What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

****OFFICIAL DYNASTY TRADES**** (26 Viewers)

building off my acquisition of Godwin.

12 team FFPC SF league

Lots of back and forth on this one. The other owner wanted the 2.05 for Pacheco, worked him down to the 3.05 for I Pacheco. My team is needy at RB, so this seemed like decent risk/price.

Gave 3.05

Got I Pacheco

Same league, a bit of negotiations were needed here as well.

Gave 1.02 and a 2026 3rd

Got M Penix

My QB room is J Daniels, B Young and M Penix, so I am feeling much better this off season than I was last year. I will also add that the league gave me hard time for taking Daniels over MHJ last rookie draft at the 1.02. I felt confident at the time and now I feel great about that decision.

I bought this orphan a few years ago and I feel like I finally have a competitive team.
There is not a league where I would trade Pacheco for the 3.5. He is worth more. His injury was very similar to Pollard's, and Pollard did not start being himself again until the second year after his injury. Pacheco is going through his age-26 season. He should respond well this season unless this is a league where there are contracts, and there is a need to unload him or lose him or some penalty for keeping him. He is a clear hold for the 3.5. I suppose if you wanted to throw a dart, it makes sense.

I think 2.5 is about right. I can see a better dart throw at 2.5, but even then, it is still a dart throw—a much better dart, however.

I didn't bother responding before and you summed up a lot of what I was thinking. Pacheco for a mid-3rd is absurd. If someone wants to argue the 2.05 is a no go due to the risk KC adds someone in the draft, OK sure. It's a risk, but not a strong one it will be a Day 2 or better guy given their other holes IMO. But out of 10 other teams no one would offer better than 3.05 even with FFPC's cut down rules?

Edit: I guess it would be 10 other teams, not 12 but the point still stands. Owner should have shopped around
 
Last edited:
Gave 3.05

Got I Pacheco
I don't play SF so no comment on the Penix trade but like this a great deal.

People are too down on Pachecho. Let me put it this way, I'm 7 drafts into this season and have already drafted him more then in 42 drafts last year.

It's like they got the guy in their head who came back from his injury and was not the same guy. Now he probably won't get that volume like he did to end 2023 and opening last year but he's a long way away from that guy who Andy Reid said last week was playing with an injury most players would not have returned from last season. Love discounts on players who let people down the previous season and I think this is what you got.
 
Gave 3.05

Got I Pacheco
I don't play SF so no comment on the Penix trade but like this a great deal.

People are too down on Pachecho. Let me put it this way, I'm 7 drafts into this season and have already drafted him more then in 42 drafts last year.

It's like they got the guy in their head who came back from his injury and was not the same guy. Now he probably won't get that volume like he did to end 2023 and opening last year but he's a long way away from that guy who Andy Reid said last week was playing with an injury most players would not have returned from last season. Love discounts on players who let people down the previous season and I think this is what you got.
42 leagues?
 
Gave 3.05

Got I Pacheco
I don't play SF so no comment on the Penix trade but like this a great deal.

People are too down on Pachecho. Let me put it this way, I'm 7 drafts into this season and have already drafted him more then in 42 drafts last year.

It's like they got the guy in their head who came back from his injury and was not the same guy. Now he probably won't get that volume like he did to end 2023 and opening last year but he's a long way away from that guy who Andy Reid said last week was playing with an injury most players would not have returned from last season. Love discounts on players who let people down the previous season and I think this is what you got.
42 leagues?
Well 43, forgot the local league but 18 of them are BB, no management. Know many people who do more, but always trying to cut back a few. Wednesday blind bid waivers is like a part time job.
 
Gave 3.05

Got I Pacheco
I don't play SF so no comment on the Penix trade but like this a great deal.

People are too down on Pachecho. Let me put it this way, I'm 7 drafts into this season and have already drafted him more then in 42 drafts last year.

It's like they got the guy in their head who came back from his injury and was not the same guy. Now he probably won't get that volume like he did to end 2023 and opening last year but he's a long way away from that guy who Andy Reid said last week was playing with an injury most players would not have returned from last season. Love discounts on players who let people down the previous season and I think this is what you got.
42 leagues?
Well 43, forgot the local league but 18 of them are BB, no management. Know many people who do more, but always trying to cut back a few. Wednesday blind bid waivers is like a part time job.
Oh. OK. So only 25 that you have to manage weekly. That makes sense.
 
