What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** OFFICIAL *** COVID-19 CoronaVirus Thread. Fresh epidemic fears as child pneumonia cases surge in Europe after China outbreak. NOW in USA (12 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
(Continued from another FFA thread)

8 minutes ago, Gally said: 

19 minutes ago, Doug B said:

Because ... ?

What do you think would have happened if all of humanity, starting in Wuhan, had just "dropped its hands" and let COVID-19 spread freely?
It would have acted like all other first run viruses.  We are not on different sides of the street here.  

I am actually saying the flu is worse than people make it out to be.  
My first, ready response is that flu mitigation measures make a tremendous difference vs. the flu 'running wild'.

 
Who the heck thinks that reopening the economy will be like flipping a switch and everything quickly returns to normal? I don't see anyone saying that. People want intermediate measures taken towards reopening based on the realization that with each passing day, the hole being dug gets deeper. It's defeatist to throw up our arms and pretend that nothing can be done while we wait for mass testing. It's a balancing act.

 
I have been monitoring this thread pretty closely since its inception and I don't believe I have seen much/any of the bolded.  I think what I have seen, and perhaps what you have misunderstood, is people arguing against an across-the-board re-opening of the country's economy/businesses with complete disregard for regional timelines and characteristics AND without a plan in place to prevent what is happening now (i.e. the blunt instrument of a near-national stay-at-home advisory).  I think most/all of the people arguing AGAINST re-opening NOW are arguing FOR three things:

  1. A gradual (i.e. keep public gatherings under 25 people, mask requirements, etc.) re-opening directed by those closest (i.e. governors with input from mayors) to account for the specific regional threats (i.e. number of cases, population density, and unique public gathering features - like beaches or mass transit)
  2. The ability to conduct wide-scale testing and contact tracing
  3. An executable plan for both tightening and relaxing restrictions as necessary given the ongoing feedback of #2 above


As always, just my opinion.
:goodposting:

 
That's a misleading stat, imo, when you consider the lower number of cases and deaths. 

If people are relatively healthy and do not have COVID19....and the state has a ton of people....there's going to be a lower number of tests per capita.

Would you prefer them testing a ton more people that are most likely healthy and don't have COVID19? 
 Yes. It's how you get ahead of the disease as shown by multiple countries

 
:shrug:

Many restaurants are trying to stay afloat NOW by just doing take-out and delivery.  Allowing them to seat a few people in a responsible manner would only help support jobs, right?

I don't think anyone is expecting pre-pandemic numbers for awhile.
There is a a BBQ bar and grill in my neighborhood that is doing a concert in their parking lot. They have the cars parked in every other parking space, and then a local musician is playing on the patio. They have it tied to a channel on your radio so you can listen in your car and watch.

The wait staff is then basically being car-hops and bringing your food to you. Just like a take-out deal.

Apparently it's been pretty popular and the restaurant can employ most of their entire staff. They are doing it three nights a week.

Fireside BBQ

Edit to add: I believe you can also tip the musician as well as the wait staff. The tips have been really good from what I understand.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Even if it's not "many" in the grand scheme of things, reopening would sure be a big deal to those people who are in a position to have their jobs saved.  Not saying that justifies prematurely opening things back up - and I'm personally in the 'shut it down as long as we need to' camp - but I've noticed there is a problematic tendency among those of us in white collar jobs who have been relatively unaffected by this whole thing to be a little cavalier about when other people should get their jobs and incomes back (that's a generality not necessarily directed at you).
That's a very good point and could affect some people's opinions.  That being said, doing what's best for everyone shouldn't change based on our personal experiences.  If I had a blue-collar job where I made 900 a week and I got unemployment AND the 600/week stipend from the federal govt, AND the bulk payments that should be dropping this week, I'd hope that my opinions would be similar.

For me, that's really the confusing part.  Incredible benefits were offered.  People are about to get money dropped into their accounts.  I thought the reason they did this was that so people could get through the quarantine...

 
Who the heck thinks that reopening the economy will be like flipping a switch and everything quickly returns to normal? I don't see anyone saying that.
It's a lot like no one (around here, anyway) ever said "Close it all down until a vaccine is totally done and ready to go!

