dparker713
Footballguy
Umm, no. We can't agree to disagree. This is basic math.Well, we'll just have to agree to disagree because Obama was just about as green as they come.
Umm, no. We can't agree to disagree. This is basic math.Well, we'll just have to agree to disagree because Obama was just about as green as they come.
Sure it is. Obama had infinity times more experience than Donald.
God, that's such an ugly decorating job.
Trump's winning!SaintsInDome2006 said:
Jeff Gauvin @JeffersonObama 13m13 minutes ago
NEW#polls 7/21
■REUT: Clinton +4
■RASM: Trump +1
■ARG: C +1
■DECP: C+7
■ECN: C +4
■CNN: C +7
■NBC: C +5
■ABC: C +4
■AP: C +4
■PEW: C +9
at Rasmussen still fighting the good fight.2.7 pt lead for crooked Hillary according to RCP average.at Rasmussen still fighting the good fight.
But even if you don't throw them out, that's an average lead of 4.5% for Clinton (5% without it). That's up slightly from the start of the convention (~3%). Pretty sure losing ground the week of your convention would be unprecedented.
You are Trump.MaxThreshold said:Yeah, you obviously haven't read any of my posts on Trump. He is not "my side" and I won't be voting for him. I'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy of the left.
It's what I do.
If I'm not mistaken Rasmussen was down -6 from the prior week.That's what it was a couple days ago. Can you see if that total includes the polls above?
ETA: nope...latest dates there are 7/20. Not sure how far back they include in the rolling average so still won't be +4.5%, but that's a lot of data points suggesting she's extending her lead.
How can anybody say this with a straight face?sho nuff said:Obamas experience wasnt bad at all.
"a little" <> "infinity". THAT'S basic math.dparker713 said:Umm, no. We can't agree to disagree. This is basic math.
x/0 = infinity"a little" <> "infinity". THAT'S basic math.
I don't think experience is so much the point of criticism as it is judgment. For however much you might dislike Obama, his errors in judgment are entirely within the normal range. Trump, however, is a lunatic.MaxThreshold said:Well, at least the good news is the GOP isn't nominating a criminal like the DNC. And I don't remember the left complaining about experience when Obama first ran. He hadn't even run a lemonade stand at that point.
But only NOW is experience absolutely crucial.
Why wouldn't you? Trump is using a very basic gameplan. The idea is that voters get sick of hearing the same thing over and over again and eventually tune it out and go the other way. The democrats went to extreme lengths over the years to call Bush and Palin stupid morons who say dumb things and then they applied it to the entire republican party. Its actually common sense that the voters overall are going to get really tired of hearing democrats say that after 10 years (even if YOU think it is still valid and funny). To most voters, its not original or funny anymore, and if democrats keep saying it, they are going to vote for the guy who represents it best just to shut it up.MaxThreshold said:I agree with that. I never expected this either.
This is the sort of stuff that gets Trump elected. If democrats everywhere call him a lunatic, Trump is going to win big. That must stop. It simply must stop. I'm growing more pessimistic by the day that democrats have a clue what they are doing.I don't think experience is so much the point of criticism as it is judgment. For however much you might dislike Obama, his errors in judgment are entirely within the normal range. Trump, however, is a lunatic.
Because facts aren't that funny?How can anybody say this with a straight face?
Obama has said plenty. The media doesn't do its job by protecting him.The General said:If Obama said a small percentage of the messed up stuff Trump has said he wouldn't have sniffed the nomination. It really is remarkable Trump won.
Go through the list of Trump gaffes in the past 6 months. Then compare to Obama when he was running. Watch the 60 Minutes interview with Trump from last week. Not even in the same universe. Nobody is with Donald, mind boggling he got the nom.Obama has said plenty. The media doesn't do its job by protecting him.
You are notIf I'm not mistaken Rasmussen was down -6 from the prior week.
He got the nomination pretty much the same way Obama did and it was mainly due to their timing. "Change" versus the "Anti- political correctness" that Trump is going with.Go through the list of Trump gaffes in the past 6 months. Then compare to Obama when he was running. Watch the 60 Minutes interview with Trump from last week. Not even in the same universe. Nobody is with Donald, mind boggling he got the nom.
ftfyGo through the list of Trump gaffes in the past 6 hours. Then compare to Obama when he was running.
Not really.He did just lay out quite nicely the record and legacy of Clinton in the office of SoS.
I'll repost this from the Clinton thread cause I'd like an answer.This is the sort of stuff that gets Trump elected. If democrats everywhere call him a lunatic, Trump is going to win big. That must stop. It simply must stop. I'm growing more pessimistic by the day that democrats have a clue what they are doing.
Nice. Of course he's now going to be sent to a gulag if Trump wins, but nice.Mark Cuban on Colbert : "Donald the only way you're worth $10 billion is if I paid you $9.5 billion to WASH MY BALLS!"
Umm, even the Super Bowl doesn't get 75% of Americans watching it.CNN overnight poll: 75% of Americans liked the speech, thought it was positive.
If those numbers hold up, he wins.
Dude ain't winning. Not happening.CNN overnight poll: 75% of Americans liked the speech, thought it was positive.
If those numbers hold up, he wins.
How I wish you were right. But-Dude ain't winning. Not happening.
I'm in a very rock solid Republican area of the country. Many, many, many people aren't voting for him. They sure aren't pulling the lever straight for Hillary...but they can't/won't vote for him.How I wish you were right. But-
I think he has a decent chance and its growing all the time.
Of course he hasn't a decent chance. You could put a mannequin up there and it would have a decent chance against Hillary, maybe even a better chance than Trump. The country is ideologically divided as it is but put a candidate up that most of the country can't stand, on both sides of the political aisle, and there is always a chance the other side will win.How I wish you were right. But-
I think he has a decent chance and its growing all the time.
This is the sort of stuff that gets Trump elected. If democrats everywhere call him a lunatic, Trump is going to win big. That must stop. It simply must stop. I'm growing more pessimistic by the day that democrats have a clue what they are doing.
Just calling a spade a spade. I don't think this is in much dispute, do you?He's been spewing the same oleJust calling a spade a spade. I don't think this is in much dispute, do you?
for weeks. Don't bother.Gotchya'. Makes sense.He's been spewing the same olefor weeks. Don't bother.
Exactly, I'm not sure how people that were on the fence would feel about that speech. He made America sound like we're going down the crapper and the only way anything will be fixed is if we elect him and only him. If people were hoping for specifics from him, they're going to be waiting awhile.No one knows anything about how the speech played until we see new polling on the race but it's hard to see how that speech would convinced anyone who wasn't already on board.
Incredibly dystopian and made the U.S. sound like a ####hole.
Anybody on the fence has x debates coming that will render last night irrelevant.Exactly, I'm not sure how people that were on the fence would feel about that speech. He made America sound like we're going down the crapper and the only way anything will be fixed is if we elect him and only him. If people were hoping for specifics from him, they're going to be waiting awhile.
In many ways it is the boy who cried wolf...the dems have disparaged anyone who they have deemed a threat dating back to Reagan...pretty much every Republican that has challenged them has been attacked with many of the same labels that are now being thrown at Trump...I think many are tired of this tactic...if Hillary wants to defeat Trump I don't think this strategy will be the way to go...if she wants to win she should show why a continuation of the past eight years is a winning formula for our country as well as why the American people can trust her to be her their Commander-in-Chief...Just calling a spade a spade. I don't think this is in much dispute, do you?