What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** OFFICIAL *** COVID-19 CoronaVirus Thread. Fresh epidemic fears as child pneumonia cases surge in Europe after China outbreak. NOW in USA (13 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Unfortunately no. Already seeing pushback from doctors that this doesnt mean anything because we dont know infectious dose. 

And these arent no name people. If you google Angela Rasmussen you can see she is quoted all over the place. 
This has always been the case though, right?  The correct answer is "we don't know enough yet".  That sure seems like it to me.  What am I missing?  Anyone jumping to either side at this point should stop with the absolutes, no?

 
People just need to use a little sense (I know, I know):

Step 1 - Light a candle (birthday, aromatherapy, Roman ... it doesn't matter)
Step 2 - Don your favorite gaiter in such a way that you can abide by your local mask mandate
Step 3 - Lean down and attempt to blow out the candle. Really try ... don't softly whistle. Apply some lung power.

If candle goes out: Use something else for COVID-19 source control in public
If candle stays lit: Eh ... at least make sure the part of the gaiter covering your face is folded over so you have two layers of fabric over your mouth and nose. Or else get a proper mask.
Pretty much where I'm at.  We have some of these gaiters laying around the house because of our fishing escapades and hate for sunscreen.  I wore one, folded over three times when I couldn't find masks in the store.  It wasn't the most comfortable thing (though not unbearable).  I think I'm gonna do this experiment if I can remember where I put the gaiters :lol:   

 
Duke’s COVID mask study got much attention. But neck gaiter industry wants a do-over (The News & Observer, Raleigh, NC 8/11/2020)

(spoilered for length, but not really long)

The COVID-19 pandemic has been good for the neck gaiter business. Those tubes of fabric that people wear around their necks, usually to keep warm, also function as a mask by simply being pulled up over the nose and mouth.

But then researchers at Duke University published a study Friday that cast doubt on the use of neck gaiters to prevent the spread of the coronavirus. The researchers tested 15 types of masks and face coverings, but news coverage of their study has largely focused on one, the gaiter.

That’s because the gaiter they tested actually seemed to make things worse. While the various masks, to some degree, prevented droplets of potentially virus-laden moisture from getting into the air when someone speaks, the gaiter turned the larger droplets into a cloud of smaller ones that hung in the air longer.

“The use of such a mask might be counterproductive,” the researchers wrote in their paper, published in the journal Science Advances. The headline on The Washington Post article Tuesday morning was more direct: “Wearing a neck gaiter may be worse than no mask at all, researchers find.”

Headlines like that have caused turmoil in the neck gaiter industry, which consists of hundreds of gaiter manufacturers and other companies that print art or words on the garments and sell them, said Chris Bernat.

GAITERS KEEPING BUSINESSES ALIVE
Bernat works for Vapor Apparel based near Charleston, South Carolina, and sits on the board of the Printing United Alliance, a trade group that includes several textile companies. Vapor mostly sells sun-protection clothing but has seen sales of its gaiters rise 450% in the past two months as people use them as coronavirus masks, Bernat said in an interview.

“A lot of people in our industry are literally keeping their businesses alive with this,” he said.

But not all gaiters are alike, Bernat says. Better, thicker materials distinguish a high-quality gaiter from what he calls a “giveaway gaiter,” one meant more for promotion than clothing.

“I have a feeling that whatever gaiter was in their lab was probably a giveaway gaiter,” he said.

Bernat said he reached out to the Duke researchers to see if they would test higher-quality gaiters made by his company, confident that they would perform better at preventing droplets from getting through.

He had not heard back as of Tuesday afternoon.

‘PRETTY THIN’ MATERIAL
Martin Fischer, the Duke physicist who designed the study, noted Monday that they tested only one neck gaiter, made of polyester mixed with a little spandex. In an interview, he described the material as “pretty thin” and said it got thinner when you stretch it over your mouth and nose.

