What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

****OFFICIAL DYNASTY TRADES**** (5 Viewers)

Was able to finally acquire Justin Jefferson in an FFPC, 1 QB league

Got: Jefferson, 3.03
Gave: smith-Njigba, 1.06, Allgeier and 2025 1st (presumably late)

Now i can pick Harrison Jr with the 1.01 and pair together with JJ for long time. WR room still has Olave, Devonta, Marquese Brown, Doubs and some scrubs. Felt like a slight overpay but to get these types of guys I guess that’s always what it will feel like.

If you want JJ he won't come cheap but I don't think this is too much to give at all for a player of JJ's level or age...it definitely is not an overpay IMO...this deal is very affordable/pretty cheap and if your roster is strong, it's a very appealing deal...JSN has a chance to be a good one but if we are talking about JJ I'm not hesitating to include him...I really dislike Allgeier being the 4th piece as he does nothing for me when we are talking about JJ...as for the two #1's I think it is no surprise that these are included because they are the type of assets you would assume would be involved in a deal for a player like JJ but since they are 1.6 and a possible late #1 in 2025 you aren't taking a big hit losing them...when you look at those four pieces you are not giving up a lot of upside for what you are getting...in-fact while I don't know your roster my guess is you aren't even touching the core of your roster...one other thing...why is the 3.3 included...totally unnecessary but a sneaky little addition for you as it's a decent pick you can do something with.
 
Was able to finally acquire Justin Jefferson in an FFPC, 1 QB league

Got: Jefferson, 3.03
Gave: smith-Njigba, 1.06, Allgeier and 2025 1st (presumably late)

Now i can pick Harrison Jr with the 1.01 and pair together with JJ for long time. WR room still has Olave, Devonta, Marquese Brown, Doubs and some scrubs. Felt like a slight overpay but to get these types of guys I guess that’s always what it will feel like.
It would be hard to find someone giving up JJ for cheaper than that, absolute steal IMO. Arguably the best dynasty FF player for several crapshoots? I really do not understand why someone would settle for that.
 
Was able to finally acquire Justin Jefferson in an FFPC, 1 QB league

Got: Jefferson, 3.03
Gave: smith-Njigba, 1.06, Allgeier and 2025 1st (presumably late)

Now i can pick Harrison Jr with the 1.01 and pair together with JJ for long time. WR room still has Olave, Devonta, Marquese Brown, Doubs and some scrubs. Felt like a slight overpay but to get these types of guys I guess that’s always what it will feel like.
That’s a steal for JJ. Shocked he went for that. That’s hardly an overpay. Seems like a bargain. A 2st, a future 1st, the RB2 on the Falcons and JSN?
100%. This is like one of those trades that would add up in a trade calculator but make zero sense in reality. In fact I just checked keeptradecut, which specifically attempts to make adjustments for stacking up multiple smaller assets for one big one. But even there, it says BigAl21 loses the trade by a factor of 21 to 16 🤣

Excellent trade, good work.
Yeah, calcs often place value on clearing roster spots as well, so in that light the team dealing Away JJ loses a roster spot in the process making it an even worse trade. lol
 
Was able to finally acquire Justin Jefferson in an FFPC, 1 QB league

Got: Jefferson, 3.03
Gave: smith-Njigba, 1.06, Allgeier and 2025 1st (presumably late)

Now i can pick Harrison Jr with the 1.01 and pair together with JJ for long time. WR room still has Olave, Devonta, Marquese Brown, Doubs and some scrubs. Felt like a slight overpay but to get these types of guys I guess that’s always what it will feel like.
That’s a steal for JJ. Shocked he went for that. That’s hardly an overpay. Seems like a bargain. A 2st, a future 1st, the RB2 on the Falcons and JSN?
100%. This is like one of those trades that would add up in a trade calculator but make zero sense in reality. In fact I just checked keeptradecut, which specifically attempts to make adjustments for stacking up multiple smaller assets for one big one. But even there, it says BigAl21 loses the trade by a factor of 21 to 16 🤣

Excellent trade, good work.
Yeah, calcs often place value on clearing roster spots as well, so in that light the team dealing Away JJ loses a roster spot in the process making it an even worse trade. lol
Keeptradecut also says packaging all the picks #26 - #36 is fair for Jefferson 😄 Sign me up for that one, I can go gather up those picks in 15 minutes.
 
