****OFFICIAL DYNASTY TRADES**** (29 Viewers)

[Lehigh98]

My ride with Calvin Ridley:
In last year's dispersal draft, I traded Wandale Robinson and JT Daniels for picks in dispersal draft rounds 16 and 17
16th = Rookie Draft 2nd Rounder (drafted Rachaad White) and 17th = Calvin Ridley
In this year's dispersal draft, I just traded Calvin Ridley for what equates (with our dynasty / devy rules) to a mid to late 1st rounder.
I'm hoping to use that first rounder, along with some of my other picks, to move into late (or hopefully earlier) first tier / top half of first round.

 

[Jonesin For Some Football]

12 team PPR. 1 QB. Short bench.

Gave: 1.10, Hodgins, Thornton
Received, 2024 1 (late), 2 (late), Mason, Slayton

That does seem odd that all 4 of those guys are even rostered with a short bench but I'd take the picks you got in a decent move.

 

[Jonesin For Some Football]

My ride with Calvin Ridley:
In last year's dispersal draft, I traded Wandale Robinson and JT Daniels for picks in dispersal draft rounds 16 and 17
16th = Rookie Draft 2nd Rounder (drafted Rachaad White) and 17th = Calvin Ridley
In this year's dispersal draft, I just traded Calvin Ridley for what equates (with our dynasty / devy rules) to a mid to late 1st rounder.
I'm hoping to use that first rounder, along with some of my other picks, to move into late (or hopefully earlier) first tier / top half of first round.

I do like Ridley to have a bounce back year this year but that is good work to use him as a stepping stone for more value. Especially if you are set at WR.

 

[efactor]

My ride with Calvin Ridley:
In last year's dispersal draft, I traded Wandale Robinson and JT Daniels for picks in dispersal draft rounds 16 and 17
16th = Rookie Draft 2nd Rounder (drafted Rachaad White) and 17th = Calvin Ridley
In this year's dispersal draft, I just traded Calvin Ridley for what equates (with our dynasty / devy rules) to a mid to late 1st rounder.
I'm hoping to use that first rounder, along with some of my other picks, to move into late (or hopefully earlier) first tier / top half of first round.

I do like Ridley to have a bounce back year this year but that is good work to use him as a stepping stone for more value. Especially if you are set at WR.

Yeah, that's solid value for Ridley, especially if you either aren't contending in the immediate future or have a really strong WR group already.

That said, Ridley is moving up boards in redraft mock drafts. For what it's worth, he went 4.2 in the latest CBS mock, WR 18. I only bring this up because now that he is officially reinstated and based on the letter he wrote explaining his issues, it seems he has put those issues behind him and expectations are rising . If that's the case, at age 28, he should have a solid 4 years of high production playing with a young QB who is becoming a star. It's a deal that could backfire.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

My ride with Calvin Ridley:
In last year's dispersal draft, I traded Wandale Robinson and JT Daniels for picks in dispersal draft rounds 16 and 17
16th = Rookie Draft 2nd Rounder (drafted Rachaad White) and 17th = Calvin Ridley
In this year's dispersal draft, I just traded Calvin Ridley for what equates (with our dynasty / devy rules) to a mid to late 1st rounder.
I'm hoping to use that first rounder, along with some of my other picks, to move into late (or hopefully earlier) first tier / top half of first round.

If you got a 1st rounder for Ridley, you've done well.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

it seems he has put those issues behind him and expectations are rising . If that's the case, at age 28, he should have a solid 4 years of high production playing with a young QB who is becoming a star. It's a deal that could backfire.

I hope it's true - it was a hell of a letter. People can write one thing and do another - not saying he will, just that it's another potential outcome.

in terms of pure FF value, it's really hard to say how the division of receptions will go down in JAX. Kirk is a very underrated WR, they have Zay Jones who looked pretty solid last year, and they love to throw to the TEs.

Ridley may well be 2nd in targets behind Jones. Or 3rd behind Kirk and Engram...TBD.

So some risk in keeping him - but definitely some upside. I don't mind the cash-out.

 

[efactor]

it seems he has put those issues behind him and expectations are rising . If that's the case, at age 28, he should have a solid 4 years of high production playing with a young QB who is becoming a star. It's a deal that could backfire.

I hope it's true - it was a hell of a letter. People can write one thing and do another - not saying he will, just that it's another potential outcome.

in terms of pure FF value, it's really hard to say how the division of receptions will go down in JAX. Kirk is a very underrated WR, they have Zay Jones who looked pretty solid last year, and they love to throw to the TEs.

Ridley may well be 2nd in targets behind Jones. Or 3rd behind Kirk and Engram...TBD.

So some risk in keeping him - but definitely some upside. I don't mind the cash-out.

The big reason they made the move for Ridley is because Zay Jones just isn't very good. He put up his first decent season at age 27 last year mainly because Jacksonville had nothing at WR after Kirk. Still only 823 yards and 10 yards per reception in a full 17 games. A couple big games but mostly meh. Same with Engram.

Ridley is also a better overall receiver than Kirk, so hard to believe he won't lead the team in targets. Might take a few games for that to happen but no doubt for me that he will be the alpha receiver in Jacksonville. No way in hell Jones or Engram come close to Ridley in targets and yards. Kirk may be close because he is actually talented and has a year under his belt with Lawrence, but by mid-season, Ridley will be the man in Jacksonville.

 

[smbkrypt24]

12 team PPR. 1 QB. Short bench.

Gave: 1.10, Hodgins, Thornton
Received, 2024 1 (late), 2 (late), Mason, Slayton

That does seem odd that all 4 of those guys are even rostered with a short bench but I'd take the picks you got in a decent move.

Hodgins is an easy guy to roster. He flashed big at end of year. Thornton flashed in preseason so he was occupying my last or second to last bench spot before the wire.
As far as his guys. Slayton had an okay year.and he rosters mcaffrey so I am not sure if that was insurance for him or what. Mason is an easy drop for me.

 

[jm192]

I have zero Ridley and plan to keep it that way.

People seem to think he's going to come in with Lawrence and immediately be a WR1. And maybe it works that way. He has shown the talent to be an Elite WR1. He's certainly capable.

