I understand that quite well. What you fail to understand is my point that in today's Left dominated PC correct culture, motive is an impossible metric to fairly integrate into the data. I've already shown you a real life example of this, where a gang of black BLM thugs provoked and attacked a white man for no other reason than he was white and by himself, beating him almost to death. Clear hate crime, right? Wrong - not classified as a hate crime. And why eould that be Tobias? You think politics might be playing s told in that? It kind of screws up the prevailing Narrative that racism is primarily a white phenomenon, doesn't it.
So in the absence of a fair accounting of motive in racial crimes, what are we left with?
Well, would seem to me a fairly reasonable metric to look at when assessing racial animus is the amount of violent crime being perpetrated. The numbers are reliable. There's no bias on the part of police - no profiling issue to sift through. The violence occurred or it didn't occur, and the proof is pretty well apparent.
Is the motive always racial animus? Who knows. You tell me Tobias, why is black on white violence so much greater than the reverse? You don't think any of that could relate to the deteriorating racial situation in the US, and the continued, omnipresent demonization of whites by politicians, media, and educational system? You don't think that has any effect in creating a feeling of racial animus in blacks? The crazy disparity in violence is due to what exactly? More guns in the inner city?