Fischer said the study was never meant to be a comprehensive test of all masks and mask materials. Instead, the Duke researchers wanted to show how easy it is to test the effectiveness of the wide variety of masks that people are wearing to protect themselves and others from coronavirus.
 
Kinda stops the "social distancing is enough" shtick at least, right?
You're new here, welcome  :D

I think many people knew that a sun gaiter through which you can blow out a candle would not confer much protection. Sure, some people didn't know better, used such gaiters, and thus got away with "half-arsing" their compliance with local mask mandates.
Unfortunately no, most people don't. Not knocking you Doug, more kidding than anything else but I think you've seen throughout this response just how 1. ridiculous people can be on this topic and B. the lack of common sense afforded to the general population.

People just need to use a little sense (I know, I know)
You sir, are living in some dystopian world of which I am not familiar 

 
The restaurants I go to (for pickup) uniformly use gaiters, as do a ton of outdoor workers.  This isn't great news for them.

 
Can you get a read on what kind of gaiters they are? Might be hard to tell from a distance.
The majority are sports logo licenced.  The local sports teams made a big show out of passing out a ton of these MLS, NBA, leading this charge.  

The Mavericks have licensed with "foco" for this it would seem.  

 
Oh.

Miami-Dade County reported 4,141 additional confirmed cases of COVID-19, and 30 new deaths, according to Florida’s Department of Health. The county now has 139,271 confirmed cases and 1,939 deaths.

Florida’s Department of Health says the county’s single-day high of 4,141 newly confirmed cases is “not reflective of current trends” because it was caused by a backlog of testing data dating back to June 23 from Niznik Lab Corp in Miami.

“The lab reported over 4,000 cases occurring over the past 7 weeks, but which had not been reported to DOH until today,” the health department wrote on Twitter. “Therefore, this backlog severely skews today’s daily report for Miami-Dade & is not reflective of current trends.”

 
Can you get a read on what kind of gaiters they are? Might be hard to tell from a distance.
The majority are sports logo licenced.  The local sports teams made a big show out of passing out a ton of these MLS, NBA, leading this charge.  

The Mavericks have licensed with "foco" for this it would seem.  
I thought as much -- from my Raleigh, NC News & Observer link upthread:

But not all gaiters are alike, Bernat says. Better, thicker materials distinguish a high-quality gaiter from what he calls a “giveaway gaiter,” one meant more for promotion than clothing.

“I have a feeling that whatever gaiter was in their lab was probably a giveaway gaiter,” he said.

Bernat said he reached out to the Duke researchers to see if they would test higher-quality gaiters made by his company, confident that they would perform better at preventing droplets from getting through.

He had not heard back as of Tuesday afternoon.

 
This has always been the case though, right?  The correct answer is "we don't know enough yet".  That sure seems like it to me.  What am I missing?  Anyone jumping to either side at this point should stop with the absolutes, no?
This sounds all well and good, but when inaction or the recommendation of inaction is what accompanies the "we dont know enough yet," it functions the same as an absolute in the other direction. 

There are tons of anecdotal stories that show aerosol spread is likely a problem. There are modeling studies that have shown aerosol spread could be a big problem. They have determined that live infectious virus can float in the air. They have determined that small particles from your mouth can remain in the air for a long time.

Now there are three things you can say after learning those things. 

1. We should definitely be taking precautions to minimize this kind of spread which we cant say with absolute certainty is happening, but we think it has a very high probability.

2. No way, it is ridiculous, it cant spread that way. 

3. We still need to wait and see. 

2 and 3 both have the same action plan and function as the same absolute. 

 
Oh.

Miami-Dade County reported 4,141 additional confirmed cases of COVID-19, and 30 new deaths, according to Florida’s Department of Health. The county now has 139,271 confirmed cases and 1,939 deaths.

Florida’s Department of Health says the county’s single-day high of 4,141 newly confirmed cases is “not reflective of current trends” because it was caused by a backlog of testing data dating back to June 23 from Niznik Lab Corp in Miami.