Gave 3.05

Got I Pacheco
I don't play SF so no comment on the Penix trade but like this a great deal.

People are too down on Pachecho. Let me put it this way, I'm 7 drafts into this season and have already drafted him more then in 42 drafts last year.

It's like they got the guy in their head who came back from his injury and was not the same guy. Now he probably won't get that volume like he did to end 2023 and opening last year but he's a long way away from that guy who Andy Reid said last week was playing with an injury most players would not have returned from last season. Love discounts on players who let people down the previous season and I think this is what you got.
42 leagues?
Well 43, forgot the local league but 18 of them are BB, no management. Know many people who do more, but always trying to cut back a few. Wednesday blind bid waivers is like a part time job.
Oh. OK. So only 25 that you have to manage weekly. That makes sense.
I've found that 6 dynasty / devy leagues is my sweet spot. I want to be able to give my full attention to all my leagues without it becoming a part-time job. Plus, I'm in 1 dynasty baseball league that includes minor leaguers and that league is more work than all my football leagues combined and I commish 4 of the football leagues.
 
building off my acquisition of Godwin.

12 team FFPC SF league

Lots of back and forth on this one. The other owner wanted the 2.05 for Pacheco, worked him down to the 3.05 for I Pacheco. My team is needy at RB, so this seemed like decent risk/price.

Gave 3.05

Got I Pacheco

Same league, a bit of negotiations were needed here as well.

Gave 1.02 and a 2026 3rd

Got M Penix

My QB room is J Daniels, B Young and M Penix, so I am feeling much better this off season than I was last year. I will also add that the league gave me hard time for taking Daniels over MHJ last rookie draft at the 1.02. I felt confident at the time and now I feel great about that decision.

I bought this orphan a few years ago and I feel like I finally have a competitive team.
There is not a league where I would trade Pacheco for the 3.5. He is worth more. His injury was very similar to Pollard's, and Pollard did not start being himself again until the second year after his injury. Pacheco is going through his age-26 season. He should respond well this season unless this is a league where there are contracts, and there is a need to unload him or lose him or some penalty for keeping him. He is a clear hold for the 3.5. I suppose if you wanted to throw a dart, it makes sense.

I think 2.5 is about right. I can see a better dart throw at 2.5, but even then, it is still a dart throw—a much better dart, however.

I didn't bother responding before and you summed up a lot of what I was thinking. Pacheco for a mid-3rd is absurd. If someone wants to argue the 2.05 is a no go due to the risk KC adds someone in the draft, OK sure. It's a risk, but not a strong one it will be a Day 2 or better guy given their other holes IMO. But out of 10 other teams no one would offer better than 3.05 even with FFPC's cut down rules?

Edit: I guess it would be 10 other teams, not 12 but the point still stands. Owner should have shopped around
So you’re saying I should feel bad for the other guy?! 😅

I am pretty sure he did shop around, FYI. I just stood my ground at 3.05. We had like 10 or so back and forth, to which I always countered with the 3.05. My last counter had a message that “this is my last counter, take it or Leave it.”
 
12 team, 1 QB, 6 points per passing TD, full PPR.

I gave Jordan Mason, pick 2.07 and pick 3.02 for Patrick Mahomes. Devy league so most of the 2025 expected impact rookies are gone. Plus, have 7 draft picks including 1.1, 1.6 and 2.6 so didn't have roster space for all of them.

This deal was offered to me. Just joined this league and there was a 3 team dispersal draft. My QBs were Tua and Stafford which is pretty yuck for a 12 teamer. I realize Mahomes hasn't been great for FF the last couple years, but like the fact that he seems to be getting back in shape and hopefully can get back to being a FF star. Rice and Worthy plus Kelce back another season gives me optimism.

First instinct was naturally to counter, but decided the deal was good for me " as is" so just hit the accept button.
 
Gave 3.05

Got I Pacheco
I don't play SF so no comment on the Penix trade but like this a great deal.

People are too down on Pachecho. Let me put it this way, I'm 7 drafts into this season and have already drafted him more then in 42 drafts last year.

