So a week ago, had two coronas with my son. Felt super fatigued and something similar to a mild hang over for two days. Thought the main cause was only 6 hours of sleep each day.
Yesterday, had one glass of wine. One. Ate dinner after the drink. Just woke up from 8 hours of sleep. I'm so insanely fatigued in all parts of my body. Anyone else have this?
COVID question for the people who may or may not have stayed at a Holiday Inn last night:
CDC guidelines state that I can end isolation after Day 5 if I'm fever-free for 24 hours. Yesterday was Day 5 and I hadn't had a fever since Day 1-2. Looking good so far, right?
WELL.....this morning I woke up with a fever of 100.1. Two hours later, that fever has come down to 99.7 on its own. If the fever disappears later today, can I still end isolation? Or do I have to wait another 24 hours?
update from YLE:
![]()
State of Affairs (Sept 19): COVID19, MPX, Polio, and... Flu
Here’s an update on our three, global public health emergencies.yourlocalepidemiologist.substack.com
tl;dr
Brief updates on MPX, Flu and Polio. And for COVID, nothing major but a couple of things to keep an eye on:
Currently, the Omicron subvariant BA.4.6 is taking hold in the U.S., and we are getting the first signs that it can outcompete BA.5. Wastewater levels have begun to rise in the Northeast where BA.4.6 is most prevalent. Also, for the first time last week, cases of BA.4.6 started rising while BA.5 cases started falling. We don’t think BA.4.6 will cause a big wave, as it doesn’t have mutations on the spike protein to escape our immunity, but coupled with behavior change and weather change, I guess anything is possible.
---
SARS-CoV-2 continues to mutate, and there are a few Omicron variants, like BA.2.3 and BJ.1, on the horizon with potentially concerning combinations of mutations. But evidence thus far is extremely limited. Most eyes are on BA.2.75.2, which is a second generation subvariant and has three additional spike protein mutations. Two preprints have shown substantial immune escape, even compared to BA.5. This means it has the potential to cause future waves. The number of BA.2.75.2 cases is still very small across the globe, but counts are doubling every week. If this growth rate continues, BA.2.75.2 may be one that causes the much anticipated winter wave.
--
This is the second "alert" I've seen about BA.2.75.2, probably based on the same preprints I'm guessing.
In the past few weeks, I've found myself forgetting names in a way that's really weird. Like I'll refer to someone whose name I absolutely know and draw a complete blank for like 30-60 seconds, and then it will come to me.So a week ago, had two coronas with my son. Felt super fatigued and something similar to a mild hang over for two days. Thought the main cause was only 6 hours of sleep each day.
Yesterday, had one glass of wine. One. Ate dinner after the drink. Just woke up from 8 hours of sleep. I'm so insanely fatigued in all parts of my body. Anyone else have this?
Yes, but not in response to drinking.
The all-over fatigue comes and goes. I'm old enough to where even before COVID, staying up past 9:00 p.m. is sometimes a challenge.
Shouldn’t beSo I was making an appointment to get the new booster, and realized that I somehow lost my vaccine card sometime between my booster (11/21) and now. Can't find it anywhere.
Anyone know if this is going to be a problem?
I'm not arguing that in the slightest. I fully admit that the vaccines led to my mild symptoms.One could argue that the reason your symptoms weren’t bad when you got Covid is precisely BECAUSE you were fully boosted at the time.I am torn on this latest booster. I had COVID in late July, even after being boosted. It was no big deal, was just tired and a little stuffed up for a day.
I certainly understand those that want to get the current booster but at this point I'm leaning towards just waiting.
Right.All true, but I also think that if @nirad3 had Omicron two months ago, there's no need to rush out and get the bivalent booster. While it was never a smart strategy to rely on infections in place of vaccinations, at this point in the pandemic I think if you happen to get an infection you can view that as essentially the same as if you got boosted.And one would be correct. Basically, the entire reason why this was so bad intially was because our body had no knowledge about how to fight it. The vaccines let our bodies respond fast enough that we aren’t getting super sick or getting organ damage.One could argue that the reason your symptoms weren’t bad when you got Covid is precisely BECAUSE you were fully boosted at the time.I am torn on this latest booster. I had COVID in late July, even after being boosted. It was no big deal, was just tired and a little stuffed up for a day.
I certainly understand those that want to get the current booster but at this point I'm leaning towards just waiting.
So I was making an appointment to get the new booster, and realized that I somehow lost my vaccine card sometime between my booster (11/21) and now. Can't find it anywhere.
Anyone know if this is going to be a problem?
Thanks. I might even have a photo if I dig back long enough on my phone.So I was making an appointment to get the new booster, and realized that I somehow lost my vaccine card sometime between my booster (11/21) and now. Can't find it anywhere.