On the flip side, he was on a bad Atlanta team without any real competition for targets and was brutal through a handful of games. Then he stepped away for his mental health. The mental health to me is a huge red flag--especially for dynasty. I applaud him for recognizing he needs help and getting it. I just worry it could be an issue again in the future.

He's been gone the majority of two seasons. Can he come back and be the same guy that was dominating? Maybe. But he may also may not. Jacksonville's receiving group isn't a bunch of scrubs. And they're guys that have had time to develop chemistry with Lawrence.

He's 28. He MAY give you 3 to 4 good years. But he may also have another issue flare up at any point. If you own him, I think you sell into the hype.

I sold him in 1 league for pennies on the dollar. I wish I'd held until now. But I also was happy not to have him clogging up a roster spot for an entire year.

Short version, selling him is the right move.

 

[Lehigh98]

I only bring this up because now that he is officially reinstated and based on the letter he wrote explaining his issues, it seems he has put those issues behind him and expectations are rising .

Yep, I was basically holding him until the value bump from reinstatement to move him. The letter was like a bonus on top to boost his value. I wish him all the best, but don't feel comfortable relying on a guy that will have been out for nearly 2 years of football games and had some other issues to boot.

That said, looking forward to my post getting bumped when he finishes top 5.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

I only bring this up because now that he is officially reinstated and based on the letter he wrote explaining his issues, it seems he has put those issues behind him and expectations are rising .

Yep, I was basically holding him until the value bump from reinstatement to move him. The letter was like a bonus on top to boost his value. I wish him all the best, but don't feel comfortable relying on a guy that will have been out for nearly 2 years of football games and had some other issues to boot.

I think it’s the shark move. Especially with people being certain he’s going to be the WR1 - I am much less certain.

I see ETN getting more receptions, and while folk knock Zay for being an age 27 breakout, he was a fairly highly thought of prospect who was simply underutilized. He looked fantastic last year so I just don’t see them going away from him. They have Engram & they might draft a TE. And some mocks I’ve seen have them drafting a day 2 WR

It’s a crowded receiver room. As the hype builds for Ridley, selling him makes more and more sense. The demand is there and based on a lot of hope. Not saying he won’t be good, but there’s a wide spectrum of possible outcomes. Getting a 1st for him solidifies that value pretty well.

 

[Jonesin For Some Football]

I have zero Ridley and plan to keep it that way.

People seem to think he's going to come in with Lawrence and immediately be a WR1. And maybe it works that way. He has shown the talent to be an Elite WR1. He's certainly capable.

On the flip side, he was on a bad Atlanta team without any real competition for targets and was brutal through a handful of games. Then he stepped away for his mental health. The mental health to me is a huge red flag--especially for dynasty. I applaud him for recognizing he needs help and getting it. I just worry it could be an issue again in the future.

He's been gone the majority of two seasons. Can he come back and be the same guy that was dominating? Maybe. But he may also may not. Jacksonville's receiving group isn't a bunch of scrubs. And they're guys that have had time to develop chemistry with Lawrence.

He's 28. He MAY give you 3 to 4 good years. But he may also have another issue flare up at any point. If you own him, I think you sell into the hype.

I sold him in 1 league for pennies on the dollar. I wish I'd held until now. But I also was happy not to have him clogging up a roster spot for an entire year.

Short version, selling him is the right move.

I can say that for the right price, I'd sell him as I do have him but I disagree your take here. He had a great season his last full season in ATL with a healthy-ish Julio so had comp for targets. Also, I would argue that Jax WR core is closer to a bunch of scrubs than it is a bunch of good options. Engram was a turd in NY and they didn't even trust him enough to give him a full contact after last year. Zay Jones isn't good. Kirk has talent but not even close to a #1 option.

I'd sell him for a mid-late 1st this year most likely but I am also more than ok keeping him and I don't necessarily think he blows up out of the gate but I think he is easily their WR1 by the middle of the season.

 

[Jonesin For Some Football]

I only bring this up because now that he is officially reinstated and based on the letter he wrote explaining his issues, it seems he has put those issues behind him and expectations are rising .

Yep, I was basically holding him until the value bump from reinstatement to move him. The letter was like a bonus on top to boost his value. I wish him all the best, but don't feel comfortable relying on a guy that will have been out for nearly 2 years of football games and had some other issues to boot.

I think it’s the shark move. Especially with people being certain he’s going to be the WR1 - I am much less certain.

I see ETN getting more receptions, and while folk knock Zay for being an age 27 breakout, he was a fairly highly thought of prospect who was simply underutilized. He looked fantastic last year so I just don’t see them going away from him. They have Engram & they might draft a TE. And some mocks I’ve seen have them drafting a day 2 WR

It’s a crowded receiver room. As the hype builds for Ridley, selling him makes more and more sense. The demand is there and based on a lot of hope. Not saying he won’t be good, but there’s a wide spectrum of possible outcomes. Getting a 1st for him solidifies that value pretty well.

Agreed on the value but I think this WR room is getting overhyped. I like Kirk but I think he is more of a WR2 in my eyes. Zay Jones had 823 yards in 16 games. That isn't even close to elite. Especially on a team that threw it 600 times last year. I do agree that Etienne gets more targets and they draft a rookie TE but rookie TEs always struggle and I would expect them to cut in to Engram's 98 targets.

Marvin Jones 81 targets are gone, I don't see Zay (who is bumped to the WR3 easily here) getting 121 targets again, and I could see Ridley getting a few of the 133 Kirk got also (I still expect him to be over 100 for sure though). I think Ridley is definitely the most talented of that group. That isn't saying that it is definitely going to happen as anything can happen in the NFL But I think just selling him isn't necessarily the right move either. Depends on team and what you are getting back. Like I have a win now team and I'd rather have him than like Josh Downs or someone like that.

 

[efactor]

I only bring this up because now that he is officially reinstated and based on the letter he wrote explaining his issues, it seems he has put those issues behind him and expectations are rising .

Yep, I was basically holding him until the value bump from reinstatement to move him. The letter was like a bonus on top to boost his value. I wish him all the best, but don't feel comfortable relying on a guy that will have been out for nearly 2 years of football games and had some other issues to boot.