It's like they got the guy in their head who came back from his injury and was not the same guy. Now he probably won't get that volume like he did to end 2023 and opening last year but he's a long way away from that guy who Andy Reid said last week was playing with an injury most players would not have returned from last season. Love discounts on players who let people down the previous season and I think this is what you got.
42 leagues?
Well 43, forgot the local league but 18 of them are BB, no management. Know many people who do more, but always trying to cut back a few. Wednesday blind bid waivers is like a part time job.
Oh. OK. So only 25 that you have to manage weekly. That makes sense.
That and the 8 dynasty leagues.

I actually cut 4 leagues out from 2023. Trying to cut 3 more out this year but not sure I'll be able to hold myself to it. There is nothing I like more then a dynasty startup and I've only done one since 2016, the Sharkpool league, because I don't want to add more.

It's a lot but like I said earlier there are people who blow this number away in the national type contests, some people are in the hundreds. I truly don't know how they do it, maybe have assistants? Setting lineups for that many teams is not really an issue, the work is the blind bid waivers.
 
Gave 3.05

Got I Pacheco
I don't play SF so no comment on the Penix trade but like this a great deal.

People are too down on Pachecho. Let me put it this way, I'm 7 drafts into this season and have already drafted him more then in 42 drafts last year.

It's like they got the guy in their head who came back from his injury and was not the same guy. Now he probably won't get that volume like he did to end 2023 and opening last year but he's a long way away from that guy who Andy Reid said last week was playing with an injury most players would not have returned from last season. Love discounts on players who let people down the previous season and I think this is what you got.
42 leagues?
Well 43, forgot the local league but 18 of them are BB, no management. Know many people who do more, but always trying to cut back a few. Wednesday blind bid waivers is like a part time job.
Oh. OK. So only 25 that you have to manage weekly. That makes sense.
That and the 8 dynasty leagues.

I actually cut 4 leagues out from 2023. Trying to cut 3 more out this year but not sure I'll be able to hold myself to it. There is nothing I like more then a dynasty startup and I've only done one since 2016, the Sharkpool league, because I don't want to add more.

It's a lot but like I said earlier there are people who blow this number away in the national type contests, some people are in the hundreds. I truly don't know how they do it, maybe have assistants? Setting lineups for that many teams is not really an issue, the work is the blind bid waivers.
Besides the reasons I listed previously as to why 6 dynasty leagues is the sweet spot for me, I think those who play in 40 or 50 leagues and say they plan to cut 3 here or 6 there, is the part of dynasty as a commissioner I dislike. Having to find replacements for teams that aren't really into it for the long haul. I take it that the leagues you're cutting, some are those that don't have as good of a outlook long term, or are filled with geezers and / or limited picks? I think playing in so many leagues leads to these kind of situations, not being able to give all of them the same dedication equally that is needed. I'm sure you will say you are leaving several leagues in a good situation and some may not, but as a commish I've seen a lot of teams that aren't left in good shape. I'm sure many of these owners play in too many leagues and leave some teams bare of assets because they lacked the time or effort to make said teams the best they could be. I know this doesn't apply to every situation and some take on too many leagues and life itself changes their ability to manage them, maybe including yours. But mostly, I think owners who take on 40 or 50+ leagues play the game of when one goes bad they dump it. This can be a big headache for dynasty commissioners. As commissioner the biggest reason owners dump leagues that I've seen is they say they are cutting back. As I've realized, most, but not all, are they have run their team into the ground with geezers and / or no picks, or both. Just my opinion.
 
Last edited:
I take it that the leagues you're cutting, some are those that don't have as good of a outlook long term, or are filled with geezers and / or limited picks?
No sir, could not be further from the case.

When I talk about cutting leagues I'm talking about cutting redraft leagues down. Don't even remotely consider cutting dynasty leagues unless there is some major turnoff with the league.

Full disclosure. I've joined 10 dynasty leagues in my life and have quit two of them. Quit an FFPC league in 2016 because I did not like the trading habits of some people in the league, backscratching/favoritism, so decided to leave the league and do a new startup. I told the FFPC I wanted to sale the team, which among it's notable assets had Julio Jones and pick 1.1(Gurley) and in less then hour of me making the team available someone paid full price. The other was a DFWC league I split with poster here Dez because the league was filled with turds and the service and league hosting site are a joke. That was my only league with DFWC and I wanted out so we sold the team last year and it finished first without making hardly any moves.

