What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** OFFICIAL *** COVID-19 CoronaVirus Thread. Fresh epidemic fears as child pneumonia cases surge in Europe after China outbreak. NOW in USA (11 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sort of grim, but I wonder if you could check infant mortality for something like that and tease something out, since what we know so far of COVID is that it affects the elderly the most, while the flu tends to affect both the very young and the elderly. I am not sure if flu deaths need a positive flu test to be recorded as such, or if flu like symptoms are good enough.
Definitely some merit to this possibility. I believe we will know one way or another and possibly soon. The process of going back with coroners to look at earlier deaths has just now begun in earnest.

 
Thanks for posting it. Didn't read the whole thing but will get back to it.  Great read for all those that constantly choose sides.

The conclusion itself is a must read, imo
Linked in that article is another article on Dr. Tedros

Interesting quote from that one:

Where possible, China wants to criminalize any speech … any social media … that does not follow the official party line. Where it’s not possible to criminalize that speech, China wants to ban it through the cooperative censorship of global tech and media platforms. Where it’s not possible to ban that speech, China wants to shame it into the shadows by getting us to reject it as “fake news”.

And if you don’t see that the United States is about two minutes behind China in doing the same damn thing, then you’re just not paying attention.

 
The tide is turning...

Michigan governor: Opening businesses that "pose very little risk" may be appropriate

Michigan ranks 7th in total cases out of all U.S. states, districts, and territories.

 If even Whitmer acknowledges it's time for some businesses to open, what's your excuse Nevada, Wisconsin, others?
Your last sentence tends to contradict your first sentence.

If the tide was truly turning, then you wouldn't need to ask why Nevada, Wisconsin another states have not joined the "tide."

 
Been a while since I checked into this thread.  Thanks to the early preppers in here I was able to stock up.  Now I'm almost out of toilet paper and hand soap.  Where the hell are people getting this stuff?  It's gone everywhere.  
I just got both at Sam's Club this past weekend.  Curbside pickup.  Had to order 2 days in advance, but was otherwise easy.

 
Your last sentence tends to contradict your first sentence.

If the tide was truly turning, then you wouldn't need to ask why Nevada, Wisconsin another states have not joined the "tide."
Because this literally broke this morning. If Michigan is preparing to start open some businesses, the excuse being made in Wisconsin and especially Nevada to stay closed will hold no weight as they both have far less severe situations. Both governors are trying to lean on other states as a lead but now even those states they've been leaning on, including California have begun easing restrictions. Their excuses are vanishing at an accelerating pace. The "we're just following such and such state" is a card they'll no longer be able to play.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'll tell my story again.  I related it up thread, but after consulting with my wife and niece, a couple of details have changed.  On Friday January 24th, my niece, a 34-year old first-grade teacher, asked my wife if she could watch her younger son (1) for a couple of hours the next day, so she could bring her older son (5) to a birthday party.  Wife went to niece's house that day to figure out how to use younger son's new car seat and stayed about 20 minutes.  Niece had a mild fever, but felt ok.  Next day, niece calls and says both kids are sick with fevers and she is taking them to urgent care. She feels better. Urgent care tests both kids for flu and both are negative.

Following day is Sunday and niece asks wife to keep her kids the next day so she can go to work.  Kids still have fevers and daycare won't take them.  Monday, the one-year-old is better and goes to daycare and my wife babysits 5-year-old all day.

Wednesday my wife comes down with a fever and cough.  Friday, I get fever and fatigue. Wife has fever for five days and cough for two weeks, the worst cough she's ever had.  I watched the Super bowl with a 101 fever and had fever for five days, with minor other symptoms (no cough).  I've never had a fever last that long and I was not back to normal (able to run and work out) for two solid weeks.

The severity of the symptoms, the kids negative flu test and the fact that both the wife and I had the flu shot all make me wonder if it was COVID-19.  The time frame, late January and early February makes me doubt that it was COVID.  It's possible we had the disease around here then, but we have had a very small outbreak overall here (340 confirmed cases in a Parish of 200,000 residents).  One would think it would have been huge if it was here already when schools were still open. 

I am guessing the probability is small, less than ten percent chance I had it.  I still want the antibody test.  I want to know for sure (and if I had it, I want to donate blood and plasma).
I would think unlikely but definately worth getting anti-body test when widely available.  If you did get it and had mild symptoms and recovered like that it is good news for you and your wife.  