Anyone know if this is going to be a problem?
As long as you know when your last shot was your fine - I have a picture of mine on my phone and just showed them. They gave me a new card when I was done.
Couldn't agree more with the last paragraph:![]()
and this is the part that caught my attention:
The right question
Boosters provide substantive and unequivocal benefit for protection from severe Covid and help reduce Long Covid (magnitude uncertain), and still, despite the challenges of Omicron, have some early (~2 months) effect for reducing infection and transmission. We don’t know yet if the BA.5 bivalent booster is any better than the BA.1 or the original booster. Based on the evolution of the virus through Omicron and its subvariants, it appears unlikely the new vaccine will have a major or important impact on reducing infection or transmission (we got a hint of that from the new BA.1 NEJM study above). There’s ample evidence from multiple studies that mucosal IgA antibodies are what will be needed to help block infections and transmission, such as this NEJM new report with 60-80% reduction of breakthrough infections (and reduced viral load, higher Ct, Tables below) as a function of mucosal IgA antibodies, not related to IgG antibodies. While they were formed in some health care workers as a response to vaccination and or infection, there is a way to induce them via nasal or oral vaccines. The durability of this effect isn’t yet known, but it would be far easier to take a nasal spray repetitively, with expectation of much less side effects, than shots. Certainly encouraging data from CanSino’s newly approved inhaled vaccine vs Omicron is a solid precursor for the many programs that are in advanced clinical trials.
The right question is about the future. We can’t go on getting boosters every 4 to 6 months and the premise of an “annual” shot is that the virus exhibits seasonality like flu, which certainly isn’t the case.
We have a new variant to be concerned about: BA.2.75.2, a daughter of BA.2.75 ,with three new spike mutations that are troubling. You can see its immune escape from the new preprint from Ben Murrell and colleagues. This variant has the most immune escape these investigators at the Karolinska Institute have yet seen, and that has been replicated by Yunlong Cao’s group in Peking. Given these observations, our current variant-chasing strategy to catch up to BA.5 will not likely help us counter BA.2.75.2. That underscores the need for variant-proof efforts.
Now is the time to stop chasing SARS-CoV-2 and start mounting an aggressive get- ahead strategy. There’s the intertwined triad to contend with: more immune escape, more evidence of imprinting, and the inevitability of new variants that are already laying a foundation for spread. Enough of the booster after booster, shot-centric approach; it has been formidable, lifesaving, sickness-avoiding, and essential as a bootstrap, temporizing measure. Now we need to press on with innovation for more durable, palatable, and effective solutions. They are in our reach.
Meanwhile back at the farm, our leadership is saying "we're good" and aborting most funding and efforts to do what is needed. Yay midterm elections?Couldn't agree more with the last paragraph:![]()
and this is the part that caught my attention:
The right question
Boosters provide substantive and unequivocal benefit for protection from severe Covid and help reduce Long Covid (magnitude uncertain), and still, despite the challenges of Omicron, have some early (~2 months) effect for reducing infection and transmission. We don’t know yet if the BA.5 bivalent booster is any better than the BA.1 or the original booster. Based on the evolution of the virus through Omicron and its subvariants, it appears unlikely the new vaccine will have a major or important impact on reducing infection or transmission (we got a hint of that from the new BA.1 NEJM study above). There’s ample evidence from multiple studies that mucosal IgA antibodies are what will be needed to help block infections and transmission, such as this NEJM new report with 60-80% reduction of breakthrough infections (and reduced viral load, higher Ct, Tables below) as a function of mucosal IgA antibodies, not related to IgG antibodies. While they were formed in some health care workers as a response to vaccination and or infection, there is a way to induce them via nasal or oral vaccines. The durability of this effect isn’t yet known, but it would be far easier to take a nasal spray repetitively, with expectation of much less side effects, than shots. Certainly encouraging data from CanSino’s newly approved inhaled vaccine vs Omicron is a solid precursor for the many programs that are in advanced clinical trials.
The right question is about the future. We can’t go on getting boosters every 4 to 6 months and the premise of an “annual” shot is that the virus exhibits seasonality like flu, which certainly isn’t the case.
We have a new variant to be concerned about: BA.2.75.2, a daughter of BA.2.75 ,with three new spike mutations that are troubling. You can see its immune escape from the new preprint from Ben Murrell and colleagues. This variant has the most immune escape these investigators at the Karolinska Institute have yet seen, and that has been replicated by Yunlong Cao’s group in Peking. Given these observations, our current variant-chasing strategy to catch up to BA.5 will not likely help us counter BA.2.75.2. That underscores the need for variant-proof efforts.
