What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Denver RB Thread (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Any late breaking news would be great but right now it appears henry starts and young gets some PT. So until we hear something differently, the question becomes how good a play is Henry. So to get some collective perspective how about giving us your "starting him over" or "benching him for" decisions.

Right now I sm starting him over Maroney.

 
Any late breaking news would be great but right now it appears henry starts and young gets some PT. So until we hear something differently, the question becomes how good a play is Henry. So to get some collective perspective how about giving us your "starting him over" or "benching him for" decisions.Right now I sm starting him over Maroney.
With Henry coming back from his injury for the first game in a while, I expect it to be a near split. Playing Oakland, both should be good plays today.
 
I'd like to start Henry (as my flex), but am going with Owen Daniels. I need to see how Henry looks before I put him in my lineup.

 
Any late breaking news would be great but right now it appears henry starts and young gets some PT. So until we hear something differently, the question becomes how good a play is Henry. So to get some collective perspective how about giving us your "starting him over" or "benching him for" decisions.Right now I sm starting him over Maroney.
I am a Young owner and I'm benching that Maroney dud in favour of a guy who is a RB2 in Denver. However, I may bench Young in favour of Ward. If Henry gets hot, Shanny rides him to death.
 
Henry is expected to be the starting RB today, with Selvin also getting touches. Looks more like RBBC. I wouldn't touch these guys with a 10 foot poll in a meaningful fantasy game (own both, benching both)

 
Henry is expected to be the starting RB today, with Selvin also getting touches. Looks more like RBBC. I wouldn't touch these guys with a 10 foot poll in a meaningful fantasy game (own both, benching both)
Six words: RAIDERS DEFENSE CAN'T STOP THE RUN.
 
Henry is expected to be the starting RB today, with Selvin also getting touches. Looks more like RBBC. I wouldn't touch these guys with a 10 foot poll in a meaningful fantasy game (own both, benching both)
Six words: RAIDERS DEFENSE CAN'T STOP THE RUN.
4 words: I HAVE BETTER OPTIONSOne thing I've learned over years and years of fantasy sports is that if you get too caught up in playing matchups you end up regretting it more than you end up patting yourself on the back for it.Henry is a great play today if he's healthy. In fact I've been waiting for this matchup for months... but 1) he is coming off a torn PCL... the PT side of me tells me to stay away2) Selvin Young has impressed when given the chance... and has done better than Henry when they both play3) Shannahan ruins fantasy teams when people try to figure out which RB to play... better off just starting your better options and waiting for one to get hurt this week and start the other next week.4) I was caught up in the DEN RB last year and it was a headache I didn't want again... unfortunately Henry couldnt hold onto the starting job in DEN (couldn't stay healthy) and here I am againGood luck playing both, or one, or whatever you're doing this week
 
Henry is expected to be the starting RB today, with Selvin also getting touches. Looks more like RBBC. I wouldn't touch these guys with a 10 foot poll in a meaningful fantasy game (own both, benching both)
Six words: RAIDERS DEFENSE CAN'T STOP THE RUN.
4 words: I HAVE BETTER OPTIONSOne thing I've learned over years and years of fantasy sports is that if you get too caught up in playing matchups you end up regretting it more than you end up patting yourself on the back for it.Henry is a great play today if he's healthy. In fact I've been waiting for this matchup for months... but 1) he is coming off a torn PCL... the PT side of me tells me to stay away2) Selvin Young has impressed when given the chance... and has done better than Henry when they both play3) Shannahan ruins fantasy teams when people try to figure out which RB to play... better off just starting your better options and waiting for one to get hurt this week and start the other next week.4) I was caught up in the DEN RB last year and it was a headache I didn't want again... unfortunately Henry couldnt hold onto the starting job in DEN (couldn't stay healthy) and here I am againGood luck playing both, or one, or whatever you're doing this week
Well if you got better options go for it!
 
Denver Post link

From article posted late last night, sounds like Henry to start with Young spelling him, but some split is likely in order:

"The Broncos may also interchange Henry and Young against the Raiders because neither is completely healthy.

"I would say I'm at about 80 percent," Henry said. "

Best I can find at this point...

Also has interesting take that Henry could be gone after this week, but then it becomes Young/Hall mix if Hall is ready.

Freakin' nightmare!!

 
Andre Hall-RB- Broncos Dec. 2 - 3:07 pm et

Broncos declared RB Andre Hall, RB Mike Bell, QB Darnell Hackney (3rd QB), WR Glenn Martinez, DT Isaac Snell, DE Larry Birdine, and DE Paul Carrington inactive in Week 13.

Travis Henry will start, with Selvin Young spelling him off the bench. Javon Walker is active, as expected.

Source: NFL.com

 
Week 13: Selvin started, went out with knee, then arm injury? THenry comes in, scores twice.

Any news on Henry's suspension or A. Hall high ankle sprain?

 
Selvin started? Where did the "Travis Henry will start" info come from? It's starting sound like the only way this will be a reliable situation is if Henry gets suspended, Young and Hall go on IR and Cecil Sapp gets the start.

Of course in that scenario, Bell would get the start, since he's the one I don't have. Ugh.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top