Was able to finally acquire Justin Jefferson in an FFPC, 1 QB league

Got: Jefferson, 3.03
Gave: smith-Njigba, 1.06, Allgeier and 2025 1st (presumably late)

Now i can pick Harrison Jr with the 1.01 and pair together with JJ for long time. WR room still has Olave, Devonta, Marquese Brown, Doubs and some scrubs. Felt like a slight overpay but to get these types of guys I guess that’s always what it will feel like.
That’s a steal for JJ. Shocked he went for that. That’s hardly an overpay. Seems like a bargain. A 2st, a future 1st, the RB2 on the Falcons and JSN?
100%. This is like one of those trades that would add up in a trade calculator but make zero sense in reality. In fact I just checked keeptradecut, which specifically attempts to make adjustments for stacking up multiple smaller assets for one big one. But even there, it says BigAl21 loses the trade by a factor of 21 to 16 🤣

Excellent trade, good work.
Yeah, calcs often place value on clearing roster spots as well, so in that light the team dealing Away JJ loses a roster spot in the process making it an even worse trade. lol
Keeptradecut also says packaging all the picks #26 - #36 is fair for Jefferson 😄 Sign me up for that one, I can go gather up those picks in 15 minutes.
People relying on KTC for gauging trade value probably shouldn’t. That app is so flawed .
 
Was able to finally acquire Justin Jefferson in an FFPC, 1 QB league

Got: Jefferson, 3.03
Gave: smith-Njigba, 1.06, Allgeier and 2025 1st (presumably late)

Now i can pick Harrison Jr with the 1.01 and pair together with JJ for long time. WR room still has Olave, Devonta, Marquese Brown, Doubs and some scrubs. Felt like a slight overpay but to get these types of guys I guess that’s always what it will feel like.
That’s a steal for JJ. Shocked he went for that. That’s hardly an overpay. Seems like a bargain. A 2st, a future 1st, the RB2 on the Falcons and JSN?
100%. This is like one of those trades that would add up in a trade calculator but make zero sense in reality. In fact I just checked keeptradecut, which specifically attempts to make adjustments for stacking up multiple smaller assets for one big one. But even there, it says BigAl21 loses the trade by a factor of 21 to 16 🤣

Excellent trade, good work.
Yeah, calcs often place value on clearing roster spots as well, so in that light the team dealing Away JJ loses a roster spot in the process making it an even worse trade. lol
Keeptradecut also says packaging all the picks #26 - #36 is fair for Jefferson 😄 Sign me up for that one, I can go gather up those picks in 15 minutes.
People relying on KTC for gauging trade value probably shouldn’t. That app is so flawed .
I think it's a good guideline, for normalish trades, if you take into account any peculiarities about your league. If you're stacking up assets on one side for a big guy on the other side ... you usually need to adjust in favor of the big guy, more than the calculator adjusts. But always just a guideline.

I think the idea is really cool though. It's better as a somewhat-always-up-to-date rankings than a trade calculator.
 
People relying on KTC for gauging trade value probably shouldn’t. That app is so flawed .
I don't see anyone *relying* on it.

I referenced it as a "this is what KTC says" as an external guide after posting my own opinion on the deal. I didn't even check it prior to writing my post.
 
Was able to finally acquire Justin Jefferson in an FFPC, 1 QB league

Got: Jefferson, 3.03
Gave: smith-Njigba, 1.06, Allgeier and 2025 1st (presumably late)

Now i can pick Harrison Jr with the 1.01 and pair together with JJ for long time. WR room still has Olave, Devonta, Marquese Brown, Doubs and some scrubs. Felt like a slight overpay but to get these types of guys I guess that’s always what it will feel like.
It would be hard to find someone giving up JJ for cheaper than that, absolute steal IMO. Arguably the best dynasty FF player for several crapshoots? I really do not understand why someone would settle for that.
I 100% agree that is not an overpay.
 
