-fish-
Footballguy
Girlfriend? I totally agree.Had one for about three weeks...so freakin' annoying.
Girlfriend? I totally agree.Had one for about three weeks...so freakin' annoying.
"Two years into this thing" is a wild mis-framing of the situation though. Vaccines are free and widely available and have been for some time. If you're vaccinated, covid-19 is a respiratory bug not that different from the flu. You know this just as well as I do. It's not a controversial point. If anything, I'm over-hyping it because a lot of people experience this as more like a cold.2 years into this thing, almost 1 million dead in this country alone and the leading cause of death in that time, and we still have posts questioning why people test, why we worry about "very small percentages", and even asking if we are hypochondriacs.
Time to just shake my head and back out for a little. Frustrating and disappointing, to say the least.
But conditions are changing rapidly, aren't they? In which case talking about what to do now within the context of the last two years loses meaning.2 years into this thing, almost 1 million dead in this country alone and the leading cause of death in that time, and we still have posts questioning why people test, why we worry about "very small percentages", and even asking if we are hypochondriacs.
Time to just shake my head and back out for a little. Frustrating and disappointing, to say the least.
I'm stealing for future use."just to be safe, we better panic".
As you've always been a reasonable and level-headed poster, I'm going to ignore the "you're being that guy" comment in the current setting. I will offer this:"Two years into this thing" is a wild mis-framing of the situation though. Vaccines are free and widely available and have been for some time. If you're vaccinated, covid-19 is a respiratory bug not that different from the flu. You know this just as well as I do. It's not a controversial point. If anything, I'm over-hyping it because a lot of people experience this as more like a cold.
(Unvaccinated people are still hugely at risk, but I'm not unvaccinated and there's not a thing I can do about the people who aren't so leave me out of that. Take it up with them.)
What we're asking is that people kindly recognize that it isn't March 2020 anymore. I was all in favor of school closures, lockdowns, masks, distancing, etc. back then because we had a novel virus circulating among an immunologically naive population. Circumstances on the ground are night and day different now, and it's frustrating that people refuse to accept that.
You know how irritating is is when our resident anti-vax posters come in here and post quotes from like November 2020 or something and get all indignant about how folks have changed their tune since then, and you patiently explain that of course people change their behaviors when the facts on the ground have changed? You're being that guy.
If you would like to argue that omicron is a big deal on a macro scale because of the sheer number of people getting infected right now, I agree with you 100%. People should really attend to their personal health and safety for the next 4-6 weeks while this wave clears out. But on a micro level, getting omicron is not a major issue. If I get covid, I probably won't enjoy it but I will be fine. It will not be a catastrophe that has befallen House Karamazov. We've all been sick before and we'll be sick again. It will be fine.
Okay, why ARE they there if it's Omicron and no risk factors?Those in the hospital (with Omicron) are there because they need to be there (risk factors or not). And those numbers are through the roof and affecting every aspect of medical care.
No, that's all fair. I wasn't being sarcastic or anything when I said that I agree with you about the macro effects of omicron. I get that an extremely contagious virus can be damaging to our health care system even if it's a little less severe than previous variants.As you've always been a reasonable and level-headed poster, I'm going to ignore the "you're being that guy" comment in the current setting. I will offer this:
Our hospital numbers now are the worst they've been in the last 2 years and that's WITH vaccinations. Covid positivity in the hospital here is almost 50%. And most of those aren't just "with Covid". Of course I'm speaking about a macro level because that affects all of us.
And, based on some of these comments (not just from you), I don't know if all are aware that you don't get admitted and stay in a hospital because you want to or ask to be there. That's not how it works. Those in the hospital (with Omicron) are there because they need to be there (risk factors or not). And those numbers are through the roof and affecting every aspect of medical care.
I don't expect everyone to have a full understanding of what's going on now in the healthcare setting but I would suggest giving a little benefit of the doubt to those that do (like some in this thread) and believe when it's being said that things are not good now. Because they are not.
Well, it's one of 2 options:Okay, why ARE they there if it's Omicron and no risk factors?
1) Indignance isn't an argument, but I'll let it goWell, it's one of 2 options:
1) Doctors across the nation have no idea what they are doing since they are the ones who decide who gets admitted to the hospital and who doesn't
Or
2) Omicron is still Covid and still gets some people really, really sick. Risk factors are just that. Higher risk means you are more likely to get sick than low or no risk. But low and no risk can and still do get sick.