“The lab reported over 4,000 cases occurring over the past 7 weeks, but which had not been reported to DOH until today,” the health department wrote on Twitter. “Therefore, this backlog severely skews today’s daily report for Miami-Dade & is not reflective of current trends.”
Count me out on trusting Florida's data, unfortunately.

 
Count me out on trusting Florida's data, unfortunately.
Major foul-up by the lab in Miami which means past numbers reported should adjusted. DOH is investigating. A big question is whether those who tested positive were informed in a timely manner.

That said, the metrics from individual hospitals, emergency calls, positivity rate all indicate a downward trend.

Two people to follow:

Ben Conarck of the Miami Herald

Marc Bevand, whose code and data sources are on github

>> Today Florida reported 212 covid deaths among state residents. They are shown by the darkest blue layer added to the bar chart (left) The rainbow chart (right) indicates we are past peak deaths: curves for the last few days since 8/6 are not as steep. <<

 
Oh.

Miami-Dade County reported 4,141 additional confirmed cases of COVID-19, and 30 new deaths, according to Florida’s Department of Health. The county now has 139,271 confirmed cases and 1,939 deaths.

Florida’s Department of Health says the county’s single-day high of 4,141 newly confirmed cases is “not reflective of current trends” because it was caused by a backlog of testing data dating back to June 23 from Niznik Lab Corp in Miami.

“The lab reported over 4,000 cases occurring over the past 7 weeks, but which had not been reported to DOH until today,” the health department wrote on Twitter. “Therefore, this backlog severely skews today’s daily report for Miami-Dade & is not reflective of current trends.”
Yeah, we had several of those "catch-ups" and system maintenance windows that caused big one-day numbers which weren't all attributed to that particular day. That's what made me start looking closer at the 14-day trends and the positivity percentage numbers moreso than the daily case numbers.

ETA: Now we don't update at all on Saturdays.  And just from looking through my own data, you can see a pretty regular pattern in little rises and falls in numbers of tests processed on different days of the week. I'd guess it has something to do with the way they collect their data from different entry points.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This has always been the case though, right?  The correct answer is "we don't know enough yet".  That sure seems like it to me.  What am I missing?  Anyone jumping to either side at this point should stop with the absolutes, no?
This sounds all well and good, but when inaction or the recommendation of inaction is what accompanies the "we dont know enough yet," it functions the same as an absolute in the other direction. 

There are tons of anecdotal stories that show aerosol spread is likely a problem. There are modeling studies that have shown aerosol spread could be a big problem. They have determined that live infectious virus can float in the air. They have determined that small particles from your mouth can remain in the air for a long time.
I'm happy to treat aerosol spread as absolutely settled science. It would be a huge shock IMHO if, five years down the line, there were new information that made science say "Erm ... so aerosol spread really had nothing to do with it". It's not a 50-50 call at this point ... it's not "maybe we know, maybe we don't". We know.

 
I'm happy to treat aerosol spread as absolutely settled science. It would be a huge shock IMHO if, five years down the line, there were new information that made science say "Erm ... so aerosol spread really had nothing to do with it". It's not a 50-50 call at this point ... it's not "maybe we know, maybe we don't". We know.
I agree with you. I have no idea how else you could explain so many super spreading events. 

Mostly just addressing that even if you think it isn't settled science, sitting on your hands is the exact same thing as acting as if it is settled science the other direction. 

 
I assume they know the date of the test so why not just tabulate tests based on that date rather than the date that the lab returns the results? Or, better yet, do both and present both data/graphs to the public?

 
Arizona appears to have flattened the curve a bit on hospitalizations. Good. 
Arizona is certainly an interesting case and possibly a sign of how beneficial masks are. AZ did mask mandates by city/county and mainly just shut down bars and gyms. Restaurants remained open with only slight additional restrictions. Many bar-like establishments also were able to stay open because they did it based on license. 