 
This will be my last response to you on this, but you and a couple of others in this thread insist on following only the experts that fit your position.  I am not talking about Facebook post, etc.  It is the complete dismissal of potential conflicting ideas.  And yet we continue to be told we don't know enough about this virus........So which is it?  We know enough to dismiss alternative ideas outright?  Or we don't know enough and even the "experts" positions need to be looked at as not set? 

This point is getting bogged down with all the I believe I had it in Jan/Feb.  We should absolutely be critical of all "opinions" whether they fit someones ideas or not until there has been time for the medical/science community to vet their own theories.  Because I still believe almost all of the causes, numbers, etc are not fleshed out yet and are little more than theories that need to be proven with the scientific process.  We have to stop dismissing ideas outright that have a possibility of being correct.
No one is dismissing ideas.  We are looking at them skeptically.  The innocent question "hey I may have had it in January, what do you guys think" is fine.  I don't think anyone that presents that question is getting "dismissed".

But HERE is the issue.  There are a number of people pushing ideas in here that ALSO have an agenda.  That agenda is that we should open up the economy.  This agenda may not apply to you.

This is not necessarily a political agenda, but instead an agenda that our economy needs to be re-opened.  That argument is not unique to this website, but is an argument that is all over the internet.  People that have this agenda often believe the following:

1. They say the CFR is probably very low, closer to that of the flu

2. They are quick to latch onto drugs that have not been tested and gone through the trial process.  They will say things like "a doctor in New York had 100% success rate with hydroxychloroquine".  

3. They are quick to believe any studies that imply that we've reached or are close to reaching herd immunity.

4. They are quick to believe any studies that imply that the virus is far more widespread than we believe.  

5. They are noticeably not so quick to believe the official word from the WHO/CDC and are usually quick to ridicule those organizations that have done so much in this fight.

I don't have an issue with any of the above beliefs.  If someone feels that way, lets discuss it.  But when you're using these as a rationale for opening up the country, THAT IS WHEN I HAVE A PROBLEM.  

I think your point is well made and I'll make sure that in the future I try not to dismiss anyone's ideas.  But this is a deadly idea and there are a LOT OF PEOPLE that want to open it up because of fake crap that they read on the internet.  I don't know where you live, but you may not be all that worried about it.  I live in Tennessee and the governor wants to start opening things up next week.  So forgive me if I take this crap seriously and at times don't want to be polite and kind and understanding of all beliefs, including those that are being pushed by those that think this is a big overblown flu.

 
Because this literally broke this morning. If Michigan is preparing to start open some businesses, the excuse being made in Wisconsin and especially Nevada to stay closed will hold no weight as they both have far less severe situations. Both governors are trying to lean on other states as a lead but now even those states they've been leaning on, including California have begun easing restrictions. Their excuses are vanishing at an accelerating pace. The "we're just following such and such state" is a card they'll no longer be able to play.
@Ksquared, Mr A is a perfect example of what I was talking about.  Statements like "their excuses are vanishing at an accelerating pace" shows that his mind is made up.  

My mind is absolutely not made up. But until the science establishes it, which it hasn't, the quarantines and social distancing should continue.  

 
@Ksquared, Mr A is a perfect example of what I was talking about.  Statements like "their excuses are vanishing at an accelerating pace" shows that his mind is made up.  

My mind is absolutely not made up. But until the science establishes it, which it hasn't, the quarantines and social distancing should continue.  
Lol, who the heck's mind isn't made up that some appropriate businesses should be reopening? Even Gretchen Whitmer has conceded that.

That's all people like myself and others have been calling for. Yet you continue to try and assign thoughts and paint with broad strokes. You imply that we want some free for all reopening and that's never been further from the truth. I was right here posting dozens of links for people to buy masks a MONTH AGO. And look where we are today, one of the common restrictions in place for many businesses to be able to reopen is the wearing of masks by employees and customers.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
But beaches man...

New: Study of 318 outbreaks in China found transmission occurred out-of-doors in only one, involving just 2 cases. Most occurred in home or public transport. Raises key chance for states to move services outdoors (religious, gym classes, restaurants, etc). https://medrxiv.org/content/10.110
Yet we have tons of boat ramps closed of all things.....ridiculous.  Can't get much more socially distant than on a boat.

 
um....did the PSF get officially shut down or something?  90% of the last twoish pages belongs there.  :oldunsure:   

I AM glad people are finally acknowledging that things could have been here well before Late Jan, early Feb though.  As I stated in the PSF a month or so ago (at least it seems like it was that long ago), in that mindnumbingly dumb "death rate" tangent, at this point, "death rate" is going to be a guess this round...no idea when it ACTUALLY got here and was the cause of death for many who were diagnosed wrongly with something else.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rough calculations would translate to 2.7 million having had the virus in New York State. 