On the flip side my oldest FFPC team back in like 2016 I was looking at startup ADP and realized I did not have one single player whose ADP was in the top 3 rounds and only one player who made round 4. Devonta Freeman. A barren wasteland of a roster. I remained.

Understand stuff comes up for people and priorities change, but like you not a fan of people bailing so quickly in dynasty leagues and it's been heavily on the increase the last few years. It's a problem IMO, not in leagues filling and continuing, just the way people run their teams and the experience of it all.
 
FFPC Triflex (superflex, start 3 WRs, TE premium)

Gave: Marvin Harrison, Sam Darnold, 2.04
Got: Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Derek Carr, 1.06

New guy took over an orphan and was looking to make moves.

Made another deal with the same guy:

Gave: Jaylen Waddle
Got: '26 R1
 
Besides the reasons I listed previously as to why 6 dynasty leagues is the sweet spot for me, I think those who play in 40 or 50 leagues and say they plan to cut 3 here or 6 there, is the part of dynasty as a commissioner I dislike. Having to find replacements for teams that aren't really into it for the long haul.

I think guys who play in dozens of leagues are doing so through sites like FFPC, which collects a one-time deposit (often at least half of the yearly dues, often more) when you join the league, specifically because guys will abandon teams (forfeiting their deposit), so FFPC does get some money back when that happens. (This isn't taking into account the rake that FFPC collects.)
 
Besides the reasons I listed previously as to why 6 dynasty leagues is the sweet spot for me, I think those who play in 40 or 50 leagues and say they plan to cut 3 here or 6 there, is the part of dynasty as a commissioner I dislike. Having to find replacements for teams that aren't really into it for the long haul.

I think guys who play in dozens of leagues are doing so through sites like FFPC, which collects a one-time deposit (often at least half of the yearly dues, often more) when you join the league, specifically because guys will abandon teams (forfeiting their deposit), so FFPC does get some money back when that happens. (This isn't taking into account the rake that FFPC collects.)
I wouldn't know because I don't play or commish in FFPC. I know from experience people leave leagues after after their team becomes terrible. Collecting deposits for initially joining leagues is mostly irrelevant because most owners play more than 1 year. As for collecting deposits on traded future picks, that works up to a point. At the end of the day, I've seen owners play dynasty like they play redraft and "Go for it", without regards to the future and often times their team ends up with very few meaningful long term assets, so they bail.
 
FFPC Triflex (superflex, start 3 WRs, TE premium)

Gave: Marvin Harrison, Sam Darnold, 2.04
Got: Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Derek Carr, 1.06

New guy took over an orphan and was looking to make moves.

Made another deal with the same guy:

Gave: Jaylen Waddle
Got: '26 R1
I’m probably on the MH2/Darnold side. The 1.06 doesn’t really offset how much I’m not a Carr guy.

ETA: and I just saw this news:
NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport reports that “Derek Carr is now dealing with a shoulder injury that threatens his availability for this season.”
Rapoport adds that “Carr is weighing options, including the possibility of surgery.” Just eight days ago, Rapoport also reported that the Saints “could end up taking a quarterback” in the 2025 NFL Draft. Carr is not viewed as the long-term answer in-house, but the fully guaranteed $40 million salary he is owed for 2025 was thought to at least pencil him in as the early-season starter. Carr’s odds of contributing meaningfully as a 2025 fantasy asset are quickly diminishing. The development could also spur a move from Aaron Rodgers, who has been in talks with the Steelers for some time now.
😬

Waddle for a 1st isn’t bad value.
 
building off my acquisition of Godwin.

12 team FFPC SF league

Lots of back and forth on this one. The other owner wanted the 2.05 for Pacheco, worked him down to the 3.05 for I Pacheco. My team is needy at RB, so this seemed like decent risk/price.

Gave 3.05

Got I Pacheco

Same league, a bit of negotiations were needed here as well.

Gave 1.02 and a 2026 3rd

Got M Penix

My QB room is J Daniels, B Young and M Penix, so I am feeling much better this off season than I was last year. I will also add that the league gave me hard time for taking Daniels over MHJ last rookie draft at the 1.02. I felt confident at the time and now I feel great about that decision.