Now is the time to stop chasing SARS-CoV-2 and start mounting an aggressive get- ahead strategy. There’s the intertwined triad to contend with: more immune escape, more evidence of imprinting, and the inevitability of new variants that are already laying a foundation for spread. Enough of the booster after booster, shot-centric approach; it has been formidable, lifesaving, sickness-avoiding, and essential as a bootstrap, temporizing measure. Now we need to press on with innovation for more durable, palatable, and effective solutions. They are in our reach.

I know people getting covid now that got it 3 months ago. Its insane.
mild, slight fever, congestion, sore throat. All have it like a bad cold. But who gets dozens of rhinovirus infections a year?I know people getting covid now that got it 3 months ago. Its insane.
Severity?
Getting COVID often should eventually start mattering a whole lot less (in the way our dozens of annual rhinovirus infections usually don't matter), but it's going to take more time for the main run of society to get to that point.
Meanwhile back at the farm, our leadership is saying "we're good" and aborting most funding and efforts to do what is needed.
As the clinical trial for the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research’s unique COVID-19 vaccine enters its third month, volunteers are still needed.
The vaccine, called spike ferritin nanoparticle (SpFN), stands out in the COVID-19 vaccine landscape. Scientists developed a nanoparticle vaccine, based on a ferritin platform, which offers a flexible approach to targeting multiple variants of SARS-COV-2 and potentially other coronaviruses as well.
Pre-clinical studies indicate that SpFN induces highly potent and broad neutralizing antibody responses against the virus that causes COVID-19 infection, as well as three major SARS-CoV-2 variants and SARS-CoV-1 virus.
The phase 1 study is being conducted at WRAIR’s Clinical Trials Center and will enroll 72 healthy, adult volunteers ages 18-55. Volunteers will be placed into one of three groups, each receiving a different dose or schedule of the vaccine. As of June 11th , the 24 individuals have participated in the trial. Volunteers must meet certain inclusion and exclusion criteria—most notably that they have never been infected with COVID-19 or received a COVID-19 vaccine.
But who gets dozens of rhinovirus infections a year?
I know people getting covid now that got it 3 months ago. Its insane.
Severity?
Getting COVID often should eventually start mattering a whole lot less (in the way our dozens of annual rhinovirus infections usually don't matter), but it's going to take more time for the main run of society to get to that point.
Not that I have seen. Jobarules is not an anti-vaxxer and I believe he said it. Personally I am vaccinated with one booster and my experience recently with my Dad and brother getting COVID makes me want to hold off on any more boosters. Very minimal symptoms for both of them.Are the anti-vaxxers actually comparing moderately severe vaccine side effects to the mildest of covid symptoms?
I have most of them blocked.
As rough as the first 24 hours were for me, it's well worth reducing the risk for my MIL, thanks.
I'm starting to wonder if there are a significant number of COVID deaths that only get in the system as COVID cases on or near the pronouncement of death. Detected cases have been moving downward at haste since mid-July. And while there has been a concomitant decline in deaths since August 11th, it hasn't been at nearly the same rate of decline as the cases. That seems to say something about the observed numbers.I know case counts aren't super important (right now at least) but IMO the numbers being reported are less accurate than ever. I know more people who have had covid in the last few weeks than at any point during the pandemic, and I'd wager that close to zero of them have been "reported".
One of my neighbors who is in charge of the COVID response for one of the local universities here keeps telling my wife that her research shows that repeated infection potentially causes organ damage.
Yes. Yes it is.Just finished up on paxlovid the other day. Good god the nasty taste is all it’s hyped to be
it was announced yesterday that Pfizer applied for EUA for theirs for ages 5-11Getting my updated microchip today.
Any word on FDA approval on the 5-12 year old group for the bivalent vaccine? I have been holding my kids back from their booster since infection in early June, but with cases on the rise in the UK, the next wave will be here soon, so I want them to get their shot soon. But prefer to have the new one if possible.
Looks like the next FDA Advisory Committee meeting on covid/vaccines is October 6. Hopefully they vote then.it was announced yesterday that Pfizer applied for EUA for theirs for ages 5-11Getting my updated microchip today.
Any word on FDA approval on the 5-12 year old group for the bivalent vaccine? I have been holding my kids back from their booster since infection in early June, but with cases on the rise in the UK, the next wave will be here soon, so I want them to get their shot soon. But prefer to have the new one if possible.