Or a .7% death rate as things stand now.
Yes, he estimated 0.55% with the caveat that "deaths at home" weren't included. 0.7% would seem about right given those additional deaths. 

Thoughts on how that impacts any decisions? 

 
@Ksquared, Mr A is a perfect example of what I was talking about.  Statements like "their excuses are vanishing at an accelerating pace" shows that his mind is made up.  

My mind is absolutely not made up. But until the science establishes it, which it hasn't, the quarantines and social distancing should continue.  
But I believe your previous post to this indicates your mind is made up in many areas and a lot of it is related to your political bias.  I have tried to stay out of the politics of this and you are correct that positions have been assigned to ideas by a political affiliation.  We all need to evaluate the information we have and try to remove the outside bias influences as much as possible. I am an engineer so I think in terms of hypothesis and theory development.  My main point is we do not know enough yet to reject legitimate possibilities because they do not fit our preconceived bias ... especially if it is related to a political position (on both sides).  Politics IMO is the opposite of a scientific approach and has to be removed as much as possible.

Because one political group grabbed a hold of a position early in this crisis, it should not keep us from thoroughly evaluating other positions as we continue to gain in the scientific knowledge of this virus.  We have to adapt since this truly is a novel virus and do not really understand all the details about it.

 
I didn't come in here every day, so forgive if this has all been discussed.

I can't recall the site, but the genome mapping project one that had mapped the virus's location according to lab samples... Did that get updated to show that the virus was present in the US prior to late January? Or was it otherwise debunked in general? 

 
The tide is turning...

Michigan governor: Opening businesses that "pose very little risk" may be appropriate

Michigan ranks 7th in total cases out of all U.S. states, districts, and territories.

 If even Whitmer acknowledges it's time for some businesses to open, what's your excuse Nevada, Wisconsin, others?
FWIW, all of these governors are in very difficult positions trying to determine the right way and time to re-open given the paucity of testing.  And so I have been doing a little thought experiment along the lines of what Fauci said early on about: if we do our job well, we will appear to have over-reacted.  In this case, it seems to me that governors are in a very similar situation in that they, too, are balancing a similar risk-reward strategy in which one week too early could make ALL the difference.  As such, my thought experiment would suggest that the right time to re-open is when about 80%+ think you should have re-opened already - because the populace sees all/most of the upside, but very little of the downside.  Does that make sense to anyone other than me?

 
Yes, he estimated 0.55% with the caveat that "deaths at home" weren't included. 0.7% would seem about right given those additional deaths. 

Thoughts on how that impacts any decisions? 
I think you have to include the deaths at home.  Also, if you assume 2.7 million people have it, a number of those will still die over the next 1-2 weeks. Let's say 500/day die over next 2 weeks, that's another 7k deaths.  I mean, we're looking at something 7-12 times worse than the flu.  I think that's kind of been the assumption of governments all along, so I don't see how this really changes anything from a policy perspective, but that's just me.  I'm sure some will disagree.

 
But I believe your previous post to this indicates your mind is made up in many areas and a lot of it is related to your political bias.  I have tried to stay out of the politics of this and you are correct that positions have been assigned to ideas by a political affiliation.  We all need to evaluate the information we have and try to remove the outside bias influences as much as possible. I am an engineer so I think in terms of hypothesis and theory development.  My main point is we do not know enough yet to reject legitimate possibilities because they do not fit our preconceived bias ... especially if it is related to a political position (on both sides).  Politics IMO is the opposite of a scientific approach and has to be removed as much as possible.

Because one political group grabbed a hold of a position early in this crisis, it should not keep us from thoroughly evaluating other positions as we continue to gain in the scientific knowledge of this virus.  We have to adapt since this truly is a novel virus and do not really understand all the details about it.
I don't have a political bias.  So not sure where you're headed there.

 
um....did the PSF get officially shut down or something?  90% of the last twoish pages belongs there.  :oldunsure:   

I AM glad people are finally acknowledging that things could have been here well before Late Jan, early Feb though.  As I stated in the PSF a month or so ago (at least it seems like it was that long ago), in that mindnumbingly dumb "death rate" tangent, at this point, "death rate" is going to be a guess this round...no idea when it ACTUALLY got here and was the cause of death for many who were diagnosed wrongly with something else.
About 3 pages ago, some guy seemed lost, posting and cheering on state poll numbers regarding the election. 
 