I see ETN getting more receptions, and while folk knock Zay for being an age 27 breakout, he was a fairly highly thought of prospect who was simply underutilized. He looked fantastic last year so I just don’t see them going away from him. They have Engram & they might draft a TE. And some mocks I’ve seen have them drafting a day 2 WR

It’s a crowded receiver room. As the hype builds for Ridley, selling him makes more and more sense. The demand is there and based on a lot of hope. Not saying he won’t be good, but there’s a wide spectrum of possible outcomes. Getting a 1st for him solidifies that value pretty well.

A couple things:

-I wouldn't exactly call 820/4 at 10 yards a catch a "breakout" season for Jones. My point was it took him until his age 27 season to have his first mediocre season. Not a great sign for a guy who was drafted early 2nd round. He was underutilized for a reason. He wasn't very good in either Buffalo or Oakland. He had 3 years in each place so it wasn't like he didn't have a chance to impress and earn a bigger role. Jacksonville was 9th overall in passing attempts, so he was able to achieve "meh" status based on a lot of targets. I remember a couple really bad drops on longer passes that would have been TDs. In the CBS mock I mentioned, Ridley went early 4th, Kirk mid 6th and Jones in the 13th. Early mock and take it for what it's worth, but it does say something on the expected pecking order this season.

-It's not a crowded WR in Jacksonville. Kirk and nothing much else after that at WR. Engram is nothing special at TE. ETN may have a larger role but don't think that will impact the WRs much. More an extension of the running game. Last year, most expected a big receiving season (optimists were saying 75 plus catches) but that never happened. Only 35 catches. Even if he gets to say 55, I don't think that impacts the WRs much.

If Ridley is mentally back in the game, I really like his value, even in the 4th round.

 

[efactor]

I only bring this up because now that he is officially reinstated and based on the letter he wrote explaining his issues, it seems he has put those issues behind him and expectations are rising .

Yep, I was basically holding him until the value bump from reinstatement to move him. The letter was like a bonus on top to boost his value. I wish him all the best, but don't feel comfortable relying on a guy that will have been out for nearly 2 years of football games and had some other issues to boot.

I think it’s the shark move. Especially with people being certain he’s going to be the WR1 - I am much less certain.

I see ETN getting more receptions, and while folk knock Zay for being an age 27 breakout, he was a fairly highly thought of prospect who was simply underutilized. He looked fantastic last year so I just don’t see them going away from him. They have Engram & they might draft a TE. And some mocks I’ve seen have them drafting a day 2 WR

It’s a crowded receiver room. As the hype builds for Ridley, selling him makes more and more sense. The demand is there and based on a lot of hope. Not saying he won’t be good, but there’s a wide spectrum of possible outcomes. Getting a 1st for him solidifies that value pretty well.

Agreed on the value but I think this WR room is getting overhyped. I like Kirk but I think he is more of a WR2 in my eyes. Zay Jones had 823 yards in 16 games. That isn't even close to elite. Especially on a team that threw it 600 times last year. I do agree that Etienne gets more targets and they draft a rookie TE but rookie TEs always struggle and I would expect them to cut in to Engram's 98 targets.

Marvin Jones 81 targets are gone, I don't see Zay (who is bumped to the WR3 easily here) getting 121 targets again, and I could see Ridley getting a few of the 133 Kirk got also (I still expect him to be over 100 for sure though). I think Ridley is definitely the most talented of that group. That isn't saying that it is definitely going to happen as anything can happen in the NFL But I think just selling him isn't necessarily the right move either. Depends on team and what you are getting back. Like I have a win now team and I'd rather have him than like Josh Downs or someone like that.

Well said sir

 

[TartanLion]

Absolute blockbuster coming up here that I’ve been offered

SuperFlex 12 team 0.5ppr

I’ve got

QB - Hurts/ Geno Smith/Brissett/Trubisky/Dalton
RBs - Etienne/Dobbins/Akers/Pacheco/Penny/Algieier
WR - Deebo/Pittman/Gabe/Jamo/Skyy/Lazard/Renfrow

I have the 1.01


I’m being offered - Josh Allen/‘23 1.09/‘23 4.04

For

‘23 1.01/Etienne/Dobbins/Geno Smith


It seems like a heavy price but what do y’all think ? feel like I desperately need the FootballGuys hive mind on this one !!

Obviously my RB room would be cleaned out but I could work around that and I’d have Hurts and Allen ! The 1.09 should offer me a Charbonnet/Miller/etc etc

Also been offered 1.04 for Etienne which woikd allow me to take Bijan at 1.01 and a QB at 1.04

 

[Blick]

My ride with Calvin Ridley:
In last year's dispersal draft, I traded Wandale Robinson and JT Daniels for picks in dispersal draft rounds 16 and 17
16th = Rookie Draft 2nd Rounder (drafted Rachaad White) and 17th = Calvin Ridley
In this year's dispersal draft, I just traded Calvin Ridley for what equates (with our dynasty / devy rules) to a mid to late 1st rounder.
I'm hoping to use that first rounder, along with some of my other picks, to move into late (or hopefully earlier) first tier / top half of first round.

If you got a 1st rounder for Ridley, you've done well.

I'm on the fence with Ridley. I don't think Kirk is the kind of receiver to demand targets. Ridley can be. That said, I'm guessing his value will continue to climb through training camp with every positive note. That's when I'll sell.

 

[efactor]

My ride with Calvin Ridley:
In last year's dispersal draft, I traded Wandale Robinson and JT Daniels for picks in dispersal draft rounds 16 and 17
16th = Rookie Draft 2nd Rounder (drafted Rachaad White) and 17th = Calvin Ridley
In this year's dispersal draft, I just traded Calvin Ridley for what equates (with our dynasty / devy rules) to a mid to late 1st rounder.
I'm hoping to use that first rounder, along with some of my other picks, to move into late (or hopefully earlier) first tier / top half of first round.

If you got a 1st rounder for Ridley, you've done well.

I'm on the fence with Ridley. I don't think Kirk is the kind of receiver to demand targets. Ridley can be. That said, I'm guessing his value will continue to climb through training camp with every positive note. That's when I'll sell.