While it’s still bad here definite improvements are being seen with these minimal (IMO) rollbacks. Hospital numbers are dropping across the board and cases both in number and percent positive have dropped like a rock. Demand for testing has gone way down too but that could be due to testing fatigue after long lines and delays in results for most of July. The labs are now caught up and getting test results back quickly and ASU has a spit test that’s even quicker.

Large number of reported deaths today but that’s to be expected.

 
I assume they know the date of the test so why not just tabulate tests based on that date rather than the date that the lab returns the results? Or, better yet, do both and present both data/graphs to the public?
We (here in my area, that have been tracking numbers) have been asking this since March, when the first data "glitch" happened in their reporting system. You know they have to have that piece of data available. Makes no sense to not report it. Same goes for hospital/ICU capacity vs current censuses. I would think all states have a state department that monitors that. I know our state does.  I guess this is when it would be beneficial to have a supreme data overlord that could make that a requirement for everywhere to report those things for data consistency. 

 
This sounds all well and good, but when inaction or the recommendation of inaction is what accompanies the "we dont know enough yet," it functions the same as an absolute in the other direction. 

There are tons of anecdotal stories that show aerosol spread is likely a problem. There are modeling studies that have shown aerosol spread could be a big problem. They have determined that live infectious virus can float in the air. They have determined that small particles from your mouth can remain in the air for a long time.

Now there are three things you can say after learning those things. 

1. We should definitely be taking precautions to minimize this kind of spread which we cant say with absolute certainty is happening, but we think it has a very high probability.

2. No way, it is ridiculous, it cant spread that way. 

3. We still need to wait and see. 

2 and 3 both have the same action plan and function as the same absolute. 
I'm not sure the bold is true.  If we are in "wait and see" mode, to me, "plan for the worst, hope for the best" is the logical step.  That would mean "wear the mask and if it turns out we didn't need them all that time so be it....now we know".  I don't see that being the same action as #2.

 
I assume they know the date of the test so why not just tabulate tests based on that date rather than the date that the lab returns the results? Or, better yet, do both and present both data/graphs to the public?
Requires planning and thought, you must be new here too, welcome!

For the record, I agree, not sure why this is so difficult unless there are agendas afoot.

 
My 18 year old son had a friend over our house this past weekend.  His friend informed us this morning that he just tested positive. He is asymptomatic and was only tested because he’s leaving for college next week and the school requires a negative test for all student athletes before they can attend practices. 
 

So, I just took my family of four for testing less than an hour ago in Palm Beach County, FL. I was told I should have our results in 2-3 days. 

 
I'm not sure the bold is true.  If we are in "wait and see" mode, to me, "plan for the worst, hope for the best" is the logical step.  That would mean "wear the mask and if it turns out we didn't need them all that time so be it....now we know".  I don't see that being the same action as #2.
I dont remember all those doctors and public health officials in february and March speaking that way about masks. 

 
My 18 year old son had a friend over our house this past weekend.  His friend informed us this morning that he just tested positive. He is asymptomatic and was only tested because he’s leaving for college next week and the school requires a negative test for all student athletes before they can attend practices. 
 

So, I just took my family of four for testing less than an hour ago in Palm Beach County, FL. I was told I should have our results in 2-3 days. 
Hope your results 1. come back and 2. come back negative

My daughter, who leaves for college this weekend, was just discussing this with me. Her roommate from last year is moving into a house with 3 other girls. One of them has been there for the last few weeks and just informed the others that she tested positive so as schools begins on the 17th, the other 3 are out of pocket for at least 2 weeks. I fear this is going to turn into a cluster #### of epic proportion as 35,000 kids descend on Columbia, SC.

 
Hope your results 1. come back and 2. come back negative

My daughter, who leaves for college this weekend, was just discussing this with me. Her roommate from last year is moving into a house with 3 other girls. One of them has been there for the last few weeks and just informed the others that she tested positive so as schools begins on the 17th, the other 3 are out of pocket for at least 2 weeks. I fear this is going to turn into a cluster #### of epic proportion as 35,000 kids descend on Columbia, SC.
Yep. And on every other college campus having in-person classes. Hopefully they all have solid plans in place when positives arise. 