Monster...

12 team, PPR

Chase Brown for 2 - 2024 3s
If I were the owner of Chase Brown, I would have waited a month before making that deal. Mixon may be a cap casualty — we don’t know at this time. BUT he’s due a $3M bonus in mid-March if he’s on the roster — that’s one month to see whether the owner could’ve gotten a lot more for Brown.
 
Monster...

12 team, PPR

Chase Brown for 2 - 2024 3s
If I were the owner of Chase Brown, I would have waited a month before making that deal. Mixon may be a cap casualty — we don’t know at this time. BUT he’s due a $3M bonus in mid-March if he’s on the roster — that’s one month to see whether the owner could’ve gotten a lot more for Brown.
I own Brown in 2 leagues so I'm probably biased, but between the mid 2nd+ draft capital he cost last year, the flashes he showed, the likelihood of Mixon being cut, AND the seeming overall weakness of this year's RB class - I'm not moving him for less than a late 1st.

ETA: Same goes for Kendre Miller.
 
Monster...

12 team, PPR

Chase Brown for 2 - 2024 3s
As a few have said the Bengals may cut Mixon if he does not take another pay cut. Either way, unless roster space was a driving force, I'm keeping Brown over two thirds even if I knew Mixon was a lock to return especially in a draft that is both weak at RB and is actually not that deep and we might see a decent tail off by round 3 in overall quality.
 
Monster...

12 team, PPR

Chase Brown for 2 - 2024 3s
As a few have said the Bengals may cut Mixon if he does not take another pay cut. Either way, unless roster space was a driving force, I'm keeping Brown over two thirds even if I knew Mixon was a lock to return especially in a draft that is both weak at RB and is actually not that deep and we might see a decent tail off by round 3 in overall quality.
On the flip side, shrewd move by the dude paying the 2x 3rds.
 
Monster...

12 team, PPR

Chase Brown for 2 - 2024 3s
As a few have said the Bengals may cut Mixon if he does not take another pay cut. Either way, unless roster space was a driving force, I'm keeping Brown over two thirds even if I knew Mixon was a lock to return especially in a draft that is both weak at RB and is actually not that deep and we might see a decent tail off by round 3 in overall quality.
On the flip side, shrewd move by the dude paying the 2x 3rds.
Yeah, I would do that foe Brown.
 
Juicy one in FFPC Triflex (can start 2 QBs)

Gave: London, Achane

Got: 1.04, 1.11

Teams needs were not a factor. Personally I think it’s very balanced. Have lots of Achane so don’t mind moving a share and would rather build around WR.
 
Juicy one in FFPC Triflex (can start 2 QBs)

Gave: London, Achane

Got: 1.04, 1.11

Teams needs were not a factor. Personally I think it’s very balanced. Have lots of Achane so don’t mind moving a share and would rather build around WR.
I’d probably rather have Achane / London

Seems early to toss them back, and gamble on 1.04 / 1.11

Who do you expect to get at 1.04?
 
Juicy one in FFPC Triflex (can start 2 QBs)

Gave: London, Achane

Got: 1.04, 1.11

Teams needs were not a factor. Personally I think it’s very balanced. Have lots of Achane so don’t mind moving a share and would rather build around WR.
I’d probably rather have Achane / London

Seems early to toss them back, and gamble on 1.04 / 1.11

Who do you expect to get at 1.04?

Yeah I’m sure many would prefer the players. Will be either Maye, Nabers, or Daniels at 1.4 almost certainly. Main goal here was liquidating a RB. I can definitely see the other side of it too.
 
Juicy one in FFPC Triflex (can start 2 QBs)

Gave: London, Achane

Got: 1.04, 1.11

Teams needs were not a factor. Personally I think it’s very balanced. Have lots of Achane so don’t mind moving a share and would rather build around WR.
I’d probably rather have Achane / London

Seems early to toss them back, and gamble on 1.04 / 1.11

Who do you expect to get at 1.04?