I'm doing the same thing. But only because I'm lucky enough that he is my #5 WR and probably won't play much outside of bye weeks. If he was a weekly starter, I would keep him.

However, I'll also be shopping my #3 and #4 WRs. If I can get a nice haul for them, then I'll keep Ridley.

 

[jm192]

I only bring this up because now that he is officially reinstated and based on the letter he wrote explaining his issues, it seems he has put those issues behind him and expectations are rising .

Yep, I was basically holding him until the value bump from reinstatement to move him. The letter was like a bonus on top to boost his value. I wish him all the best, but don't feel comfortable relying on a guy that will have been out for nearly 2 years of football games and had some other issues to boot.

I see ETN getting more receptions, and while folk knock Zay for being an age 27 breakout, he was a fairly highly thought of prospect who was simply underutilized. He looked fantastic last year so I just don’t see them going away from him. They have Engram & they might draft a TE. And some mocks I’ve seen have them drafting a day 2 WR

It’s a crowded receiver room. As the hype builds for Ridley, selling him makes more and more sense. The demand is there and based on a lot of hope. Not saying he won’t be good, but there’s a wide spectrum of possible outcomes. Getting a 1st for him solidifies that value pretty well.

A couple things:

-I wouldn't exactly call 820/4 at 10 yards a catch a "breakout" season for Jones. My point was it took him until his age 27 season to have his first mediocre season. Not a great sign for a guy who was drafted early 2nd round. He was underutilized for a reason. He wasn't very good in either Buffalo or Oakland. He had 3 years in each place so it wasn't like he didn't have a chance to impress and earn a bigger role. Jacksonville was 9th overall in passing attempts, so he was able to achieve "meh" status based on a lot of targets. I remember a couple really bad drops on longer passes that would have been TDs. In the CBS mock I mentioned, Ridley went early 4th, Kirk mid 6th and Jones in the 13th. Early mock and take it for what it's worth, but it does say something on the expected pecking order this season.

-It's not a crowded WR in Jacksonville. Kirk and nothing much else after that at WR. Engram is nothing special at TE. ETN may have a larger role but don't think that will impact the WRs much. More an extension of the running game. Last year, most expected a big receiving season (optimists were saying 75 plus catches) but that never happened. Only 35 catches. Even if he gets to say 55, I don't think that impacts the WRs much.

If Ridley is mentally back in the game, I really like his value, even in the 4th round.

But that is an "IF" that other guys in the same range don't have.

Drafting well comes down to understanding the range of outcomes for players.

There's a lot of "If things go right" and "I think things will go right."

But Ridley has a significantly higher chance of guys that will be valued around him of things NOT going right. He has missed the majority of the last two seasons. The last time we saw him on the field, it wasn't good. There's the mental health concerns.

IF everything works out, yes, he can be very good. But I remember thinking everything was going to work out in 2021--and he had significantly fewer red flags then.

 

[jm192]

RE: NOT selling Ridley:

Everyone eventually becomes a sell. He's 28, he'll be 29 at the end of the season. People will be much more skeptical of buying 29 year olds going into their age 30 season. This may be the highest his value gets the rest of his career.

He may come out of the gate red hot and get you a little bit more in trade. But he may also bust and lose value and then he quickly becomes hard to trade.

Even if you think he's going to be good, the getting isn't going to be much better.

 

[JohnnyU]

RE: NOT selling Ridley:

Everyone eventually becomes a sell. He's 28, he'll be 29 at the end of the season. People will be much more skeptical of buying 29 year olds going into their age 30 season. This may be the highest his value gets the rest of his career.

He may come out of the gate red hot and get you a little bit more in trade. But he may also bust and lose value and then he quickly becomes hard to trade.

Even if you think he's going to be good, the getting isn't going to be much better.

A-men brother Bill.

 

[ghostguy123]

Absolute blockbuster coming up here that I’ve been offered

SuperFlex 12 team 0.5ppr

I’ve got

QB - Hurts/ Geno Smith/Brissett/Trubisky/Dalton
RBs - Etienne/Dobbins/Akers/Pacheco/Penny/Algieier
WR - Deebo/Pittman/Gabe/Jamo/Skyy/Lazard/Renfrow

I have the 1.01


I’m being offered - Josh Allen/‘23 1.09/‘23 4.04

For

‘23 1.01/Etienne/Dobbins/Geno Smith


It seems like a heavy price but what do y’all think ? feel like I desperately need the FootballGuys hive mind on this one !!

Obviously my RB room would be cleaned out but I could work around that and I’d have Hurts and Allen ! The 1.09 should offer me a Charbonnet/Miller/etc etc

Also been offered 1.04 for Etienne which woikd allow me to take Bijan at 1.01 and a QB at 1.04

Keep what you have

 

[Jonesin For Some Football]

I only bring this up because now that he is officially reinstated and based on the letter he wrote explaining his issues, it seems he has put those issues behind him and expectations are rising .

Yep, I was basically holding him until the value bump from reinstatement to move him. The letter was like a bonus on top to boost his value. I wish him all the best, but don't feel comfortable relying on a guy that will have been out for nearly 2 years of football games and had some other issues to boot.

I see ETN getting more receptions, and while folk knock Zay for being an age 27 breakout, he was a fairly highly thought of prospect who was simply underutilized. He looked fantastic last year so I just don’t see them going away from him. They have Engram & they might draft a TE. And some mocks I’ve seen have them drafting a day 2 WR

It’s a crowded receiver room. As the hype builds for Ridley, selling him makes more and more sense. The demand is there and based on a lot of hope. Not saying he won’t be good, but there’s a wide spectrum of possible outcomes. Getting a 1st for him solidifies that value pretty well.

A couple things:

-I wouldn't exactly call 820/4 at 10 yards a catch a "breakout" season for Jones. My point was it took him until his age 27 season to have his first mediocre season. Not a great sign for a guy who was drafted early 2nd round. He was underutilized for a reason. He wasn't very good in either Buffalo or Oakland. He had 3 years in each place so it wasn't like he didn't have a chance to impress and earn a bigger role. Jacksonville was 9th overall in passing attempts, so he was able to achieve "meh" status based on a lot of targets. I remember a couple really bad drops on longer passes that would have been TDs. In the CBS mock I mentioned, Ridley went early 4th, Kirk mid 6th and Jones in the 13th. Early mock and take it for what it's worth, but it does say something on the expected pecking order this season.