Practically everyone in here with a take describes opposing views as the farthest point on the spectrum. Lots of excluded middle.

 
If it's a full service restaurant, probably not. Table staff work for tips, so they need a lot of tables to make a living. 
Exactly.  They should be getting unemployment PLUS up to 600/week from federal government right?  I'd imagine there are some people doing better right  now.

 
Who the heck thinks that reopening the economy will be like flipping a switch and everything quickly returns to normal? I don't see anyone saying that. People want intermediate measures taken towards reopening based on the realization that with each passing day, the hole being dug gets deeper. It's defeatist to throw up our arms and pretend that nothing can be done while we wait for mass testing. It's a balancing act.
We're also not totally closed either. We are doing a lot already while we wait for testing/treatments/vaccine. 

And I'm open to moving where that line exists, based on location and the virus current impact on the location. Some locations like Ohio could increase the number of businesses allowed open without overwhelming the hospitals, whereas some locations like Michigan should probably be decreasing the number of businesses allowed open, because their hospitals are overwhelmed. 

 
https://www.businessinsider.com/death-rate-german-laboratory-city-5x-less-than-national-average-2020-4

Streeck went on to say that though the virus could "live" on various surfaces for up to seven days, he believed there was little chance that someone could become infected via surfaces, contradicting both the Center for Disease Control and National Institute of Health guidelines.

Streeck posited that in order to contract the virus via a surface like a doorknob, "it would be necessary that someone coughs into their hand, immediately touches a doorknob, and then straight after that another person grasps the handle and goes on to touches their face," Streeck told reporters. 

Instead, claims Streeck, his study found that: "There is no significant risk of catching the disease when you go shopping. Severe outbreaks of the infection were always a result of people being closer together over a longer period of time."

 
We're also not totally closed either. We are doing a lot already while we wait for testing/treatments/vaccine. 

And I'm open to moving where that line exists, based on location and the virus current impact on the location. Some locations like Ohio could increase the number of businesses allowed open without overwhelming the hospitals, whereas some locations like Michigan should probably be decreasing the number of businesses allowed open, because their hospitals are overwhelmed. 
It's a start and we're getting somewhere. I'm thankful.

Btw, speaking to the economic measures that are supposedly there to help bridge people to the day when they can return to work - they're sporadic at best. In Nevada apparently the unemployment filing website has been down for days. I believe the same issues exist in many other states. The $1200 per adult money from the feds is just now getting to the first recipients. And the small business aid has been a mess as well. For many, the damage that already has been done won't magically go away when the funds arrive. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If it's a full service restaurant, probably not. Table staff work for tips, so they need a lot of tables to make a living. 
Right so the restaurants would just have less staff working.  So the waitstaff, in theory, would have a similar number of table they had pre pandemic it just there are less waitstaff around.  Less cooks too.  So the ones working could maintain a similar wage to what they had before and the ones not can continue collecting unemployment.

 
Where are you?  I’m about to run out to the Cub in EP. 
Sorry for the delay in response. PL. How was the Cub in EP?

I had to go to urgent care today in Shako. Not COVID related. Thankfully it was at a clinic that does not treat or diagnose COVID patients. Only one other person in the waiting room. Quiet and plenty of distance but I was still weirded out by it.

@mr roboto

 
It's a start and we're getting somewhere. I'm thankful.

Btw, speaking to the economic measures that are supposedly there to help bridge people to the day when they can return to work - they're sporadic at best. In Nevada apparently the unemployment filing website has been done for days. I believe the same issues exist in many other states. The $1200 per adult money from the feds is just now getting to the first recipients. And the small business aid has been a mess as well. For many, the damage that already has been done won't magically go away when the funds arrive. 
The small business aid is horrifically bad. A HUGE percentage of them took the loan believing they would qualify for it to be forgiven, but were forced to start the clock the moment they were approved for the loan, and that clock will run out well before they can achieve the requirements of forgiveness. Most of them just took on more debt at a time where they cannot afford to service that debt. It will result in more bankruptcies than it was intended to save. 