I'll let you decide for yourself which of the above it is.
Is this a real question?Okay, why ARE they there if it's Omicron and no risk factors?
You said it already on the last pageOkay, why ARE they there if it's Omicron and no risk factors?
Of course it is. All I've seen and read is that Omicron symptoms are, relative to the other variants, really not that concerning for the overwhelming majority.Is this a real question?
This makes me sick to my stomach. Really hoping I don't see a letter like for my wife. Ugh.We are starting 2022 in a place we never wanted to be, as COVID-19 has resurged stronger than ever. Our patient cases and hospitalizations are climbing at a rate we have not experienced before, and our own team members are getting sick in record numbers. We have been making plans to alleviate pressures on our team members and continue caring for patients through this latest surge. With inpatient COVID census at more than 500 this morning, which is the highest level we’ve seen since the pandemic started, we will be taking all but urgent and emergent procedures off the schedule until further notice, beginning Thursday, January 6. This decision is not being made lightly and a great deal of thought and planning has informed our next steps. While it’s impossible to know how long the current surge may last, we anticipate the worst to continue through the month of January.
Just hard to tell- what's the other plausible answer to why they're in the hospital other than "they're sick"?Of course it is. All I've seen and read is that Omicron symptoms are, relative to the other variants, really not that concerning for the overwhelming majority.
I'm just asking for elucidation since I have never been one to eat/sleep/breathe COVID.
It's difficult to find that without a heaping of snark, though.
@Terminalxylem, @gianmarco, @ProstheticRGK, @ghostguy123, @growlers and other medical folks:Okay, why ARE they there if it's Omicron and no risk factors?
We can only do that if our health care system has the capacity to handle the flux of patients coming through the doors. Obviously, it cannot right now.@Terminalxylem, @gianmarco, @ProstheticRGK, @ghostguy123, @growlers and other medical folks:
Isn't there a kind of inherent chaotic quality about COVID in general? Such that even people with no risk factors -- and plenty of them, even if percentages are small -- often end up with poor outcomes?
I don't even mean death, necessarily. Hospitalization, being hit much harder than statistics would dictate, lingering symptoms, not being "back to normal" for an extended period, etc.
There's going to be a point where society has to kind of collectively "let go" and take whatever damage COVID can still inflict. I agree with the medical folks that time is not yet upon us. And no, I don't know when we'll be on the off-ramp -- probably won't see it coming.
I think you’re buying too much into ‘Omicron is milder’ and that’s where the disconnect is. Yes it might be milder to many but that is largely due to vaccinations, prior natural immunity and improvements in treatment. There are still many people who are and will get seriously sick from this variant and fill up hospitals.Of course it is. All I've seen and read is that Omicron symptoms are, relative to the other variants, really not that concerning for the overwhelming majority.
I'm just asking for elucidation since I have never been one to eat/sleep/breathe COVID.
It's difficult to find that without a heaping of snark, though.
It's an enormous strain on healthcare in general. Forget Covid for a minute. NON COVID people are ending up with worse health outcomes than they normally would when health care was more accessible.....say 2 years ago.@Terminalxylem, @gianmarco, @ProstheticRGK, @ghostguy123, @growlers and other medical folks:
Isn't there a kind of inherent chaotic quality about COVID in general? Such that even people with no risk factors -- and plenty of them, even if percentages are small -- often end up with poor outcomes?
I don't even mean death, necessarily. Hospitalization, being hit much harder than statistics would dictate, lingering symptoms, not being "back to normal" for an extended period, etc.
There's going to be a point where society has to kind of collectively "let go" and take whatever damage COVID can still inflict. I agree with the medical folks that time is not yet upon us. And no, I don't know when we'll be on the off-ramp -- probably won't see it coming.
After her fever spiked again her primary said to go to the ER to get checked for pneumonia. It was a zoo, but to the credit of the health care workers, we were in and out in just over 2 hours. She was triaged at the check-in desk, got a chest x-ray, and was examined by an ER doc in the lobby. Some people were getting seen in the hospital chapel. Nobody was taken to a room unless they were being admitted. Most people were examined in the lobby or an adjacent hallway.-fish- said:roverkid got sick on Sunday. Fever, cough, aches, etc. Went to urgent care, where they tested her for Covid, influenza A and influenza B. All negative. Sent her home and told her to take over the counter cold meds. This is exactly what they did to two other people I know, both of whom ended up having viral pneumonia. Tried teledoc, where after 4.5 hours they gave her a cough suppressant.