-It's not a crowded WR in Jacksonville. Kirk and nothing much else after that at WR. Engram is nothing special at TE. ETN may have a larger role but don't think that will impact the WRs much. More an extension of the running game. Last year, most expected a big receiving season (optimists were saying 75 plus catches) but that never happened. Only 35 catches. Even if he gets to say 55, I don't think that impacts the WRs much.

If Ridley is mentally back in the game, I really like his value, even in the 4th round.

Totally agreed. I will agree with some others there is risk there but I think that is more due to his mental health and being off almost 2 years instead of it having much to do with what else is in Jax already.

 

[Jonesin For Some Football]

Absolute blockbuster coming up here that I’ve been offered

SuperFlex 12 team 0.5ppr

I’ve got

QB - Hurts/ Geno Smith/Brissett/Trubisky/Dalton
RBs - Etienne/Dobbins/Akers/Pacheco/Penny/Algieier
WR - Deebo/Pittman/Gabe/Jamo/Skyy/Lazard/Renfrow

I have the 1.01


I’m being offered - Josh Allen/‘23 1.09/‘23 4.04

For

‘23 1.01/Etienne/Dobbins/Geno Smith


It seems like a heavy price but what do y’all think ? feel like I desperately need the FootballGuys hive mind on this one !!

Obviously my RB room would be cleaned out but I could work around that and I’d have Hurts and Allen ! The 1.09 should offer me a Charbonnet/Miller/etc etc

Also been offered 1.04 for Etienne which woikd allow me to take Bijan at 1.01 and a QB at 1.04

I don't play SF in Dynasty personally and would love to have Allen here but losing Bijan/Etienne/Dobbins would be tough. Not sure I could pull that trigger due to roster construction more so than value as Allen is worth it but I would hate my RB room in that scenario and I already am not crazy impressed with the WR room so hard to see a winning team in that situation.

 

[TartanLion]

Absolute blockbuster coming up here that I’ve been offered

SuperFlex 12 team 0.5ppr

I’ve got

QB - Hurts/ Geno Smith/Brissett/Trubisky/Dalton
RBs - Etienne/Dobbins/Akers/Pacheco/Penny/Algieier
WR - Deebo/Pittman/Gabe/Jamo/Skyy/Lazard/Renfrow

I have the 1.01


I’m being offered - Josh Allen/‘23 1.09/‘23 4.04

For

‘23 1.01/Etienne/Dobbins/Geno Smith


It seems like a heavy price but what do y’all think ? feel like I desperately need the FootballGuys hive mind on this one !!

Obviously my RB room would be cleaned out but I could work around that and I’d have Hurts and Allen ! The 1.09 should offer me a Charbonnet/Miller/etc etc

Also been offered 1.04 for Etienne which woikd allow me to take Bijan at 1.01 and a QB at 1.04

Keep what you have

I get what you’re saying. The other side of this to me is …

Just about everything I listen to and read says if you have a chance to get a hold of 2 of the top 9 QBs do it and work the rest out. This is arguably 2 of the top 3 QBs I’d have.

Who knows the longevity of Geno Smith, so I def need another top QB at some point.

The consensus 1.01 is Bijan and I’m loaded at RB. Oh what I’d give for it to be the year of Caleb/Maye because honestly to me 1.01 isn’t an auto Bijan in this league. People value QBs so high and RBs so low. Stuck as what to do.

Alternatives

1.01ish for Fields or Watson might be possible

Go for broke and take my QB choice at 1.01

Draft Bijan and use Etienne to get another QB or WR.

 

[metoo]

I have zero Ridley and plan to keep it that way.

People seem to think he's going to come in with Lawrence and immediately be a WR1. And maybe it works that way. He has shown the talent to be an Elite WR1. He's certainly capable.

On the flip side, he was on a bad Atlanta team without any real competition for targets and was brutal through a handful of games. Then he stepped away for his mental health. The mental health to me is a huge red flag--especially for dynasty. I applaud him for recognizing he needs help and getting it. I just worry it could be an issue again in the future.

He's been gone the majority of two seasons. Can he come back and be the same guy that was dominating? Maybe. But he may also may not. Jacksonville's receiving group isn't a bunch of scrubs. And they're guys that have had time to develop chemistry with Lawrence.

He's 28. He MAY give you 3 to 4 good years. But he may also have another issue flare up at any point. If you own him, I think you sell into the hype.

I sold him in 1 league for pennies on the dollar. I wish I'd held until now. But I also was happy not to have him clogging up a roster spot for an entire year.

Short version, selling him is the right move.

I still feel Kirk will will be the WR1 and some are underestimated him. Kirk put up solid numbers and matched up against team's top corners. With Ridley, his numbers should improve. I would be selling Ridley if I had him to someone who thinks he's WR1 in Jacksonville. His value may never be higher than now.

 

[farfromforgotten]

I’m being offered - Josh Allen/‘23 1.09/‘23 4.04

For

‘23 1.01/Etienne/Dobbins/Geno Smith

I understand the lure of owning both Allen and Hurts in SF. Is there any possibility that you could get this done without Dobbins involved in the equation?
Bijan in a .5 PPR league is going to hold big value as well.

 

[TartanLion]

I’m being offered - Josh Allen/‘23 1.09/‘23 4.04

For

‘23 1.01/Etienne/Dobbins/Geno Smith

I understand the lure of owning both Allen and Hurts in SF. Is there any possibility that you could get this done without Dobbins involved in the equation?
Bijan in a .5 PPR league is going to hold big value as well.

I’d imagine the obvious route would be to strike away the 1.09 and Dobbins from both sides of the deal. Ultimately, an RB selected there could turn out better than Dobbins but it’s more of an unknown, he has the more immediate and established expectancy of putting up points

 

[menobrown]

RE: NOT selling Ridley:

Everyone eventually becomes a sell. He's 28, he'll be 29 at the end of the season. People will be much more skeptical of buying 29 year olds going into their age 30 season. This may be the highest his value gets the rest of his career.