 
Right so the restaurants would just have less staff working.  So the waitstaff, in theory, would have a similar number of table they had pre pandemic it just there are less waitstaff around.  Less cooks too.  So the ones working could maintain a similar wage to what they had before and the ones not can continue collecting unemployment.
For large restaurants, sure. There are however a lot of full service restaurants that only have one or two waitstaff needed to run the dining area. 

 
The small business aid is horrifically bad. A HUGE percentage of them took the loan believing they would qualify for it to be forgiven, but were forced to start the clock the moment they were approved for the loan, and that clock will run out well before they can achieve the requirements of forgiveness. Most of them just took on more debt at a time where they cannot afford to service that debt. It will result in more bankruptcies than it was intended to save. 
I am curious as to why federal aid like this couldn't have been made "clean and easy" essentially by fiat. I guess our government's structure is not set up for that kind of magic-wand waving, though.

Similar thought: Why couldn't pretty much all debts of any kind -- mortgages, rents, student loans, car payments, credit cards, business loans, personal loans, etc. - just have been put on a 90-day freeze by fiat? Something like that is just THAT ruinous to even contemplate?

 
The small business aid is horrifically bad. A HUGE percentage of them took the loan believing they would qualify for it to be forgiven, but were forced to start the clock the moment they were approved for the loan, and that clock will run out well before they can achieve the requirements of forgiveness. Most of them just took on more debt at a time where they cannot afford to service that debt. It will result in more bankruptcies than it was intended to save. 
Is this true?  The clock doesn't start when they actually receive the funds?  I would hope they'd go back and change that since for many businesses it takes weeks to receive the funds.  What I don't understand is why aren't fica taxes part of the forgivable amount.  It is a mandatory cost of payroll yet that's specifically excluded.

 
Here is my problem with opening things back up before we have reliable ways to prevent transmission - such as a vaccine:

Essentially, it forces everybody back in whether they are prepared or not. If an elderly, diabetic couple run a small restaurant, they will have no choice but to open up so they can compete. Otherwise, they face a situation where everyone is making money except for them, the stimulus funds won’t be coming anymore, and they run the risk of losing their regulars to the competition. 

I guess you could say that’s just capitalism doing its thing, but it seems unfair to stack the deck against vulnerable people.

 
The very idea of "reopening the economy" implies a few things:

1.  It's closed - which isn't true

2. That someone can "open it", which they can't. Because it isn't closed.
Try getting 50 people around a food truck at a Chicago beach front without being hassled by the cops.  The "economy" isn't fully open.  Governors can mandate certain actions that close off parts of the economy.  They also have the power to "open" the parts of the economy that they've closed.  But Pritzker isn't going to stroll up to the podium tomorrow and say 'see yall at B-Dubs at 5pm, first rounds on me".

Nobody thinks the economy is fully closed.  Revenue is still being generated, just a lot less of it. 

Even the just a flu bros understand that there won't be 35,000 at Wrigley anytime soon.  But there's definitely room to lift some restrictions if reasonable safety precautions are followed.

"The economy" (aka revenue generation) doesn't have to be opened up like a fire hose, but it certainly doesn't have to be a trickle either.

 
Right so the restaurants would just have less staff working.  So the waitstaff, in theory, would have a similar number of table they had pre pandemic it just there are less waitstaff around.  Less cooks too.  So the ones working could maintain a similar wage to what they had before and the ones not can continue collecting unemployment.
And with fewer tables the restaurant would have lower turnover

 
South Dakota implements first statewide Hydroxychloroquine trial

South Dakota will be the first state to hold a statewide trial for hydroxychloroquine as a possible treatment of the coronavirus.

Gov. Kristi Noem announced on Monday that the state health department and every major hospital would take part in a clinical trial to treat COVID-19 patients and those who have been exposed to individuals who tested positive for the coronavirus. The trial, which will be led by Sanford Health, was given approval by federal authorities to be the first statewide trial of the drug.

"We are going to be the first state in the nation to run a statewide clinical trial on hydroxychloroquine. It will be used to fight COVID-19, and the team behind me, Sanford Health, has helped lead this effort," Noem said.
The trial will include two parts. The first will allow people who are already sick from COVID-19 to take hydroxychloroquine either in an inpatient or outpatient setting to see if it works as a therapeutic and mitigates the extreme symptoms of the virus. The other trial will test those exposed to the coronavirus, including medical professionals and family members of those infected, to see if they can stop the virus before it infects vulnerable people.