I bought this orphan a few years ago and I feel like I finally have a competitive team.
There is not a league where I would trade Pacheco for the 3.5. He is worth more. His injury was very similar to Pollard's, and Pollard did not start being himself again until the second year after his injury. Pacheco is going through his age-26 season. He should respond well this season unless this is a league where there are contracts, and there is a need to unload him or lose him or some penalty for keeping him. He is a clear hold for the 3.5. I suppose if you wanted to throw a dart, it makes sense.

I think 2.5 is about right. I can see a better dart throw at 2.5, but even then, it is still a dart throw—a much better dart, however.

I didn't bother responding before and you summed up a lot of what I was thinking. Pacheco for a mid-3rd is absurd. If someone wants to argue the 2.05 is a no go due to the risk KC adds someone in the draft, OK sure. It's a risk, but not a strong one it will be a Day 2 or better guy given their other holes IMO. But out of 10 other teams no one would offer better than 3.05 even with FFPC's cut down rules?

Edit: I guess it would be 10 other teams, not 12 but the point still stands. Owner should have shopped around
So you’re saying I should feel bad for the other guy?! 😅

I am pretty sure he did shop around, FYI. I just stood my ground at 3.05. We had like 10 or so back and forth, to which I always countered with the 3.05. My last counter had a message that “this is my last counter, take it or Leave it.”
You never know in trades, but he should have let you walk. He may hit on his dart throw and look like a genius, but the odds are not with him.
 
FFPC Triflex (superflex, start 3 WRs, TE premium)

Gave: Marvin Harrison, Sam Darnold, 2.04
Got: Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Derek Carr, 1.06

New guy took over an orphan and was looking to make moves.

Made another deal with the same guy:

Gave: Jaylen Waddle
Got: '26 R1
I’m probably on the MH2/Darnold side. The 1.06 doesn’t really offset how much I’m not a Carr guy.

ETA: and I just saw this news:
NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport reports that “Derek Carr is now dealing with a shoulder injury that threatens his availability for this season.”
Rapoport adds that “Carr is weighing options, including the possibility of surgery.” Just eight days ago, Rapoport also reported that the Saints “could end up taking a quarterback” in the 2025 NFL Draft. Carr is not viewed as the long-term answer in-house, but the fully guaranteed $40 million salary he is owed for 2025 was thought to at least pencil him in as the early-season starter. Carr’s odds of contributing meaningfully as a 2025 fantasy asset are quickly diminishing. The development could also spur a move from Aaron Rodgers, who has been in talks with the Steelers for some time now.
😬

Waddle for a 1st isn’t bad value.

My partner and I saw MHJ and JSN as a wash, and Darnold and Carr as a wash, so the pick swap made it worth it. Of course, this was about 24 hours before the Carr news, but we really wanted to get rid of Darnold, and Carr wasn't ever going to be a big part of our plans anyway.
 
FFPC Triflex (superflex, start 3 WRs, TE premium)

Gave: Marvin Harrison, Sam Darnold, 2.04
Got: Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Derek Carr, 1.06

New guy took over an orphan and was looking to make moves.

Made another deal with the same guy:

Gave: Jaylen Waddle
Got: '26 R1

Would probably favour MHJ/Darnold more than JSN/Carr enough to offset the pick downgrade before the news of a reported Carr injury. Taking a first for Waddle seems fine at this point
 
news, but we really wanted to get rid of Darnold
But why .gif?

I have Darnold as a 3rd QB in a SF league, but I’m going to let his value build a while. Right now seems like a terrible time to sell since the community is so low on him. Couple of 300+ yard games and his value is gonna take a massive leap.

The Carr owner in that league has already hit me up on GroupMe asking if he’s available. Imagine how much more he’ll pay in October.
;)
 
news, but we really wanted to get rid of Darnold
But why .gif?

I have Darnold as a 3rd QB in a SF league, but I’m going to let his value build a while. Right now seems like a terrible time to sell since the community is so low on him. Couple of 300+ yard games and his value is gonna take a massive leap.

The Carr owner in that league has already hit me up on GroupMe asking if he’s available. Imagine how much more he’ll pay in October.
;)

Has the community ever been "high" on Darnold? Isn't the likelihood of him throwing a couple 300+ yard games the same as him throwing a couple two-interception, one-TD games?

