Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
15th overall? I like it. I’m expecting the Chargers to draft a WR early, and I wasn’t all that impressed with Palmer this year. Gainwell is a good RB but I doubt they make him a feature back.
Actually traded Gainwell for Palmer last season. Both seem solid but more like players I'd value in the 3rd-4th round type of range and I'd pay two thirds for 2.3.
I don’t like claypool at all, but I would still trade a 6th for him if I had roster room.
Same. I don’t like him either and am trying to actively trade him in my other league with him and getting no response from owners. But I have 2 spots in this one and I’ll fill one with him at this price
Fine deal for u, but I stopped giving my ffpc cutdown guys away for anything less than a 4th and even then it is a toss up if I can't get a 3rd. Is the 6th worth more to your trade partner than forcing you or another owner to use a 3rd to get Claypool in the draft? Unless you have no picks at all IMHO it often makes more sense to just cut the player rather than gain a 6th.
I hear ya. IMO, Tua is a HUGE risk. Pretty much one more concussion and his career is done. He'd have to be a throw in on a deal as he's not someone I'd sink value into right now.
Solid. For the record I wil l state I was previously wrong about Kirk and that I don't think this deal is as bad as some have said, but yes give me the picks and the young QB (who I'd try to flip for more picks).
1.06 and two roster spots. Slam dunk.
Single 1st for Pollard could be a decent price. I'd probably lean on the asset that can't break it's knee or ankle or head. That 2024 1st won't decline in value.
I think I have a negative bias against both Moore and Swift. Still not sure I'd move them here, but I can see it. If it wasn't for the risk associated with Tua, I'd easily do it. I don't have a handle on how I feel about his situation. I know people are trying to move him and there is potentially a buylow window here.
Big Palmer fan but I'd go for the pick and the roster spots (in any format)
Same here with a pretty big caveat. It depends on whether it is somebody I actually like or not. If I think the player will be a clogger on someone else's roster, then yes I would love to "profit" a cheap 6th round pick in order to do that to an opponent. My hit rate on 5th-7th round picks isn't terrible. At the same time, if it's someone I think will be desirable enough to warrant someone picking them with a 3rd while OTC, and if I don't like that player, I might lean towards cutting just to make the draft deeper for me.
There's probably a President's Day Sale going on for towels if you need to clean up after that. My god man, good work. I actually don't know that I'd have been able to counter the first offer. I'd probably ship it just like that.
I’m a little in shock.
Yes for sure if I truly think nothing of the player I'd take it. I also might be more inclined to take it if it's a player I like but am trading them to a team I don't view as a threat to my goals. At least that way I bury the player so no one else I'm contending with can pick him up for peanuts.
I have a lot of Likely but doubt I can get anything and I'll probably be cutting him (not for any clever reason but just because I'll have to).
Amazing work!so here’s a good “ya never know what might happen” deal. I posted the 1st offer in the “worst trade you’ve ever been offered” topic.
I countered, and chatted with the owner via text. Went back & forth for a day+. Now we have an accord that I’m pretty happy with. I think.
Originally rec’d offer of Purdy/Lance/Hall/Swift for his 1.01
Nope!
16 team, PPR, IDP, SF with performance scoring (TFL/SFL = big points)
I gave: Swift/Purdy/Skyy Moore
I get: 1.01
It leaves me with only Fields at QB in a SF format, but I’ve found in performance IDP where a sack for a loss can be 26 points, that’s not all that bad. I like Purdy, but he’s about to go through a significant surgery, and I’m not sure what his upside is. I suspect we’ve seen close to his ceiling, which might be better for RL football than FF. ~15-25 a week at QB isn’t that great.
We had a deal in place for a swift/purdy/6.06 for 1.01, but he decided he wanted Hall. I wouldn’t budge, so he offered this up and I smashed accept.
If Swift becomes the stud 20 touch guy everyone thought he’d be, I may lose this trade. For now I’m very happy to move off of him before the Lions Re-sign Williams or draft a Williams replacement. I also like Skyy Moore more than many here, so that was a dude I didn’t want to part with. But some here feel he’s a ST guy, so maybe that’s a win too before his value craters more.
I’m very tempted to flip the 1.01 for the 1.02 or 1.03 + player(s) and take a QB, but I’m also very tempted to take Bijan and have him in both of my dynasty leagues.
And as a small bonus I got to keep Lance, who I now hope starts or gets traded. That’s kinda crazy - I would have gladly included him for not a lot more.
