What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

"Official" Donald Trump for President: Great Wall of Mexico (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well I commend you for at least being brave enough to give an answer.  Now as to that answer...

It's complete and utter nonsense.  You want to absolve women of any responsibility for murdering an innocent human because of the guilt and suffering they'd likely experience?  Yeah, nothing ridiculous with that position.  :lmao:
Well, I think "it's complete and utter nonsense" that someone would deem it murder.  Yeah "nothing ridiculous with that position."   :lmao:

See how that works.  

 
Arguing a position even the pro-lifers aren't arguing.  

No one argues that position, this is a complete waste of time.  no chance of it ever becoming any kind of law, so why bother.  

Only people that argue that position are dummies that get led down a path by Chris Matthews.  

 
Well, I think "it's complete and utter nonsense" that someone would deem it murder.  Yeah "nothing ridiculous with that position."   :lmao:

See how that works.  
You already forgot.  This whole exercise is postulated on the hypothetical that the laws have been changed - along with underlying consensus in the country - so that abortion is now illegal and thus murder.

Starting to understand how ridiculous the whole Trump controversy was?

 
Can you expound?  I'm genuinely interested.  If abortion is illegal, and is murder, then a woman who has an abortion shouldn't be punished?  How does that make any sense?
I think the premise of the question is ridiculous. We aren't going back. To then say you would arrest the women is disgusting.

 
I think the premise of the question is ridiculous. We aren't going back. To then say you would arrest the women is disgusting.
I'm sure there are a few people out there who'd argue that murder of an innocent fetus is disgusting, but that's another issue.  If we are talking about the hypothetical that Trump was posed with - a world where abortion is now illegal - then the woman absolutely needs to be punished.  There is no intellectual gymnastics one could do to escape that reality.

 
I think the whole thing is an exercise in futility and based on what ifs that don't exist.

I am a Trump supporter, but I am strongly pro-choice. That was one of the things that drew me to him was I believed he had already made his position on the issue known and I figured if he got the GOP nomination, he would have maintained his previously stated opinion.  I would say that is why I was so disappointed in his flip-flopping on the issue earlier in the week.,

This is why politics is so frustrating. I am pro-choice--well the Republicans don't want me. I am for less government hand-outs--well the Dems don't want me. I am for exploring alternative energy options--well the GOP doesn't want me. .I am pro-gun--well the Dems don't want me. It goes on and on. Just :wall:

 
The bigger issue with the abortion statement IMO is how quickly he backtracked and flip flopped. How does someone leading the GOP primary in April not have a clear position and ready answer for abortion questions. It's a further sign of his total unpreparedness for the job.

 
I'm sure there are a few people out there who'd argue that murder of an innocent fetus is disgusting, but that's another issue.  If we are talking about the hypothetical that Trump was posed with - a world where abortion is now illegal - then the woman absolutely needs to be punished.  There is no intellectual gymnastics one could do to escape that reality.
So you think that a change in the law will suddenly make everyone believe that aborting a fetus is murder?  That's where the disconnect is. 

 
I think the whole thing is an exercise in futility and based on what ifs that don't exist.

I am a Trump supporter, but I am strongly pro-choice. That was one of the things that drew me to him was I believed he had already made his position on the issue known and I figured if he got the GOP nomination, he would have maintained his previously stated opinion.  I would say that is why I was so disappointed in his flip-flopping on the issue earlier in the week.,

This is why politics is so frustrating. I am pro-choice--well the Republicans don't want me. I am for less government hand-outs--well the Dems don't want me. I am for exploring alternative energy options--well the GOP doesn't want me. .I am pro-gun--well the Dems don't want me. It goes on and on. Just :wall:
Agree 100% with everything you said, court.  I was hoping Trump would find a place for my views within the political system, but his mistakes are making that less likely.

 
I'm sure there are a few people out there who'd argue that murder of an innocent fetus is disgusting, but that's another issue.  If we are talking about the hypothetical that Trump was posed with - a world where abortion is now illegal - then the woman absolutely needs to be punished.  There is no intellectual gymnastics one could do to escape that reality.
I don't feel like discussing abortion on an Internet forum is a good idea. Trump has definitely shown he's not up to this type of nuanced, thoughtful discussion. 

For him to get trapped and make comments that he clearly IMO is not equipped to discuss is just another example of why he would be an awful president. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So you think that a change in the law will suddenly make everyone believe that aborting a fetus is murder?  That's where the disconnect is. 
I agree with General that it was a ridiculous hypothetical.  In order for it to happen (abortion being made illegal) there would have to be a consensus in Smerica that aborting a fetus is murder.  And I agree - that ain't happening.  Not in this country.  Not now.