——————

GF already got her test back: negative. Probably just a sinus infection. 
 

Looks like people worried about coming into contact with people outdoors is unnecessary going forward. I might be a civil disobedient if they don’t open up the beaches here. Sure, I’m not hugging anyone, shaking hands, or even trying to walk right next to someone, but I’m going to the park, beach, etc. Stay in your bubble if you disagree. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Been a while since I checked into this thread.  Thanks to the early preppers in here I was able to stock up.  Now I'm almost out of toilet paper and hand soap.  Where the hell are people getting this stuff?  It's gone everywhere.  
Easy-to-find toilet paper returned here the weekend before Easter ... but not at every store. Have to ask around locally and see what places are doing the best job staying stocked with paper and at the same time not getting overrun with shoppers. Around here, that's the local WalMart Neighborhood Markets. Will likely be different in your area.

Our WalMart Neighborhood Markets also have hand soap now (still no sanitizer). But you can certainly get by with any kind of bar soap, or even dish soap, shampoo, etc. All will wash your hands just fine.

...

What I can't find locally yet is isopropyl alcohol and/or hydrogen peroxide. Would like to order online, maybe, but not if it's going to take a month to come in.

 
FWIW, all of these governors are in very difficult positions trying to determine the right way and time to re-open given the paucity of testing.  And so I have been doing a little thought experiment along the lines of what Fauci said early on about: if we do our job well, we will appear to have over-reacted.  In this case, it seems to me that governors are in a very similar situation in that they, too, are balancing a similar risk-reward strategy in which one week too early could make ALL the difference.  As such, my thought experiment would suggest that the right time to re-open is when about 80%+ think you should have re-opened already - because the populace sees all/most of the upside, but very little of the downside.  Does that make sense to anyone other than me?
It makes total sense. A lot of people including myself have also warned of and criticized governors whose immediate reaction to the guidelines was to reopen before the criteria was met. Above all else people want some direction. The Nevada governor set no standards for what it will take to reopen ANYTHING. No one here that I know is calling for a return to February and for everything to open tomorrow. What would be nice is some consistency and common sense. We have Whitmer saying you can't even mow your lawn and then on a dime she's talking about it being time for some businesses to reopen. What people want most of all is a plan with some specifics from their leaders. Very few are providing that. And that goes for governors on the reopen and stay closed side.

 
I don't think this is going to hold up to much scrutiny over time.

Without going into much detail I'll simply ask: 

NYC had cases in early Jan, had 11k cases by Mar 1, but didn't see their first fatality until Mar 14th, and didn't see 500 hospitalizations until Mar 22? With a doubling time of 2-3 days at that point? 

Okay... so the disease just suddenly got more lethal after 2+ months of just hanging out? 
Not really.  This is perfectly in line with Wuhan.  First cases in Wuhan in late Nov/Dec, peak 3 months later in mid-Feb.

First cases in NY in Jan, peak 3 months later in April.   Geometric progression.
Yeah, I didn't see anything objectionable in the NYT article, either. Just pushing the timeline back maybe 3 weeks.

 
 Have to ask around locally and see what places are doing the best job staying stocked with paper and at the same time not getting overrun with shoppers. Around here, that's the local WalMart Neighborhood Markets. 
WalMart Neighborhood Markets had best record around here too. Regular supermarket had worst.

 
But beaches man...

New: Study of 318 outbreaks in China found transmission occurred out-of-doors in only one, involving just 2 cases. Most occurred in home or public transport. Raises key chance for states to move services outdoors (religious, gym classes, restaurants, etc). https://medrxiv.org/content/10.110
Ok, this made me laugh as it just seems like the conclusion drawn is similar to Mike Tice's analysis that: Vikings' winning was highly correlated with Randy Moss getting 40%+ of the receiving targets.*  He thus concluded that in order to produce wins he should force feed Moss the ball to ensure he'd get 40%+ of the targets.  Guess what didn't happen after Moss was force fed targets? 

