason? The cover skills of rookie safety Tanard Jackson. TB hasn't been on TV at all this year, so most people aren't familiar with Tanard. You will be.Lots of teams play a cover 2. To use it as a reason to favor the Bucs in this matchup seems a stretch. That's all I'm sayin'Minnesota plays the cover 2, and I believe Eli had just a little bit of a problem against them this year.Bucs may be 6-1 at home but the Giants are 7-1 on the road, including 7 straight W's. Relying on turnovers and big plays to win isn't a bad thing last time I checked. Can the cover 2 still be considered deceiving? This form of D is being played in a lot of towns besides Tampa. Also, in response to the poster who said the Giants haven't beaten anyone ... where's Tampa's big win(s) this season? New Orleans? Of teams that are assured of making the playoffs, Tampa went winless and got blown out in each of those contests, except Jacksonville.
As a Giants backer, I'm not guaranteeing a win. I won't even say I'm overly confident. However to say they have no chance is just foolish. If the Giants could've picked an opponent it would've been Tampa. The Bucs may be playing better than Seattle at present, however Seattle is a much tougher road opponent (and Seattle waxed Tampa). Not to mention getting Eli out of the bad weather is also probably a benefit for the G-Men.![]()
Monte's Cover 4 is in the same shell as the C2....so a QB drops back thinking zone, but ends up facing man.
The Bucs defensive issues are against the run...so Jacobs could have success.
But Monte and his savvy vets like Barber and Brooks are the smarter unit of the 2...and I'd be shocked if Eli does much of anything....200 yds and 1 TD tops.
:(- Bucs win 27-10