 
I agree with General that it was a ridiculous hypothetical.  In order for it to happen (abortion being made illegal) there would have to be a consensus in Smerica that aborting a fetus is murder.  And I agree - that ain't happening.  Not in this country.  Not now.
But if you believe strongly in a position, why not defend it? "I believe abortion is murder and when I'm President I will work to make it illegal."

What kind of defeatist attitude is "a consensus ain't happening"?? That's just a form of appeasement, isn't it? Anti-exceptionalism at its finest.

 
I spoke about NATO at length about a week ago in here.  In summary, I think Trump's instincts on the subject (that NATO needs to be re-evaluated) were correct, but once again the country and the world are not used to dealing with this level of openness and honesty.  

 
Besides the NATO spin which I'd still like to see explained how do Trump fans believe a guy who claims he'll get everything done by making "good deals" consistently gets boxed in by reporters whenever he has a back and forth discussion for more than a few minutes.

 
But if you believe strongly in a position, why not defend it? "I believe abortion is murder and when I'm President I will work to make it illegal."

What kind of defeatist attitude is "a consensus ain't happening"?? That's just a form of appeasement, isn't it? Anti-exceptionalism at its finest.
Who said I am pro life?

 
I spoke about NATO at length about a week ago in here.  In summary, I think Trump's instincts on the subject (that NATO needs to be re-evaluated) were correct, but once again the country and the world are not used to dealing with this level of openness and honesty.  
Deal with facts then, Nato plays an important anti-terrorism role.

 
The bigger issue with the abortion statement IMO is how quickly he backtracked and flip flopped. How does someone leading the GOP primary in April not have a clear position and ready answer for abortion questions. It's a further sign of his total unpreparedness for the job.
I doubt Higgs will respond to this.  

But if you believe strongly in a position, why not defend it? "I believe abortion is murder and when I'm President I will work to make it illegal."

What kind of defeatist attitude is "a consensus ain't happening"?? That's just a form of appeasement, isn't it? Anti-exceptionalism at its finest.
Or this.  

 
Besides the NATO spin which I'd still like to see explained how do Trump fans believe a guy who claims he'll get everything done by making "good deals" consistently gets boxed in by reporters whenever he has a back and forth discussion for more than a few minutes.
I wouldn't say it's consistently.  I don't think you guys fully comprehend how much he talks to the media, and how much they are out to get him.  Chris Matthews is a ####### punk for trapping Trump in a ridiculous hypothetical like that.  It serves no purpose other than to trap Trump and make him look bad.  Trump gets this 24x7.  When you are this open to the media, and anti-PC to boot, you are going to have missteps.  It's unavoidable.  Personally I think Trump erred this week in stepping back from his original abortion comments to Matthews.  I think he should have stayed with his original comment and screw the Conservative backlash.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Deal with facts then, Nato plays an important anti-terrorism role.
Did Trump say they don't play a role?  Or did he say that the alliance needs to be revisited, especially the issue of more money coming to the United States for the protections it provides?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It is confusing to me as well that pro-lifers reacted so strongly to Trump's assertion that women who have abortions should be punished.  

 
I wouldn't say it's consistently.  I don't think you guys fully comprehend how much he talks to the media, and how much they are out to get him.  Chris Matthews is a ####### punk for trapping Trump in a ridiculous hypothetical like that.  It serves no purpose other than to trap Trump and make him look bad.  Trump gets this 24x7.  When you are this open to the media, and anti-PC to boot, you are going to have missteps.  It's unavoidable.  Personally I think Trump erred this week in stepping back from his original abortion comments to Matthews.  I think he should have stayed with his original comment and screw the Conservative backlash.
:lol:  at Trump getting this. They say Clinton killed people, Obama wasn't born in this country (well that was Trump mostly) etc. G TFO with that.

What do you guys think part of this job requires? You can't "speak honestly" as you put it, and not have people ask for follow up. You can't troll all day lapping up the coverage then get butthurt when they attack you. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wouldn't say it's consistently.  I don't think you guys fully comprehend how much he talks to the media, and how much they are out to get him.  Chris Matthews is a ####### punk for trapping Trump in a ridiculous hypothetical like that.  It serves no purpose other than to trap Trump and make him look bad.  Trump gets this 24x7.  When you are this open to the media, and anti-PC to boot, you are going to have missteps.  It's unavoidable.  Personally I think Trump erred this week in stepping back from his original abortion comments to Matthews.  I think he should have stayed with his original comment and screw the Conservative backlash.
Like I said, abused wife making excuses for the bruises.  

 
It is confusing to me as well that pro-lifers reacted so strongly to Trump's assertion that women who have abortions should be punished.  
That's to the right of Huckabee.