She spiked a fever of 102 last night. Her primary is two weeks out and says go to urgent care.
correct... all around the mouth but not throat for some reason. I just followed protocol for the study.Leeroy Jenkins said:So an all over mouth swab, but you don't need to swab the throat? Is this how we should be doing all of the at-home tests now?
I get the point of the post, but if the goal is to stop the spread of disease for a host of reasons (pick the poison that matters to you)... getting the virus is a failure.IvanKaramazov said:Seriously, I think a lot of people talked themselves into the proposition that getting covid-19 is some kind of moral failure on their part.
-fish- said:Girlfriend? I totally agree.
Biff84 said:I think you’re buying too much into ‘Omicron is milder’ and that’s where the disconnect is. Yes it might be milder to many but that is largely due to vaccinations, prior natural immunity and improvements in treatment. There are still many people who are and will get seriously sick from this variant and fill up hospitals.
Most of those people are unvaccinated and as someone who has spent the last year vaccinating and boosting as many people as I can, I understand not caring one bit about those people. But it won’t be just them that it effects. There will be serious breakthrough cases and there will be people who will other health care treatment disrupted by what’s happening.
But most of all when we see these declarations of COVID being over it’s a slap in the face of the healthcare workers who have no choice but have their life revolve around COVID. People being asked to keep working while sick. But when we speak up and say things are really bad it’s met with ‘can you keep it down over there, we’re trying to live our life’. I’m just a retail pharmacist, I can only imagine what it’s like for those people on the frontline watching these patients die. Trust me, we all want this to be over, probably more than you. It’s not.
Yep. I had that head cold for the past 6-7 days.[icon] said:The Girlfriend (moderna boosted the week before Christmas) has been fairly sick for a few days now. Cough with a rattle, head cold. Have tested her twice, including once with the omicron-preferred oral swab following the main study's methodology (no food/drink for 30mins, cough into hand/arm 3-4 times, then swab inner cheek / tongue / gums / palate for 30 seconds).... negative both times.
A buddy's wife and daughter had the same symptoms and he ran a PCR on them (owns 3 children's clinics who do testing) and they were negative.
Seems like there's a good head cold going around too.
Is this a serious question?matuski said:Why in the hell would an asymptomatic person test?
Sorry to hear they're behaving like bums.jobarules said:In my brother and his wife's case, they were both close contacts and wanted to get off work for a week.
Both from what I've read and from what my doctor told me today on my monthly appointment, antigen tests deliver about 20% false negatives. She wasn't worried about my negative antigen test on Sunday since I'd had a negative PCR test 6 days earlier.Leeroy Jenkins said:They are still pretty reliable, especially if symptomatic. Nothing is 100% these days.matuski said:Ah no, the at home tests are unreliable. Not sure if that is the same or different from drive through.
That'll be very different next week as omicron takes over.humpback said:Hard to say, Hogan said they're finding that this is 50/50 between Delta and Omicron. Omicron definitely seems to be the "preferred" wave to get hit hard with, but not when the health care system is already overwhelmed.
Andy Dufresne said:1) Indignance isn't an argument, but I'll let it go
LOL, nice.Andy Dufresne said:It's difficult to find that without a heaping of snark, though.
I think you spelled "whiners" wrong.Andy Dufresne said:Are we sure we haven't become a nation of hypochondriacs?
You're not in the PSF, Ivan. And you have a short memory. When COVID first hit the country in 2020 there were some idiots who thought it was a good thing that it first hit points of entry, like NY and DC, since they were "blue". Over time that didn't work out so well for the rest of the country since it spread everywhere. In the more-vaccinated year of 2021, the "ripping through blue states thing" didn't work out so well for those thinking that would be a good thing.IvanKaramazov said:To the degree that there's a silver lining associated with omicron, it's that it's ripping through blue states. Once a critical mass of media/professional types realizes that vaccinated covid is just another bug, maybe we can chill a bit.
Straw men seem irrational to me.Andy Dufresne said:Standing in line for hours to get tested to see if you have something that may make you slightly uncomfortable seems irrational to me.