 
I dont remember all those doctors and public health officials in february and March speaking that way about masks. 
ok?  you won't get any disagreement from me that the general public is pretty lazy and likes people to tell them what to do, well until it's something they don't want to do that is.

 
Yep. And on every other college campus having in-person classes. Hopefully they all have solid plans in place when positives arise. 
My daughter has 5 classes this semester, one in person, 4 online. Her friend that I mentioned has all online classes. Just seems really transparent to bring all the kids back and tout the safety of the children when it's incredibly apparent you just want the cash generated from having students onsite.

I give it a month before they go all virtual and have to shut down stuff or send kids home. Just not at all optimistic 35,000 students under the age of 23 are going to pull this off.

 
@Nathan R. Jessep

They are doing this on the Louisiana Dept. of Health daily update now.  It's very helpful.
Nice! Thanks for calling that to my attention.  I hadn't checked the other tabs lately, as I usually just pull my data from the main data screen. I see they added some of the charts on hospitalization by region that they have always used in the press conferences.  Now, one thing I'd like to see added on the "# of cases by collection date" is the number of tests on those same dates. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yep. And on every other college campus having in-person classes. Hopefully they all have solid plans in place when positives arise. 
Schools will be just like everywhere else, do the right things for awhile until it becomes overwhelming. At the beginning of the pandemic, you’d hear about any business with an employee who tested positive, now I have no clue how many people have tested positive in my own store and I’m in management. There was even someone who I am in regular contact with who was positive and I was never told.

Many pharmacies have drastically changed their post exposure procedures too. Initially some places were replacing their entire staff with any exposure which was excessive. Then they would send staff home if other staff tested positive. Now your lucky if they do anything. If you don’t have symptoms and waiting for test results a lot of places will expect you to keep working.

Schools will be the same if they stay open. The quarantining of all exposed students will stop. Schools will be less forthcoming with information and some students just won’t be in school for a couple weeks. Those are really the only two options, shut it down or stop disclosing as much information. What’s happening now won’t last long.

 
I'm curious as my daughter mentioned it to me, what happens for in person classes when a student tests positive? How do they continue with the class? Seems like you'll almost have to have some online option. But then you have lab classes that are hands on, how do you make up 2 weeks of that? Will certainly be an interesting year.

 
BIL was out of work for 2 days with high fever and intestinal stuff and figured it was just food poisoning. Didn’t tell anyone about it and assumed it went away. He is close to his parents in Milwaukee and dumb/lazy. My MIL has lots of underlying health issues and he just thought it would be fine just heading over to their house tomorrow. If it’s just food poisoning, then a COVID test will be negative and life goes on. If he tests positive, then he will hopefully avoid his parents and everyone else until he’s good to go. This is so frustrating, but seems common, irresponsible, and self-defeating. 
 

ETA: He was told to get tested so hoping he actually does. 
Update: Looks like in-laws now need to get tested as they are complaining of chest pain and shortness of breath. Keep in mind they were visited by my BIL on Sunday. I’m not saying he is responsible (didn’t bother to get tested), but the timing is suspect. Hoping for the best here, but it could have been easily avoided (at least my BIL)  :wall:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just some reading ... articles that synthesize the current state of knowledge about COVID-19 transmission.