And I cleared 2 roster spots.
Even from a Swift believer like myself, jumping Swift up to Robinson for that price (...I know QB's are very valuable in SF, but Purdy? Not a lock to be anything) is just insane. And Moore is literally an unnoticeable blip within this transaction.
Are you a lock for Bijan at 1.01 given your lack of quality QB regardless of landing spot?so here’s a good “ya never know what might happen” deal. I posted the 1st offer in the “worst trade you’ve ever been offered” topic.
I countered, and chatted with the owner via text. Went back & forth for a day+. Now we have an accord that I’m pretty happy with. I think.
Originally rec’d offer of Purdy/Lance/Hall/Swift for his 1.01
Nope!
16 team, PPR, IDP, SF with performance scoring (TFL/SFL = big points)
I gave: Swift/Purdy/Skyy Moore
I get: 1.01
It leaves me with only Fields at QB in a SF format, but I’ve found in performance IDP where a sack for a loss can be 26 points, that’s not all that bad. I like Purdy, but he’s about to go through a significant surgery, and I’m not sure what his upside is. I suspect we’ve seen close to his ceiling, which might be better for RL football than FF. ~15-25 a week at QB isn’t that great.
We had a deal in place for a swift/purdy/6.06 for 1.01, but he decided he wanted Hall. I wouldn’t budge, so he offered this up and I smashed accept.
If Swift becomes the stud 20 touch guy everyone thought he’d be, I may lose this trade. For now I’m very happy to move off of him before the Lions Re-sign Williams or draft a Williams replacement. I also like Skyy Moore more than many here, so that was a dude I didn’t want to part with. But some here feel he’s a ST guy, so maybe that’s a win too before his value craters more.
I’m very tempted to flip the 1.01 for the 1.02 or 1.03 + player(s) and take a QB, but I’m also very tempted to take Bijan and have him in both of my dynasty leagues.
And as a small bonus I got to keep Lance, who I now hope starts or gets traded. That’s kinda crazy - I would have gladly included him for not a lot more.
And I cleared 2 roster spots.
I’ll likely entertain offers during the draft. If teams 1.02 or 1.03 have a RB+WR+1st I could see moving down 1-2 spots and taking a QB.
Interesting strategy. I'm always trying to sell off my bottom players for minimal picks, or minimal pick-swaps. But last year I almost went the route you're describing with Gallup. Couldn't get anything out of him, not any second round pick. So I thought about just dropping him, and thinking that someone would hopefully take him before my first pick at 2.06. Had that happened, that would be one extra rookie available when my string of four picks in the late second round came up. But I ended up selling him to move up from 2.11 to 2.07. (The good news is, that 2.07 got me Jameson Williams, so it's plausible the guy I traded with would have snagged him, had I not done the trade.)
Seems really dumb of the other guy.
Williams at 2.07?? WTF??
Honestly don’t know why anyone would deal the 1.01 before the NFL draft. With the right landing spot for Bijan, the value could actually take a big jump.
Our league is nuts for RB's. It is QRRWWFKD, 20 man rosters, so WR are rather plentiful, but these guys just take it too far. The first round included 10 or 11 RB's.
That's really stupid. That many RBs in LAST year's draft??
If you see any of them, just tell them it's very smart. Thank you.
)
Strange league where 2nd round picks are more valuable than 1sts.
I was offered Mixon for my 1.04 in SF. Yours is a bit more palatable.
I’d need a moist towelette.
I’d probably want the Stevenson side because I love the dude, but that’s a very fair deal.
Start 6 (outside of K + D), I can understand the thinking. Depending on how many teams, it's likely each team has at least 3 WRs that are better options than a rookie WR. With those starting roster requirements, anyone past WR40 is a roster clogger. I'd be taking my chances on RBs that could potentially see my lineup.
It's 12 team. Yeah, I think RB's with a shot are rightfully around the value of gold, but the degree is definitely a bit extreme.
Only thing I can think of is the comment that the 2024 pick “could be anywhere”, so if you’re a gambler & stacked at RB, you could be getting a QB1 or Harrison Jr.
I’m with you - see my response above. I’d take Stevenson all day.
This feels like you just robbed him. Not sure why he would even consider dropping Lance/Hall and taking Skyy Moore (total bust it looks like so far). 1.01 is worth a lot more than that. Maybe it would be fairer if you had left Lance in the deal so he for sure got the 49ers starting QB. I don't play Dynasty SF personally but this feels like a really bad trade for him. Good trade for you.so here’s a good “ya never know what might happen” deal. I posted the 1st offer in the “worst trade you’ve ever been offered” topic.
