Check your thorax.It sounds like the ant-body test was approved by the FDA yesterday. We need everyone to get tested ASAP to see how many of us have already been infected.
We're not in disagreement, actually. There are case not being reported for sure ... but they typically (not 100%) won't end up needing hospital care. What we get, in the U.S., as positive-case counts is something akin to "counts of those at risk for hospitalization".I respectfully disagree. When you look at existing protocols used for administering tests I believe there are a tremendous amount of cases not being reported. Specifically, not-at-risk groups like <20yo. For example, Ive seen protocols which stipulate not to test for CV unless they are headed to a vent. Think about the number of positives /not/ being reported.In the sense of someone thinking "If it's not a positive-tested case, it's not an infection", I agree with you.
Positive-case counts do have value as a down-the-pike look at near-future hospitalizations. But yes, case counts don't inform about anything happening outside of the "testing system". That means assumptions that "kids don't get COVID infections" are baseless.
Sampling of asymptomatics and apparent healthies (incl children of a range of ages) can't come soon enough.
If you want to use cases as "worst case", I think that makes sense.
This was a great point -- a true "low-risk" cohort barely exists. Maybe "hermits and shut-ins under 30 years old". I dunno.I think the notion that there is a “high risk” group has been an obstacle to the general acceptance of social distancing policies. At first it was just the elderly, then it was people with compromising medical conditions. But there have been plenty of otherwise healthy people under 50 who have died from this disease, which suggests we don’t really know what comprises “high risk”. I’ve seen theories that blood type may play a roll (O pos ) or some genetic marker that affects lung functionality. I read a story yesterday about an otherwise healthy 30-year-old couple who both got sick. She had moderate flu-like symptoms and recovered. He had more severe symptoms but seemed to be recovering when he suddenly died. We don’t yet understand the mechanics of this virus, so any notion that we could segregate a small percentage of our population while the rest of us go back to business as usual is foolish and a recipe for disaster.
Children themselves can still serve as fomites.I bolded a part where he was talking about teacher to teacher spread. You pointing out kids not washing their hands has zero to do with that.I think you don't understand how often restaurant workers wash their hands and work areas as opposed to school children.
This is also a decent public Playlist. We have it playing in the background when homeschooling or having family reading time.Good idea. I'll merely add that it would be good to skip Strauss' Also Sprach Zarathustra
just my opinion
This is infinitely more helpful when you post the numbersGeorgia numbers really bad today :(
QFT. Looking for that quick, easy out. It ain't coming.People are trying to look for excuses to go back to normal. The same people who are saying it’s ok to open up schools are the ones that jump all over hydroxychloroquine and/or we’ll all be fine if we just wear masks.
There's a thread in the political forum that is nothing but blaming and snarky finger pointing like this.Other than the testing, coordination, lack of supplies and mixed messaging it's been a good response though.
My apologies, was just trying to add some levity.There's a thread in the political forum that is nothing but blaming and snarky finger pointing like this.
Please take this kind of thing there and do our best to keep this thread helping each other move forward. Thanks.
It certainly makes sense that the symptomatic would yield more positives than the asymptomatic. I still think its good, usable data.This chart for Illinois is interesting. It tracks the increase of cases in relationship to the increase of testing. Not exactly sure if it's good news or not or if I'm understanding the data correctly, but it seems like as testing increases there is a greater number of negative cases than positive cases.
https://chicago.suntimes.com/coronavirus-data/2020/4/1/21203460/illinois-coronavirus-testing-totals-by-day-graph-live-updates
If you mean antibodies testing via blood draw, this has been done plenty in other countries. Do you meant nothing available yet in the U.S.? I had thought it made it to the U.S., but not yet in numbers.At some point in the future there will likely be a serologic test to do this but nothing available yet AFAIK.Forgive my stupidity if this has already been answered - can they test to see if you had it earlier, but are recovered?