Last year at this time, Darnold was on the wire in FFPC superflex leagues and you could get him for a 4th-round pick (vets are available in the FFPC rookie draft player pool). We traded Hollywood Brown and what turned out to be the 3.12 for Darnold and Minshew a couple weeks before the season, so even when Darnold was known to be the starter, he was cheap. (In another Triflex league, right before Halloween, I got both Darnold and DK Metcalf for a 2025 1st, at a time when Darnold was an every-week superflex starter, so even then his value wasn't that high.) It's also highly league-specific -- nearly all of the other teams have three QBs already, and, of the ones that didn't, only one was even interested in Darnold. Yes, it sucks that the QB we got to replace him is now probably hurt, but I think if you can get a reasonable return for him now, then you should.
 
news, but we really wanted to get rid of Darnold
But why .gif?

I have Darnold as a 3rd QB in a SF league, but I’m going to let his value build a while. Right now seems like a terrible time to sell since the community is so low on him. Couple of 300+ yard games and his value is gonna take a massive leap.

The Carr owner in that league has already hit me up on GroupMe asking if he’s available. Imagine how much more he’ll pay in October.
;)
Seattle will need to something about adding some weapons for him to be successful (and probably beef the oline). I do not see it a given that his value will rise anytime soon.
 
news, but we really wanted to get rid of Darnold
But why .gif?

I have Darnold as a 3rd QB in a SF league, but I’m going to let his value build a while. Right now seems like a terrible time to sell since the community is so low on him. Couple of 300+ yard games and his value is gonna take a massive leap.

The Carr owner in that league has already hit me up on GroupMe asking if he’s available. Imagine how much more he’ll pay in October.
;)
Seattle will need to something about adding some weapons for him to be successful (and probably beef the oline). I do not see it a given that his value will rise anytime soon.
I think people are vastly underrating JSN.
 
news, but we really wanted to get rid of Darnold
But why .gif?

I have Darnold as a 3rd QB in a SF league, but I’m going to let his value build a while. Right now seems like a terrible time to sell since the community is so low on him. Couple of 300+ yard games and his value is gonna take a massive leap.

The Carr owner in that league has already hit me up on GroupMe asking if he’s available. Imagine how much more he’ll pay in October.
;)
Seattle will need to something about adding some weapons for him to be successful (and probably beef the oline). I do not see it a given that his value will rise anytime soon.
I think people are vastly underrating JSN.
I know you love him and I do like him, but the cupboard is pretty bare after that.
 
news, but we really wanted to get rid of Darnold
But why .gif?

I have Darnold as a 3rd QB in a SF league, but I’m going to let his value build a while. Right now seems like a terrible time to sell since the community is so low on him. Couple of 300+ yard games and his value is gonna take a massive leap.

The Carr owner in that league has already hit me up on GroupMe asking if he’s available. Imagine how much more he’ll pay in October.
;)

Has the community ever been "high" on Darnold?
I can't say that I've ever smoked any Darnold. Does it make you paranoid?
 
news, but we really wanted to get rid of Darnold
But why .gif?

I have Darnold as a 3rd QB in a SF league, but I’m going to let his value build a while. Right now seems like a terrible time to sell since the community is so low on him. Couple of 300+ yard games and his value is gonna take a massive leap.

The Carr owner in that league has already hit me up on GroupMe asking if he’s available. Imagine how much more he’ll pay in October.
;)
Seattle will need to something about adding some weapons for him to be successful (and probably beef the oline). I do not see it a given that his value will rise anytime soon.
I think people are vastly underrating JSN.
I know you love him and I do like him, but the cupboard is pretty bare after that.
There’s talk of them drafting a WR early. A good rookie, JSN, and Kupp should be just fine, along with MVS and Bobo. RBs are solid too.

And yeah, I know I’m overly high on JSN, but I think he’ll be very dominant and a top 5 WR this year.
 
news, but we really wanted to get rid of Darnold
But why .gif?

I have Darnold as a 3rd QB in a SF league, but I’m going to let his value build a while. Right now seems like a terrible time to sell since the community is so low on him. Couple of 300+ yard games and his value is gonna take a massive leap.

The Carr owner in that league has already hit me up on GroupMe asking if he’s available. Imagine how much more he’ll pay in October.
;)
Seattle will need to something about adding some weapons for him to be successful (and probably beef the oline). I do not see it a given that his value will rise anytime soon.
I think people are vastly underrating JSN.
I know you love him and I do like him, but the cupboard is pretty bare after that.
There’s talk of them drafting a WR early. A good rookie, JSN, and Kupp should be just fine, along with MVS and Bobo. RBs are solid too.