Yeah I’m sure many would prefer the players. Will be either Maye, Nabers, or Daniels at 1.4 almost certainly. Main goal here was liquidating a RB. I can definitely see the other side of it too.
That makes sense.
 
Juicy one in FFPC Triflex (can start 2 QBs)

Gave: London, Achane

Got: 1.04, 1.11

Teams needs were not a factor. Personally I think it’s very balanced. Have lots of Achane so don’t mind moving a share and would rather build around WR.
I am a huge believer in London’s talent and he has shown big time upside in an offense that did its best to hold him back. Archane also has shown huge upside. So you’re trading two young players who have great upside for two unproven crapshoots. This trade does not make a lot of sense to me and I would have wanted more if trading two young talented pieces.
 
Juicy one in FFPC Triflex (can start 2 QBs)

Gave: London, Achane

Got: 1.04, 1.11

Teams needs were not a factor. Personally I think it’s very balanced. Have lots of Achane so don’t mind moving a share and would rather build around WR.
I'd rather have the 1.04 than London by quite a bit (assuming going QB there), but I'd also rather have Achane than the 1.11 by quite a bit. I think the gap between the 4 & London is smaller than the gap between Achane and the 11 so give me the players.
 
Juicy one in FFPC Triflex (can start 2 QBs)

Gave: London, Achane

Got: 1.04, 1.11

Teams needs were not a factor. Personally I think it’s very balanced. Have lots of Achane so don’t mind moving a share and would rather build around WR.
I'd rather have the 1.04 than London by quite a bit (assuming going QB there), but I'd also rather have Achane than the 1.11 by quite a bit. I think the gap between the 4 & London is smaller than the gap between Achane and the 11 so give me the players.
Your explanation seems to imply that you'd rather have London than Achane -- which is fine, obviously. But I would personally much prefer Achane over London. I'm in a weirdly RB-focused league, but even in a normal league I feel like I'd be comparing Achane to the 1.04, and London to the 1.11.
 
Juicy one in FFPC Triflex (can start 2 QBs)

Gave: London, Achane

Got: 1.04, 1.11

Teams needs were not a factor. Personally I think it’s very balanced. Have lots of Achane so don’t mind moving a share and would rather build around WR.
I'd rather have the 1.04 than London by quite a bit (assuming going QB there), but I'd also rather have Achane than the 1.11 by quite a bit. I think the gap between the 4 & London is smaller than the gap between Achane and the 11 so give me the players.
Your explanation seems to imply that you'd rather have London than Achane -- which is fine, obviously. But I would personally much prefer Achane over London. I'm in a weirdly RB-focused league, but even in a normal league I feel like I'd be comparing Achane to the 1.04, and London to the 1.11.
I was going to respond to the trade earlier and make some comments similar to Buckna in large part because it's just easier comping London to one of WR options that might be the choice at 4. I then tried to think of who I'd rather have between London and Achane and was kind of stumped due to abundance/supply of WR's vs RB's.

Kind of a cop out but kind of have them even and I'm basing that in large part that I think the incoming Rams offense could fit London extremely well and allow him to function out of the power slot role that has been such a boon for Puka and Kupp. Obviously QB has to be worked out but London's got a shot to be one of the biggest off-season winners.

Anyway I kind of see like Buckna except I'd rate this as what Da Franchise initially said in that it's very balanced to having a slight edge to the picks. I do agree the gap between the 11 and whichever one of these two you want to consider the second best player feels large but the fact I'm getting the top asset back(1.4) and I just cleared two roster spots makes that up for me. In truth I'm not that excited for the 11 but it's probably going to be like last year where things were not so clear cut after the top few picks but there was a lot of gold to found in them hills. Players like Achane who I recall Da Franchise being higher on then anyone last year and has kind of allowed himself to play with house money.
 