So, to be perfectly clear, just because few transmissions occurred out-of-doors doesn't mean that we can simply move ALL of our indoor behaviors  outside and expect the same results.  Which, I suspect you know...but still it kinda seems like you don't.  Because if you believe that, I have a study for you: VERY high positive correlation between elementary school-children and weight.  Specifically, the heavier the child the more knowledge they possess.  So, should we fatten up our children? OR do we conclude that maybe weight is highly correlated with age and age is highly correlated with knowledge?  IOW, 5th graders are heavier, older, and more knowledgeable than 2nd graders.   Correlation <> causation...even while I do think/understand there are some real benefits to outdoor activities (higher heat, humidity, and UV light) over indoor ones that MAY prove important in slowing the spread.

* don't quote me on the exact statistic as I doing this from memory and too lazy to look it up

 
Does 7=1?
It's closer to the flu than many thought. Nobody said it had to be exact. There have been some bad flu years. Also people at risk get flu shots limiting the death rate. The problems with CV wasn't death rate but the asymptomatic spread, the fact that vulnerable can't get vaccinated, and the fact that we didn't know anything about it. The lockdowns were still justified imo but I think when we look back years later we'll figure out the true death rate and realize it was basically the flu that we knew nothing about. 

 
The thing that is hard to figure out from that NY Times Article is how come SF did not blow up like NYC, if they had similar levels of infected March 1st. SF did not go on lock down until 3/16, so there should have been plenty of opportunity for it to spread. I know NYC is more dense than SF, but as the second most dense Metro area it should have still spread widely.
2-3 weeks prior to the lockdown a lot of the tech companies started having people work from home. That's what likely saved the Bay Area.

 
It makes total sense. A lot of people including myself have also warned of and criticized governors whose immediate reaction to the guidelines was to reopen before the criteria was met. Above all else people want some direction. The Nevada governor set no standards for what it will take to reopen ANYTHING. No one here that I know is calling for a return to February and for everything to open tomorrow. What would be nice is some consistency and common sense. We have Whitmer saying you can't even mow your lawn and then on a dime she's talking about it being time for some businesses to reopen. What people want most of all is a plan with some specifics from their leaders. Very few are providing that. And that goes for governors on the reopen and stay closed side.
Agree.  Not what any of us want, but we have to understand that most of these so-called "leaders" aren't really leaders.  Indeed, most "leaders" in all walks of life are not truly "leaders" they are managers.  Leaders do what you described above, but the political cost of leading on this issue is significant.  What I think you are seeing is many are taking a fast-follower approach UNLESS, as is the case in Michigan, there is real public outcry to act sooner/differently.  This isn't unique to governors, business leaders would rather fail together than risk failing alone.  It's alot easier to say to your board "everyone's stock is down because no one saw this coming" than it is to stick your nexk out against the crowd and risk being terminated IF your prediction doesn't come AND doesn't come on the timeline you predicted.  Heck, the only thing I disliked about The Big Short is that it made the dumb money out to be entirely dumb, when in fact alot of that dumb money read the personal risk-reward EXACTLY right.  Football coaches do this ALL the time when they punt on 4th down too often rather than look like fools - particularly noteworthy when it is being done solely to ensure the margin of defeat isn't TOO egregious.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I also totally disagree with your statement that people are dismissed and ridiculed.  If someone pops in and mentions a study, this thread does a great job of discussing it.  The issue is when someone has an agenda and only posts studies or doctors that agree with their agenda.
Quoted for truth. Skepticism is not ridicule.

For myself - if I am skeptical of an against-the-grain finding, I have tried to make sure I have at least explained why I don't buy into the against-the-grain finding. I'm sure my hit rate has not been 100% in doing this, though.
 

Also, let's not use the phrase "group think" when we're talking about the consensus of the experts.  There's an underlying idea by some that all doctors, all studies, all information should be considered equally.  That's 100% false.  If the scientific community leans one way and some new study comes out and goes in the entire other direction, it should be looked at very skeptically.  That's the way science should work.
Also, quoted for truth. As an addendum -- credentials don't make truth, or even really indicate anything the "truthiness" of a statement. Lots of people with stacks of PhDs peddle unsupported claims as close-enough "facts".

 
Easy-to-find toilet paper returned here the weekend before Easter ... but not at every store. Have to ask around locally and see what places are doing the best job staying stocked with paper and at the same time not getting overrun with shoppers. Around here, that's the local WalMart Neighborhood Markets. Will likely be different in your area.

Our WalMart Neighborhood Markets also have hand soap now (still no sanitizer). But you can certainly get by with any kind of bar soap, or even dish soap, shampoo, etc. All will wash your hands just fine.

...

