Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
Not entirely no.it's entirely different than what he originally said, which is what I replied to
Not entirely no.it's entirely different than what he originally said, which is what I replied to
Lot's of tbd here, could end up being wildly in favor of either side, which means it's probably fair.Not involved, FFPC:
Team A got: ETN and Bateman
Team B got: Roschon/K Herbert, Nico Collins, first, second and third round 2024 picks.
I'd take Team A unless the draft pick was from a bottom feeder.Lot's of tbd here, could end up being wildly in favor of either side, which means it's probably fair.Not involved, FFPC:
Team A got: ETN and Bateman
Team B got: Roschon/K Herbert, Nico Collins, first, second and third round 2024 picks.I'd take Team A unless the draft pick was from a bottom feeder.
Jeez. Yes, it's entirely different. One is an absolute dealing in direction only, the other deals in magnitude/speed regardless of direction.Not entirely no.it's entirely different than what he originally said, which is what I replied to
Agreed all around.Lot's of tbd here, could end up being wildly in favor of either side, which means it's probably fair.Not involved, FFPC:
Team A got: ETN and Bateman
Team B got: Roschon/K Herbert, Nico Collins, first, second and third round 2024 picks.I'd take Team A unless the draft pick was from a bottom feeder.
I'd project the picks in the 7-12 range. At least two powerhouse teams in the league and that's not one of them but should be a playoff team and just about anything can happen in a 1-2 week window at the end of the season. Not a bottom feeder for sure.
I thought the trade was fair, I'd lean the ETN side due to the picks not projecting as non playoff and I'm not looking to invest heavily in the Bears backfield.
You’re just more literal than I am. It’s ok, some folks are wired that way.Jeez. Yes, it's entirely different. One is an absolute dealing in direction only, the other deals in magnitude/speed regardless of direction.
Picks don't lose value- demonstrably false, sometimes they do
Picks are less volatile than players- generally accepted as true
Bonds don't lose value- demonstrably false, sometimes they do
Bonds are less volatile than stocks- generally accepted as true
10 team PPR SF not involved, Jameson Williams straight up for Brock Purdy
#TeamETNBATEMANNot involved, FFPC:
Team A got: ETN and Bateman
Team B got: Roschon/K Herbert, Nico Collins, first, second and third round 2024 picks.
Purdy in SF, no brainer.10 team PPR SF not involved, Jameson Williams straight up for Brock Purdy
Is this 2 separate deals?12 Team, 1QB/PPR/No TE Premium
Team A (K Herbert Owner) receives D Foreman/ Team B (1.1 Pick owner) received T Allgeier (yes, boring)
Team A - Receives Goedert/ Team C - Receives Dulcich/2.4
Yes - two separate deals. Team A did 2 deals. One with Team B and one with Team C.Is this 2 separate deals?12 Team, 1QB/PPR/No TE Premium
Team A (K Herbert Owner) receives D Foreman/ Team B (1.1 Pick owner) received T Allgeier (yes, boring)
Team A - Receives Goedert/ Team C - Receives Dulcich/2.4
I’m a little confused by your formatting.
12 team, 1 QB, TE prem PPR
Team A- ETN, Higgins, Pickens
Team B- Jefferson, 24' 3rd
It’s not a bad deal. I feel that whenever there is trade involving JJ or Chase 90+% of people automatically assume it’s not enough no matter the package.12 team, 1 QB, TE prem PPR
Team A- ETN, Higgins, Pickens
Team B- Jefferson, 24' 3rd
I thought it was a fair package. JJ has questions for Cousins after this year, but other than the estimated RBBC ETN & Tank will share, Tee & Pickens are unquestionably valuable pieces in the deal.It’s not a bad deal. I feel that whenever there is trade involving JJ or Chase 90+% of people automatically assume it’s not enough no matter the package.12 team, 1 QB, TE prem PPR
Team A- ETN, Higgins, Pickens
Team B- Jefferson, 24' 3rd
Edit: wording, and multiple different trade calculators (including my own, *sarcasm*) have the package side comfortably ahead here. That’s three very good, and young, pieces for JJ.