Thanks for the comments. Definitely understand preferring the players. This team won’t be able to compete for the chip until 2026 so offloading a RB into what I imagine to be either two WRs or QB/WR was my angle. Love Achane but don’t want to build around RBs and my one worry of course is his size so that general RB concern is even more amplified here.

As for how I value them, I do think Achane should be worth more than Drake. So I would personally slot them 1.4/Achane/London/1.11. I also don’t rule out there will be a WR available at 1.11 who ends up outproducing London if he doesn’t get his QB fixed so that pushes me over the edge for the picks side. If I valued Drake and Achane oppositely, I wouldn’t have made the deal most likely.

Now I might still end up moving these picks still but they will stay in my pocket until I’ve done my rookie research and they are peak value at draft time.
 
Thanks for the comments. Definitely understand preferring the players. This team won’t be able to compete for the chip until 2026 so offloading a RB into what I imagine to be either two WRs or QB/WR was my angle. Love Achane but don’t want to build around RBs and my one worry of course is his size so that general RB concern is even more amplified here.

As for how I value them, I do think Achane should be worth more than Drake. So I would personally slot them 1.4/Achane/London/1.11. I also don’t rule out there will be a WR available at 1.11 who ends up outproducing London if he doesn’t get his QB fixed so that pushes me over the edge for the picks side. If I valued Drake and Achane oppositely, I wouldn’t have made the deal most likely.

Now I might still end up moving these picks still but they will stay in my pocket until I’ve done my rookie research and they are peak value at draft time.
Those second tier wrs that are hitting in the late first sure look juicy right now. Landing spots will certainly change some of those opinions, but in a rebuild I'm not mad at all at the 1.11.
 
Thanks for the comments. Definitely understand preferring the players. This team won’t be able to compete for the chip until 2026 so offloading a RB into what I imagine to be either two WRs or QB/WR was my angle. Love Achane but don’t want to build around RBs and my one worry of course is his size so that general RB concern is even more amplified here.

As for how I value them, I do think Achane should be worth more than Drake. So I would personally slot them 1.4/Achane/London/1.11. I also don’t rule out there will be a WR available at 1.11 who ends up outproducing London if he doesn’t get his QB fixed so that pushes me over the edge for the picks side. If I valued Drake and Achane oppositely, I wouldn’t have made the deal most likely.

Now I might still end up moving these picks still but they will stay in my pocket until I’ve done my rookie research and they are peak value at draft time.
Those second tier wrs that are hitting in the late first sure look juicy right now. Landing spots will certainly change some of those opinions, but in a rebuild I'm not mad at all at the 1.11.

I’ve barely scratched the surface of rookie scouting but just at first glance see a handful of receivers I’ll be very excited to draft in the late 1st/early 2nd. Add in the 2nd tier of QBs, the RBs and a couple more WRs a little more under the radar and I’m stoked for this draft through the mid 3rd round.

Was also quite excited for last years draft while the consensus seemed pretty underwhelmed, but still underestimated the elite talent that was available. Thought it was really deep but more in a roster glue sense. This draft looks like a real banger to me. More obvious studs and really deep, too. Can’t wait to really dig into it once more info is revealed.
 
Juicy one in FFPC Triflex (can start 2 QBs)

Gave: London, Achane

Got: 1.04, 1.11

Teams needs were not a factor. Personally I think it’s very balanced. Have lots of Achane so don’t mind moving a share and would rather build around WR.
I'd rather have the 1.04 than London by quite a bit (assuming going QB there), but I'd also rather have Achane than the 1.11 by quite a bit. I think the gap between the 4 & London is smaller than the gap between Achane and the 11 so give me the players.
Your explanation seems to imply that you'd rather have London than Achane -- which is fine, obviously. But I would personally much prefer Achane over London. I'm in a weirdly RB-focused league, but even in a normal league I feel like I'd be comparing Achane to the 1.04, and London to the 1.11.

Ask me any particular day and I might flip them. I would consider them fairly close and wouldn’t fault anyone for preferring the RB given positional scarcity. Flip flop them and its basically the same observation.
 
12 team. 1 QB.

