This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
You robbed him big time. There is risk due to injury but Hubbard helps with that a little. This was a terrible trade by the other person and don't think it would have been fair if that 2nd was a 1st unless it was definitely going to be a top 4-5 pick.
I had a ton of picks 3 1sts this year and 4 next year along with 3 2nds and wanted CMC to go for the 3peat this year. I overpaid a bit earlier this offseason giving 1.12 (kept 1.1 and 1.5), 2023 1st, 2024 1st (both of those will be 10-12 guaranteed and kept higher ones in 23), Irv Smith (have Pitts/Kelce), Gus Edwards, Jaelen Reagor, and Quintez Cephus (both from my taxi) for CMC and Hubbard. This was a robbery in comparison. I know I overpaid but was ok with it because of everything else that I had.
Good job. Dang. Besides the obvious lack of value giving away CMC, just in general I'd rather roster *one* of Gibson or Robinson and hope to be right. Plus it sure looks like a committee. Even if Gibson blows the world away (I really, really want him to), a healthy CMC is in a whole other stratosphere.
Nothing wrong with taking the dart throw to a better offense without a running QB. Plus, younger and more unknown. Ceiling may be higher and no Monty in front of him.
Moved Dalvin Cook for Pickens and a 23 first. I probably didn’t maximize value with these trades but my roster was devoid of young talent to build around and not good enough to win. I’m content with how my roster is shaping up for 2024.
Reposting from a couple days ago just because.
nice buy low. Doubt that you would find Golladay's upside at that spot.
Interesting trade.....
Good price to pay for elite WR JJ. I'd be happy to pay that plus add a 2nd round pick if I needed to...
I am team A. The extra value that few take into consideration is the roster spot that was opened up. This was key as I had 2 1st rnd and 3 2nd round rookie picks. Roster spots are so valuable!
And another.
That’s extremely good for a rooster. I’m no farmer, but I believe most don’t live more than 7-8 years.
Fields for TLaw seems like a wash with the edge to TLaw - I like TLaw’s situation better.
Total guess, but I think he’d go for a 4th-ish but his owner would probably want a 3rd.
I think the pick is on the wrong side. I guess if you're a contender looking for safety this may make sense.
Not amazing moves but got some talent and if you were committed to the rebuild it could have been worse. Not sure I think you got enough for TB12 and Lizard for 2 2nds (one in a bad draft). Ridley could still come back and who knows how good the 24 1st will be this early. I'd like a little more for Cook but if that 23 1st is high then it may not be bad as Pickens looks legit.
In true dynasty this is closer as I do think Goedert and Godwin are good pieces and Lamb is a stud. If you weren't going to keep the other 2 then this was a good move for you and probably a win-win for the other guy if those other 2 are better than his keepers. Good move.
This seems pretty fair due to T-Law over Fields. I like London and Robinson might have just taken the starting spot from Gibson. Might come down to where that 1st falls but if I'm in pretty even deal, then give me the side that gets the best player and that is Lamb by a long ways. Give me the Fields/Lamb side and I'd be way happy with it.
How did the Moore owner have to include a pick on this. This seems bad. Someone drinking the pre-season koolade on A-Rob way too much.
I think Sutton for the #1 was pretty fair even though I'm not as huge on Sutton as some. The 24 1st and 3rd for Allgeier was a big win for him. I think the Johnson one was a loss and not sure why he felt he needed to include a young, taxi RB in Haskins to make it happen.
I'd take Johnson over Sutton if that matters.
Yeah, for sure. I was only asking a 2nd for Robinson, and he said he wanted to send a WR to even the roster positions. I did not argue. Elijah for both of us would be our WR4 or WR5.
This is Gibson in a slam dunk
Gibson was my RB5 and I need depth at WR. I am really concerned about Gibson’s value going forward. With that said, I traded 2 of my bench players for a starter, I’m good with that.
I don't think we can include Gibson and "slam dunk" in any deal right now, but I don't care for the other side either. If Gibson's value is that low the owner should have probably held him.
Gibbons perceived value has taken a hit, but I have not been impressed with Kirk at all. Way better chance of Gibson value increasing imo.
Fair enough, my take is that Kirk is about to take off and become a top 20 WR, maybe better.
time will tell.
While I like Kirk too, you undersold Gibson. You gave away value. I would have requested something to go with Kirk ... maybe a late 2nd.
You would have accepted Kirk and a 2nd for Hooper and Gibson? Geez, maybe I did way undersell. Either way, I wanted out on Gibson and in on Kirk. I almost straight up offered a 2nd, but my bigger issue is not enough roster spots.
I’d probably pay that.