He may come out of the gate red hot and get you a little bit more in trade. But he may also bust and lose value and then he quickly becomes hard to trade.

Even if you think he's going to be good, the getting isn't going to be much better.

I think his age is already one of the biggest factors against him.

I don't see how what any of you are posting is directly related to Ridley vs say Adams, Tyreek, Kupp, etc, etc.

 

[rockaction]

I am out on telling people what to do in SF dynasty because I don't play SF dynasty and I don't know your particular league.

Good luck, TartanLion.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

The big reason they made the move for Ridley is because Zay Jones just isn't very good

I thought he looked great.

 

[JohnnyU]

The big reason they made the move for Ridley is because Zay Jones just isn't very good

I thought he looked great.

Great?

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

The big reason they made the move for Ridley is because Zay Jones just isn't very good

I thought he looked great.

Great?

Ok, good. Figure of speech. There were some big games and some games that he disappeared.

But he did make some high effort plays, and he showed flashes.

Great was probably too loose a term.

 

[jm192]

RE: NOT selling Ridley:

Everyone eventually becomes a sell. He's 28, he'll be 29 at the end of the season. People will be much more skeptical of buying 29 year olds going into their age 30 season. This may be the highest his value gets the rest of his career.

He may come out of the gate red hot and get you a little bit more in trade. But he may also bust and lose value and then he quickly becomes hard to trade.

Even if you think he's going to be good, the getting isn't going to be much better.

I think his age is already one of the biggest factors against him.

I don't see how what any of you are posting is directly related to Ridley vs say Adams, Tyreek, Kupp, etc, etc.

First and foremost, I would also advocate for selling every one of those guys.

None of those guys missed time due to mental health. None of those guys have missed most of the last 2 years.

All of those guys have had an elite season more recent than Ridley. If you’re saying, Ridley is the same as those guys, he is not. We know what those guys are.

His value is currently spiking. His situation is changing. He is back from suspension. He has a good young QB and a good situation. But he is nowhere near as safe as the people you’re grouping him with.

 

[JohnnyU]

The big reason they made the move for Ridley is because Zay Jones just isn't very good

I thought he looked great.

Great?

Ok, good. Figure of speech. There were some big games and some games that he disappeared.

But he did make some high effort plays, and he showed flashes.

Great was probably too loose a term.

That’s like saying I’m handsome.

 

[TartanLion]

I am out on telling people what to do in SF dynasty because I don't play SF dynasty and I don't know your particular league.

Good luck, TartanLion.

No problem @rockaction cmon @Hot Sauce Guy im interested in what you have to say

 

[rockaction]

Jones isn't a bad receiver and had a big fantasy day or two. He's not really fantasy-relevant, but he's professionally relevant. Just because his career started out poorly in Buffalo doesn't mean he didn't show well in Oakland, either. He was behind two rookies Oakland was trying to get involved in Ruggs and Bryan Edwards. Jones wound up starting for them when everything went down that year with Ruggs and Edwards disappeared. Jones is getting paid by Jacksonville. He might be JAG, but he's a starting Jag, if you know what I'm throwing down.

In other words, not fantasy relevant, and not enough to challenge Ridley, but something to think about when thinking about target distribution.

 

[efactor]

The big reason they made the move for Ridley is because Zay Jones just isn't very good

I thought he looked great.

Great?

Great was probably too loose a term.

Understatement of the year. He was the definition of mediocre. Took 131 targets to get to 820 yards.

He had two good games and a few OK ones. Most were pretty bad. That was in a high volume pass offense too. He won’t come close to 2022 target level.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

Absolute blockbuster coming up here that I’ve been offered

SuperFlex 12 team 0.5ppr

I’ve got

QB - Hurts/ Geno Smith/Brissett/Trubisky/Dalton
RBs - Etienne/Dobbins/Akers/Pacheco/Penny/Algieier
WR - Deebo/Pittman/Gabe/Jamo/Skyy/Lazard/Renfrow

I have the 1.01


I’m being offered - Josh Allen/‘23 1.09/‘23 4.04

For

‘23 1.01/Etienne/Dobbins/Geno Smith


It seems like a heavy price but what do y’all think ? feel like I desperately need the FootballGuys hive mind on this one !!

Obviously my RB room would be cleaned out but I could work around that and I’d have Hurts and Allen ! The 1.09 should offer me a Charbonnet/Miller/etc etc

Also been offered 1.04 for Etienne which woikd allow me to take Bijan at 1.01 and a QB at 1.04

I am out on telling people what to do in SF dynasty because I don't play SF dynasty and I don't know your particular league.

Good luck, TartanLion.

No problem @rockaction cmon @Hot Sauce Guy im interested in what you have to say

Ok, so you’ll be be getting Bijan. That helps offset losing the RBs.

At face value, yes. Get Allen. Allen/Hurts is a monstrous 1-2 at QB.

Geno isn’t a long term dude and I’m not even sure he can replicate 2022. But he is valuable in the barren wasteland that is QB in 2023x

Getting the 1.09 is decent as well.

It’s a bit of an overpay, maybe by as much as Dobbins. But that’s what it takes to pry Allen away from someone and I would definitely do this. I’d do it 100/100 times because it sets you up for the long term, and also because opportunities to get a Josh Allen in SF are extremely rare.

RBs come and go. I overpaid for TLaw recently for the exact same reason. And for Fields in another league. It’s both immediately beneficial, and secures your future at the hardest position to fill in that format.

 

[menobrown]

First and foremost, I would also advocate for selling every one of those guys.

Fine but you painted that as something specific to Ridley and it's not and all of those players are valued higher then him so so to say his value can't go up is not something I agree with.

None of those guys missed time due to mental health. None of those guys have missed most of the last 2 years.

This not only means zero to but does not even match the fact that Ridley's had less wear and tear on his body then those players, is younger then all of them, and is more motivated then any of them to see future paydays. I'll take that over what you paint as concerns.

If you’re saying, Ridley is the same as those guys, he is not.

I think he's as good as some of them so we can agree to disagree.