Team A received: 1.06, 1.07. 1.10, Brian Robinson
Team B received: 1.01, Tillman
Assuming the 1.01 team is on the barren side, give me the extra picks.
Team trading away 1.01 had:
QB: Murray
RB: Hall, K. Williams, Swift
WR: Waddle, Collins, Kirk
TE: Goedert, Freiermuth

Team receiving 1.01:
QB: Goff, Cousins
RB: Gibbs, Pacheco
WR: Chase, Jefferson, JSN
TE: Pitts, Schultz, Likely
 
12 team. 1 QB.

Team A received: 1.06, 1.07. 1.10, Brian Robinson
Team B received: 1.01, Tillman
Assuming the 1.01 team is on the barren side, give me the extra picks.
Team trading away 1.01 had:
QB: Murray
RB: Hall, K. Williams, Swift
WR: Waddle, Collins, Kirk
TE: Goedert, Freiermuth

Team receiving 1.01:
QB: Goff, Cousins
RB: Gibbs, Pacheco
WR: Chase, Jefferson, JSN
TE: Pitts, Schultz, Likely
Rare good get for both sides, it appears. Team selling 1.01 gets 3x shots at Tier 2 WRs and RB1 and MAYBE Bowers if the cards fall right. Team buying 1.01 adds MHJ to Chase and Jefferson.
 
12 team. 1 QB.

Team A received: 1.06, 1.07. 1.10, Brian Robinson
Team B received: 1.01, Tillman

I like the picks here. I am a smidge lower on MHJ than consensus and very high on the depth of this class. And Robinson’s not nothing. This is a great haul and I’d take it every time.
 
12 team. 1 QB.

Team A received: 1.06, 1.07. 1.10, Brian Robinson
Team B received: 1.01, Tillman
Assuming the 1.01 team is on the barren side, give me the extra picks.
Team trading away 1.01 had:
QB: Murray
RB: Hall, K. Williams, Swift
WR: Waddle, Collins, Kirk
TE: Goedert, Freiermuth

Team receiving 1.01:
QB: Goff, Cousins
RB: Gibbs, Pacheco
WR: Chase, Jefferson, JSN
TE: Pitts, Schultz, Likely
Rare good get for both sides, it appears. Team selling 1.01 gets 3x shots at Tier 2 WRs and RB1 and MAYBE Bowers if the cards fall right. Team buying 1.01 adds MHJ to Chase and Jefferson.

I understand your point but even in tighter roster settings like FFPC I wouldn’t deal that for the 1.01 unless there are a bunch more notable players on this guys bench. Harrison is a big get no doubt and makes a strong starting lineup, but it’s still not a super team at full strength and is an injury or two away from trouble. I’d stock up on depth from this draft.
 
12 team. 1 QB.

Team A received: 1.06, 1.07. 1.10, Brian Robinson
Team B received: 1.01, Tillman
Assuming the 1.01 team is on the barren side, give me the extra picks.
Team trading away 1.01 had:
QB: Murray
RB: Hall, K. Williams, Swift
WR: Waddle, Collins, Kirk
TE: Goedert, Freiermuth

Team receiving 1.01:
QB: Goff, Cousins
RB: Gibbs, Pacheco
WR: Chase, Jefferson, JSN
TE: Pitts, Schultz, Likely
Rare good get for both sides, it appears. Team selling 1.01 gets 3x shots at Tier 2 WRs and RB1 and MAYBE Bowers if the cards fall right. Team buying 1.01 adds MHJ to Chase and Jefferson.

Agree with this...a Jefferson-Chase-Harrison trio is very formidable and if it doesn't work out the way you want I think you could make a deal with any of them to recoup what you just traded away and it could actually be better if you sub out a pick or two for a young player that is not a dice roll.
 
12 team. 1 QB.