 
Try getting 50 people around a food truck at a Chicago beach front without being hassled by the cops.  The "economy" isn't fully open.  Governors can mandate certain actions that close off parts of the economy.  They also have the power to "open" the parts of the economy that they've closed.  But Pritzker isn't going to stroll up to the podium tomorrow and say 'see yall at B-Dubs at 5pm, first rounds on me".

Nobody thinks the economy is fully closed.  Revenue is still being generated, just a lot less of it. 

Even the just a flu bros understand that there won't be 35,000 at Wrigley anytime soon.  But there's definitely room to lift some restrictions if reasonable safety precautions are followed.

"The economy" (aka revenue generation) doesn't have to be opened up like a fire hose, but it certainly doesn't have to be a trickle either.
Just about every piece of anecdotal evidence I have to offer contradicts this stuff.  We are so lacking in self awareness as a society people can't fathom how much different things could be and what actual "shutdown" really looks like.

 
I am curious as to why federal aid like this couldn't have been made "clean and easy" essentially by fiat. I guess our government's structure is not set up for that kind of magic-wand waving, though.
When you have a two party system, one party represents one group of people and the other party represents the other group of people. When you are not part of either group, you are left out and usually screwed by politics.

In this case, those people being left out our small business owners. And in this case it's a slap in the face, because the aid was labeled like it was to help small businesses. It wasn't. It is formatted to help EMPLOYEES of small businesses, because that's who the Democrats represent. Well, don't the Republicans represent the small business owner? Answer? Kind of, but not really. What the Republicans wanted was aid to corporations. That's why that aid was separated from the small business aid. The republicans really didn't do much to influence the small business aid, other than say "yes, that's great, help them too". So basically, if you are still functioning your business somewhat, so you still have somewhat of a payroll, if you can get that payroll back to pre-crisis levels in a couple of months, you just got free money to help get you through the crisis. Basically, the free money just paid for your payroll. But any business that is forced closed and doesn't know when they can reopen, let alone no what amount of business will return once they are reopened will not be forgiven for taken the loan. It's a loan. Pay it back with interest, or go bankrupt. 

Similar thought: Why couldn't pretty much all debts of any kind -- mortgages, rents, student loans, car payments, credit cards, business loans, personal loans, etc. - just have been put on a 90-day freeze by fiat? Something like that is just THAT ruinous to even contemplate?
It's because one a loan is created, it become just a piece of a bigger asset. For example, the bank that issued you your loan and gave you the money, sells your loan so they can then have money to issue another loan. That's their business. Their business is to make loans, not collect on loans. The entity collecting your loan is a loan servicer who also does not own your loan. They collect your loan, keep a little for a service fee, and distribute the money you paid to things like Mortgage Backed Securities, which are owned by pensions, which are serviced by pension mangers. Ultimately the money you pay for your loan goes through all these channels and ends up in your retired neighbor's pension payment. The only way for you to not pay your loan is for your neighbor to not get his pension payment (just an example, and just a nutshell). So unless the ultimate recipient of the loan is willing to let it slide for 3 months, the only other way to get a 3 month pass is for one of the entities in between to take an income hit, and most likely they can't afford it, unless they get a government bailout.... which is actually happening in some cases. 

 
Right so the restaurants would just have less staff working.  So the waitstaff, in theory, would have a similar number of table they had pre pandemic it just there are less waitstaff around.  Less cooks too.  So the ones working could maintain a similar wage to what they had before and the ones not can continue collecting unemployment.
The only way this plan might work is if restaurants decide we are only going to serve 15 tables today total--reserve your 30 minute window, no walk ins.You can't have people congregated around one another like a normal night at Olive Garden waiting for 2 hours for a table--that will be a recipe for disaster. But who in their right mind would say Okay I will be the one server to go to work and take the chance of getting infected, having to pay for daycare, while serving tables and hoping I get a good tip, while my co-workers stay home in safety and collect their unemployment check? Plus you have the whole sanitizing every surface, every plate, and fork after every customer leaves. Then of course when someone catches it, do you honestly believe they won't be in line at the first ambulance chaser attorney's office suing said restaurant for getting them sick? IMO full service restaurants aren't coming back any time soon.