I countered, and chatted with the owner via text. Went back & forth for a day+. Now we have an accord that I’m pretty happy with. I think.
Originally rec’d offer of Purdy/Lance/Hall/Swift for his 1.01
Nope!
16 team, PPR, IDP, SF with performance scoring (TFL/SFL = big points)
I gave: Swift/Purdy/Skyy Moore
I get: 1.01
It leaves me with only Fields at QB in a SF format, but I’ve found in performance IDP where a sack for a loss can be 26 points, that’s not all that bad. I like Purdy, but he’s about to go through a significant surgery, and I’m not sure what his upside is. I suspect we’ve seen close to his ceiling, which might be better for RL football than FF. ~15-25 a week at QB isn’t that great.
We had a deal in place for a swift/purdy/6.06 for 1.01, but he decided he wanted Hall. I wouldn’t budge, so he offered this up and I smashed accept.
If Swift becomes the stud 20 touch guy everyone thought he’d be, I may lose this trade. For now I’m very happy to move off of him before the Lions Re-sign Williams or draft a Williams replacement. I also like Skyy Moore more than many here, so that was a dude I didn’t want to part with. But some here feel he’s a ST guy, so maybe that’s a win too before his value craters more.
I’m very tempted to flip the 1.01 for the 1.02 or 1.03 + player(s) and take a QB, but I’m also very tempted to take Bijan and have him in both of my dynasty leagues.
And as a small bonus I got to keep Lance, who I now hope starts or gets traded. That’s kinda crazy - I would have gladly included him for not a lot more.
And I cleared 2 roster spots.
I'm looking to sell Mixon but it is 1 QB but this would not get it done for me.
I offered to include him for a modest upgrade on his side, and he declined and countered with Skyy Moore.This feels like you just robbed him. Not sure why he would even consider dropping Lance/Hall and taking Skyy Moore (total bust it looks like so far). 1.01 is worth a lot more than that. Maybe it would be fairer if you had left Lance in the deal so he for sure got the 49ers starting QB. I don't play Dynasty SF personally but this feels like a really bad trade for him. Good trade for you.so here’s a good “ya never know what might happen” deal. I posted the 1st offer in the “worst trade you’ve ever been offered” topic.
I countered, and chatted with the owner via text. Went back & forth for a day+. Now we have an accord that I’m pretty happy with. I think.
Originally rec’d offer of Purdy/Lance/Hall/Swift for his 1.01
Nope!
16 team, PPR, IDP, SF with performance scoring (TFL/SFL = big points)
I gave: Swift/Purdy/Skyy Moore
I get: 1.01
It leaves me with only Fields at QB in a SF format, but I’ve found in performance IDP where a sack for a loss can be 26 points, that’s not all that bad. I like Purdy, but he’s about to go through a significant surgery, and I’m not sure what his upside is. I suspect we’ve seen close to his ceiling, which might be better for RL football than FF. ~15-25 a week at QB isn’t that great.
We had a deal in place for a swift/purdy/6.06 for 1.01, but he decided he wanted Hall. I wouldn’t budge, so he offered this up and I smashed accept.
If Swift becomes the stud 20 touch guy everyone thought he’d be, I may lose this trade. For now I’m very happy to move off of him before the Lions Re-sign Williams or draft a Williams replacement. I also like Skyy Moore more than many here, so that was a dude I didn’t want to part with. But some here feel he’s a ST guy, so maybe that’s a win too before his value craters more.
I’m very tempted to flip the 1.01 for the 1.02 or 1.03 + player(s) and take a QB, but I’m also very tempted to take Bijan and have him in both of my dynasty leagues.
And as a small bonus I got to keep Lance, who I now hope starts or gets traded. That’s kinda crazy - I would have gladly included him for not a lot more.
And I cleared 2 roster spots.
If Purdy wasn't a huge question mark now, this wouldn't be terrible but as it is, are you sure this is not collusion?
I would agree with you but he also plays for the Pats who always limit their RB value and always bring in a shiny new toy there as well. I would go Stevenson too but I think looking at the 2 teams rosters matters. If I felt that pick had a good chance of being top 4 pick and Stevenson was on my bench, then I'd make this move. But do think the 3rd should have been left out for sure.