There are probably some pro-lifers that loved that position.  But people that want Republicans getting elected don't like that one little bit.  Because that's the kind of dumb sheet that get people to completely cast their vote the other way.  

 
It is confusing to me as well that pro-lifers reacted so strongly to Trump's assertion that women who have abortions should be punished.
It's quite funny watching the right feign shock whenever Trump overtly takes a position that they have subtly backed for decades with coded language. In this specific case, I do believe that the majority of those who are pro-life likely don't want to punished the woman but to pretend this is the absolute consensus on the right is a joke. This is doubly true for banning Muslims from entering the country, deporting all illegal immigrants and etc. I feel like every time I turn on the news I see some republican stooge pretending that they haven't specifically aided in cultivating this movement.

 
I wouldn't say it's consistently.  I don't think you guys fully comprehend how much he talks to the media, and how much they are out to get him.  Chris Matthews is a ####### punk for trapping Trump in a ridiculous hypothetical like that.
It's not a ridiculous hypothetical anymore than the wall is a ridiculous hypothetical.

 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/04/02/transcript-donald-trump-interview-with-bob-woodward-and-robert-costa/

Transcript of interview with Washington Post.  This guy:

BOB WOODWARD: And the real first question is, where do you start the movie of your decision to run for president? Because that is a big deal. A lot of internal/external stuff, and we’d love to hear your monologue on how you did it.

DONALD TRUMP: Where do you start the movie? I think it’s actually — and very interesting question — but I think the start was standing on top of the escalator at Trump Tower on June 16, which is the day — Bob, you were there, and you know what I mean, because there has. . . . I mean, it looked like the Academy Awards. I talk about it. There were so many cameras. So many — it was packed. The atrium of Trump Tower, which is a very big place, was packed. It literally looked like the Academy Awards.
:lmao:

DT: Well, but that was — okay, but I will tell you, until the very end. . . . You know, I have a good life. I built a great company. It’s been amazingly — I’m sure you looked at the numbers. I have very little debt, tremendous assets. And great cash flows. I have a wonderful family. Ivanka just had a baby. Doing this is not the easiest thing in the world to do. People have — many of my friends, very successful people, have said, "Why would you do this?"
:lmao:   He has very successful friends.  

DT: Well no, the real possibility was the Romney time, or the Romney term. This last one four years ago. I looked at that, really. I never looked at it seriously then. I was building my business, I was doing well. And I went up to New Hampshire, made a speech. And because it was in New Hampshire, it was sort of like, Trump is going to run. And since then people have said, Trump is going to run. I never was interested. I could almost say at all, gave it very little thought, other than the last time, where Romney was running. And I thought that Romney was a weak candidate. I thought that — I thought Obama was very beatable. Very, very beatable. You know, you had a president who was not doing well, to put it nicely. And I looked at that very seriously. I had some difficulty because I was doing some big jobs that were finishing up, which I wanted to do. My children were younger. And four years makes a big difference. And I also had a signed contract to do "The Apprentice" with NBC. Which in all fairness, you know, sounds like — when you’re talking about “president” it doesn’t sound much, but when you have a two-hour show, prime time, every once a week on a major network . . .  .
Sacrifice, people.  Sacrifice.

 
Poor Trump getting mistreated by big meany Chris Matthews. Asking him questions and stuff.
General, I agree with you that Trump should be able to handle someone like Matthews without blinking an eye. And I have to tell you this is another area of disappointment I had with Trump this week. His performance at the town hall was disjointed, embarrassing, you name it. He is not preparing for these events and thinks he can just wing everything and it is an insult to every one who is supporting him when he performs like he did.

That being said (and I know the left disagrees with me) the media has been engaging in gotcha journalism with Trump since day one. There are questions asked of him that are clearly trap questions, where you can tell the journalist actually had to research the question before they ask him. On the flip side, the other candidates get softball questions or questions about Trump.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
General, I agree with you that Trump should be able to handle someone like Matthews without blinking an eye. And I have to tell you this is another area of disappointment I had with Trump this week. His performance at the town hall was disjointed, embarrassing, you name it. He is not preparing for these events and thinks he can just wing everything and it is an insult to every one who is supporting him when he performs like he did.

That being said (and I know the left disagrees with me) the media has been engaging in gotcha journalism with Trump since day one. There are questions asked of him that are clearly trap questions, where you can tell the journalist actually had to research the question before they ask him. On the flip side, the other candidates get softball questions or questions about Trump.  
We'll have to agree to disagree on media treatment of these guys. They try and dump on all of them.

 
But if you believe strongly in a position, why not defend it? "I believe abortion is murder and when I'm President I will work to make it illegal."