And yeah, I know I’m overly high on JSN, but I think he’ll be very dominant and a top 5 WR this year.
I do not think you are overly high on him, but I am an idiot and forgot they added Kupp. Been on vacation this last week and realize that most my recent posts really don’t make any sense.
 
Last edited:
12-team dynasty 1QB PPR performance scoring four-round rookie draft.

Team A: gave Alec Pierce

for

Team B: gave 2025 4.11

Out of curiosity how big are the rosters?
25-man rosters. 4-man taxi squad slots and 4-man IR.

Not a big Pierce guy but that's a no-brainer...you can't trust him but he's still only 24 and always a threat to go off and definitely worthy of a roster spot...hopefully the week you need to play him is the 3-125-2 game
 
12-team dynasty 1QB PPR performance scoring four-round rookie draft.

Team A: gave Alec Pierce

for

Team B: gave 2025 4.11

Out of curiosity how big are the rosters?
25-man rosters. 4-man taxi squad slots and 4-man IR.

Not a big Pierce guy but that's a no-brainer...you can't trust him but he's still only 24 and always a threat to go off and definitely worthy of a roster spot...hopefully the week you need to play him is the 3-125-2 game
I see him as an injury filler and bye-week guy with upside. He reminds me of Teddy Gin Jr. in that way. If the Colts trade him, or he goes somewhere else in free agency, his numbers could increase. I think he will be a free agent next year. The concern with Alec Pierce is the crowded room; they could draft Warren or Loveland. That said, he can go off in any given week.
 
12-team dynasty 1QB PPR performance scoring four-round rookie draft.

Team A: gave Alec Pierce

for

Team B: gave 2025 4.11

Out of curiosity how big are the rosters?
25-man rosters. 4-man taxi squad slots and 4-man IR.

Not a big Pierce guy but that's a no-brainer...you can't trust him but he's still only 24 and always a threat to go off and definitely worthy of a roster spot...hopefully the week you need to play him is the 3-125-2 game
I see him as an injury filler and bye-week guy with upside. He reminds me of Teddy Gin Jr. in that way. If the Colts trade him, or he goes somewhere else in free agency, his numbers could increase. I think he will be a free agent next year. The concern with Alec Pierce is the crowded room; they could draft Warren or Loveland. That said, he can go off in any given week.

Ginn is a good comp...I don't think he will ever be reliable for fantasy but in a 12-team league with 25-man rosters not everyone is going to be a WR1 and if the injuries and byes pile-up and you have to play him he can make it worth it in 1 play.
 
news, but we really wanted to get rid of Darnold
But why .gif?

I have Darnold as a 3rd QB in a SF league, but I’m going to let his value build a while. Right now seems like a terrible time to sell since the community is so low on him. Couple of 300+ yard games and his value is gonna take a massive leap.

The Carr owner in that league has already hit me up on GroupMe asking if he’s available. Imagine how much more he’ll pay in October.
;)

Has the community ever been "high" on Darnold? Isn't the likelihood of him throwing a couple 300+ yard games the same as him throwing a couple two-interception, one-TD games?

Last year at this time, Darnold was on the wire in FFPC superflex leagues and you could get him for a 4th-round pick (vets are available in the FFPC rookie draft player pool). We traded Hollywood Brown and what turned out to be the 3.12 for Darnold and Minshew a couple weeks before the season, so even when Darnold was known to be the starter, he was cheap. (In another Triflex league, right before Halloween, I got both Darnold and DK Metcalf for a 2025 1st, at a time when Darnold was an every-week superflex starter, so even then his value wasn't that high.) It's also highly league-specific -- nearly all of the other teams have three QBs already, and, of the ones that didn't, only one was even interested in Darnold. Yes, it sucks that the QB we got to replace him is now probably hurt, but I think if you can get a reasonable return for him now, then you should.
I disagree with 2 premises here.

1. No, the likelihood is greater that Darnold is successful. Call it recency bias, but he showed a ton last year, outside of the no good very bad last game.

2. I’m in 3 SF leagues and Darnold was rostered in all 3. He was on the FA list in zero of my leagues. That’s simply a false assertion.

I stopped reading after that.
 
news, but we really wanted to get rid of Darnold
But why .gif?