Forty percent of people with coronavirus infections have no symptoms. Might they be the key to ending the pandemic?
New research suggests that some of us may be partially protected due to past encounters with common cold coronaviruses (Washington Post, 8/8/2020)


The Good (But Not Great) News About T-Cells and Herd Immunity (New York magazine, 8/9/2020)

From the New York article:

Over the last few months, coronavirus contrarians and those hoping for more optimistic news have spent a fair amount of time focusing on two particular areas of apparent weirdness. The first is how the heterogeneity of the disease’s spread affects the threshold of herd immunity — the point at which enough people in a community have been exposed to the disease that it can no longer really spread. If that point arrives sooner than was projected early in the pandemic, when a rough, conventional-wisdom calculation held that herd immunity would require between 60 percent and 80 percent of a community to be exposed, it would mean that the “end” would be coming much sooner, too — and perhaps that some hard-hit places, like New York City, had already reached a point of relative safety.

The second is how the heterogeneity of the immune response affects disease outcomes across a population: who gets mildly sick, who gets very sick, who recovers, and who dies. Some of those looking for good news have been especially focused on the heterogeneity of the T-cell aspects of the immune response, because a handful of studies have found that a quite significant number of people unexposed to the coronavirus nevertheless exhibited what are called “cross-reactive” T-cell immune responses to the disease. In other words, you didn’t necessarily need to catch COVID-19 for your T-cells to know how to fight it, because previous exposure to similar coronaviruses (chiefly the common cold) had already taught your immune systems how to respond to this one.

In both cases, the picture remains somewhat uncertain; all research into COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 is very young. But the early returns suggest that while the maximalist interpretation of each hypothesis is not very credible — herd immunity has probably not been reached in many places, and cross-reactive T-cell response almost certainly does not functionally immunize those who have it — more modest interpretations appear quite plausible. It may well be the case that some amount of community protection kicks in below 60 percent exposure, and possibly quite a bit below that threshold, and that those who exhibit a cross-reactive T-cell immune response, while still susceptible to infection, may also have some meaningful amount of protection against severe disease.

 
The restaurants I go to (for pickup) uniformly use gaiters, as do a ton of outdoor workers.  This isn't great news for them.
Right now they believe they are doing the right thing to prevent the spread, but they are putting their health, and the health of others, at risk.  With this news they can adjust their behavior to make their precautions effective.  To me, that's very good news.  Same with bandanas.

 
I was wondering why you posted this, but I just figured it out.

Leg gaiters may well exist ... but neck gaiters are often "neck" gaiters :)  
I have no idea what this conversation means at this point. I didnt understand what you meant by neck and gaiter being redundant and now I am even more confused. 

side tangent but this reminds me of a notepad we got in the mail once to advertise a realtor. It said he had ”33" years of experience. 

No idea why 33 was in quotes. 

ETA: I see he sent out a new one. Now it is "35" years. and he will get you "highest sales price"

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have no idea what this conversation means at this point. I didnt understand what you meant by neck and gaiter being redundant and now I am even more confused. 

side tangent but this reminds me of a notepad we got in the mail once to advertise a realtor. It said he had ”33" years of experience. 

No idea why 33 was in quotes. 
He means red neck when referring to “neck” gaiters. Though I guess it should be ‘neck gaiters.

We have a realtor here that advertises 75 years of experience. He is in his 30’s. I assume he means cumulative experience of all of the staff.

 
I was wondering why you posted this, but I just figured it out.

Leg gaiters may well exist ... but neck gaiters are often "neck" gaiters :)  
I think you have it backwards...."gaiters" as I've ever known them are "leg warmers"....they were just "gaiters" though...so "leg gaiter" would have been redundant.  :oldunsure:  

 
Just some reading ... articles that synthesize the current state of knowledge about COVID-19 transmission.

Forty percent of people with coronavirus infections have no symptoms. Might they be the key to ending the pandemic?
New research suggests that some of us may be partially protected due to past encounters with common cold coronaviruses (Washington Post, 8/8/2020)


The Good (But Not Great) News About T-Cells and Herd Immunity (New York magazine, 8/9/2020)

From the New York article:
What I’m curious about is whether the 40% that have no symptoms have no effects at all. With all the reports of this thing leaving people with damaged organs, I wonder if it’s possible that people have damage from the virus and may not even know it. Certainly hope that’s not the case obviously.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top