I like to use "asymptomatic" as shorthand for "both no-symptom people, and low-symptom people". Probably best to spell out both groups, though.Don't have a link but just read an article that says there really aren't that many asymptomatic carriers. After going back and re-interviewing patients many said that they actually had symptoms but didn't report them because they didn't think it was important or that the symptoms were mild.Another thing to remember about asymptomatic carriers, is that everyone starts out asymptomatic.
I've been waiting to make a joke about Sting and Tantric sex. Is this it?Yeah... I think a lot of people are thinking of "peaked" in the sense of sex, where it's over soon after the peak.
This isn't going to be over for quite awhile even after the peak. And the virus may be multi-orgasmic.
In cases where a definite diagnosis of COVID–19 cannot be made, but it is suspected or likely (e.g., the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty), it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate as “probable” or “presumed.” In these instances, certifiers should use their best clinical judgement in determining if a COVID–19 infection was likely. However, please note that testing for COVID–19 should be conducted whenever possible.
Yes, sorry, should have clarified. I don't think we have it here yet.If you mean antibodies testing via blood draw, this has been done plenty in other countries. Do you meant nothing available yet in the U.S.? I had thought it made it to the U.S., but not yet in numbers.
not sure what that is thanks
https://ants.com/ant-anatomy-101/It sounds like the ant-body test was approved by the FDA yesterday. We need everyone to get tested ASAP to see how many of us have already been infected.
With the surge of “unknown” deaths in Florida and now this article, I’m not sure what to believe anymore...I know we talk about numbers a lot in this thread, but it's important to note that the CDC guidelines don't require a patient to be tested positive in order for a death to be labeled a Covid-19 death. I know at the end of the day it means little, but the death numbers may be artificially high.
From the official CDC website
I'm not sure that the number of non-COVID deaths attributed to COVID is high enough to make a huge differene, given that a doctor can use his best judgement to presume. If patient 10 shows the same symptoms as patents 1-9 but simply hasn't taken the test, it's probably appropriate to count patent 10 as COVID.I know we talk about numbers a lot in this thread, but it's important to note that the CDC guidelines don't require a patient to be tested positive in order for a death to be labeled a Covid-19 death. I know at the end of the day it means little, but the death numbers may be artificially high.
From the official CDC website
Yep. These conversations get so annoying. That's where we started. Then a counterpoint was brought up that teachers could spread to other teachers. My response about how schools were better setup than pretty much anywhere to avoid that was misinterpreted and when clarified Moops then replies with well so what, teachers could get it from students!In his defense, he is arguing from the view that kids may not (or likely don’t) transmit it to others.
This is so true. I think it's important to realize that we sort of have a pretty good idea of a number of things. There likely aren't a large percentage of asymptomatic people. This virus probably kills 1-5% of people. The R0 number is likely 2.5-3 with no social distancing. We have a pretty good idea of the deaths and although we know the cases aren't 100% accurate, in many countries they probably aren't too far off. We know that most countries that are testing have a vast majority of the tests come up negative.I'm not sure that the number of non-COVID deaths attributed to COVID is high enough to make a huge differene, given that a doctor can use his best judgement to presume. If patient 10 shows the same symptoms as patents 1-9 but simply hasn't taken the test, it's probably appropriate to count patent 10 as COVID.
No numbers will ever be exact. we do the best we can with what we have.
Hopefully you and your love ones will all be alive to get new jobs. Good luck with your health!Well, it's starting. Wife just got laid off, which means not only a pretty big hit to our financial situation, but an even bigger one when her health insurance stops. It's only a matter of time until the hotel shuts its doors for good.
Niece got laid off 2 days ago.
4 local restaurants have announced their permanent closure in the last 24 hours, including a grand dame of the local scene, place had been open 40 years.
Unemployment claims last week were already double the previous all-time high for a single week. This week will be even worse.