 

[TartanLion]

Absolute blockbuster coming up here that I’ve been offered

SuperFlex 12 team 0.5ppr

I’ve got

QB - Hurts/ Geno Smith/Brissett/Trubisky/Dalton
RBs - Etienne/Dobbins/Akers/Pacheco/Penny/Algieier
WR - Deebo/Pittman/Gabe/Jamo/Skyy/Lazard/Renfrow

I have the 1.01


I’m being offered - Josh Allen/‘23 1.09/‘23 4.04

For

‘23 1.01/Etienne/Dobbins/Geno Smith


It seems like a heavy price but what do y’all think ? feel like I desperately need the FootballGuys hive mind on this one !!

Obviously my RB room would be cleaned out but I could work around that and I’d have Hurts and Allen ! The 1.09 should offer me a Charbonnet/Miller/etc etc

Also been offered 1.04 for Etienne which woikd allow me to take Bijan at 1.01 and a QB at 1.04

I am out on telling people what to do in SF dynasty because I don't play SF dynasty and I don't know your particular league.

Good luck, TartanLion.

No problem @rockaction cmon @Hot Sauce Guy im interested in what you have to say

Ok, so you’ll be be getting Bijan. That helps offset losing the RBs.

At face value, yes. Get Allen. Allen/Hurts is a monstrous 1-2 at QB.

Geno isn’t a long term dude and I’m not even sure he can replicate 2022. But he is valuable in the barren wasteland that is QB in 2023x

Getting the 1.09 is decent as well.

It’s a bit of an overpay, maybe by as much as Dobbins. But that’s what it takes to pry Allen away from someone and I would definitely do this. I’d do it 100/100 times because it sets you up for the long term, and also because opportunities to get a Josh Allen in SF are extremely rare.

RBs come and go. I overpaid for TLaw recently for the exact same reason. And for Fields in another league. It’s both immediately beneficial, and secures your future at the hardest position to fill in that format.

Thanks dude, always good to get your thoughts !

Sorry, just to avoid confusion I wouldn’t be getting Bijan as I’d be trading away my 1.01 in the deal.

The last sentence I put was regarding a separate offer I’d been been sent ( I give Etienne and receive 1.04 ) and what I would do if I took that offer instead of the Allen one.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

Absolute blockbuster coming up here that I’ve been offered

SuperFlex 12 team 0.5ppr

I’ve got

QB - Hurts/ Geno Smith/Brissett/Trubisky/Dalton
RBs - Etienne/Dobbins/Akers/Pacheco/Penny/Algieier
WR - Deebo/Pittman/Gabe/Jamo/Skyy/Lazard/Renfrow

I have the 1.01


I’m being offered - Josh Allen/‘23 1.09/‘23 4.04

For

‘23 1.01/Etienne/Dobbins/Geno Smith


It seems like a heavy price but what do y’all think ? feel like I desperately need the FootballGuys hive mind on this one !!

Obviously my RB room would be cleaned out but I could work around that and I’d have Hurts and Allen ! The 1.09 should offer me a Charbonnet/Miller/etc etc

Also been offered 1.04 for Etienne which woikd allow me to take Bijan at 1.01 and a QB at 1.04

I am out on telling people what to do in SF dynasty because I don't play SF dynasty and I don't know your particular league.

Good luck, TartanLion.

No problem @rockaction cmon @Hot Sauce Guy im interested in what you have to say

Ok, so you’ll be be getting Bijan. That helps offset losing the RBs.

At face value, yes. Get Allen. Allen/Hurts is a monstrous 1-2 at QB.

Geno isn’t a long term dude and I’m not even sure he can replicate 2022. But he is valuable in the barren wasteland that is QB in 2023x

Getting the 1.09 is decent as well.

It’s a bit of an overpay, maybe by as much as Dobbins. But that’s what it takes to pry Allen away from someone and I would definitely do this. I’d do it 100/100 times because it sets you up for the long term, and also because opportunities to get a Josh Allen in SF are extremely rare.

RBs come and go. I overpaid for TLaw recently for the exact same reason. And for Fields in another league. It’s both immediately beneficial, and secures your future at the hardest position to fill in that format.

Thanks dude, always good to get your thoughts !

Sorry, just to avoid confusion I wouldn’t be getting Bijan as I’d be trading away my 1.01 in the deal.

The last sentence I put was regarding a separate offer I’d been been sent ( I give Etienne and receive 1.04 ) and what I would do if I took that offer instead of the Allen one.

Ohdamn.

Yep - read that wrong. Oops.

Yeaaaaah…that’s an overpay. I would counter with either 1.01 or ETN/Dobbins but not both.

If they’ll take it without the 1.01 even better.

 

[phandango]

I get what you’re saying. The other side of this to me is …

Just about everything I listen to and read says if you have a chance to get a hold of 2 of the top 9 QBs do it and work the rest out. This is arguably 2 of the top 3 QBs I’d have.

Who knows the longevity of Geno Smith, so I def need another top QB at some point.

The consensus 1.01 is Bijan and I’m loaded at RB. Oh what I’d give for it to be the year of Caleb/Maye because honestly to me 1.01 isn’t an auto Bijan in this league. People value QBs so high and RBs so low. Stuck as what to do.

Alternatives

1.01ish for Fields or Watson might be possible

Go for broke and take my QB choice at 1.01

Draft Bijan and use Etienne to get another QB or WR.

I wouldn't take the deal. I'd consider it if you had weak QBs, but you've got Hurts.

As to the bolded, just take Bijan. If you are considering taking a QB instead, then trade down to 1.02 or 1.03.

This seems like a win-now team, especially with the 1.01. Geno is fine for that purpose. Worry about this year.

 

[IHEARTFF]

Not a SF guy so could be wrong, but seems like Bijan and Etienne would be enough to get Allen.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

This seems like a win-now team, especially with the 1.01. Geno is fine for that purpose. Worry about this

If he can get it done without the 1.01, or without Dobbins/ETN, it’s a good long term move.

Get Allen if you can’t just don’t overpay by too much.

Geno offers very little long term upside.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

Not a SF guy so could be wrong, but seems like Bijan and Etienne would be enough to get Allen.

Yes. Or Dobbin/Bijan.