I have Darnold as a 3rd QB in a SF league, but I’m going to let his value build a while. Right now seems like a terrible time to sell since the community is so low on him. Couple of 300+ yard games and his value is gonna take a massive leap.

The Carr owner in that league has already hit me up on GroupMe asking if he’s available. Imagine how much more he’ll pay in October.
;)
Seattle will need to something about adding some weapons for him to be successful (and probably beef the oline). I do not see it a given that his value will rise anytime soon.
They added Kupp and will likely draft a WR.

What they “need” to do is build the interior line after striking out in FA.
 
Last year at this time, Darnold was on the wire in FFPC superflex leagues and you could get him for a 4th-round pick (vets are available in the FFPC rookie draft player pool).

2. I’m in 3 SF leagues and Darnold was rostered in all 3. He was on the FA list in zero of my leagues. That’s simply a false assertion.

I guess I'm confused why you're saying what I wrote is false. I did five FFPC superflex rookie/vet drafts last May. Darnold went 4.09, 5.06 and 5.12. In a startup FFPC superflex league I did last June, Darnold was the 35th QB off the board, taken in the last round (20th). I get that you think he's valuable and that he will continue to perform as a top-12 QB. I'm telling you that, in the FFPC superflex leagues that I play in, he's not valued that way, and I don't think he will be.
 
I guess I'm confused why you're saying what I wrote is false. I did five FFPC superflex rookie/vet drafts last May. Darnold went 4.09, 5.06 and 5.12. In a startup FFPC superflex league I did last June, Darnold was the 35th QB off the board, taken in the last round (20th). I get that you think he's valuable and that he will continue to perform as a top-12 QB. I'm telling you that, in the FFPC superflex leagues that I play in, he's not valued that way, and I don't think he will be.
FPPC is a small roster IIRC?

Yeah - I’m talking about FF in general and you’re talking FPPC. Apples to oranges, and irrelevant in context.

And he put up top 5 numbers after that and you expect him to be no more valuable this year, after a 4300+ yard season.

Got it.

Also none chance of his value improving after going out and showing well (my assertion) in Seattle.

got it. Very sensible positions, how ever could I have questioned them.
/s
 
Was offered 2 trades in FFPC standard yesterday.

1) my Josh Allen for 1.8,1.10 and 2026 1st
Couldn't hit reject fast enough
From same owner about an hour later
2) my Justin Fields for 3.8,4.8 and 2026 3rd
Planned on cutting Fields after the draft so accepted this one
 
Was offered 2 trades in FFPC standard yesterday.

1) my Josh Allen for 1.8,1.10 and 2026 1st
Couldn't hit reject fast enough
From same owner about an hour later
2) my Justin Fields for 3.8,4.8 and 2026 3rd
Planned on cutting Fields after the draft so accepted this one
1) Quite a haul for Allen but I get it. He’s a real strategic advantage at QB in any league and he always plays. Set and forget stud.
2) nice. I imagine you would’ve accepted simply the 3.8. :)
 
Was offered 2 trades in FFPC standard yesterday.

1) my Josh Allen for 1.8,1.10 and 2026 1st
Couldn't hit reject fast enough
From same owner about an hour later
2) my Justin Fields for 3.8,4.8 and 2026 3rd
Planned on cutting Fields after the draft so accepted this one
This guy threw out 2 very strong offers to you. Valuable trading partner to have in your pocket.
 
Was offered 2 trades in FFPC standard yesterday.

1) my Josh Allen for 1.8,1.10 and 2026 1st
Couldn't hit reject fast enough
From same owner about an hour later
2) my Justin Fields for 3.8,4.8 and 2026 3rd
Planned on cutting Fields after the draft so accepted this one
I don’t play FFPC. Standard means not Superflex?
If so,
I’d accept that for Allen. That’s solid.
If not, I’d reject.
 
Was offered 2 trades in FFPC standard yesterday.

1) my Josh Allen for 1.8,1.10 and 2026 1st
Couldn't hit reject fast enough
From same owner about an hour later
2) my Justin Fields for 3.8,4.8 and 2026 3rd
Planned on cutting Fields after the draft so accepted this one

If single QB I would have taken that 1st offer and if you didn't have a good backup to step in shopped around with the extra picks for a cheaper QB that may not give all of Allen's points but get you most of the way there. If SF not enough though.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top