What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** OFFICIAL *** COVID-19 CoronaVirus Thread. Fresh epidemic fears as child pneumonia cases surge in Europe after China outbreak. NOW in USA (36 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
School has been very vague about being open or closed so she doesn't know how to prepare over the summer and school admin is typically very last minute with direction. It's cool now but in another month or so she'll be freaking out. The online stuff they did this year was poor at best and not learning, more review. Kids are going to struggle with online only if that's the road they go. She already had about 3-4 kids that just checked out when this started. We're going to lose a lot of kids if this school from home thing continues.
My wife is a 3rd grade teacher and I have two elementary school age kids so I'm experiencing both sides of it, and it's a similar story here.  They've done a pretty good job of distance learning here but it's tough, especially at those ages.  It's largely dependent on the effort the parents are able to put into it, which varies greatly from one family to the next.  I'm fortunate to have a job that I could already work remotely on my own schedule, so during the day I do a lot of homeschooling with the kids while my wife is working with her students, and I try to get my work done during breaks and in the evenings.  Not ideal but we have it much better than many, I imagine.  Can tell that some kids don't have that level of support and are falling off, which is a shame and will only get worse the longer it goes on. 

Of course, knowing the way these things go, I'm guessing the teachers won't know about next school year until late August.  

 
Kid had a pediatrician appointment next week. Apparently the staff isn’t wearing masks (“you’ll be more than 6 feet away“, they told me, as if the thing can’t travel in the air) so I’m shopping for a new pediatrician. I liked them too. Shocking they would disregard a mask indoors. 
What part of the country?

 
Dr Marty Makary from Johns Hopkins wrote an Op-Ed in the New York Times today which is almost identical to my stance on how to proceed forward...

Months ago, I called for a long lockdown. Now we must minimize collateral damage.

His 5 bullet points...

  • Universal Masking
  • Spend More Time Outside
  • Businesses Must Adapt
  • Prioritize Safeguarding Nursing Homes
  • Protect Those at High Risk
Nice to see some common sense adaptation based upon what we've learned in the past 8 weeks. Makary was originally down on the usefulness of masks but now sees their benefits. He's also taken note of where most deaths are occurring and the benefits of getting out of closed spaces.
He makes some good points, but why do we favor the opinion of a surgeon over infectious disease specialists?

 
Yeah he’s talking total crap now.  Everyone should have him on ignore . His postings are as bad as plandemic.  A steady stream of disinformation for the last three months. 
 

France was ravaged.  Yet a new study shows they’ve barely scratched the surface of the population.

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/05/12/science.abc3517.full
I made an . . . adjustment to the thread/board about two weeks ago and it greatly increased my ability to read and enjoy the thread . . . . 

 
Makes it look like they are doing something.
Yeah test someone today then they develop symptoms later.. so numbers are going down in states that open early are doing better, my state had more deaths from flu last year then covid. Yet we moved covid confirm people from hospitals to nursing homes... 

 
How is this any different than you trusting an opinion piece by Faust over somebody like Rasmussen? 
Sorry, I'm not familiar with Rasmussen - can you give me some details about his work? Is he the guy determining Sweden's Covid policy? If so, I won't need to reiterate the problems with taking his approach in the U.S. (or in Sweden, for that matter).

And while I'm sure misspelling Fauci was unintentional, I'm not just talking about his opinions. While it's practically impossible to achieve consensus in any discipline, nearly all the global leaders in infectious diseases agree with Fauci's methodology, as well as rank-and-file epidemiologists and ID clinicians in this country.

 
Proof of concept?  Lots of businesses have been doing that. 
What works for a lot of businesses might not work for the postal service, so I would think they need a proof of concept for their business structure and with the unions approval when all is said and done. 

 
Sorry, I'm not familiar with Rasmussen - can you give me some details about his work? Is he the guy determining Sweden's Covid policy? If so, I won't need to reiterate the problems with taking his approach in the U.S. (or in Sweden, for that matter).

And while I'm sure misspelling Fauci was unintentional, I'm not just talking about his opinions. While it's practically impossible to achieve consensus in any discipline, nearly all the global leaders in infectious diseases agree with Fauci's methodology, as well as rank-and-file epidemiologists and ID clinicians in this country.
Just wait, the "experts" response is coming. 

Appreciate everything you do in here, hope you're hanging in there. 