What I can't find locally yet is isopropyl alcohol and/or hydrogen peroxide. Would like to order online, maybe, but not if it's going to take a month to come in.
Target is good most of the time here. I try to stay out of Walmart, and really Target as well, but the gf shops at Target religiously, it seems, and they always have paper towels. I stocked up on TP about a month before things got crazy, but somehow neglected paper towels. That's been good for me as I have used cloth napkins and towels more frequently, but I really don't have the fear some people have in overuse of paper products, other than questioning pine plantations vs. deciduous forests.

I'm about halfway done with my hand sanitizer for the truck, and of course I don't see that, alcohol, or even aloe to make my own anywhere.

 
Sweden is fascinating to watch IMO. Maybe their media isn't pumping death porn 24/7 because pictures I see from there seem totally normal. Most people without masks, drinking beers in pubs, shopping, gathering in parks, etc. I get that their death per M is higher than Denmark, but it's less than the UK, Italy, France, Spain, Belgium, etc. Not sure how it will work out for them or if they're already past peak like they've said, but I'm glad some country is trying something different to help gauge counter approaches to lockdowns.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11465420/sweden-still-has-fewer-new-cases-despite-no-lockdown/

 
Been a while since I checked into this thread.  Thanks to the early preppers in here I was able to stock up.  Now I'm almost out of toilet paper and hand soap.  Where the hell are people getting this stuff?  It's gone everywhere.  
We scored 96 rolls for $65 at a local custodial supply store a few weeks ago. Wife found out about it on the Nexdtdoor app. 

 
2-3 weeks prior to the lockdown a lot of the tech companies started having people work from home. That's what likely saved the Bay Area.
I work for a tech company based the Bay Area, though I don't live there.  Just looked back through my emails - my company started mandatory work from home on March 11. And I remember thinking at the time that we were late, as I know Google and many others started at least a week or two prior.  I think many tech companies were very on top of what was happening and proactive about WFH, far in advance of government mandates.

 
Justaflu bros are gonna end up being right
Justaflu bros won't ever be right. This is far more contagious than the flu. The problem is the "justaflu" label gets applied far too broadly. Justaflu bros are the extreme and low populated group of people who are congregating in the tens and hundreds demanding we open everything today and that this was all a hoax. A segment here and in other places wants to toss anyone who disagrees with them into that same bin. What's really funny and goes to your point is the fact that scientists and doctors have used the flu to compare and contrast from the start. Yet when anyone cited them, they drew the "justaflu" label from people here like everyone knows who. Now there are literally people from the CDC and the medical community admitting there is a likelihood many Covid-19 cases were mistaken as the flu. Just another example why painting others with broad strokes and "when in doubt - name call" is such a pathetic form of discussion.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://news.trust.org/item/20200423162137-vgafb
 

Sorry if posted. Unreal. Market went up 800 points after hours last week on rumor that Gilead drug Remdesivir had successful results in trial. Turns out it didn’t and whomever started that rumor probably did it to pump and dump, likely knowing the opposite. Company statement the next day said they couldn’t comment until results were reviewed, but that they looked forward to sharing them. Seemed a wink and nod that they were positive.

Should be a thorough investigation into the source of that false rumor, and aggressive prosecution.

Overall bad news as just yesterday it was being reported this drug was the most promising candidate for a scalable treatment.
There's reason to be skeptical of that particular study - performed in China, under-enrollment and it ended early as a result. There's several more that Gilead is running stateside. 

 
On upside, appears 14% or so in antibody study in NY showed presence. IF (big if) thats representative of a wider sample, then it’s good news for overall mortality. However, there is still no indication antibodies mean immunity from a single or multiple strains. And we still don’t know if some strains are more deadly, and will hit later. Decent news though.
I just read the following. No idea if that may or may not change things slightly.

“Cuomo noted that the survey was preliminary and limited by other factors. He said the testing targeted people who were out in society shopping, meaning that they may be more likely to be infected than people isolating at home.”

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's closer to the flu than many thought. Nobody said it had to be exact. There have been some bad flu years. Also people at risk get flu shots limiting the death rate. The problems with CV wasn't death rate but the asymptomatic spread, the fact that vulnerable can't get vaccinated, and the fact that we didn't know anything about it. The lockdowns were still justified imo but I think when we look back years later we'll figure out the true death rate and realize it was basically the flu that we knew nothing about. 
Worst flu season in the past 10 years was 61K deaths. We'll hit 50K coronavirus deaths by tomorrow and we'll top 60K by the end of the month.

You're wrong, shady.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top