This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I would be on the Pollard 2025 1st side.Understood. I think pollard is undervalued but I should have gotten more back for Walker.I like getting the 1et but I’d rather have Walker.The perils of making an offer before having yourin the morning. I saw the offer was accepted when I went to withdraw.
12 team SF
Ken Walker, 2025 3rd (probably late)
For
Tony pollard, 2025 1st (probably late)
Understood. I think pollard is undervalued but I should have gotten more back for Walker.I like getting the 1et but I’d rather have Walker.The perils of making an offer before having your
12 team SF
Ken Walker, 2025 3rd (probably late)
For
Tony pollard, 2025 1st (probably late)
Understood. I think pollard is undervalued but I should have gotten more back for Walker.I like getting the 1et but I’d rather have Walker.The perils of making an offer before having your
12 team SF
Ken Walker, 2025 3rd (probably late)
For
Tony pollard, 2025 1st (probably late)
His team’s starting lineup is strong. But other than having 3 really good QBs (Mahomes, Allen, Stafford), he majorly lacks depth. So there’s a chance the pick is higher than the lineup would suggest. Still, unless he really gets hit by injuries it’s probably 1.08-1.12.Understood. I think pollard is undervalued but I should have gotten more back for Walker.I like getting the 1et but I’d rather have Walker.The perils of making an offer before having your
12 team SF
Ken Walker, 2025 3rd (probably late)
For
Tony pollard, 2025 1st (probably late)
From what you are saying the fact it looks like the #1 will be late is the part I don't like...I don't mind the structure of the deal, but I wish either the RB was a little younger (although Pollard has low miles) or the pick had more potential to be a high one...definitely not a bad deal and I see the thinking but would like a little more potential long-term upside.
His team’s starting lineup is strong. But other than having 3 really good QBs (Mahomes, Allen, Stafford), he majorly lacks depth. So there’s a chance the pick is higher than the lineup would suggest. Still, unless he really gets hit by injuries it’s probably 1.08-1.12.Understood. I think pollard is undervalued but I should have gotten more back for Walker.I like getting the 1et but I’d rather have Walker.The perils of making an offer before having your
12 team SF
Ken Walker, 2025 3rd (probably late)
For
Tony pollard, 2025 1st (probably late)
From what you are saying the fact it looks like the #1 will be late is the part I don't like...I don't mind the structure of the deal, but I wish either the RB was a little younger (although Pollard has low miles) or the pick had more potential to be a high one...definitely not a bad deal and I see the thinking but would like a little more potential long-term upside.
Cool trade. Brooks better hit.
Fair. I’m probably on Hall/2.12 but if I can wait to win Brooks/Waddle has a lot of upside.
This is a weird team. I think my starters were ok, but the bench is basically empty.
Why trade a guy in hopes you draft someone as good as LaPorta?
To get two guys as good as Laporta? Guessing that's the hope.
That’s a lot. But I do like LaPorta.
Yeah, we’ve never seen that fail have we?
Even if that’s TE-P that’s not a small price to pay.
More context. We are halfway through the startup draft. This is a best ball empire league (league shuts down if someone wins twice in a row, or after 10 years).
No, no it's not
Brian Thomas
I like Thomas but would have taken brooks 5.
I'm so confused, seriously, you are saying this is a startup but everything about this sounds like rookie draft picks. But I also don't know how FFPC could be having a rookie draft now. What am I missing???
Do most startup drafts not separate rookie and veteran drafts? The last few I did were like that. But it’s been a while.
All 3 of mine did.
:thinkiing: I still like the Robinson side of this trade, especially in a 14 team league. I don't really consider 1.25 ppr for TEs much of a TE Premium and Brooks may not be what people hope him to be, especially giving up Robinson. I would not trade Robinson for any two of those. Not close for me.
As a Bijan shareholder it would take an overpay for me to part with him.
I think both could get it done. I’d certainly consider either package.
I'm in the camp that two is equitable value, would consider it a fair trade. But I'm also in the camp that if I had Bijan I'm probably wanting more then equitable. But three of them, especially in a 14 team league, is a pretty stout overpay I'd be jumping on and the side getting all 3 three is a clear and decisive winner of this trade.
I probably make the trade too, but not without fear that any of those 3 could be a handful of magic beans, since there’s a greater than zero chance any rookie busts.
If Brooks flops it’s a bummer in a 14 team league where you have to start 2 of them
It's a potential dynasty making kind of trade. It's two 2nd round startup pick plus a 4th round startup pick. All obviously very young and very promising.
Not taken that way at all. I'm just saying it would be very hard for me to trade a young stud like Bijan Robinson when RBs are so scarce in this league, but yes, it COULD be good value long term but risky when 2 of the 3 are rookies. Having said that, the team trading Robinson is the strongest team in the league and still has Hall, ETN, and JT. The team trading the 3 players isn't a contender and probably shouldn't have made this deal.
Agreed. I gave Rome and a late 25 1st for Bijan in a 32 team league (players available twice). And was really on the fence about it.
I gave it more context in that the team getting the 3 players is the strongest team in the league and that team getting Bijan Robinson isn't a contender, so he shouldn't have made the trade. For me personally, it would be hard to pry Robinson from my cold dead hands in a 14 team league with scarcity at RB, but on the surface it's a good deal getting the 3 players, but still risky because two of the three are rookies and one of them coming off a major injury. The guy getting the three players plays this league like a fiddle and shows why he's the strongest team year in and year out. In the past he has always gotten the better end of most trades, but not all. None of us do.
Timeframe and team makeup certainly matter. Still, Bijan is a player you can build around. Other than CMC, he’s the closest thing to Tomlinson that we’ve seen in quite a while imo.