 
:shrug: we employ union workers. 
A lot of companies have union workers,  you do realize the postal service has over 500,00 employees and deals with multiple unions.  All union contracts aren’t the same.  I’m sure the language in the postal unions contracts and whatever business you are in, along with your union’s contracts,  are not similar at all.

 
A lot of companies have union workers,  you do realize the postal service has over 500,00 employees and deals with multiple unions.  All union contracts aren’t the same.  I’m sure the language in the postal unions contracts and whatever business you are in, along with your union’s contracts,  are not similar at all.
We have 30,000 employees across North America.  Not picking a fight, I just dont get it. The unions want to work. We arent going to be affected much at all.  

 
If someone has C-19 and is asymptomatic, what good are temp checks?
Not sure why this concept difficult to understand?  Perhaps the Socratic method will help:

  • If someone shoots you in the head, what good are bullet-proof vests?
Obviously the answer in both cases is, they were useless for that specific case, but that doesn't necessarily make them useless overall.  Also, if you want to argue that the number of asymptomatic people is so large and the cost of temp checks so costly that the marginal gain isn't worth it THEN we can have a debate.  But to start with the premise that anything that isn't 100% effective isn't worth doing at all...ever.  Well that just isn't the case.  There are LOTS of things...indeed maybe everything we do, isn't 100% effective.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not very good news around the world at Covid worldometers with the new cases back up to 96,000 and deaths at 5,300.  Brazil reporting almost 13,800 new cases, which is a couple thousand above their previous high.  Zambia with almost a 50% increase (to 654 cases).  

The encouraging news in the U.S. is the downward trend in cases, per the CDC's "Cases in the U.S." chart.
It’s probably not worth reacting to the daily increase in Brazil’s known cases.  They’ve tested about 1/10th the number of people (per capita) as the US.  So the current reported cases of 200k are probably more like 2 million in actuality, if they tested on par with the US.  Brazil will see known cases skyrocket unless they stop testing.  Hopefully they don’t have a similar rate of deaths.....but......probably just a matter of time.

 
Sorry, I'm not familiar with Rasmussen - can you give me some details about his work? Is he the guy determining Sweden's Covid policy? If so, I won't need to reiterate the problems with taking his approach in the U.S. (or in Sweden, for that matter).

And while I'm sure misspelling Fauci was unintentional, I'm not just talking about his opinions. While it's practically impossible to achieve consensus in any discipline, nearly all the global leaders in infectious diseases agree with Fauci's methodology, as well as rank-and-file epidemiologists and ID clinicians in this country.
Angela Rasmussen. Virologist

Jeremy Faust. ER Doc

Faust is the guy that wrote this opinion piece that you and gianmarco agreed with in this very thread. It goes against what Angela Rasmussen says,and his research was to make some phone calls and ask some doctor buddies. But since it supports something you accept, you weren't too concerned with his credentials or the process. 

 
Tribes are done with it. Casinos opening up in WA. Finally something else to do on the weekend.  :pickle:
It's misleading to say that the "tribes are done with it" -- first off, not every casino has decided to open (link). Second, the only casino opening in western Washington will be open to less than 50% capacity (link). Third, they are checking everyone's temperature at entry. Fourth, they're requiring masks. And fifth -- here's the big one -- they're requiring all customers to register their cellphone so that the customers can potentially be tracked.

But, other than allllllll of those caveats -- yeah, they're done with it!

 
Not sure why this concept difficult to understand?  Perhaps the Socratic method will help:

  • If someone shoots you in the head, what good are bullet-proof vests?
Obviously the answer in both cases is, they were useless for that specific case, but that doesn't necessarily make them useless overall.  Also, if you want to argue that the number of asymptomatic people is so large and the cost of temp checks so costly that the marginal gain isn't worth it THEN we can have a debate.  But to start with the premise that anything that isn't 100% effective isn't worth doing at all...ever.  Well that just isn't the case.  There are LOTS of things...indeed maybe everything we do, isn't 100% effective.  
I’m not suggesting we don’t perform thermal checks. My concern is that businesses use this tool as they re-open to instill a false - or at least exaggerated - sense of safety to their patrons and staff. 
 

I’d be more optimistic if the messaging was, “We will be issuing temp checks to everyone wearing a mask looking to enter this establishment. Those not wearing masks will not be tested as they will not be admitted inside.” 