Agreed12 team, 1 QB, TE prem PPR
Team A- ETN, Higgins, Pickens
Team B- Jefferson, 24' 3rd
Jefferson and the third comfortably.
14 team .. no ppr
Terrible trade happened last night (not involved) ..
N Harris
for
GSmith and 2023 Pick 1.14
Team trading Harris has Ekeler and DPierce and no backup QB, but still.... UGH
12 team, 1 QB, TE prem PPR
Team A- ETN, Higgins, Pickens
Team B- Jefferson, 24' 3rd
With a 1st thrown in I’m definitely considering it.It’s fair but I’m not trading JJ for that. No brainer reject for me. Add a 1st to make me activate cerebrals.
JJ easily. But, unlike you, I'm not a fan of ETN or Pickens.I thought it was a fair package. JJ has questions for Cousins after this year, but other than the estimated RBBC ETN & Tank will share, Tee & Pickens are unquestionably valuable pieces in the deal.It’s not a bad deal. I feel that whenever there is trade involving JJ or Chase 90+% of people automatically assume it’s not enough no matter the package.12 team, 1 QB, TE prem PPR
Team A- ETN, Higgins, Pickens
Team B- Jefferson, 24' 3rd
Edit: wording, and multiple different trade calculators (including my own, *sarcasm*) have the package side comfortably ahead here. That’s three very good, and young, pieces for JJ.
I am an ETN fan. I would be hard pressed to turn it down if I had JJ ....
I would want just the picks over Bateman & ETN. The CHI RBs are gravy.#TeamETNBATEMANNot involved, FFPC:
Team A got: ETN and Bateman
Team B got: Roschon/K Herbert, Nico Collins, first, second and third round 2024 picks.
But that said that’s a pretty good haul for them.
But that that said. The upside of both Bateman & ETN seems > than any of the pieces in return.
Feels like a lot of scraps and a 1st for 2 players who each have a relatively high ceiling. I roster both and smash reject on this deal pretty confidently.
It is not horrible return but I would need something more exciting to convince me to give up Bijan.Team A:
Bijan Robinson
Team B:
Nick Chubb
2024 1st (late)
2025 1st (same team pick)
Team A:
Bijan Robinson
Team B:
Nick Chubb
2024 1st (late)
2025 1st (same team pick)
Bijan side and not close for me.Team A:
Bijan Robinson
Team B:
Nick Chubb
2024 1st (late)
2025 1st (same team pick)
Mahomes and 2nd easily for me. Carr is WW guy in 1 QB and Chubb is aging asset. Surprised a 2nd had to be included to get this done.FFPC 1 QB not involved
Chubb and Carr
for
Mahomes and 2024 2nd
Why does someone bail on London at this early stage of his career for this kind of package. Amazing12 team PPR
Team A gave up D London
Team B gave up a '24 first (probably mid range) and Rasheed Rice.
It is odd unless they are strangely high on Rice. London showed enough last season to continue to be excited about his future, although he has a few hurdles to increase his value much more (new QB, run first offense, Bijan, healthy Pitts…etc). Regardless he showed he can play in this league and seems to be hungry to continue to improve.Why does someone bail on London at this early stage of his career for this kind of package. Amazing12 team PPR
Team A gave up D London
Team B gave up a '24 first (probably mid range) and Rasheed Rice.
Mahomes and not remotely close. That’s a brutal deal.FFPC 1 QB not involved
Chubb and Carr
for
Mahomes and 2024 2nd
It's for some of these reasons I gave London up. Run first offense, questionable qb to say the least, etc.It is odd unless they are strangely high on Rice. London showed enough last season to continue to be excited about his future, although he has a few hurdles to increase his value much more (new QB, run first offense, Bijan, healthy Pitts…etc). Regardless he showed he can play in this league and seems to be hungry to continue to improve.Why does someone bail on London at this early stage of his career for this kind of package. Amazing12 team PPR
Team A gave up D London
Team B gave up a '24 first (probably mid range) and Rasheed Rice.