And hopefully for only 1-4 more months, until omicron spreads itself to all the hinterlands and they work their way through it. Because we all know it's headed almost everywhere. It's just a matter of how long it'll take to get there, and how long they'll take to fight it off.The Z Machine said:We will have to live with this thing and adjust our society accordingly.
Case in pointI don’t see how people who never step foot in a hospital can argue with those who are in one everyday. The majority of my LinkedIn feed is from hospital CEO’s, doctors and nurses. What Gianmarco is saying is what’s going on just about everywhere. Hospitals stopping elective procedures. Turning away heart attack victims because they don’t have staff. Staff getting sick at record rates. Patients in bad shape in ICU’s. Sure the majority are non vaxxed.
And businesses starting to get really affected again. My buddy owns a custom cabinetry business. Gave his workers off for Christmas week. Today 5 of the 8 are very sick with COVID. All vaxxed.
Anyway, people can say that they got a mild case. Great. But they don’t know the outcome of the cases of the 1.8 people they infected.
Maybe but the last two major variants Delta (severity) and Omicron (transmissibility and vaccine resistance) had mutations that were beneficial. So I’m not sure it’s good to assume COVID is like any other virus we’ve dealt with.Or....maybe like a lot of viruses throughout history, it is weakening as it mutates. ??
South Africa made it through with a 26% vax rate, and 60%+ poverty rate. Its mild, and hopefully the beginning of the end of this pandemic.Biff84 said:I think you’re buying too much into ‘Omicron is milder’ and that’s where the disconnect is. Yes it might be milder to many but that is largely due to vaccinations, prior natural immunity and improvements in treatment.
You’d think we could collectively at least wear a mask to the grocery store. Or do like….anything to do our part. But it is just too much to ask I guess. We are talking about reducing hours at my place of business due to people out w Covid. We aren’t even requiring masks. Nobody would do it.Doug B said:@Terminalxylem, @gianmarco, @ProstheticRGK, @ghostguy123, @growlers and other medical folks:
Isn't there a kind of inherent chaotic quality about COVID in general? Such that even people with no risk factors -- and plenty of them, even if percentages are small -- often end up with poor outcomes?
I don't even mean death, necessarily. Hospitalization, being hit much harder than statistics would dictate, lingering symptoms, not being "back to normal" for an extended period, etc.
There's going to be a point where society has to kind of collectively "let go" and take whatever damage COVID can still inflict. I agree with the medical folks that time is not yet upon us. And no, I don't know when we'll be on the off-ramp -- probably won't see it coming.
Sort of. Antigens do not amplify the sample so they wont detect minute amounts of it. But what they are very good for is detecting when you are contagious which is what most people want to accomplish. Often if you take it early and have it but test negative you arent contagious yet. This is the reason that most instructions have you repeat the test after 24-48 hours.Both from what I've read and from what my doctor told me today on my monthly appointment, antigen tests deliver about 20% false positives. She wasn't worried about my negative antigen test on Sunday since I'd had a negative PCR test 6 days earlier.
They also had a high infection rate and it’s summer. So hard to compare. We tend to trend with the UK.South Africa made it through with a 26% vax rate, and 60%+ poverty rate. Its mild, and hopefully the beginning of the end of this pandemic.
To what end?The bigger problem that I see with Omicron and it being mild is that there are a good amount of people that don't see a need to continue to get boosters.
I agree.What's needed is a mass of unvaccinated types to realize this is a real ongoing thing and they're helping keep it going.
I don't believe this is accurate. Antigen tests can give false negatives because they are less sensitive than PCR tests, but false positives are very rare. Mostly only caused by doing the test incorrectly, or cross-contaminating samples when performing multiple tests.Both from what I've read and from what my doctor told me today on my monthly appointment, antigen tests deliver about 20% false positives. She wasn't worried about my negative antigen test on Sunday since I'd had a negative PCR test 6 days earlier.
Based on emerging data from South Africa and now the United States, it appears the rate of people infected with the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 who require hospitalization is genuinely lower than what was recorded during prior waves. Does that mean the Omicron variant really causes milder Covid-19 illnesses than its predecessors, as has been widely speculated? Or are vaccines and prior infections just providing more protection?