Every science person with some letters after their name "think" they know something about this virus, but not one of them "knows" anything. This thing is too new--there hasn't been time for any long-term comprehensive studies to definitively know anything about it.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here is my problem with opening things back up before we have reliable ways to prevent transmission - such as a vaccine:

Essentially, it forces everybody back in whether they are prepared or not. If an elderly, diabetic couple run a small restaurant, they will have no choice but to open up so they can compete. Otherwise, they face a situation where everyone is making money except for them, the stimulus funds won’t be coming anymore, and they run the risk of losing their regulars to the competition. 

I guess you could say that’s just capitalism doing its thing, but it seems unfair to stack the deck against vulnerable people.
But wasn't the whole mitigation effort and "closing" to simply flatten the curve? So we all don't all get it at once? 

In other words, it seems like we've moved from "look, most are going to get this - let's flatten to curve" to "it must be safe for everyone before we open again".

 
June 1 is still ridiculously over-optimistic IMO.  At this point, I would be very happy with things starting to loosen up in late summer, and I'm not sure I even put the odds of that happening at 50-50.
But I think you're missing his point. Things ARE going to start opening up again sooner rather than later. Whether you agree with it or not. And frankly, whether it's the correct thing to do or not (Narrator: It's not). So I think it would be helpful if people start thinking more about what that will mean when it does happen instead of just arguing "academically/scientifically" that it should not happen. Or blaming certain political parties or leaders (and I use that last word very reluctantly). 

Not just meaning you of course, just responding to your post. But I'd love to hear from you and the other very smart, informed people in here what we can do as a country/community/family when things start opening up more in mid-May. Not just that we "can't do it until summer" or whatever. Let's think realistically instead of academically. 

TIA. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
But I think you're missing his point. Things ARE going to start opening up again sooner rather than later. Whether you agree with it or not. And frankly, whether it's the correct thing to do or not (Narrator: It's not). So I think it would be helpful if people start thinking more about what that will mean when it does happen instead of just arguing "academically/scientifically" that it should not happen. Or blaming certain political parties or leaders (and I use that last word very reluctantly). 

Not just meaning you of course, just responding to your post. But I'd love to hear from you and the other very smart, informed people in here what we can do as a country/community/family when things start opening up more in mid-May. Not just that we "can't do it to summer" or whatever. Let's think realistically instead of academically. 

TIA. 
Personally?  One thing for us....stay the hell home....we are going nowhere for the next several months and we've cancelled three trips this summer/fall to see family/friends.

 
Circa 1999, I asked my best friend, who was top of his class at Harvard Business School, to explain to me how all these dot coms had crazy valuations despite no earnings. He tried to explain that it was about branding and future market share and future earnings and the valuations were sustainable. I said okay, but I don’t see it.

In 2006, I asked him how ARMs wouldn’t cause a massive housing bubble and collapse when rates rose and reset, and he explained how the availability of flexible mortgage vehicles would probably create a new normal and class of homeowner that interfered with normal cyclical downswings. 

Now that friend has over $100m banked post tax after a couple of big SaaS exits, and is starting a PE firm, so maybe I was a blind squirrel catching nuts, but sometimes the simple fundamentals cannot be eluded.

At some point, a market that trades substantially above earnings is going to come falling down to Earth. It’s a matter of when. You make compelling arguments that it will be staved off for awhile. I suspect it won’t be, and eventually it will be spooked back down to an equilibrium by poor earnings outlooks, and short sellers are going to knock it down to the studs.

But we shall see. 
When the Fed is printing, and assets such as the stock market and housing prices continue to fall, then we're ####ed. What is happening there is that the forces of deleveraging are so great that even inflation of base money can't counter act it. 

Is it possible it could happen now? Yes. But unlikely. And if/when it does happen, it pretty much means no assets are worth anything except assets that can grown wealth naturally like farmland. So I understand where you are coming from. But I'm not even anywhere near as close as you are to the belief that the sky is about to fall. 