 
Ohio wants companies to snitch on workers who don't show up to work to the government who blame the Virus saying it's fraud. Ohio must LOVE Lawsuits

Also Jersey is opening some beaches for Memorial Day but Parks and a lot of other stuff are closed. Some locals are saying some beaches are still Locals only and The Jersey Shore has very little if any short term beach rentals. My one former teacher who lives at the shore now from HS said if you are coming from PA to the Shore you better have a fake NJ License or they might not even let you on the shore properties. There's a lot of stuff people in PA or those more inland in NJ who own a home there have to jump through a bunch of hoops to get to their houses and prove its theirs. Also depending on county only the people in the immediate family can be in the house. That means if you are going solo have a few friends coming well you are #### out of luck. Considering the traffic and all most people might be better off staying back in Philly this summer. Also beaches are gonna be limited on amount of people on a beach with social distancing enforced. 

 
Not sure why this concept difficult to understand?  Perhaps the Socratic method will help:

  • If someone shoots you in the head, what good are bullet-proof vests?
Obviously the answer in both cases is, they were useless for that specific case, but that doesn't necessarily make them useless overall.  Also, if you want to argue that the number of asymptomatic people is so large and the cost of temp checks so costly that the marginal gain isn't worth it THEN we can have a debate.  But to start with the premise that anything that isn't 100% effective isn't worth doing at all...ever.  Well that just isn't the case.  There are LOTS of things...indeed maybe everything we do, isn't 100% effective.  
This is my problem with a lot of the people arguing about restrictions. They are trying to argue that anything not effective 100% isn't worth doing. Then again most of those people are the ones that thing 5G caused this virus and I just tell them sorry we are inconveniencing your life but despite what you think your life is no more important then anyone else. Suck it up butter cup 

 
Disclaimer: Opinion on opening up. For what it’s worth. 

Watching how the “opening up” of states is unfolding raises the concern that we’re collectively missing the point of “re-opening”.  The point is to get people back to work. 30 million unemployed? Not acceptable. We need unemployment to begin falling, so in re-opening we should be wisely opening businesses to get as many people as possible back to earning a living again ASAP.

The point of re-opening is not to initiate “happy fun time” again. People need to be focused on getting back to work safely, as many people as possible working, as quickly as possible. Not to run out to some bar to drink, socialize and spread the virus while one bartender gets back to work. Not smart. The point of re-opening is not to head to the beach as quickly as possible, or to go to Disney soon. The point is to get as many people back to work as quickly as possible, safely, go to sleep, and do it again the next day, and the next day. Get off of unemployment, get back to work. Not “party fun time” right now.

Stay healthy and safe. Hopefully better times are ahead.

 
Sorry, I'm not familiar with Rasmussen - can you give me some details about his work? Is he the guy determining Sweden's Covid policy? If so, I won't need to reiterate the problems with taking his approach in the U.S. (or in Sweden, for that matter).

And while I'm sure misspelling Fauci was unintentional, I'm not just talking about his opinions. While it's practically impossible to achieve consensus in any discipline, nearly all the global leaders in infectious diseases agree with Fauci's methodology, as well as rank-and-file epidemiologists and ID clinicians in this country.
Just wait, the "experts" response is coming. 

Appreciate everything you do in here, hope you're hanging in there. 
 Bias is everywhere. Two biased assumptions in the first post and then another one to follow it up. Solid work.

I only typed what I did to illustrate that the only reason terminalxylem was questioning the pedigree of the writer is because it didn't match his view or he generally disagrees with the poster that linked it. 

Similar to how if somebody posted something from dailymail that went against the grain in here it would be pointed out immediately that dailymail is a tabloid. However if it was a story that matched the popular opinion or was a narrative people bought it would not get questioned at all. (yes this happened in this thread also)

 
Angela Rasmussen. Virologist

Jeremy Faust. ER Doc

Faust is the guy that wrote this opinion piece that you and gianmarco agreed with in this very thread. It goes against what Angela Rasmussen says,and his research was to make some phone calls and ask some doctor buddies. But since it supports something you accept, you weren't too concerned with his credentials or the process. 
Sorry, my bad. Can you remind how the two's opinions conflict?

And FTR, with regards to treatment and containment measures, I'm most interested in the opinions of infectious disease clinicians and public health experts. 

 
It's misleading to say that the "tribes are done with it" -- first off, not every casino has decided to open (link). Second, the only casino opening in western Washington will be open to less than 50% capacity (link). Third, they are checking everyone's temperature at entry. Fourth, they're requiring masks. And fifth -- here's the big one -- they're requiring all customers to register their cellphone so that the customers can potentially be tracked.