 

[zaner75]

Not a SF guy so could be wrong, but seems like Bijan and Etienne would be enough to get Allen.

Yes. Or Dobbin/Bijan.

If @TartanLion could get Allen for only 2 pieces - one of which is not another elite QB, that would be a heist of epic proportions. Etienne/1.04 is a good deal to consider too.
But I agree that getting Allen to pair with Hurts sets the team up better to build around those 2 pillars. Depending on league scoring, the 2 QBs could carry the team to a W basically by themselves. Prioritize premium players at premium positions. Fill in around them. Easier to find a higher percentage of replacement production at RB at a fraction of the cost.

 

[Da Franchise]

Absolute blockbuster coming up here that I’ve been offered

SuperFlex 12 team 0.5ppr

I’ve got

QB - Hurts/ Geno Smith/Brissett/Trubisky/Dalton
RBs - Etienne/Dobbins/Akers/Pacheco/Penny/Algieier
WR - Deebo/Pittman/Gabe/Jamo/Skyy/Lazard/Renfrow

I have the 1.01


I’m being offered - Josh Allen/‘23 1.09/‘23 4.04

For

‘23 1.01/Etienne/Dobbins/Geno Smith


It seems like a heavy price but what do y’all think ? feel like I desperately need the FootballGuys hive mind on this one !!

Obviously my RB room would be cleaned out but I could work around that and I’d have Hurts and Allen ! The 1.09 should offer me a Charbonnet/Miller/etc etc

Also been offered 1.04 for Etienne which woikd allow me to take Bijan at 1.01 and a QB at 1.04

I am out on telling people what to do in SF dynasty because I don't play SF dynasty and I don't know your particular league.

Good luck, TartanLion.

No problem @rockaction cmon @Hot Sauce Guy im interested in what you have to say

Ok, so you’ll be be getting Bijan. That helps offset losing the RBs.

At face value, yes. Get Allen. Allen/Hurts is a monstrous 1-2 at QB.

Geno isn’t a long term dude and I’m not even sure he can replicate 2022. But he is valuable in the barren wasteland that is QB in 2023x

Getting the 1.09 is decent as well.

It’s a bit of an overpay, maybe by as much as Dobbins. But that’s what it takes to pry Allen away from someone and I would definitely do this. I’d do it 100/100 times because it sets you up for the long term, and also because opportunities to get a Josh Allen in SF are extremely rare.

RBs come and go. I overpaid for TLaw recently for the exact same reason. And for Fields in another league. It’s both immediately beneficial, and secures your future at the hardest position to fill in that format.

Thanks dude, always good to get your thoughts !

Sorry, just to avoid confusion I wouldn’t be getting Bijan as I’d be trading away my 1.01 in the deal.

The last sentence I put was regarding a separate offer I’d been been sent ( I give Etienne and receive 1.04 ) and what I would do if I took that offer instead of the Allen one.

Bijan at 1.01
Anthony Richardson at 1.04

This is the way.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

Not a SF guy so could be wrong, but seems like Bijan and Etienne would be enough to get Allen.

Yes. Or Dobbin/Bijan.

If @TartanLion could get Allen for only 2 pieces - one of which is not another elite QB, that would be a heist of epic proportions. Etienne/1.04 is a good deal to consider too.
But I agree that getting Allen to pair with Hurts sets the team up better to build around those 2 pillars. Depending on league scoring, the 2 QBs could carry the team to a W basically by themselves. Prioritize premium players at premium positions. Fill in around them. Easier to find a higher percentage of replacement production at RB at a fraction of the cost.

I would think Geno going the other way would be a must as well. And I’d have no issue with a 1.01, Geno, Dobbins for Allen.

Or 1.01, Geno, ETN if that fails.

All 4 seems like a bit much. But I still might. Again, getting Allen in SF is a long-term move to have 2x set it & forget it top 4 QBs for a long, long time.

Massive advantage if you can pull it off without decimating your roster.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

Absolute blockbuster coming up here that I’ve been offered

SuperFlex 12 team 0.5ppr

I’ve got

QB - Hurts/ Geno Smith/Brissett/Trubisky/Dalton
RBs - Etienne/Dobbins/Akers/Pacheco/Penny/Algieier
WR - Deebo/Pittman/Gabe/Jamo/Skyy/Lazard/Renfrow

I have the 1.01


I’m being offered - Josh Allen/‘23 1.09/‘23 4.04

For

‘23 1.01/Etienne/Dobbins/Geno Smith


It seems like a heavy price but what do y’all think ? feel like I desperately need the FootballGuys hive mind on this one !!

Obviously my RB room would be cleaned out but I could work around that and I’d have Hurts and Allen ! The 1.09 should offer me a Charbonnet/Miller/etc etc

Also been offered 1.04 for Etienne which woikd allow me to take Bijan at 1.01 and a QB at 1.04

I am out on telling people what to do in SF dynasty because I don't play SF dynasty and I don't know your particular league.

Good luck, TartanLion.

No problem @rockaction cmon @Hot Sauce Guy im interested in what you have to say

Ok, so you’ll be be getting Bijan. That helps offset losing the RBs.

At face value, yes. Get Allen. Allen/Hurts is a monstrous 1-2 at QB.

Geno isn’t a long term dude and I’m not even sure he can replicate 2022. But he is valuable in the barren wasteland that is QB in 2023x

Getting the 1.09 is decent as well.

It’s a bit of an overpay, maybe by as much as Dobbins. But that’s what it takes to pry Allen away from someone and I would definitely do this. I’d do it 100/100 times because it sets you up for the long term, and also because opportunities to get a Josh Allen in SF are extremely rare.

RBs come and go. I overpaid for TLaw recently for the exact same reason. And for Fields in another league. It’s both immediately beneficial, and secures your future at the hardest position to fill in that format.

Thanks dude, always good to get your thoughts !

Sorry, just to avoid confusion I wouldn’t be getting Bijan as I’d be trading away my 1.01 in the deal.

The last sentence I put was regarding a separate offer I’d been been sent ( I give Etienne and receive 1.04 ) and what I would do if I took that offer instead of the Allen one.

Bijan at 1.01
Anthony Richardson at 1.04

This is the way.

The way to not get Josh Allen