![]()
Pfizer and BioNTech Submit Application to U.S. FDA for Emergency Use Authorization of Omicron BA.4/BA.5-Adapted Bivalent Vaccine Booster in Children 5 Through 11 Years of Age
Pfizer Inc. (NYSE: PFE) and BioNTech SE (Nasdaq: BNTX) today announced they have completed a submission to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reques...www.businesswire.com
![]()
Fall bivalent boosters: Science update
The fall booster roll-out is well on its way.yourlocalepidemiologist.substack.com
I felt tired the first night and a little arm soreness. That’s it. I really never had any issues beyond that for earlier shots. No one in my family had any adverse reactions to any just a little fatigue and soreness.![]()
Fall bivalent boosters: Science update
The fall booster roll-out is well on its way.yourlocalepidemiologist.substack.com
Got my Moderna bivalent booster yesterday. This is a walk in the park compared to prior shots. Where I was basically bedridden the day after each of the prior shots, I am working normally today. I took an Advil before bed as I had a slight headache, and I had a headache earlier this morning as well, so took another. But other than that, being a little more tired than usual, and feeling somewhat off or off-balance from time to time, I am totally fine. Keeping my massage appointment for tomorrow . . . .
Not surprising, as most studies on vitamins fail to live up to the hype rampant in the nutraceutical world. Meanwhile, people eagerly consume fistfuls of supplements, while simultaneously complaining vaccines and other conventional medications aren’t adequately tested.![]()
Study challenges a longstanding myth about Covid-19 and Vitamin D
Vitamin aficionados beware.www.inverse.com
tl;dr:
WHAT THEY FOUND — Neither study found vitamin D made a dramatic difference in the number of Covid-19 infections, serious illness (including hospitalizations and any deaths), or other respiratory tract infections between the controls and those taking the vitamin in whichever form.
"Among people aged 16 years and older with a high baseline prevalence of suboptimal vitamin D status, implementation of a population level test-and-treat approach to vitamin D supplementation was not associated with a reduction in risk of all cause acute respiratory tract infection or Covid-19," authors of the UK study wrote.
“Daily supplementation with cod liver oil, a low dose vitamin D, eicosapentaenoic acid, and docosahexaenoic acid supplement, for six months during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among Norwegian adults, did not reduce the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, serious Covid-19, or other acute respiratory infections,” the Norwegian researchers wrote in their study.

While I agree it’s preferable to be ahead of the curve, I dont think it’s ridiculous to believe we can reduce the frequency of boosters more in-line with things like flu. After all, coronaviruses mutate more slowly than influenza - the problem is, there’s a lot more SARS-CoV-2 around to mutate. That should decrease as the pandemic runs its course, though COVID’s lack of seasonality is also an issue.![]()
and this is the part that caught my attention:
The right question
Boosters provide substantive and unequivocal benefit for protection from severe Covid and help reduce Long Covid (magnitude uncertain), and still, despite the challenges of Omicron, have some early (~2 months) effect for reducing infection and transmission. We don’t know yet if the BA.5 bivalent booster is any better than the BA.1 or the original booster. Based on the evolution of the virus through Omicron and its subvariants, it appears unlikely the new vaccine will have a major or important impact on reducing infection or transmission (we got a hint of that from the new BA.1 NEJM study above). There’s ample evidence from multiple studies that mucosal IgA antibodies are what will be needed to help block infections and transmission, such as this NEJM new report with 60-80% reduction of breakthrough infections (and reduced viral load, higher Ct, Tables below) as a function of mucosal IgA antibodies, not related to IgG antibodies. While they were formed in some health care workers as a response to vaccination and or infection, there is a way to induce them via nasal or oral vaccines. The durability of this effect isn’t yet known, but it would be far easier to take a nasal spray repetitively, with expectation of much less side effects, than shots. Certainly encouraging data from CanSino’s newly approved inhaled vaccine vs Omicron is a solid precursor for the many programs that are in advanced clinical trials.
The right question is about the future. We can’t go on getting boosters every 4 to 6 months and the premise of an “annual” shot is that the virus exhibits seasonality like flu, which certainly isn’t the case.
We have a new variant to be concerned about: BA.2.75.2, a daughter of BA.2.75 ,with three new spike mutations that are troubling. You can see its immune escape from the new preprint from Ben Murrell and colleagues. This variant has the most immune escape these investigators at the Karolinska Institute have yet seen, and that has been replicated by Yunlong Cao’s group in Peking. Given these observations, our current variant-chasing strategy to catch up to BA.5 will not likely help us counter BA.2.75.2. That underscores the need for variant-proof efforts.
I’d be interested in that as well, as everything I’ve seen shows Zn, vit D and C do next to nothing, except in people who are severely nutritional deficient.I wish they did more studies on zinc rather than vitamin D. If I recall, Zinc is the only vitamin shown to have any sort of effectiveness against common cold coronavirus.