I'm glad that quarantine/self-isolation measures are keeping the hospitals from being overrun and saving lives. That's the most important thing. Now, I guess I'm just preparing for what the landscape is going to look like when this is all said and done. The effects of this are going to be catastrophic. It hasn't even been a month yet and we still have probably 4-5 more to go.
I know we talk about numbers a lot in this thread, but it's important to note that the CDC guidelines don't require a patient to be tested positive in order for a death to be labeled a Covid-19 death. I know at the end of the day it means little, but the death numbers may be artificially high.
From the official CDC website
I'm not sure on the asmymptomatic (and by that, I'm including mildly symptomatic) number. I think there is a possibility that this thing is wildly contagous, but most folks fight it off easily. The overall numbers we see today would likely be similar (I think). If that were the case, will have herd immunity before too long, which would be a great thing.This is so true. I think it's important to realize that we sort of have a pretty good idea of a number of things. There likely aren't a large percentage of asymptomatic people. This virus probably kills 1-5% of people. The R0 number is likely 2.5-3 with no social distancing. We have a pretty good idea of the deaths and although we know the cases aren't 100% accurate, in many countries they probably aren't too far off. We know that most countries that are testing have a vast majority of the tests come up negative.
Those are all things that are probably true. So when some study or random articles comes in that questions something in a massive and fundamental way, it's probably not true. Good to read, listen to, talk about, think about....but at this stage we likely aren't going to learn something that blows us away.
Now look, in the end if we run antibody testing and it turns out that 70% of people had a very mild form and the death rate was .02 then we can all throw a party and move on as there won't be a 2nd wave.
But as far as we know, herd immunity isn't even something ANY country is even REMOTELY close to, the VAST majority of people aren't infected, and we need to beat this with quarantining, social distancing, testing, and contact tracing.
Really sorry to hear this.Well, it's starting. Wife just got laid off, which means not only a pretty big hit to our financial situation, but an even bigger one when her health insurance stops. It's only a matter of time until the hotel shuts its doors for good.
Niece got laid off 2 days ago.
4 local restaurants have announced their permanent closure in the last 24 hours, including a grand dame of the local scene, place had been open 40 years.
Unemployment claims last week were already double the previous all-time high for a single week. This week will be even worse.
I'm glad that quarantine/self-isolation measures are keeping the hospitals from being overrun and saving lives. That's the most important thing. Now, I guess I'm just preparing for what the landscape is going to look like when this is all said and done. The effects of this are going to be catastrophic. It hasn't even been a month yet and we still have probably 4-5 more to go.
too soonI've been waiting to make a joke about Sting and Tantric sex. Is this it?
I hope you're right, but have seen zero evidence that you are. Either way, we plan like herd immunity is as far away as the numbers tell us it is.I'm not sure on the asmymptomatic (and by that, I'm including mildly symptomatic) number. I think there is a possibility that this thing is wildly contagous, but most folks fight it off easily. The overall numbers we see today would likely be similar (I think). If that were the case, will have herd immunity before too long, which would be a great thing.
Still, I believe in hope for the best and prepare for the worst. That means, we should continue on with the assumption that your first paragraph is accurate.
me neither. I'm just saying - based on the data available (to me, a bottom tier analyst), you can't tell either way. That's why anti-body testing and/or massive, wide scale testing will be so important.I hope you're right, but have seen zero evidence that you are. Either way, we plan like herd immunity is as far away as the numbers tell us it is.
So my nephew in OH has been down with what he thinks is this since Thursday of last week, fever, aches, trouble breathing, cough. Had a teleconference with his doc today. His fever broke yesterday so doc said to stay home and continue to quarantine, fluids, etc. If things get worse to call back but the doc said he should be feeling better over the next week.I can see not admitting a near-certain COVID patient who can walk and talk ... but at least prescribing something for the secondary infections would be decent.
they're all over the place day-to-daySomeone mentioned this yesterday, but France makes no sense.
Today's numbers: 11,059 new cases, 1,417 new deaths.
What is this response, exactly?Hopefully you and your love ones will all be alive to get new jobs. Good luck with your health!