Team A received: 1.06, 1.07. 1.10, Brian Robinson
Team B received: 1.01, Tillman
Assuming the 1.01 team is on the barren side, give me the extra picks.
Team trading away 1.01 had:
QB: Murray
RB: Hall, K. Williams, Swift
WR: Waddle, Collins, Kirk
TE: Goedert, Freiermuth

Team receiving 1.01:
QB: Goff, Cousins
RB: Gibbs, Pacheco
WR: Chase, Jefferson, JSN
TE: Pitts, Schultz, Likely
If I was the team getting the 1.1 this would be a very easy trade for me to make. When you got that much young studs, and potential young studs, depth will be very easy to build out over time because in theory no one in that core is going to be aging out anytime soon.

It's ok for the team giving up the 1.1 but I'd have had to pass now. Things will of course change as more info becomes available but for over a month now I've been trying to come up with a 6th non-QB I feel really strong about and I'm coming up empty and I'm not excited about picking a QB that high in a one start format.
 
12 team. 1 QB.

Team A received: 1.06, 1.07. 1.10, Brian Robinson
Team B received: 1.01, Tillman
Assuming the 1.01 team is on the barren side, give me the extra picks.
Team trading away 1.01 had:
QB: Murray
RB: Hall, K. Williams, Swift
WR: Waddle, Collins, Kirk
TE: Goedert, Freiermuth

Team receiving 1.01:
QB: Goff, Cousins
RB: Gibbs, Pacheco
WR: Chase, Jefferson, JSN
TE: Pitts, Schultz, Likely
Rare good get for both sides, it appears. Team selling 1.01 gets 3x shots at Tier 2 WRs and RB1 and MAYBE Bowers if the cards fall right. Team buying 1.01 adds MHJ to Chase and Jefferson.

I understand your point but even in tighter roster settings like FFPC I wouldn’t deal that for the 1.01 unless there are a bunch more notable players on this guys bench. Harrison is a big get no doubt and makes a strong starting lineup, but it’s still not a super team at full strength and is an injury or two away from trouble. I’d stock up on depth from this draft.
Not a bunch of notables, but this gives me 1.01, 1.02, 1.03, 1.04 so I should add some WR depth in this draft to my trio of Chase, Jefferson, MHJ
 
12 team. 1 QB.

Team A received: 1.06, 1.07. 1.10, Brian Robinson
Team B received: 1.01, Tillman
Assuming the 1.01 team is on the barren side, give me the extra picks.
Team trading away 1.01 had:
QB: Murray
RB: Hall, K. Williams, Swift
WR: Waddle, Collins, Kirk
TE: Goedert, Freiermuth

Team receiving 1.01:
QB: Goff, Cousins
RB: Gibbs, Pacheco
WR: Chase, Jefferson, JSN
TE: Pitts, Schultz, Likely
Rare good get for both sides, it appears. Team selling 1.01 gets 3x shots at Tier 2 WRs and RB1 and MAYBE Bowers if the cards fall right. Team buying 1.01 adds MHJ to Chase and Jefferson.

I understand your point but even in tighter roster settings like FFPC I wouldn’t deal that for the 1.01 unless there are a bunch more notable players on this guys bench. Harrison is a big get no doubt and makes a strong starting lineup, but it’s still not a super team at full strength and is an injury or two away from trouble. I’d stock up on depth from this draft.
Not a bunch of notables, but this gives me 1.01, 1.02, 1.03, 1.04 so I should add some WR depth in this draft to my trio of Chase, Jefferson, MHJ

Oh well in THAT case, awesome freaking move lol and I have no idea why the other owner would leave the store without one of those earlier picks in return.
 
12 team. 1 QB.

Team A received: 1.06, 1.07. 1.10, Brian Robinson
Team B received: 1.01, Tillman
Assuming the 1.01 team is on the barren side, give me the extra picks.
Team trading away 1.01 had:
QB: Murray
RB: Hall, K. Williams, Swift
WR: Waddle, Collins, Kirk
TE: Goedert, Freiermuth

Team receiving 1.01:
QB: Goff, Cousins
RB: Gibbs, Pacheco
WR: Chase, Jefferson, JSN
TE: Pitts, Schultz, Likely
Rare good get for both sides, it appears. Team selling 1.01 gets 3x shots at Tier 2 WRs and RB1 and MAYBE Bowers if the cards fall right. Team buying 1.01 adds MHJ to Chase and Jefferson.