What kind of defeatist attitude is "a consensus ain't happening"?? That's just a form of appeasement, isn't it? Anti-exceptionalism at its finest.
What is wrong with "I personally feel abortion is murder but the courts have ruled that abortion is Constitutional and a majority of people want to keep it legal so won't do anything to change it"?

 
Watching some Trump reports interviewed about the missteps The Donald's made lately, the theme all of them gave for their primary reason for supporting him was that he speaks his mind and is honest.

Have we really fallen so far as a country in either our faith in politicians, or in our intellectual demands from our politicians, that "speaking one's mind" is a reason to vote for them to be president?  Really?

I'm really starting to think Mike Judge is freaking Nostradamus.  

 
That being said (and I know the left disagrees with me) the media has been engaging in gotcha journalism with Trump since day one. There are questions asked of him that are clearly trap questions, where you can tell the journalist actually had to research the question before they ask him. On the flip side, the other candidates get softball questions or questions about Trump.  
And you think this is solely due to some kind of anti-Trump bias? If so, how do you explain the source and reason for that bias? Because the "gotcha" questions are coming from pretty much every news organization (including Fox).

 
No, I agree with Courtjester that he gets more of the gotcha stuff.

But that's for two reasons:

1.  He's leading.  

2.  Frankly, he falls for it.  

Which is actually a waste of time on the part of the media.  Because there's no reason to aste time on this dumb Chris Matthews stunt, when there's so much other dumb Trumpisms to cover.

The wall.  That freaking wall.  This alone should bury him.  John Oliver showed video of this Circus Peanut (that is the exact hue, by the way) changing his answer on cost from $4 billion to $12 billion.   No coverage.  People should just be pounding him on his dumb foreign policy answers that are making every other world leader go like this:   :shock:

 
No, I agree with Courtjester that he gets more of the gotcha stuff.

But that's for two reasons:

1.  He's leading.  

2.  Frankly, he falls for it.  

Which is actually a waste of time on the part of the media.  Because there's no reason to aste time on this dumb Chris Matthews stunt, when there's so much other dumb Trumpisms to cover.

The wall.  That freaking wall.  This alone should bury him.  John Oliver showed video of this Circus Peanut (that is the exact hue, by the way) changing his answer on cost from $4 billion to $12 billion.   No coverage.  People should just be pounding him on his dumb foreign policy answers that are making every other world leader go like this:   :shock:
I feel in a lot of ways the media feels guilty for giving Trump so much attention and building him up, that they know also feel a responsibility to tear him down. He has gone from underdog to lead dog. 

 
Correction.  He got caught saying something that makes complete sense to anyone with a brain.  Still haven't heard you refute his point.
And then the guy who says what's on his mind and doesn't play PC games immediately began flopping on his answer like a fish out of water. So, either he got shook and decided he does need to play PC politics or he was 7 months from the Presidential election without any understanding of where he actually stood on abortion or he is lying about his political views on abortion and got his lies mixed up. 2 of those expose him as a politician just everyone else and not the honest speak his mind outsider he has billed himself as. The other just makes him seem incompetent and ill-prepared.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No, I agree with Courtjester that he gets more of the gotcha stuff.

But that's for two reasons:

1.  He's leading.  

2.  Frankly, he falls for it.  

Which is actually a waste of time on the part of the media.  Because there's no reason to aste time on this dumb Chris Matthews stunt, when there's so much other dumb Trumpisms to cover.

The wall.  That freaking wall.  This alone should bury him.  John Oliver showed video of this Circus Peanut (that is the exact hue, by the way) changing his answer on cost from $4 billion to $12 billion.   No coverage.  People should just be pounding him on his dumb foreign policy answers that are making every other world leader go like this:   :shock:
Link to the speech or position paper where Trump said the wall would cost $4 billion?

 
Watching some Trump reports interviewed about the missteps The Donald's made lately, the theme all of them gave for their primary reason for supporting him was that he speaks his mind and is honest.

Have we really fallen so far as a country in either our faith in politicians, or in our intellectual demands from our politicians, that "speaking one's mind" is a reason to vote for them to be president?  Really?

I'm really starting to think Mike Judge is freaking Nostradamus.  
It's a backlash to the absurdity of political correctness we have encountered in recent years. I get it but I agree it's a terrible reason to vote for president. 

 
Correction.  He got caught saying something that makes complete sense to anyone with a brain.  Still haven't heard you refute his point.
I really don't know what his stance is because it has changed often over the years and the past few days. Very Hillary-esque of this guy who "speaks the truth". So I do think it's fair to say that he was speaking out of his ### and got caught.

So I'll go with that if elected he will appoint judges and do all he can to make abortions illegal. Then I'll accept that this guy will then arrest women. Excellent candidate. 

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top