There is a lot to be concerned about. It is good to have perspective that everyone's health is first and foremost. I am glad he has that perspective and wish them all well!!!What is this response, exactly?Hopefully you and your love ones will all be alive to get new jobs. Good luck with your health!
Seems like an odd way to deliver that message, but cool. Thanks.There is a lot to be concerned about. It is good to have perspective that everyone's health is first and foremost. I am glad he has that perspective and wish them all well!!!
Their testing is in fits and starts.Someone mentioned this yesterday, but France makes no sense.
Today's numbers: 11,059 new cases, 1,417 new deaths.
Thanks for digging deep here. Curious to see if we can a peek under the lid.Hospitals to be Reimbursed for Treating Uninsured Coronavirus Cases via the Economic Relief Package
Coincidence? Who knows for sure or to what extent? But it appears as though it would make business sense to classify as many deaths as possible as due to or suspected due to Covid-19. Apparently deaths recorded as due to flu and pneumonia have plummeted to near zero. Looking for better sourcing on that.
Only if they are uninsured.Hospitals to be Reimbursed for Treating Uninsured Coronavirus Cases via the Economic Relief Package
Coincidence? Who knows for sure or to what extent? But it appears as though it would make business sense to classify as many deaths as possible as due to or suspected due to Covid-19. Apparently deaths recorded as due to flu and pneumonia have plummeted to near zero. Looking for better sourcing on that.
So far I'm finding graphics saying they are sourced from the CDC website which show plummeting flu and pneumonia deaths, but none are linked and I can't find the same charts myself. There's also the argument to be made that social distancing is helping to stop the flu in its tracks. Still digging.Thanks for digging deep here. Curious to see if we can a peek under the lid.
I don't know about "wildly contagious" like measles ... but the part in red I had thought was pretty well established when you look at an overall population (and thus "most" meaning "50% + 1").I'm not sure on the asymptomatic (and by that, I'm including mildly symptomatic) number. I think there is a possibility that this thing is wildly contagious, but most folks fight it off easily. The overall numbers we see today would likely be similar (I think). If that were the case, will have herd immunity before too long, which would be a great thing.
Can only tell you the brand we have is Interline and we are happy with it. Not the knock you on your ### heat that you get in the sauna at your club but gets you sweating and has a nice sound system.Any recommendations on the sauna? I’m usually a regular 5 day a week sauna user, and it’s one of the things I miss the most.
I agree that the numbers aren't over reported overall. I think the number of false reports of a covid death cancel out the number of lost tests. As of right now I think the deaths are the most accurate data there is in all of this.I'm not sure that the number of non-COVID deaths attributed to COVID is high enough to make a huge differene, given that a doctor can use his best judgement to presume. If patient 10 shows the same symptoms as patents 1-9 but simply hasn't taken the test, it's probably appropriate to count patent 10 as COVID.I know we talk about numbers a lot in this thread, but it's important to note that the CDC guidelines don't require a patient to be tested positive in order for a death to be labeled a Covid-19 death. I know at the end of the day it means little, but the death numbers may be artificially high.
From the official CDC website
No numbers will ever be exact. we do the best we can with what we have.
They surrender at a much higher rateSomeone mentioned this yesterday, but France makes no sense.
Today's numbers: 11,059 new cases, 1,417 new deaths.
Good point. It does look like they are doing a terrible job at testing.Their testing is in fits and starts.
Sort the Worldometers Coronavirus by Country chart by the rightmost column, Tests/1M pop. Look how low their testing rate is compared to most other countries, esp European countries. Their nearest neighbors are trouncing France in testing.
And France is still fourth in the world in confirmed case count. Wait until they get their testing straight.
FWIW, I enjoyed it. Reminded me of the People's Front of Judea, but in reverse...or was it the Judean People's Front? Anyway, Joe's point is a fair one as this thread as been far more successful than "the thread that shall not be named"My apologies, was just trying to add some levity.