The party of hotSomeday when his daughter runs, what party does she represent?
The party of hotSomeday when his daughter runs, what party does she represent?
What? Did you not watch the fight the GOP had over trump? The Never Trump? The outright blasting of Trump by Cruz, still now we are seeing Republicans run away from Trump.Saints, I like your analysis, except-
On the Democratic side, nobody beats Hillary- not Booker, or Biden, or anyone. Simple reason- she had the best name recognition among African-Americans and they believed she was due. The trust and email issues would have made no difference.
And once Hillary was the Democratoc nominee she would have defeated anybody on the Republican side. I suspect that deep down conservatives senses this which was part of the reason they went with Trump. Barring a catastrophe, Hillary Clinton was always going to be our next President.
Think it will reach 1000 by election?This is page 666 for those who care.
Yeah, this. PlusWhat? Did you not watch the fight the GOP had over trump? The Never Trump? The outright blasting of Trump by Cruz, still now we are seeing Republicans run away from Trump.
@ actual conservatives having anything to do with Trump. Trump is the result of a grass roots insurgency by a bunch of angry bigots scared because the world is changing.My opinion of her doesn't matter. I am trying to point out 2 facts:GTFO. I know you love her man, but she's a hugely flawed candidate. Many (D)s would have beat her, and anyone reasonable nominated by the Republicans would have been a close call.
I watched it all. Trump was terrible from the beginning, and none of those guys could stop him.What? Did you not watch the fight the GOP had over trump? The Never Trump? The outright blasting of Trump by Cruz, still now we are seeing Republicans run away from Trump.
This is too easy of a softball:. The party in my pants.Someday when his daughter runs, what party does she represent?
Because of name and face recognition?I watched it all. Trump was terrible from the beginning, and none of those guys could stop him.
Cruz was an established politician who shared most of Trump's views. And he didn't really come close to stopping Trump, because of name and face recognition.
Well, black voters certainly did prefer Hillary to Bernie Sanders. I don't think it's particularly obvious that they would have overwhelmingly preferred her to other options. And no, name recognition doesn't trump all other factors. No one outside of die hard Democrats and political junkies knew who Obama was when he started off running against Hillary in 2008. And beat her.My opinion of her doesn't matter. I am trying to point out 2 facts:
1. Name and face recognition trumps all other factors.
3. On the Democratic side, when blacks vote as a group, it's over.
Wat?I watched it all. Trump was terrible from the beginning, and none of those guys could stop him.
Cruz was an established politician who shared most of Trump's views. And he didn't really come close to stopping Trump, because of name and face recognition.
I am betting that if you polled the people who attend Trump rallies, not now but one year ago, they would have told you they loved Ted Cruz.Because of name and face recognition?
I think it has more to do with this being the death rattle of the Tea Party, and everyone in the GOP agreeing that they cannot stand Ted Cruz.
I mean, finding Cruz repulsive is one thing everyone can get on board with.
1. Everyone recognizes both Clinton and Trump and everyone hates either Clinton or Trump. Recognition isn't intrinsically good.My opinion of her doesn't matter. I am trying to point out 2 facts:
1. Name and face recognition trumps all other factors.
3. On the Democratic side, when blacks vote as a group, it's over.
I should have written that name recognition trumps most factors- but incredible charisma can trump all factors. I like Corey Booker, and Kaine, and Joe Biden, but there are no Obamas on that list.Well, black voters certainly did prefer Hillary to Bernie Sanders. I don't think it's particularly obvious that they would have overwhelmingly preferred her to other options. And no, name recognition doesn't trump all other factors. No one outside of die hard Democrats and political junkies knew who Obama was when he started off running against Hillary in 2008. And beat her.
I watched it all. Trump was terrible from the beginning, and none of those guys could stop him.
Cruz was an established politician who shared most of Trump's views. And he didn't really come close to stopping Trump, because of name and face recognition.
And by everyone we mean Like EVERYONE - he might be the most hated politician in Washington.Because of name and face recognition?
I think it has more to do with this being the death rattle of the Tea Party, and everyone in the GOP agreeing that they cannot stand Ted Cruz.
I mean, finding Cruz repulsive is one thing everyone can get on board with.