I understand your point but even in tighter roster settings like FFPC I wouldn’t deal that for the 1.01 unless there are a bunch more notable players on this guys bench. Harrison is a big get no doubt and makes a strong starting lineup, but it’s still not a super team at full strength and is an injury or two away from trouble. I’d stock up on depth from this draft.
Not a bunch of notables, but this gives me 1.01, 1.02, 1.03, 1.04 so I should add some WR depth in this draft to my trio of Chase, Jefferson, MHJ

Oh well in THAT case, awesome freaking move lol and I have no idea why the other owner would leave the store without one of those earlier picks in return.
Agree 1000%

You’re sitting on the 2,3 and 4 and they settle for the 6, 7, 10. questionable owners in that league.

I assume you’ve won back to back to back Chips in that league? :)
 
Last edited:
12 team. 1 QB.

Team A received: 1.06, 1.07. 1.10, Brian Robinson
Team B received: 1.01, Tillman
Assuming the 1.01 team is on the barren side, give me the extra picks.
Team trading away 1.01 had:
QB: Murray
RB: Hall, K. Williams, Swift
WR: Waddle, Collins, Kirk
TE: Goedert, Freiermuth

Team receiving 1.01:
QB: Goff, Cousins
RB: Gibbs, Pacheco
WR: Chase, Jefferson, JSN
TE: Pitts, Schultz, Likely
Rare good get for both sides, it appears. Team selling 1.01 gets 3x shots at Tier 2 WRs and RB1 and MAYBE Bowers if the cards fall right. Team buying 1.01 adds MHJ to Chase and Jefferson.

I understand your point but even in tighter roster settings like FFPC I wouldn’t deal that for the 1.01 unless there are a bunch more notable players on this guys bench. Harrison is a big get no doubt and makes a strong starting lineup, but it’s still not a super team at full strength and is an injury or two away from trouble. I’d stock up on depth from this draft.
Not a bunch of notables, but this gives me 1.01, 1.02, 1.03, 1.04 so I should add some WR depth in this draft to my trio of Chase, Jefferson, MHJ

Oh well in THAT case, awesome freaking move lol and I have no idea why the other owner would leave the store without one of those earlier picks in return.
Agree 1000%

You’re sitting on the 2,3 and 4 and they settle for the 6, 7, 10. questionable owners in that league.

I assume you’ve won back to back to back Chips in that league? :)
No I have not. I earned one of those picks in the top 6 (lottery system)
 
Just made another big one.

FFPC Triflex (can start 2 QB)

Gave: Purdy, Rashee Rice, 1.11

Got: Anthony Richardson, Chase Brown, 2025 2nd (random)

I’d love to hear some thoughts.
 
Just made another big one.

FFPC Triflex (can start 2 QB)

Gave: Purdy, Rashee Rice, 1.11

Got: Anthony Richardson, Chase Brown, 2025 2nd (random)

I’d love to hear some thoughts.

I have no problem with either side...Richardson has a chance to be a dynamic fantasy player and you are not getting him in this format without giving up something...Purdy will be under-estimated by some, but he is a very good QB who will get better every year in fantasy as the Niners lean on him more...Rice and 1.11 is a nice get for the new Purdy Owner but if ARich really hits you won't remember including them and getting a #2 and Brown takes some of the sting out of that anyways...Brown is the sneaky x-factor in this deal...overall, I could see myself making this deal on either side based on what my team looks like.
 
Just made another big one.

FFPC Triflex (can start 2 QB)

Gave: Purdy, Rashee Rice, 1.11

Got: Anthony Richardson, Chase Brown, 2025 2nd (random)

I’d love to hear some thoughts.
At first blush, I loved this deal for you. I still like it for sure, but not by a landslide like I thought at first. I like getting Brown and I'm not as crazy about Rice as some are. I consider Richardson an upgrade. The pick downgrade is the cost, and I say it's a discount.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top