But, other than allllllll of those caveats -- yeah, they're done with it!
I'm not disagreeing with your info for the most part, but it's not true that there is an "only" casino opening in western WA.  The one a few miles from me, which is not the one you linked, announced this morning that it is opening on Monday.  I'd expect others are also following suit.  It's certainly not all, though, and some tribes such as the Makah have announced extended closures of their spaces instead.

 
Disclaimer: Opinion on opening up. For what it’s worth. 

Watching how the “opening up” of states is unfolding raises the concern that we’re collectively missing the point of “re-opening”.  The point is to get people back to work. 30 million unemployed? Not acceptable. We need unemployment to begin falling, so in re-opening we should be wisely opening businesses to get as many people as possible back to earning a living again ASAP.

The point of re-opening is not to initiate “happy fun time” again. People need to be focused on getting back to work safely, as many people as possible working, as quickly as possible. Not to run out to some bar to drink, socialize and spread the virus while one bartender gets back to work. Not smart. The point of re-opening is not to head to the beach as quickly as possible, or to go to Disney soon. The point is to get as many people back to work as quickly as possible, safely, go to sleep, and do it again the next day, and the next day. Get off of unemployment, get back to work. Not “party fun time” right now.

Stay healthy and safe. Hopefully better times are ahead.
Not sure how this makes sense. For restaurants to open and servers to be re-hired, they need customers. For theme parks to hire back workers, they need guests. Etc. Etc....

 
Disclaimer: Opinion on opening up. For what it’s worth. 

Watching how the “opening up” of states is unfolding raises the concern that we’re collectively missing the point of “re-opening”.  The point is to get people back to work. 30 million unemployed? Not acceptable. We need unemployment to begin falling, so in re-opening we should be wisely opening businesses to get as many people as possible back to earning a living again ASAP.

The point of re-opening is not to initiate “happy fun time” again. People need to be focused on getting back to work safely, as many people as possible working, as quickly as possible. Not to run out to some bar to drink, socialize and spread the virus while one bartender gets back to work. Not smart. The point of re-opening is not to head to the beach as quickly as possible, or to go to Disney soon. The point is to get as many people back to work as quickly as possible, safely, go to sleep, and do it again the next day, and the next day. Get off of unemployment, get back to work. Not “party fun time” right now.

Stay healthy and safe. Hopefully better times are ahead.
Sure, but that discounts how much of our economy is based on "happy fun time." A lot of service industries depend on it.

Honestly, I hope the pandemic forces us to re-examine our national priorities, focussing a bit more on things like education, income inequality, healthcare and disaster preparedness, and less on entertainment.

 
Gov. Tim Walz’s announcement Wednesday that Minnesota’s stay-at-home order would expire on May 18 came after a model produced by local researchers showed relatively little direct benefit from extending it

_________

in which Minnesota’s stay-at-home order ends on May 18, followed by a period of less-intense social distancing — projects that by the end of May, an estimated 1,441 people will have died of COVID-19 in Minnesota. By next March, that model predicts that just over 29,000 people will have died from the disease in the state. 

But a scenario in which Minnesota’s stay-at-home order is extended until May 31 was almost as bad, with 1,388 predicted deaths through May, and 28,231 into next year. That’s about a 2.8 percent reduction in overall predicted deaths over 12 months, between the two scenarios.

 
parasaurolophus said:
 Bias is everywhere. Two biased assumptions in the first post and then another one to follow it up. Solid work.

I only typed what I did to illustrate that the only reason terminalxylem was questioning the pedigree of the writer is because it didn't match his view or he generally disagrees with the poster that linked it. 

Similar to how if somebody posted something from dailymail that went against the grain in here it would be pointed out immediately that dailymail is a tabloid. However if it was a story that matched the popular opinion or was a narrative people bought it would not get questioned at all. (yes this happened in this thread also)
I said the author made many good points...in fact, I didn't criticize anything he said. 

While you're right I don't often agree with Mr. A, I really was pointing out a larger problem I have with accepting "expert" opinion from people who have little expertise in the subject they're opining. And when they're going against the grain of legitimate experts in the field, I'm much more likely to call their expertise into question.