To find out, I asked researchers in South Africa for data from their recent Omicron wave. I wondered how frequent Covid-19 hospitalizations were during their recent Omicron wave compared to the prior Delta wave. They told me that after taking vaccination and immune status, age, and medical co-morbidities into account, the risk of Covid-19 hospitalization was around 50% lower during the Omicron wave compared to the Delta wave. That means Omicron hospitalized its targets less often than other variants had both as a result of its biologic characteristics and community immunity from vaccines and, likely to a lesser extent, prior infections.
If this sounds like good news, that’s because, in isolation, it is. Imagine if Omicron caused severe Covid-19 just as often as Delta and other previous variants while spreading as quickly as Omicron does; more hospitals would have overflowed sooner and by greater margins than what appears to be happening now.
However, any discussion of Omicron’s lower rates of hospitalization that is devoid of the context of its cinematic contagiousness misses a devastating and important point. Whether due to our behavior or its biology, Omicron is spreading through cities, counties, and states like fire in wind. Hospital beds are filling up fast because Omicron’s rate of spread appears to have quickly overtaken any felt benefit resulting from a lower rate of hospitalization.
The visualization below created for Inside Medicine by Dr. Kristin Panthagani demonstrates this concept dramatically. Using realistic estimates of emerging data, we show how a variant spreading as quickly as Omicron (“Virus O”, right) would be expected to fill up hospital beds faster than a variant like Delta (“Virus D”, left)—even if Omicron “merely” hospitalizes half as many of its new targets as Delta did.
(I can't link the GIF image, but it depicts the situation perfectly, worth a view)
As the visualization shows, even after a few "cycles," a less virulent pathogen like Omicron will cause far more hospitalizations (red) than one like Delta, largely because of how many more infections it causes (gray).
•••
Another important problem is that, unlike previous waves, United States hospitals entered the Omicron wave already facing pressure from high demand for non-Covid-19 care. In addition to other “typical” problems that seem to mount in winter, flu is back after a hiatus last year. Entering the Delta wave, on July 1st, 2021, around 67% of staffed hospital beds in the United States were full. Leading up to the Omicron wave, around 79% of staffed beds in the US were full. That 12% is important buffer territory that we desperately need. Things get dicey in hospitals the closer to full we get.
•••
But what about younger demographics getting Omicron? Does this not help in some way? Yes and no. On one hand, younger populations getting most of the Omicron infections means that hospitalization rates are likely to be lower. Indeed, that’s what we’ve seen so far. But that’s a double-edged sword. Younger people also staff hospitals. Right now, so many healthcare workers are being sidelined with Omicron that our ability to care for all patients, Covid and non-Covid alike, has been noticeably compromised in many places.
On top of that, the rate of Omicron spread is outpacing any benefit hospitals might have felt owing to lower rates of hospitalization. The graph below (made by Benjy Renton and me), shows how in Florida for example, the number of new cases needed for hospitals to exceed capacity has actually increased in the last couple of weeks (we call this number a “circuit breaker threshold”). If the hospitalization rate among Omicron cases is lower—which indeed we’ve seen in many places including Florida, where the rate of hospitalization among new SARS-CoV-2 cases has dropped by more than 50% since mid-December—a region should be able to “tolerate” more new cases before hospitals will fill up. (Note: some, though not all, of this lower rate of hospitalization reflects increases in testing among younger healthier people). Unfortunately, the graph also shows that Omicron’s rapid spread has already overcome that increasingly higher "circuit breaker" capacity threshold. In essence, Omicron’s lower hospitalization rate meant we had more money in the bank to spend. But we’ve already spent it all. In fact, whenever the yellow line is on or above the blue line, we've gone into debt.
•••
My friend Dr. Carter Mecher, who served as Director of Medical Preparedness Policy at the White House under both President George W. Bush and President Barack Obama, shared a great analogy with me over the weekend. “If Delta was a Category 5 hurricane, Omicron is a Category 2 that moves ashore and just sits there until everything is flooded and just about everything is damaged,” he wrote to me in an email. “Hurricane Omicron doesn’t have the windspeed to rip off the roofs and flatten buildings. It just damages the roofs enough and floods them with massive rainfall, destroying the building just the same.”
Just a little bit more water in a building that’s already water damaged is enough to cause irreparable damage. That's how life in many US hospitals feels right now. The looming question is, just where are we in this storm?