I can understand that a little, but talent usually rises above and finds its level. I did the opposite and bought him for Ridley as I wanted to get younger and had great depth. Good luck, hope you land Marvin HJr.It's for some of these reasons I gave London up. Run first offense, questionable qb to say the least, etc.It is odd unless they are strangely high on Rice. London showed enough last season to continue to be excited about his future, although he has a few hurdles to increase his value much more (new QB, run first offense, Bijan, healthy Pitts…etc). Regardless he showed he can play in this league and seems to be hungry to continue to improve.Why does someone bail on London at this early stage of his career for this kind of package. Amazing12 team PPR
Team A gave up D London
Team B gave up a '24 first (probably mid range) and Rasheed Rice.
London for Ridley? Interesting. I would have done that too from a longevity standpoint.I can understand that a little, but talent usually rises above and finds its level. I did the opposite and bought him for Ridley as I wanted to get younger and had great depth. Good luck, hope you land Marvin HJr.It's for some of these reasons I gave London up. Run first offense, questionable qb to say the least, etc.It is odd unless they are strangely high on Rice. London showed enough last season to continue to be excited about his future, although he has a few hurdles to increase his value much more (new QB, run first offense, Bijan, healthy Pitts…etc). Regardless he showed he can play in this league and seems to be hungry to continue to improve.Why does someone bail on London at this early stage of his career for this kind of package. Amazing12 team PPR
Team A gave up D London
Team B gave up a '24 first (probably mid range) and Rasheed Rice.
big timeNot involved, FFPC:
Team A got: ETN and Bateman
Team B got: Roschon/K Herbert, Nico Collins, first, second and third round 2024 picks.
My guess is because of Arthur Smith and a lack of belief in Ridder. I believe in Ridder a bit but I don't see anything to make me think there are going to be FF relevant WR targets on a consistent basis. I've considered moving on from London because of this fear that they're just going to pound the rock like crazy. I don't like this deal but if the player were someone I liked more than Rice I'd probably have a hard time saying no. I realize the counter is "ok but ALL the WR targets are going to go to London" but I'm not so sure that's as true as it sounds. I think Mack Hollins is actually a sneaky late WR in best ball if you stack Atlanta. But anyway I don't like this one but don't think it's nuts.Why does someone bail on London at this early stage of his career for this kind of package. Amazing12 team PPR
Team A gave up D London
Team B gave up a '24 first (probably mid range) and Rasheed Rice.
It is also a 1QB league and although I earned the 1.20 with a playoff team last year, I did this:24 team TEP 11 starters 2 copies of each player (and our rookie draft starts this weekend - this is my only non-FFPC dynasty team)
I gave Pacheco
I got Elijah Moore, 3.18
Are you the Henry owner or believer in spears?I traded
2024 2nd
2024 4th
Courtland Sutton
For
2.05 - I drafted tyjae spears
3.05
Why? 1 QB for a Top 25 WR compared to a QB2 or 3??Not involved. 6 per TD. PPR. 1QB league
Jordan Love for Mike Williams
Sorry. I am not a Spears fan (that no cartridge thing has me nervous) but I actually believe in Sutton. The whole Denver Offense was in shambles last year. I suspect (hope?) WR 35-42 range for Sutton. Simple WR3 value for little costI traded
2024 2nd
2024 4th
Courtland Sutton
For
2.05 - I drafted tyjae spears
3.05
Are you the Henry owner or believer in spears?I traded
2024 2nd
2024 4th
Courtland Sutton
For
2.05 - I drafted tyjae spears
3.05
Sorry. I am not a Spears fan (that no cartridge thing has me nervous) but I actually believe in Sutton. The whole Denver Offense was in shambles last year. I suspect (hope?) WR 35-42 range for Sutton. Simple WR3 value for little costI traded
2024 2nd
2024 4th
Courtland Sutton
For
2.05 - I drafted tyjae spears
3.05