 
Gov. Tim Walz’s announcement Wednesday that Minnesota’s stay-at-home order would expire on May 18 came after a model produced by local researchers showed relatively little direct benefit from extending it

_________

in which Minnesota’s stay-at-home order ends on May 18, followed by a period of less-intense social distancing — projects that by the end of May, an estimated 1,441 people will have died of COVID-19 in Minnesota. By next March, that model predicts that just over 29,000 people will have died from the disease in the state. 

But a scenario in which Minnesota’s stay-at-home order is extended until May 31 was almost as bad, with 1,388 predicted deaths through May, and 28,231 into next year. That’s about a 2.8 percent reduction in overall predicted deaths over 12 months, between the two scenarios.
Oof

 
Gov. Tim Walz’s announcement Wednesday that Minnesota’s stay-at-home order would expire on May 18 came after a model produced by local researchers showed relatively little direct benefit from extending it

_________

in which Minnesota’s stay-at-home order ends on May 18, followed by a period of less-intense social distancing — projects that by the end of May, an estimated 1,441 people will have died of COVID-19 in Minnesota. By next March, that model predicts that just over 29,000 people will have died from the disease in the state. 

But a scenario in which Minnesota’s stay-at-home order is extended until May 31 was almost as bad, with 1,388 predicted deaths through May, and 28,231 into next year. That’s about a 2.8 percent reduction in overall predicted deaths over 12 months, between the two scenarios.
I don't understand the math here.

You've had 663 deaths in approximately 1.5 months. You've averaged roughly 20-25 deaths per day over the past couple of weeks.

But now the model is predicting another 725 deaths in just the next 15 days? Followed by an average of ~90 deaths per day for the next 10 months?? And that's with social distancing? What the??

 
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/convalescent-plasma-safe-treat-covid-19-nationwide-study-n1206126

I don't think this gets enough attention as the true potential 'game changer'.

Of the 5,000 seriously ill patients who received blood plasma transfusions for the study, fewer than 1 percent experienced serious adverse events. The mortality rate seven days after treatment was 14.9 percent, but the researchers noted the infusion patients were already gravely ill and the rate "does not appear excessive."

 
I don't understand the math here.

You've had 663 deaths in approximately 1.5 months. You've averaged roughly 20-25 deaths per day over the past couple of weeks.

But now the model is predicting another 725 deaths in just the next 15 days? Followed by an average of ~90 deaths per day for the next 10 months?? And that's with social distancing? What the??
That does seem high. Only thing i can point to is MN is one of only 2 states with a Rt number over 1 according to RtLive.

 
Quint said:
I’m not suggesting we don’t perform thermal checks. My concern is that businesses use this tool as they re-open to instill a false - or at least exaggerated - sense of safety to their patrons and staff. 

I’d be more optimistic if the messaging was, “We will be issuing temp checks to everyone wearing a mask looking to enter this establishment. Those not wearing masks will not be tested as they will not be admitted inside.” 
Thermal scanning is akin to taking your shoes off at the airport to me. I get the need and yes, you’ll probably have a few hits that will require the person to go home but it sure seems there is a vast amount of asymptotic people out there that this will let through. At the doctors the other day they also required a fingertip oxygen test because they said they have seen asymptotic patients that might have felt something in their chest but nothing considered out of the ordinary but their oxygen count showed low enough to point toward infection. 

I don’t know but at least there was some attempt at a secondary test to identify infection. At some point I hope there is a noninvasive test that is reliable but until then I’d expect lines to get into work to pass through testing stations for large companies. 

 
tonydead said:
Kevrunner said:
What works for a lot of businesses might not work for the postal service, so I would think they need a proof of concept for their business structure and with the unions approval when all is said and done. 
:shrug: we employ union workers.
Perhaps your union leaders prioritize different things than USPS union leaders?

 
eoMMan said:
So this doctor, who's been on NBC TV quite a bit teaching us about COVID-19, caught it. He thinks he got from a crowded flight even he wore a mask, wiped everything down, etc.

link

"NBC contributor Dr. Joseph Fair, whose expertise has been featured on NBC Nightly News through the course of the coronavirus pandemic, is himself recovering from the virus in a New Orleans hospital.

On Twitter, Fair shared that he had taken what he calls “max precautions” but still got sick. "
Update on this story...

He has not even tested positive for covid and has now convinced tons of people that he got it through his eyes on a flight. 

He could still be right, but again, how the heck is he so certain when he has been tested 4 times and been negative all four times? 

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top