 
But I think you're missing his point. Things ARE going to start opening up again sooner rather than later. Whether you agree with it or not. And frankly, whether it's the correct thing to do or not (Narrator: It's not). So I think it would be helpful if people start thinking more about what that will mean when it does happen instead of just arguing "academically/scientifically" that it should not happen. Or blaming certain political parties or leaders (and I use that last word very reluctantly). 

Not just meaning you of course, just responding to your post. But I'd love to hear from you and the other very smart, informed people in here what we can do as a country/community/family when things start opening up more in mid-May. Not just that we "can't do it to summer" or whatever. Let's think realistically instead of academically. 

TIA. 
I'm not smart nor particularly informed. But I think it means what we can do when out in any public place: masks, gloves, keeping apart from people, hand-washing/sanitizing and being really careful about touching anything, etc. Also each person can do their part by doing this. And definitely not going out to any places with even a case of the sniffles. 

But how anyone gets on a train, subway or bus I can't figure out.

 
Is this true?  The clock doesn't start when they actually receive the funds?  I would hope they'd go back and change that since for many businesses it takes weeks to receive the funds.  What I don't understand is why aren't fica taxes part of the forgivable amount.  It is a mandatory cost of payroll yet that's specifically excluded.
Once the loan is approved you have days to accept the funds or the loan gets denied. 

ETA: Withholding taxes have traditionally never been forgiveable, as they weren't in expense you incurred. You collected the employees taxes on their behalf. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Funny because... it’s true. :unsure:

I’ve drained a bottle of wine every day except one since March 9 when we went on lockdown. No more, no less. Start drinking about 3pm and have a glass on average about every other hour. Going to have to put the brakes on, but not quite ready yet.
Until you wake up thinking you may have slept through an entire season (me last Thursday) or wake up at 6 am, hurry up and run to go lay down on the couch because you vaguely remember your wife saying her stomach hurt when you went to bed and you were alarmed but too drunk to get away at whatever time it was you went to bed (me last.... Friday?  Saturday? IDK)... I think you are ok.  :D  

 
Personally?  One thing for us....stay the hell home....we are going nowhere for the next several months and we've cancelled three trips this summer/fall to see family/friends.
Exactly! As much as is possible, couldn't the people who feel the way you and many others here do just try to do that? I know it's not perfect, but I think people need to start thinking about what they can do and how they will do it. 

 
Just about every piece of anecdotal evidence I have to offer contradicts this stuff.  We are so lacking in self awareness as a society people can't fathom how much different things could be and what actual "shutdown" really looks like.
I have been accused of giving "the common person" way too much credit.  Could be.

We're certainly not welding people into their homes like China.  THAT is a shutdown.

Everybody has their own thing they miss.  I miss Sunday dinners over at my mom's house, but she's a pharmacist at an "at risk" age so it's Friday Night Movie Trivia on FaceTime/Discord  for a while.  There's work-arounds for a lot of those things.  My "shutdowns" are definitely first world problems.

 
I'm not smart nor particularly informed. But I think it means what we can do when out in any public place: masks, gloves, keeping apart from people, hand-washing/sanitizing and being really careful about touching anything, etc. Also each person can do their part by doing this. And definitely not going out to any places with even a case of the sniffles. 

But how anyone gets on a train, subway or bus I can't figure out.
Right, but can we MAKE people do that? I mean, I know a Governor or President could, but will they? Will people listen? There will be some people that more or less just go back to their normal way of interacting with people. 

 
But wasn't the whole mitigation effort and "closing" to simply flatten the curve? So we all don't all get it at once? 

In other words, it seems like we've moved from "look, most are going to get this - let's flatten to curve" to "it must be safe for everyone before we open again".
Yes, the goal of flattening the curve is to limit the amount of people who need hospitalization. The goal was never to eliminate the amount of people who need hospitalization. 

There is a benefit of people getting the virus, some being hospitalized, and some dying. That benefit is that we are taking steps towards herd immunity, which is one of the ways out of this mess. If we eliminate the amount of people who need hospitalization, then we stop taking steps towards that potential exit, and will need some other form of exit (such as a vaccine) to return to normal.