Saints, I like your analysis, except-
On the Democratic side, nobody beats Hillary- not Booker, or Biden, or anyone. Simple reason- she had the best name recognition among African-Americans and they believed she was due. The trust and email issues would have made no difference.
And once Hillary was the Democratoc nominee she would have defeated anybody on the Republican side. I suspect that deep down conservatives senses this which was part of the reason they went with Trump. Barring a catastrophe, Hillary Clinton was always going to be our next President.
Do you seriously not remember 2008, Tim? It mattered so much then that an unknown charismatic senator from Illinois thumped Hillary in the primaries. I think Booker or Biden wipe the floor with Hillary and then would be up 15-20 points on Trump right now. Would be an even bigger blood bath.My opinion of her doesn't matter. I am trying to point out 2 facts:
1. Name and face recognition trumps all other factors.
3. On the Democratic side, when blacks vote as a group, it's over.
Why won't he? It must be that what many people are saying is true, he's a major donor for NAMBLA
There was this Jeb! fella who had pretty strong name recognition.Going into this election, the two most famous people in terms of name recognition who chose to run for President were Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Nobody else was even close. It's not a coincidence that these are our nominees.
In terms of Trump, no celebrity without political experience has ever chosen to seriously run before. But what if one had? Suppose Walter Cronkite had run in 1972? Or Joe Montana in 1996? Or Bruce Springsteen? With name and face recognition greater than all politicians, who knows?
The battle between Obama and Hillary in those primaries are still legendary, their bloodbath was so vicious that many thought that the very Idea of Hillary serving in the Obama administration simply ludicrous.Do you seriously not remember 2008, Tim? It mattered so much then that an unknown charismatic senator from Illinois thumped Hillary in the primaries. I think Booker or Biden wipe the floor with Hillary and then would be up 15-20 points on Trump right now. Would be an even bigger blood bath.
No, he's not. That's one poll, and not a particularly important or well known one at that.
Not polls, one poll and that is the USC/Dornsife L.A. Times poll that uses questionable methodology because they keep using the same respondents.
That poll has had Trump on top many times and has never had Clinton up by more than a couple IIRC. Outlier for sure but let them keep believing.Not polls, one poll and that is the USC/Dornsife L.A. Times poll that uses questionable methodology because they keep using the same respondents.
Obama had two things going for him: extraordinary charisma, and the first serious chance of a black President, which got all the black vote behind him. He needed both those factors to beat Hillary and then just barely.Do you seriously not remember 2008, Tim? It mattered so much then that an unknown charismatic senator from Illinois thumped Hillary in the primaries. I think Booker or Biden wipe the floor with Hillary and then would be up 15-20 points on Trump right now. Would be an even bigger blood bath.
LA Times seems credible. Just passing along information.That poll has had Trump on top many times and has never had Clinton up by more than a couple IIRC. Outlier for sure but let them keep believing.
I edited my post. See the link.LA Times seems credible. Just passing along information.
Polls vs poll....hmm, which one is the proper term to use when just referencing one single poll?
From the article:
Moot point in that neither ran against her, knowing that she couldn't be beaten.I do agree that Booker or Biden would be doing better against Trump, though not 15-20 points. Slightly better.
I think Donald covered this. The game is rigged and everyone knows it.From the article:
"Separately, the poll also asks voters which candidate they think will win. That question has often shown greater ability to predict election outcomes than asking people who they will vote for, particularly when the election remains months away. Clinton continues to lead voter expectations by a large margin, 54%-40%."
In his defense, both statements are true. LA Times is credible (though the poll may not be) and he was passing it along. I go to real clear politics and look at the polls (all the polls!) so I've seen this one for a long time being well off of all the others. National polls don't matter much anyway.
I think Donald covered this. The game is rigged and everyone knows it.
Other than you can't rig a national election he has a point.I think Donald covered this. The game is rigged and everyone knows it.
You'll be watching Trump News every day a year from now.I think Donald covered this. The game is rigged and everyone knows it.
I think Donald covered this. The game is rigged and everyone knows it.
Not if I turn it off.You'll be watching Trump News every day a year from now.
Yup, starring Manafort, Hannity, van Susteren, Lewandowski, the blonde "Trump supporter" chick from CNN, possibly Palin. Run by Ailes & Breitbart, and featuring guest appearances by the Orange Leader himself.You'll be watching Trump News every day a year from now.