So yes, if social distancing is so effective that hospitals have empty beds and unused respirators, then the steps we are taking towards herd immunity is slower than it could be. Taking quicker steps does mean increased number of deaths, and that is a morbid thought. It's a hard thing to think about whether we should open up more businesses knowing that it will increase deaths. If the hospitals are already overwhelmed, than that's an easy answer.... NO! Opening up more businesses would overwhelm the hospitals. But if opening up more businesses would not overwhelm the hospitals, then achieving herd immunity will arrive sooner. And given we may never develop a vaccine, herd immunity needs to be seriously considered, even though it requires deaths to achieve. 

 
OR gov says first to open, when they have adequate ppe, will be medical facilities so people can get their non urgent procedures done. They had no new cases to report today but it will be a slow mo reopening. And OR isn't a real dense state compared to CA so May 1 isn't happening imo and probably everyones.

 
The small business aid is horrifically bad. A HUGE percentage of them took the loan believing they would qualify for it to be forgiven, but were forced to start the clock the moment they were approved for the loan, and that clock will run out well before they can achieve the requirements of forgiveness. Most of them just took on more debt at a time where they cannot afford to service that debt. It will result in more bankruptcies than it was intended to save. 
Can you please explain what people must do to qualify for loan forgiveness?

 
Right, but can we MAKE people do that? I mean, I know a Governor or President could, but will they? Will people listen? There will be some people that more or less just go back to their normal way of interacting with people. 
I think societal norms may help dictate that. Social shaming for those being reckless can be a motivator to do the right thing, maybe even more than the law. Not sure.

 
Instead, claims Streeck, his study found that: "There is no significant risk of catching the disease when you go shopping. Severe outbreaks of the infection were always a result of people being closer together over a longer period of time."
A lot of financial talk in here but I have a more medical/scientific question.  @gianmarco and other medical folks - I keep hearing this about longer exposure or more exposure.  I think I'm like most non-medical folks and look at this like it is binary.  I either get COVID or I don't.  Are the people who are dying that are younger ones that get extreme exposure or have underlying health issues?  More directly, my son still goes to work almost daily at a grocery store so he's exposed by I'm trying to understand our level of risk when he comes home.  I get the risk if I go shopping but with him coming home are we basically ok as long as we keep our distance from him?  I hate the idea that he has to go out and come home but happy that he's young and healthy and working to help others.  I'm just trying to gauge how concerned I should be.

 
Has there ever been a virus we couldn’t develop a vaccine for?

WOW surreal...

As I typed that, couple old timers on my block were yelling across the street to each other. “Until we get a vaccine, it’s never gonna stop.”

 
Influenza has a fast incubation period of 2 days. This is 6 days. 

John Barry author of The Great Influenza book about 1918 looks like a good read. 

 
Or maybe we start letting the able-bodied healthy people go out and start working and pay the "at risk" people to stay home?  I will gladly do my patriotic duty, sit home and take my  government money to play my PS4.  :P  I will emerge from my bunker when the all clear is issued.

 
Has there ever been a virus we couldn’t develop a vaccine for?

WOW surreal...

As I typed that, couple old timers on my block were yelling across the street to each other. “Until we get a vaccine, it’s never gonna stop.”
Lots of viruses don't have vaccines. HIV, for one, even though there are trials. RSV is a common childhood virus that also doesn't have a vaccine. Those are just 2 examples of many.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Has there ever been a virus we couldn’t develop a vaccine for?

WOW surreal...

As I typed that, couple old timers on my block were yelling across the street to each other. “Until we get a vaccine, it’s never gonna stop.”
HIV, SARS, MERS, jury's out on Ebola

 
Exactly! As much as is possible, couldn't the people who feel the way you and many others here do just try to do that? I know it's not perfect, but I think people need to start thinking about what they can do and how they will do it. 
Sure...they can and I hope they will.  What sucks is the people deciding against the right thing in favor of what they want are going to be putting hospitals and the healthcare community at a greater risk in exchange for their personal desires to be met.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top